Chapter 17

1873-1878

London Life--Love of Music--Miss Egerton-Smith--Periodical Nervous

Exhaustion--Mers; 'Aristophanes' Apology'--'Agamemnon'--'The

Inn Album'--'Pacchiarotto and other Poems'--Visits to Oxford and

Cambridge--Letters to Mrs. Fitz-Gerald--St. Andrews; Letter

from Professor Knight--In the Savoyard Mountains--Death of Miss

Egerton-Smith--'La Saisiaz'; 'The Two Poets of Croisic'--Selections from

his Works.

The period on which we have now entered, covering roughly the ten or

twelve years which followed the publication of 'The Ring and the Book',

was the fullest in Mr. Browning's life; it was that in which the varied

claims made by it on his moral, and above all his physical energies,

found in him the fullest power of response. He could rise early and go

to bed late--this, however, never from choice; and occupy every hour of

the day with work or pleasure, in a manner which his friends recalled

regretfully in later years, when of two or three engagements which

ought to have divided his afternoon, a single one--perhaps only the most

formally pressing--could be fulfilled. Soon after his final return to

England, while he still lived in comparative seclusion, certain habits

of friendly intercourse, often superficial, but always binding, had

rooted themselves in his life. London society, as I have also implied,

opened itself to him in ever-widening circles, or, as it would be truer

to say, drew him more and more deeply into its whirl; and even before

the mellowing kindness of his nature had infused warmth into the least

substantial of his social relations, the imaginative curiosity of the

poet--for a while the natural ambition of the man--found satisfaction in

it. For a short time, indeed, he entered into the fashionable routine of

country-house visiting. Besides the instances I have already given,

and many others which I may have forgotten, he was heard of, during the

earlier part of this decade, as the guest of Lord Carnarvon at Highclere

Castle, of Lord Shrewsbury at Alton Towers, of Lord Brownlow and his

mother, Lady Marian Alford, at Belton and Ashridge. Somewhat later,

he stayed with Mr. and Lady Alice Gaisford at a house they temporarily

occupied on the Sussex downs; with Mr. Cholmondeley at Condover, and,

much more recently, at Aynhoe Park with Mr. and Mrs. Cartwright. Kind

and pressing, and in themselves very tempting invitations of this nature

came to him until the end of his life; but he very soon made a practice

of declining them, because their acceptance could only renew for him the

fatigues of the London season, while the tantalizing beauty and

repose of the country lay before his eyes; but such visits, while they

continued, were one of the necessary social experiences which brought

their grist to his mill.

And now, in addition to the large social tribute which he received, and

had to pay, he was drinking in all the enjoyment, and incurring all the

fatigue which the London musical world could create for him. In Italy

he had found the natural home of the other arts. The one poem, 'Old

Pictures in Florence', is sufficiently eloquent of long communion with

the old masters and their works; and if his history in Florence and Rome

had been written in his own letters instead of those of his wife, they

must have held many reminiscences of galleries and studios, and of the

places in which pictures are bought and sold. But his love for music

was as certainly starved as the delight in painting and sculpture was

nourished; and it had now grown into a passion, from the indulgence of

which he derived, as he always declared, some of the most beneficent

influences of his life. It would be scarcely an exaggeration to say that

he attended every important concert of the season, whether isolated or

given in a course. There was no engagement possible or actual, which did

not yield to the discovery of its clashing with the day and hour fixed

for one of these. His frequent companion on such occasions was Miss

Egerton-Smith.

Miss Smith became only known to Mr. Browning's general acquaintance

through the dedicatory 'A. E. S.' of 'La Saisiaz'; but she was, at the

time of her death, one of his oldest women friends. He first met her as

a young woman in Florence when she was visiting there; and the love

for and proficiency in music soon asserted itself as a bond of sympathy

between them. They did not, however, see much of each other till he had

finally left Italy, and she also had made her home in London. She there

led a secluded life, although free from family ties, and enjoying a

large income derived from the ownership of an important provincial

paper. Mr. Browning was one of the very few persons whose society she

cared to cultivate; and for many years the common musical interest took

the practical, and for both of them convenient form, of their going to

concerts together. After her death, in the autumn of 1877, he almost

mechanically renounced all the musical entertainments to which she had

so regularly accompanied him. The special motive and special facility

were gone--she had been wont to call for him in her carriage; the

habit was broken; there would have been first pain, and afterwards an

unwelcome exertion in renewing it. Time was also beginning to sap his

strength, while society, and perhaps friendship, were making increasing

claims upon it. It may have been for this same reason that music after

a time seemed to pass out of his life altogether. Yet its almost sudden

eclipse was striking in the case of one who not only had been so

deeply susceptible to its emotional influences, so conversant with

its scientific construction and its multitudinous forms, but who was

acknowledged as 'musical' by those who best knew the subtle and complex

meaning of that often misused term.

Mr. Browning could do all that I have said during the period through

which we are now following him; but he could not quite do it with

impunity. Each winter brought its searching attack of cold and cough;

each summer reduced him to the state of nervous prostration or physical

apathy of which I have already spoken, and which at once rendered change

imperative, and the exertion of seeking it almost intolerable. His

health and spirits rebounded at the first draught of foreign air; the

first breath from an English cliff or moor might have had the same

result. But the remembrance of this fact never nerved him to the

preliminary effort. The conviction renewed itself with the close of

every season, that the best thing which could happen to him would be to

be left quiet at home; and his disinclination to face even the idea

of moving equally hampered his sister in her endeavour to make timely

arrangements for their change of abode.

This special craving for rest helped to limit the area from which their

summer resort could be chosen. It precluded all idea of 'pension'-life,

hence of any much-frequented spot in Switzerland or Germany. It was

tacitly understood that the shortening days were not to be passed in

England. Italy did not yet associate itself with the possibilities of

a moderately short absence; the resources of the northern French coast

were becoming exhausted; and as the August of 1874 approached, the

question of how and where this and the following months were to be spent

was, perhaps, more than ever a perplexing one. It was now Miss Smith who

became the means of its solution. She had more than once joined Mr. and

Miss Browning at the seaside. She was anxious this year to do so again,

and she suggested for their meeting a quiet spot called Mers, almost

adjoining the fashionable Treport, but distinct from it. It was agreed

that they should try it; and the experiment, which they had no reason

to regret, opened also in some degree a way out of future difficulties.

Mers was young, and had the defect of its quality. Only one desirable

house was to be found there; and the plan of joint residence became

converted into one of joint housekeeping, in which Mr. and Miss Browning

at first refused to concur, but which worked so well that it was renewed

in the three ensuing summers: Miss Smith retaining the initiative in

the choice of place, her friends the right of veto upon it. They stayed

again together in 1875 at Villers, on the coast of Normandy; in 1876 at

the Isle of Arran; in 1877 at a house called La Saisiaz--Savoyard for

the sun--in the Saleve district near Geneva.

The autumn months of 1874 were marked for Mr. Browning by an important

piece of work: the production of 'Aristophanes' Apology'. It was far

advanced when he returned to London in November, after a visit to

Antwerp, where his son was studying art under M. Heyermans; and its much

later appearance must have been intended to give breathing time to the

readers of 'Red Cotton Nightcap Country'. Mr. Browning subsequently

admitted that he sometimes, during these years, allowed active literary

occupation to interfere too much with the good which his holiday might

have done him; but the temptations to literary activity were this time

too great to be withstood. The house occupied by him at Mers (Maison

Robert) was the last of the straggling village, and stood on a rising

cliff. In front was the open sea; beyond it a long stretch of down;

everywhere comparative solitude. Here, in uninterrupted quiet, and in a

room devoted to his use, Mr. Browning would work till the afternoon was

advanced, and then set forth on a long walk over the cliffs, often in

the face of a wind which, as he wrote of it at the time, he could lean

against as if it were a wall. And during this time he was living, not

only in his work, but with the man who had inspired it. The image of

Aristophanes, in the half-shamed insolence, the disordered majesty, in

which he is placed before the reader's mind, was present to him from

the first moment in which the Defence was conceived. What was still more

interesting, he could see him, hear him, think with him, speak for him,

and still inevitably condemn him. No such instance of always ingenious,

and sometimes earnest pleading foredoomed to complete discomfiture,

occurs in Mr. Browning's works.

To Aristophanes he gave the dramatic sympathy which one lover of life

can extend to another, though that other unduly extol its lower forms.

To Euripides he brought the palm of the higher truth, to his work the

tribute of the more pathetic human emotion. Even these for a moment

ministered to the greatness of Aristophanes, in the tear shed by him to

the memory of his rival, in the hour of his own triumph; and we may be

quite sure that when Mr. Browning depicted that scene, and again when he

translated the great tragedian's words, his own eyes were dimmed. Large

tears fell from them, and emotion choked his voice, when he first

read aloud the transcript of the 'Herakles' to a friend, who was often

privileged to hear him.

Mr. Browning's deep feeling for the humanities of Greek literature, and

his almost passionate love for the language, contrasted strongly with

his refusal to regard even the first of Greek writers as models of

literary style. The pretensions raised for them on this ground were

inconceivable to him; and his translation of the 'Agamemnon', published

1877, was partly made, I am convinced, for the pleasure of exposing

these claims, and of rebuking them. His preface to the transcript gives

evidence of this. The glee with which he pointed to it when it first

appeared was no less significant.

At Villers, in 1875, he only corrected the proofs of 'The Inn Album' for

publication in November. When the party started for the Isle of Arran,

in the autumn of 1876, the 'Pacchiarotto' volume had already appeared.

When Mr. Browning discontinued his short-lived habit of visiting away

from home, he made an exception in favour of the Universities. His

occasional visits to Oxford and Cambridge were maintained till the very

end of his life, with increasing frequency in the former case; and the

days spent at Balliol and Trinity afforded him as unmixed a pleasure

as was compatible with the interruption of his daily habits, and with a

system of hospitality which would detain him for many hours at table.

A vivid picture of them is given in two letters, dated January 20 and

March 10, 1877, and addressed to one of his constant correspondents,

Mrs. Fitz-Gerald, of Shalstone Manor, Buckingham.

Dear Friend, I have your letter of yesterday, and thank you all I can

for its goodness and graciousness to me unworthy . . . I returned on

Thursday--the hospitality of our Master being not easy to set aside.

But to begin with the beginning: the passage from London to Oxford was

exceptionally prosperous--the train was full of men my friends. I was

welcomed on arriving by a Fellow who installed me in my rooms,--then

came the pleasant meeting with Jowett who at once took me to tea with

his other guests, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Bishop of London, Dean

of Westminster, the Airlies, Cardwells, male and female. Then came the

banquet--(I enclose you the plan having no doubt that you will recognise

the name of many an acquaintance: please return it)--and, the dinner

done, speechifying set in vigorously. The Archbishop proposed the

standing 'Floreat domus de Balliolo'--to which the Master made due

and amusing answer, himself giving the health of the Primate. Lord

Coleridge, in a silvery speech, drank to the University, responded to by

the Vice-Chancellor. I forget who proposed the visitors--the Bishop of

London, perhaps Lord Cardwell. Professor Smith gave the two Houses

of Parliament,--Jowett, the Clergy, coupling with it the name of your

friend Mr. Rogers--on whom he showered every kind of praise, and Mr.

Rogers returned thanks very characteristically and pleasantly. Lord

Lansdowne drank to the Bar (Mr. Bowen), Lord Camperdown to--I really

forget what: Mr. Green to Literature and Science delivering a most

undeserved eulogium on myself, with a more rightly directed one on

Arnold, Swinburne, and the old pride of Balliol, Clough: this was

cleverly and almost touchingly answered by dear Mat Arnold. Then the

Dean of Westminster gave the Fellows and Scholars--and then--twelve

o'clock struck. We were, counting from the time of preliminary

assemblage, six hours and a half engaged: _fully_ five and a half nailed

to our chairs at the table: but the whole thing was brilliant, genial,

and suggestive of many and various thoughts to me--and there was

a warmth, earnestness, and yet refinement about it which I never

experienced in any previous public dinner. Next morning I breakfasted

with Jowett and his guests, found that return would be difficult: while

as the young men were to return on Friday there would be no opposition

to my departure on Thursday. The morning was dismal with rain, but after

luncheon there was a chance of getting a little air, and I walked for

more than two hours, then heard service in New Coll.--then dinner again:

my room had been prepared in the Master's house. So, on Thursday, after

yet another breakfast, I left by the noon-day train, after all sorts of

kindly offices from the Master. . . . No reporters were suffered to be

present--the account in yesterday's Times was furnished by one or more

of the guests; it is quite correct as far as it goes. There were,

I find, certain little paragraphs which must have been furnished by

'guessers': Swinburne, set down as present--was absent through his

Father's illness: the Cardinal also excused himself as did the Bishop of

Salisbury and others. . . . Ever yours R. Browning.

The second letter, from Cambridge, was short and written in haste, at

the moment of Mr. Browning's departure; but it tells the same tale of

general kindness and attention. Engagements for no less than six meals

had absorbed the first day of the visit. The occasion was that of

Professor Joachim's investiture with his Doctor's degree; and Mr.

Browning declares that this ceremony, the concert given by the great

violinist, and his society, were 'each and all' worth the trouble of

the journey. He himself was to receive the Cambridge degree of LL.D. in

1879, the Oxford D.C.L. in 1882. A passage in another letter addressed

to the same friend, refers probably to a practical reminiscence of 'Red

Cotton Nightcap Country', which enlivened the latter experience, and

which Mrs. Fitz-Gerald had witnessed with disapprobation.*

* An actual red cotton nightcap had been made to flutter

down on to the Poet's head.

. . . You are far too hard on the very harmless drolleries of the young

men, licensed as they are moreover by immemorial usage. Indeed there

used to be a regularly appointed jester, 'Filius Terrae' he was called,

whose business it was to jibe and jeer at the honoured ones, by way of

reminder that all human glories are merely gilded bubbles and must not

be fancied metal. You saw that the Reverend Dons escaped no more than

the poor Poet--or rather I should say than myself the poor Poet--for

I was pleased to observe with what attention they listened to the

Newdigate. . . . Ever affectionately yours, R. Browning.

In 1875 he was unanimously nominated by its Independent Club, to the

office of Lord Rector of the University of Glasgow; and in 1877 he again

received the offer of the Rectorship of St. Andrews, couched in very

urgent and flattering terms. A letter addressed to him from this

University by Dr. William Knight, Professor of Moral Philosophy there,

which I have his permission to publish, bears witness to what had

long been and was always to remain a prominent fact of Mr. Browning's

literary career: his great influence on the minds of the rising

generation of his countrymen.

The University, St. Andrews N.B.: Nov. 17, 1877.

My dear Sir,--. . . The students of this University, in which I have

the honour to hold office, have nominated you as their Lord Rector; and

intend unanimously, I am told, to elect you to that office on Thursday.

I believe that hitherto no Rector has been chosen by the undivided

suffrage of any Scottish University. They have heard however that you

are unable to accept the office: and your committee, who were deeply

disappointed to learn this afternoon of the way in which you have been

informed of their intentions, are, I believe, writing to you on the

subject. So keen is their regret that they intend respectfully to wait

upon you on Tuesday morning by deputation, and ask if you cannot waive

your difficulties in deference to their enthusiasm, and allow them to

proceed with your election.

Their suffrage may, I think, be regarded as one sign of how the

thoughtful youth of Scotland estimate the work you have done in the

world of letters.

And permit me to say that while these Rectorial elections in the other

Universities have frequently turned on local questions, or been inspired

by political partisanship, St. Andrews has honourably sought to choose

men distinguished for literary eminence, and to make the Rectorship a

tribute at once of intellectual and moral esteem.

May I add that when the 'perfervidum ingenium' of our northern race

takes the form not of youthful hero-worship, but of loyal admiration and

respectful homage, it is a very genuine affair. In the present instance

I may say it is no mere outburst of young undisciplined enthusiasm, but

an honest expression of intellectual and moral indebtedness, the genuine

and distinct tribute of many minds that have been touched to some higher

issues by what you have taught them. They do not presume to speak of

your place in English literature. They merely tell you by this proffered

honour (the highest in their power to bestow), how they have felt your

influence over them.

My own obligations to you, and to the author of Aurora Leigh, are such,

that of them 'silence is golden'. Yours ever gratefully. William Knight.

Mr. Browning was deeply touched and gratified by these professions of

esteem. He persisted nevertheless in his refusal. The Glasgow nomination

had also been declined by him.

On August 17, 1877, he wrote to Mrs. Fitz-Gerald from La Saisiaz:

'How lovely is this place in its solitude and seclusion, with its trees

and shrubs and flowers, and above all its live mountain stream which

supplies three fountains, and two delightful baths, a marvel of delicate

delight framed in with trees--I bathe there twice a day--and then what

wonderful views from the chalet on every side! Geneva lying under

us, with the lake and the whole plain bounded by the Jura and our own

Saleve, which latter seems rather close behind our house, and yet takes

a hard hour and a half to ascend--all this you can imagine since you

know the environs of the town; the peace and quiet move me the most--And

I fancy I shall drowse out the two months or more, doing no more of

serious work than reading--and that is virtuous renunciation of the

glorious view to my right here--as I sit aerially like Euripides, and

see the clouds come and go and the view change in correspondence with

them. It will help me to get rid of the pain which attaches itself to

the recollections of Lucerne and Berne "in the old days when the Greeks

suffered so much," as Homer says. But a very real and sharp pain touched

me here when I heard of the death of poor Virginia March whom I knew

particularly, and parted with hardly a fortnight ago, leaving her

affectionate and happy as ever. The tones of her voice as on one

memorable occasion she ejaculated repeatedly 'Good friend!' are fresh

still. Poor Virginia! . . .'

Mr. Browning was more than quiescent during this stay in the Savoyard

mountains. He was unusually depressed, and unusually disposed to regard

the absence from home as a banishment; and he tried subsequently to

account for this condition by the shadow which coming trouble sometimes

casts before it. It was more probably due to the want of the sea air

which he had enjoyed for so many years, and to that special oppressive

heat of the Swiss valleys which ascends with them to almost their

highest level. When he said that the Saleve seemed close behind the

house, he was saying in other words that the sun beat back from, and the

air was intercepted by it. We see, nevertheless, in his description

of the surrounding scenery, a promise of the contemplative delight in

natural beauty to be henceforth so conspicuous in his experience, and

which seemed a new feature in it. He had hitherto approached every

living thing with curious and sympathetic observation--this hardly

requires saying of one who had animals for his first and always familiar

friends. Flowers also attracted him by their perfume. But what he loved

in nature was essentially its prefiguring of human existence, or

its echo of it; and it never appeared, in either his works or his

conversation, that he was much impressed by its inanimate forms--by even

those larger phenomena of mountain and cloud-land on which the latter

dwells. Such beauty as most appealed to him he had left behind with

the joys and sorrows of his Italian life, and it had almost inevitably

passed out of his consideration. During years of his residence in London

he never thought of the country as a source of pleasurable emotions,

other than those contingent on renewed health; and the places to which

he resorted had often not much beyond their health-giving qualities to

recommend them; his appetite for the beautiful had probably dwindled for

lack of food. But when a friend once said to him: 'You have not a great

love for nature, have you?' he had replied: 'Yes, I have, but I love

men and women better;' and the admission, which conveyed more than it

literally expressed, would have been true I believe at any, up to the

present, period of his history. Even now he did not cease to love men

and women best; but he found increasing enjoyment in the beauties of

nature, above all as they opened upon him on the southern slopes of the

Alps; and the delight of the aesthetic sense merged gradually in the

satisfied craving for pure air and brilliant sunshine which marked his

final struggle for physical life. A ring of enthusiasm comes into his

letters from the mountains, and deepens as the years advance; doubtless

enhanced by the great--perhaps too great--exhilaration which the Alpine

atmosphere produced, but also in large measure independent of it. Each

new place into which the summer carries him he declares more beautiful

than the last. It possibly was so.

A touch of autumnal freshness had barely crept into the atmosphere of

the Saleve, when a moral thunderbolt fell on the little group of persons

domiciled at its base: Miss Egerton-Smith died, in what had seemed

for her unusually good health, in the act of preparing for a mountain

excursion with her friends--the words still almost on her lips in

which she had given some directions for their comfort. Mr. Browning's

impressionable nervous system was for a moment paralyzed by the shock.

It revived in all the emotional and intellectual impulses which gave

birth to 'La Saisiaz'.

This poem contains, besides its personal reference and association,

elements of distinctive biographical interest. It is the author's

first--as also last--attempt to reconstruct his hope of immortality by

a rational process based entirely on the fundamental facts of his own

knowledge and consciousness--God and the human soul; and while the very

assumption of these facts, as basis for reasoning, places him at issue

with scientific thought, there is in his way of handling them a tribute

to the scientific spirit, perhaps foreshadowed in the beautiful epilogue

to 'Dramatis Personae', but of which there is no trace in his earlier

religious works. It is conclusive both in form and matter as to his

heterodox attitude towards Christianity. He was no less, in his way, a

Christian when he wrote 'La Saisiaz' than when he published 'A Death

in the Desert' and 'Christmas Eve and Easter Day'; or at any period

subsequent to that in which he accepted without questioning what he had

learned at his mother's knee. He has repeatedly written or declared in

the words of Charles Lamb:* 'If Christ entered the room I should fall

on my knees;' and again, in those of Napoleon: 'I am an understander of

men, and _he_ was no man.' He has even added: 'If he had been, he would

have been an impostor.' But the arguments, in great part negative, set

forth in 'La Saisiaz' for the immortality of the soul, leave no place

for the idea, however indefinite, of a Christian revelation on the

subject. Christ remained for Mr. Browning a mystery and a message of

Divine Love, but no messenger of Divine intention towards mankind.

* These words have more significance when taken with their

context. 'If Shakespeare was to come into the room, we

should all rise up to meet him; but if that Person [meaning

Christ] was to come into the room, we should all fall down

and try to kiss the hem of his garment.'

The dialogue between Fancy and Reason is not only an admission of

uncertainty as to the future of the Soul: it is a plea for it; and as

such it gathers up into its few words of direct statement, threads of

reasoning which have been traceable throughout Mr. Browning's work. In

this plea for uncertainty lies also a full and frank acknowledgment of

the value of the earthly life; and as interpreted by his general views,

that value asserts itself, not only in the means of probation which

life affords, but in its existing conditions of happiness. No one, he

declares, possessing the certainty of a future state would patiently and

fully live out the present; and since the future can be only the ripened

fruit of the present, its promise would be neutralized, as well as

actual experience dwarfed, by a definite revelation. Nor, conversely,

need the want of a certified future depress the present spiritual and

moral life. It is in the nature of the Soul that it would suffer from

the promise. The existence of God is a justification for hope. And

since the certainty would be injurious to the Soul, hence destructive

to itself, the doubt--in other words, the hope--becomes a sufficient

approach to, a working substitute for it. It is pathetic to see how

in spite of the convictions thus rooted in Mr. Browning's mind, the

expressed craving for more knowledge, for more light, will now and then

escape him.

Even orthodox Christianity gives no assurance of reunion to those whom

death has separated. It is obvious that Mr. Browning's poetic creed

could hold no conviction regarding it. He hoped for such reunion in

proportion as he wished. There must have been moments in his life when

the wish in its passion overleapt the bounds of hope. 'Prospice' appears

to prove this. But the wide range of imagination, no less than the lack

of knowledge, forbade in him any forecast of the possibilities of the

life to come. He believed that if granted, it would be an advance on the

present--an accession of knowledge if not an increase of happiness. He

was satisfied that whatever it gave, and whatever it withheld, it would

be good. In his normal condition this sufficed to him.

'La Saisiaz' appeared in the early summer of 1878, and with it 'The

Two Poets of Croisic', which had been written immediately after it. The

various incidents of this poem are strictly historical; they lead the

way to a characteristic utterance of Mr. Browning's philosophy of life

to which I shall recur later.

In 1872 Mr. Browning had published a first series of selections from his

works; it was to be followed by a second in 1880. In a preface to the

earlier volume, he indicates the plan which he has followed in the

choice and arrangement of poems; and some such intention runs also

through the second; since he declined a suggestion made to him for the

introduction or placing of a special poem, on the ground of its not

conforming to the end he had in view. It is difficult, in the one case

as in the other, to reconstruct the imagined personality to which his

preface refers; and his words on the later occasion pointed rather to

that idea of a chord of feeling which is raised by the correspondence of

the first and last poems of the respective groups. But either clue may

be followed with interest.

Life and Letters of Robert Browning · 第 17 / 22 章