The Rev. A. Moody Stuart, in his "Life of the last Duchess of

Gordon,"[69] that truly Christian lady, refers to some old pets of the

duke's and her own, which, on her becoming a widow, she took with her

from Gordon Castle to Huntly Lodge, a bullfinch, an immense Talbot

mastiff named Sall, and others. He adds--"To a stranger, the most

remarkable of the duke's old favourites was Kaiser, an Hungarian

wolf-dog, with a snow-white fleece, and most sheep-like aspect in the

distance, but at whose appearance out of doors, man, woman, and child

fled as from a wolf. The duchess called him 'The wolf in sheep's

clothing.' Her husband's tastes having brought her much into contact

with all sorts of dogs, she had learned to pat them confidently at their

first introduction, when a large space between their eyes betokened a

kindly temper. This open breadth of forehead was strongly marked in

Sall, a fine old mastiff that used at this time to walk round the

dining-room after breakfast, with her noble head reaching the level of

the table. But the duke had chosen Kaiser for other qualities. Two of

those wolf-dogs had been brought to him for sale when travelling on the

Continent; the other was the larger and handsomer animal; but Kaiser's

eyes, sunk deep in the head, and all but meeting under his shaggy hair,

at once fixed his choice on him as 'likest his work.' That work was to

defend the sheep from the wolves, and one mode of defence was by laying

a strange trap for the enemy. The dog was remarkably like a sheep, his

hair white without a dark speck, and he carried a great load of it, long

and fleecy like wool. In the Hungarian steppes four or five of those

dogs would lay themselves down on the grass in the evening, sleeping

there like so many harmless lambs, with their faces inward for the heat

of each other's breath. The keen eye of the wolf was soon attracted by

the white fleeces, with no shepherd near to guard them. Eager for blood,

he careered swiftly over the plain, and sprang unsuspecting into the

midst of the flock, only to find himself clenched in the relentless jaws

of Kaiser and his comrades, wolves more terrible than himself under the

clothing of timid sheep. A conversation once took place at the Lodge on

the character ascribed to dogs in Scripture. It slightly vexed the good

duchess that they were so often mentioned in the Bible, but only as

emblems of what is foul and fierce, except in a single instance, and

that not of commendation, but neutrality. This exception, she said,

occurred in the Book of Proverbs, where the greyhound is named, along

with the lion and the goat, as 'comely in going,' yet merely in praise

of his external beauty. But her difficulty was relieved by the reply,

that in Isaiah lvi. 10, the "dog" is really used in a good sense as

applied to the spiritual watchmen of the Lord's flock. For the

unfaithful shepherds, being there likened to dumb dogs that cannot bark,

were not censured under the simple image of watch-dogs, but because, as

such, they were faithless and useless; implying that the good watch-dog

is an honourable emblem of the true pastor, watching for the souls

committed to his care, and solemnly warning them of approaching danger."

FREDERICK THE GREAT AND HIS ITALIAN GREYHOUNDS.

Dr John Moore, when travelling with the Duke of Hamilton, saw and heard

a good deal of Frederick the Great, and has given in his second volume

of "A View of Society and Manners in France," &c., many interesting

particulars of his private and public life. Among these, he alludes to

his using "a very large gold snuff-box, the lid ornamented with

diamonds," and his taking "an immoderate quantity of Spanish snuff, the

marks of which very often appear on his waistcoat and breeches. These

are also liable to be soiled by the paws of two or three Italian

greyhounds, which he often caresses" (vol. ii. p. 236).

THE DOG AND THE FRENCH MURDERERS. (AN OCCURRENCE IN THE SPRING OF 1837.)

Thomas Raikes,[70] in his Journal 8th March 1837, records:--"Eight years

ago, a labouring man in the department of the Loire was found murdered

in a wood near his house, and his dog sitting near the body. No clue

could be gained to the perpetrators of the crime, and his widow

continued to live in the same cottage, accompanied always by the

faithful animal. Last week two men, apparently travellers, stopped at

the house, requesting shelter from the storm, which was granted; but no

sooner had the dog perceived them, than he flew at them with fury, and

could not be pacified. As they were quitting the house, one of them said

to the other, 'That rascally dog has not forgotten us.' This raised the

suspicion of the widow, who overheard it, and applying to the gendarmes

in the neighbourhood, they followed and arrested them. The result has

been that, after a long examination, one of them has confessed the

crime, and impeached his associate."

* * * * *

Hannah More wrote an ode addressed to Garrick's famous house-dog Dragon.

A copy of this she gave to Sir Joshua Reynolds in 1777, while still

unprinted, under an oath neither to take nor give a copy of it, which

oath Sir Joshua had observed (she says) like a true knight, only reading

it to his visitors till some of them learned it by heart. The "charming

bagatelle" was afterwards printed, that posterity might be enabled to

wonder what a small expenditure of wit in metre sufficed to purchase a

large modicum of fame among the blues of that day.[71]

ROBERT HALL AND THE DOG.

The eloquent Robert Hall and Dr Leifchild were often in each other's

company when at Bristol, travelling and preaching together at

anniversaries and ordinations. The son and biographer of the latter

says:[72]--"I rode with them from Bristol to Wells, and can now, in

imagination, see Mr Hall smoking and reclining on one seat of the

carriage, while my father sat on the other. I can see Mr Hall descending

at a blacksmith's shop to re-light his pipe, making his way directly to

the forge, and jumping aside with unwonted agility, when a huge dog

growled at him. I can recall his look, when rallied on his agility,

after his return to the carriage. 'You seemed afraid of the dog, sir,'

said my father. 'Apostolic advice, sir--Beware of dogs,' rejoined Mr

Hall." Dr Leifchild, in another part of the memoir (p. 360), relates

that some housekeeper would exclaim to him, as he was about to enter the

house of friend or stranger, "Don't be afraid of the dog, sir, he never

bites."--"Are you quite sure he never bites?" was his prompt

question.--"Quite sure, sir," rejoined the servant.--"Then," rejoined

the good-humoured doctor, "if he never _bites_, how does he live?"

A QUEEN AND HER LAP-DOG.

Henrietta Maria, Queen of Charles I., on her return to Burlington Bay

with assistance for her husband, was attacked in the house where she

slept by the cannonade of five ships of war belonging to the

Parliament. She left the house amid the whistling of balls, one of which

killed one of her servants. When on her way to the shelter of a ditch,

she remembered that an aged lap-dog, called "Mitte," was left behind.

She was much attached to this old favourite, and returned to the house

she had left. Rushing up-stairs into her chamber, she caught up her old

pet, which was reposing on her bed, and carried her off in safety.

Having done this, the queen and her ladies gained the ditch, and

crouched down in it, while the cannon played furiously over their

heads.[73]

THE CLEVER DOG THAT BELONGED TO THE HUNTERS OF POLMOOD.

The estate of Polmood, in Peeblesshire, was the subject of extraordinary

litigation, and a volume of considerable bulk is devoted to its history.

This work contains much curious evidence from aged country folks in the

western parts of the country. Mr Chambers[74] tells us that in the

history "reminiscences concerning a wonderfully clever dog are put

forward as links in the line of propinquity." The deponent has heard his

father say that Robert Hunter had a remarkable dog called "Algiers;" and

that, when Robert lived at Woodend, he used to tie a napkin round the

dog's neck with money in it, and send him for snuff to Lammington, which

is about three miles from Woodend, and that the dog executed his

message faithfully, and prevented everybody from laying hold of or

stopping him. Another venerable deponent, aged eighty-nine, had heard

his mother tell many stories about a dog belonging to Uncle Robert,

which went by the name of "Algiers;" that they used to cut a fleece off

him every year sufficient to make a pair of stockings; and that Uncle

Robert used to tie a purse round his neck, with money in it, and the dog

then swam the Tweed, and brought back tobacco from the Crook! And a

third declares that "Algiers" could be sent to Edinburgh with a letter,

and bring back a letter to his master.

THE IRISH CLERGYMAN AND THE DOGS.

Mr Fitzpatrick, in his anecdotal memoirs of Archbishop Whately, tells a

story of an eccentric Irish parson. This person, when preaching, was

interrupted in his homily by two dogs, which began to fight in church.

He descended the pulpit, and endeavoured to separate them. On returning

to his place, the clergyman, who was rather an absent man, asked the

clerk, "Where was I a while ago?"--"Wasn't yer Riverence appaising the

dogs?" responded the other.[75]

WASHINGTON IRVING AND THE DOG.

Patrick Fraser Tytler, author of "The History of Scotland," in a letter

to his wife in 1830, says--"At Lady Morton's, one evening, I met with

Washington Irving. I had heard him described as a very silent man, who

was always observing others, but seldom opened his lips. Instead of

which, his tongue never lay still; and he gets out more wee wordies in a

minute than any ordinary converser does in five. But I found him a very

intelligent and agreeable man. I put him in mind of his travelling with

our dear Tommy. He had at first no recollection; but I brought it back

to his memory by the incident of the little black dog, who always went

before the horses in pulling up hill, and pretended to assist them. I

put him in mind of his own wit, 'that he wondered if the doggie mistook

himself for a horse;' at which he laughed, and added, 'Yes, and thought

it very hard that he was not rubbed down at the end of the

journey.'"[76]

DOUGLAS JERROLD AND HIS DOG.

Jerrold had a favourite dog that followed him everywhere. One day in the

country, a lady, who was passing, turned round and said audibly, "What

an ugly little brute!" Whereupon Jerrold, addressing the lady, replied,

"Oh, madam! I wonder what he thinks _about us_ at this moment."[77]

SHERIDAN AND THE DOG.

After witnessing the first representation of a dog-piece by Reynolds,

called the "Caravan," Sheridan suddenly came into the green-room, on

purpose, it was imagined, to wish the author joy. "Where is he?" was

the first question; "where is my guardian angel?"--"Here I am," answered

Reynolds.--"Pooh!" replied Sheridan, "I don't mean _you_, I mean _the

dog_."[78]

CHARLES LAMB AND HIS DOG.

Thomas Hood had a dog called "Dash." This dog he gave to Charles Lamb.

The ready-witted Elia often took the creature out with him when walking

at Enfield. On one occasion, the dog dashed off to chase some young

sheep. The owner of the muttons came out quite indignant at the owner,

to expostulate with him on the assault of Lamb's dog on his sheep. Elia,

with his quiet ready wit, replied, "Hunt _Lambs_, sir?--why, he never

hunted _me_."[79]

FRENCH DOGS, TIME OF LOUIS XI.--HISTORY OF HIS DOG "RELAIS" BY LOUIS

XII.

Horace Walpole, in one of his gossiping letters to the Countess of

Ossory in 1781, writes, "You must not be surprised if I should send you

a collection of Tonton's _bons-mots_. I have found a precedent for such

a work. A grave author wrote a book on the 'Hunt of the Grand Senechal

of Normandy,' and of _les DITS du bon chien Souillard, qui fut au Roi

Loy de France onzieme du nom_. Louis XII., the reverse of the

predecessor of the same name, did not leave to his historian to

celebrate his dog "Relais," but did him the honour of being his

biographer himself; and for a reason that was becoming so excellent a

king. It was _pour animer les descendans d'un si brave chien a se rendre

aussi bons que lui, et encore meilleurs_. It was great pity the Cardinal

d'Amboise had no bastard puppies, or, to be sure, his Majesty would have

written his Prime Minister's life too, for a model to his

successors."[80]

MARTIN LUTHER OBSERVES A DOG AT LINTZ.

In the "Table Talk" of Martin Luther, it is recorded:--"I saw a dog at

Lintz, in Austria, that was taught to go with a hand-basket to the

butchers' shambles for meat. When other dogs came about him, and sought

to take the meat out of the basket, he set it down and fought lustily

with them; but when he saw they were too strong for him, he himself

would snatch out the first piece of meat, lest he should lose all. Even

so does now our Emperor Charles; who, after having long protected

spiritual benefices, seeing that every prince takes possession of

monasteries, himself takes possession of bishoprics, as just now he has

seized upon those of Utrecht and Liege."[81]

THE POOR DOG AT THE GROTTA DEL CANE.

Henry Matthews,[82] like other visitors of Naples, went to the

celebrated _Grotta del Cane_, or Dog Grotto, on the borders of Lake

Agnano, so called from the vapour in the cave, destructive to animal

life, being shown by means of a dog. In his diary, of March 3, 1818, he

records:--"Travellers have made a great display of sensibility in their

strictures upon the spectacle exhibited here; but to all appearance the

dog did not care much about it. It may be said, with truth of him, that

he is _used_ to it; for he dies many times a day, and he went to the

place of execution wagging his tail. He became insensible in two

minutes; but upon being laid on the grass, he revived from his trance in

a few seconds, without the process of immersion in the lake, which is

generally mentioned as necessary to his recovery. From the voracity with

which he bolted down a loaf of bread which I bought for him, the vapour

does not seem to injure the animal functions. Addison seems to have been

very particular in his experiments upon the vapour of this cavern. He

found that a pistol would not take fire in it; but upon laying a train

of gunpowder, and igniting it beyond the sphere of the vapour, he found

that it could not intercept the train of fire when it had once begun

flashing, nor hinder it from running to the very end. He subjected a dog

to a second trial in order to ascertain whether he was longer in

expiring the first than the second time; and he found there was no

sensible difference. A viper bore it _nine minutes_ the first time he

put it in, and _ten minutes_ the second; and he attributes the prolonged

duration of the second trial to the large provision of air that the

viper laid in after his first death, upon which stock he supposes it to

have existed a minute longer the second time."

DOG, A POSTMAN AND CARRIER.

Robert Southey says, that "near Moffat a dog used for many years to meet

the mail and receive the letters for a little post-town near."[83]

How often may you see a dog carrying a basket or a parcel. No

enticement, even of a dog-friend or of a great bone, will induce this

faithful servant to abandon his charge. Every one must have observed

this.

DOG-MATIC.

In the great dispute between South and Sherlock, the latter, who was a

great courtier, said--"His adversary reasoned well, but he barked like a

cur." To which the other replied, "That _fawning_ was the property of a

cur as well as barking."[84]

GENERAL MOREAU AND HIS GREYHOUND.

"The day after the battle of Dresden (27th Aug. 1812), a greyhound was

brought to the King of Saxony, the ally of Napoleon. The dog was moaning

piteously. On the collar were engraved the words, 'I belong to the

General Moreau.' Where was the dog's master? By the side of the Emperor

Alexander. Moreau had been mortally wounded. The dog had remained with

his master until his death. While Moreau was conversing with the Emperor

Alexander a cannon-shot nearly carried off both his legs. It is said

that throughout the five days during which he lingered he uttered not a

murmur of pain."[85]

* * * * *

At the battle of Solferino, where rifled cannon were first brought to

bear in warfare, a dog excited great attention by its attachment to the

body of its slain master. It became the chief object in a painting of

the circumstance, from which an engraving was executed.

A DUKE OF NORFOLK AND HIS SPANIELS.

In Southey's "Common-place Book," 4th ser. p. 479, he writes--"Our

Marlborough and King James's spaniels are unrivalled in beauty. The

latter breed (black and tan, with hair almost approaching to silk in

fineness, such as Vandyke loved to introduce into his portraits) were

solely in the possession of the late Duke of Norfolk. He never travelled

without two of his favourites in the carriage. When at Worksop he used

to feed his eagles with the pups; and a stranger to his exclusive pride

in the race, seeing him one day employed in thus destroying a whole

litter, told his grace how much he should be delighted to possess one of

them. The duke's reply was a characteristic one. 'Pray, sir, which of my

estates should you like to have?'"

There are shepherds who possess collies, such _proud_, useful servants

and friends, that no bribe would induce them to part with them. But what

old favourite dog or even bird is there that any one would part with?

Man, be he scavenger or duke, is very similar in this species of

attachment.

LORD NORTH AND THE DOG.

In several of the caricatures published about the year 1783, when Fox

and Burke had joined Lord North, and helped to form what is called the

Coalition Ministry, a dog is represented. This, says Mr Wright,[86] is

said to be an allusion to an occurrence in the House of Commons. During

the last defensive declamation of Lord North, on the eve of his

resignation, a dog, which had concealed itself under the benches, came

out and set up a hideous howling in the midst of his harangue. The house

was thrown into a roar of laughter, which continued until the intruder

was turned out; and then Lord North coolly observed, "As the new member

has ended his argument, I beg to be allowed to continue mine."

PERTHES DERIVES HINTS FROM HIS DOG.

In a letter, written when he first came to Gotha, Perthes, the

publisher, says--"Do not laugh if I tell you that my dog has given me

many a hint upon human nature. I never before had a dog constantly with

me, and I now ask myself whether the poodle be not a man, and men

poodles. I am not led to this thought by the animal propensities which

we have in common, such as eating, drinking, &c., but by those of a more

refined character. He too is cheerful and dejected, excited and supine,

playful and morose, gentle and bold, caressing and snappish, patient

and refractory; just like us men in all things, even in his dreams! This

likeness is not to me at all discouraging; on the contrary, it suggests

a pleasing hope that this flesh and blood which plagues and fetters us,

is not the real man, but merely the earthly clothing which will be cast

off when he no longer belongs to earth, provided he has not sinfully

chosen to identify himself with the merely material. The devil's chief

seat is not in matter but in the mind, where he fosters pride,

selfishness, and hatred, and by their means destroys not what is

transitory but what is eternal in man."[87]

PETER THE GREAT AND HIS FAVOURITE DOG LISETTE.

Mr Stoehlin[88] relates the following anecdote of the Czar Peter, on

the authority of Miss Anne Cramer, the chambermaid to the empress. In

the cabinet of natural history of the academy at St Petersburg, is

preserved, among a number of uncommon animals, Lisette, the favourite

dog of the Russian monarch. She was a small, dun-coloured Italian

greyhound, and very fond of her master, whom she never quitted but when

he went out, and then she laid herself down on his couch. At his return

she showed her fondness by a thousand caresses, followed him wherever he

went, and during his afternoon nap lay always at his feet.

A person belonging to the court, having excited the anger of the czar--I

do not know by what means--was confined in the fort, and there was

reason to suppose that he would receive the punishment of the knout on

the first market-day. The whole court, and the empress herself, thought

him innocent, and considered the anger of the czar as excessive and

unjust. Every means was tried to save him, and the first opportunity

taken to intercede in his favour. But, so far from succeeding, it served

only to irritate the emperor the more, who forbade all persons, even the

empress, to speak for the prisoner, and, above all, to present any

petition on the subject, under the pain of incurring his highest

displeasure.

It was supposed that no resource remained to save the culprit. However,

those who in concert with the czarina interested themselves in his

favour, devised the means of urging their suit without incurring the

penalty of the prohibition.

They composed a short but pathetic petition, in the name of Lisette.

After having set forth her uncommon fidelity to her master, she adduced

the strongest proofs of innocence of the prisoner, entreated the czar to

take the matter into consideration, and to be propitious to her prayer,

by granting him his liberty.

This petition was tied to her collar, in such a manner as to be easily

visible.

On the czar's return from the Admiralty and Senate, Lisette, as usual,

came leaping about him; and he perceived the paper, folded in the form

of a petition. He took, and read it--"What!" said he; "Lisette, do you

also present me petitions? Well, as it is the first time, I grant your

prayer." He immediately sent a denthtchick[89] to the fort, with orders

to set the prisoner at liberty.

THE LIGHT COMPANY'S POODLE AND SIR F. PONSONBY.

Captain Gronow, in his gossiping book,[90] says--"Every regiment has a

pet of some sort or another. One distinguished Highland regiment

possesses a deer; the Welsh Fusiliers a goat, which is the object of

their peculiar affection, and which generally marches with the band. The

light company of my battalion of the 1st Guards in 1813 rejoiced in a

very handsome poodle, which, if I mistake not, had been made prisoner at

Vittoria. At the commencement of the battle of the 9th of December 1813,

near the mayor's house, not far from Bidart, we observed the gallant

Frederick Ponsonby well in front with the skirmishers, and by the side

of his horse the soldiers' poodle. The colonel was encouraging our men

to advance, and the poodle, in great glee, was jumping and barking at

the bullets, as they flew round him like hail. On a sudden we observed

Ponsonby struggling with a French mounted officer, whom he had already

disarmed, and was endeavouring to lead off to our lines; when the French

skirmishers, whose numbers had increased, fired several shots, and

wounded Ponsonby, forcing him to relinquish his prisoner, and to retire.

At the same time, a bullet broke one of the poor dog's legs. For his

gallant conduct in this affair, the poodle became, if possible, a still

greater favourite than he was before; and his friends, the men of the

light company, took him to England, where I saw my three-legged friend

for several years afterwards, the most prosperous of poodles, and the

happiest of the canine race."

ADMIRAL RODNEY AND HIS DOG LOUP.

Earl Stanhope, in his History,[91] remarks--"To those who love to trace

the lesser lights and shades of human character, I shall owe no apology

if I venture to record of the conqueror of De Grasse, that even in his

busiest hours he could turn some kindly thoughts not only to his family

and friends, but to his dog in England. That dog, named Loup, was of the

French fox-breed, and so attached to his master, that when the admiral

left home to take the command of his fleet, the faithful animal remained

for three days in his chamber, watching his coat, and refusing food. The

affection was warmly returned. On many more than one occasion we find

Rodney wrote much as follows to his wife--'Remember me to my dear girls

and my faithful friend Loup; I know you will kiss him for me.'"[92]

RUDDIMAN AND HIS DOG RASCAL.

George Chalmers, in his Life of the learned Thomas Ruddiman,[93] tells

us that "young Ruddiman was initiated in grammar at the parish-school of

Boyndie, in Banffshire, which was distant a mile from his father's

dwelling; and which was then taught by George Morison, whom his pupil

always praised for his attention and his skill. To this school the boy

walked every morning, carrying his daily provisions with him. He is said

to have been daily accompanied by a dog, which, when he had proceeded to

the top of Tooting-hillock, the halfway resting-place, always returned

home after partaking of his victuals. This story is still (1794)

remembered, as if there were in it something supernatural. We may

suppose, however, that the excursion was equally agreeable to both

parties; and when it was once known that the dog was to eat at a

particular place at a stated hour, an appropriate allowance was

constantly made for him. Whether Ruddiman had a natural fondness for

dogs, or whether a particular attachment began, when impressions are

easily made, which are long remembered, cannot now be ascertained. He

certainly, throughout a long life, had a succession of dogs, which were

invariably called _Rascal_; and which, being springing spaniels, ever

accompanied him in all his walks. He used, with affectionate

recollection, to entertain his friends with stories of dogs, which all

tended to show the fidelity of that useful animal to man."

* * * * *

Mrs Schimmelpenninck, authoress of "Select Memoirs of Port Royal," died

in 1856. Her interesting Autobiography and Life were published in 1858

by her relation, Christiana C. Hankin. In p. 467 it is remarked that

"her love of animals formed quite a feature in her daily habits. Like St

Francis, she delighted to attract the little birds, by tempting them

with dainty food upon her verandah; and it was a positive pleasure to

her to watch their feast. She had a bag made, which was always filled

with oats, to regale any stray horse or ass; and she has been seen

surrounded by four goats, each standing on its hind legs, with its

uplifted front feet resting on her, and all eagerly claiming the salt

she had prepared for them. But her great delight was in dogs. She never

forgot those sad hours in childhood, when, unable to mix in the sports

of children from illness (perhaps, too, from her want of sympathy in the

usual pleasures of that age), the beautiful dogs at Barr were her

companions and friends.

Heads and tales · 第 7 / 21 段