These two great empires, the greatest indeed that exist in the world,

dividing between them nearly a fifth part of the whole habitable globe,

each about a tenth, exhibit a singular difference with regard to

political circumstances. One century ago Russia was but just emerging

from a state of barbarism, and in a century hence, in all human

probability, she will make a conspicuous figure among European nations,

both in arts and arms. Two thousand years ago China was civilized to the

same degree, or nearly so, that she is at present. The governments were

both arbitrary, and the people were slaves. The natural genius of the

Russian, cramped perhaps in some degree by his frozen climate, is less

susceptible of improvement than that of the Chinese. Whence then, it may

be asked, proceeds the very great difference in the progressive

improvement of the two nations? principally, I should suppose, from the

two following reasons. Russia invites and encourages foreigners to

instruct her subjects in arts, sciences, and manufactures. China, from a

spirit of pride and self-importance, as well as from jealousy, rejects

and expels them. The language of Russia is easily acquired, and her

subjects as easily learn those of other countries, whilst that of China

is so difficult, or their method of learning it so defective, as to

require the study of half the life of man to fit him for any of the

ordinary employments of the state, and they have no knowledge of any

language but their own. The one is in a state of youthful vigour,

advancing daily in strength and knowledge; the other is worn out with

old age and disease, and under its present state of existence is not

likely to advance in any kind of improvement.

To the principle of universal obedience the Chinese government has added

another, which is well calculated to satisfy the public mind: the first

honours and the highest offices are open to the very lowest of the

people. It admits of no hereditary nobility; at least none with

exclusive privileges. As a mark of the Sovereign's favour a distinction

will sometimes descend in a family, but, as it confers no power nor

privilege nor emolument, it soon wears out. All dignities may be

considered as merely personal; the princes of the blood, even, sink

gradually into the common mass, unless their talents and their

application be sufficient to qualify them for office, independent of

which there can be neither rank nor honours, and very little if any

distinction, not even in the imperial family, beyond the third

generation. On public days the Emperor, at a single glance, can

distinguish the rank of each of the many thousand courtiers that are

assembled on such occasions by their dress of ceremony. The civilians

have a bird, and the military a tyger, embroidered on the breast and

back of their upper robe; and their several ranks are pointed out by

different coloured globes, mounted on a pivot on the top of the cap or

bonnet. The Emperor has also two orders of distinction, which are

conferred by him alone, as marks of particular favour; the order of the

yellow vest and of the peacock's feather.

The influence that, in nations of Europe, is derived from birth,

fortune, and character, is of no weight in the Chinese government. The

most learned, and I have already explained how far the term extends,

provided he be not of notorious bad character, is sure to be employed;

though under the present Tartar government, the Chinese complain that

they never arrive at the highest rank till they are advanced in years.

Learning alone, by the strict maxims of state, leads to office, and

office to distinction. Property, without learning, has little weight,

and confers no distinction, except in some corrupt provincial

governments, where the external marks of office are sold, as in Canton.

Hence property is not so much an object of the laws in China as

elsewhere, and consequently has not the same security. In the

governments of Europe, property seldom fails to command influence and to

force dependence: in China, the man of property is afraid to own it, and

all the enjoyments it procures him are stolen.

Sometimes, indeed, the highest appointments in the state are conferred,

as it happens elsewhere, by some favourable accident, or by the caprice

of the monarch. A striking instance of this kind was displayed in the

person of _Ho-tchung-tang_, the last prime minister of the late

_Kien-long_. This man, a Tartar, happened to be placed on guard in the

palace, where his youth and comely countenance struck the Emperor so

forcibly in passing, that he sent for him to the presence; and finding

him equally agreeable in his conversation and manners, he raised him

rapidly, but gradually, from the situation of a common soldier, to the

highest station in the empire. Such sudden changes, from a state of

nothingness to the summit of power, have frequently been observed to be

attended with consequences no less fatal to the man so elevated, than

pernicious to the public: and thus it happened to this favourite

minister. During the life of his old master, over whom, in his later

years, he is said to have possessed an unbounded influence, he availed

himself of the means that offered, by every species of fraud and

extortion, by tyranny and oppression, to amass such immense wealth in

gold, silver, pearls, and immoveable property, that his acquisitions

were generally allowed to have exceeded those of any single individual,

that the history of the country had made known. His pride and haughty

demeanour had rendered him so obnoxious to the royal family that, at the

time we were in Pekin, it was generally supposed, he had made up his

mind to die with the old Emperor, for which event he had always at hand

a dose of poison, not chusing to stand the severe investigation which he

was well aware the succeeding prince would direct to be made into his

ministerial conduct. It seems, however, when that event actually

happened, the love of life, and the hope of escaping, prevailed on him

to change his purpose and to stand the hazard of a trial. Of the crimes

and enormities laid to his charge he was found, or rather he was said to

have pleaded, guilty. The vast wealth he had extorted from others was

confiscated to the crown, and he was condemned to suffer an ignominious

death[28].

[28] The circumstances attending the downfal of this minister are

curious, and shew, in its true light, the despotic nature of the Chinese

government, notwithstanding their salutary laws. The new Emperor,

determined on his ruin, makes a public declaration wherein, after

apologizing for not abstaining agreeably to the laws of the empire from

all acts of innovation, for the space of three years after his father's

death, he observes, that the crimes and excesses of _Ho-tchung-tang_ are

of so horrid a nature, as to preclude him from acting towards him with

any pity or indulgence. He then exhibits about twenty articles of

accusation against him, the principal of which are,

_Contumacy_ towards his father (the late Emperor) by riding on horseback

to the very door of the hall of audience at _Yuen-min-yuen_.

_Audacity_, under pretence of lameness, in causing himself to be carried

to and from the palace through the door set apart for the Emperor.

_Scandalous behaviour_, in taking away the virgins of the palace, and

appropriating them to his own use.

_Pride and insolence_, in countermanding his (the new Emperor's) order,

for all the princes of Tartary to be summoned to Pekin, those who had

not had the small-pox excepted, to assist at the funeral of his father,

and by issuing a new one, in which _none_ were excepted.

_Bribery and partiality_, in selling and giving away appointments of

weight to persons totally unqualified to fill them.

_Arrogance_, in making use of the wood _Nan-moo_ (cedar) in his house,

which is destined exclusively for royal palaces; and in building a house

and gardens in the style and manner of those belonging to the Emperor.

For having in his possession more than two hundred strings of pearls,

and an immense quantity of jewels and precious stones, which his rank

did not allow him to wear, and among which was a pearl of such wonderful

magnitude, that the Emperor himself had no equal to it.

For having in gold and silver alone, which has been already discovered

and confiscated, the amount, at least, of ten million taels (about

3,300,000_l._ sterling).

One article is singularly curious. For having been guilty of the deepest

treachery in informing him (the new Emperor) of his father's intention

to abdicate the government in his (the new Emperor's) favour, _one day_

before his father made it public, thinking by such means to gain his

favour and affection!

After enumerating the several articles of accusation, the Emperor

states, that this minister being interrogated by a Tartar prince on

several points, had confessed the whole to be true, and, therefore,

without further evidence, he commands the presidents and members of the

several courts in Pekin, the viceroys of provinces, and governors of

cities, on these articles of accusation being laid before them, to pass

a proper sentence on the said _Ho-tchung-tang_. According to the

majority, he was condemned to be beheaded; but as a peculiar act of

grace and benevolence on the part of the Emperor, this sentence was

mitigated to that of his being allowed to be his own executioner. A

silken cord being sent as an intimation of this mark of the Emperor's

favour, he caused himself to be strangled by some of his attendants.

Who could escape when the Emperor of China is himself the accuser? It

will readily occur, from the fate of _Ho-tchung-tang_, that there is not

that line of independence drawn between the executive and juridical

authority, which the ingenious author of the Spirit of Laws has clearly

proved to be the grand foundation of a just, legal, and efficient

security of the life and property of the subject. In fact, in all state

crimes, the Emperor becomes both the accuser and the judge. In the case

of _Ho-tchung-tang_ he may likewise be said to have been the only

evidence.

But _Ho-tchung-tang_, if guilty of inordinate ambition, or acts of

injustice, is far from being the only instance of such conduct in men

thus raised from humble situations. The officers of government in

general, though intended by the constitution as a kind of barrier

between the prince and the people, are the greatest oppressors of the

latter, who have seldom any means of redress, or of conveying their

complaints to the Imperial ear. There is no middle class of men in

China: men whose property and ideas of independence give them weight in

the part of the country where they reside; and whose influence and

interest are considered as not below the notice of the government. In

fact, there are no other than the governors and the governed. If a man,

by trade, or industry in his profession, has accumulated riches, he can

enjoy them only in private. He dares not, by having a grander house, or

finer clothes, to let his neighbour perceive that he is richer than

himself, lest he should betray him to the commanding officer of the

district, who would find no difficulty in bringing him within the pale

of the sumptuary laws, and in laying his property under confiscation.

Sometimes, indeed, the extortions that the officers practise upon the

people, as in the case of _Ho-tchung-tang_, meet the hand of justice.

Other magistrates keep a steady eye upon their proceedings, and, in

proper time, transmit the necessary information to court. Spies also are

detached from court into the provinces, under the name of inspectors.

Jealous of each other, they let no opportunity slip of making

unfavourable reports to their superiors. Notwithstanding which, with all

the precautions taken by government in favour of the subject, the latter

finds himself most dreadfully oppressed. It is true, for very slight

offences preferred against men in office, the court directs a public

reprimand in the official Gazette; for those of a more serious nature,

degradation from rank; and every officer so degraded is under the

necessity of proclaiming his own disgrace in all his public orders; not

only to put him in mind of his past conduct, but likewise to shew the

people how watchful the eye of government is over the actions of its

servants. The last stage of public degradation, which amounts to a

sentence of infamy, is an order to superintend the preparation of the

Emperor's tomb, which implies that the person so sentenced is more fit

to be employed among the dead than the living. _Tchang-ta-gin_, the late

viceroy of Canton, was condemned to this degrading service[29].

[29] Among the various customs of China, particularized in the accounts

of the two Mahomedan travellers in the ninth century, this remarkable

one is noticed, affording, with the rest, equally singular and peculiar

to this nation, an proof of the authenticity of these two relations.

The viceroy of a province can remain in that office no longer than three

years, lest he might obtain an undue influence. No servant of the crown

can form a family alliance in the place where he commands, nor obtain an

office of importance in the city or town wherein he was born. Yet with

these, and other precautions, there is still little security for the

subject. He has no voice whatsoever in the government, either directly

or by representation; and the only satisfaction he possibly can receive

for injuries done to him, and that is merely of a negative kind, is the

degradation or the removal of the man in power, who had been his

oppressor, and who perhaps may be replaced by another equally bad.

The ingenious Mr. Pauw has observed, that China is entirely governed by

the whip and the bamboo. To these he might have added the yearly

calendar and the Pekin Gazette, both of which, as engines in the hands

of government, contribute very materially to assist its operations. By

the circulation of the first is kept alive the observance of certain

superstitions which it is, apparently, the study of government to

encourage. The second is a vehicle for conveying into every corner of

the empire the virtues and the fatherly kindness of the reigning

sovereign, shewn by punishing the officers of his government, not only

for what they have done amiss, but for what they may have omitted to do.

Thus, if a famine has desolated any of the provinces, the principal

officers are degraded for not having taken the proper precautions

against it. This paper, in the shape of a small pamphlet, is published

every second day. The missionaries have pretended that immediate death

would be the consequence of inserting a falsehood in the Imperial

Gazette. Yet it is famous for describing battles that were never fought,

and for announcing victories that were never gained. The truth of this

observation appears from several proclamations of _Kaung-shee_, _Tchien

Long_, and the present Emperor, warning the generals on distant stations

from making false reports, and from killing thousands and ten thousands

of the enemy, sometimes even when no engagement had taken place[30]. The

reverend gentlemen only mean to say, that the editor would be punished

if he ventured to insert any thing not sent to him officially by the

government.

[30] The words of _Kaung-shee's_ proclamation, repeated by _Kia-king_,

are: "At present when an army is sent on any military service, every

report that is made of its operations, contains an account of a victory,

of rebels dispersed at the first encounter, driven from their stations,

killed, and wounded, to a great amount, or to the amount of some

thousands, or, in short, that the rebels slain were innumerable."

_Pekin Gazette, 31st July, 1800._

The press in China is as free as in England, and the profession of

printing open to every one, which is a singular circumstance, and

perhaps the only instance of the kind, in a despotic government. It has

usually been supposed that, in free countries only where every person is

equally under the protection, and equally liable to the penalties, of

the law, the liberty of the press could be cherished; and that it was a

thing next to impossible, that power, founded on error and supported by

oppression, could long be maintained where the press was free. It was

the press that in Europe effected the ruin of priestly power, by

dispelling the clouds that had long obscured the rays of truth; and by

opening a free access to the doctrines of that religion which, of all

others, is best calculated for the promotion of individual happiness and

public virtue[31].

[31] When the art of printing was first introduced into England, and

carried on in Westminster Abbey, a shrewd churchman is said to have

observed to the Abbot of Westminster, "If you don't take care to destroy

that machine, it will very soon destroy your trade." He saw at a single

glance of the press, the downfal of priestly dominion in the general

diffusion of knowledge that would be occasioned by it, and had the rest

of the clergy been equally clear-sighted, it is probable the dark ages

of superstition and ignorance had still continued, or at least had been

greatly protracted.

In China the liberty of the press seems to excite no apprehensions in

the government. The summary mode of punishing any breach of good morals,

without the formality of a trial, makes a positive prohibition against

printing unnecessary, being itself sufficient to restrain the

licentiousness of the press. The printer, the vender, and the reader of

any libellous publication, are all equally liable to be flogged with the

bamboo. Few, I suppose, would be hardy enough to print reflexions on the

conduct of government, or its principal officers, as such publications

would be attended with certain ruin. Yet, notwithstanding all the

dangers to which the printing profession is liable, daily papers are

published in the capital, circulating, something like our own, private

anecdotes, domestic occurrences, public notices of sales, and the

wonderful virtues of quack medicines. We were told that, in one of these

papers, the Portuguese missionary mentioned in Mr. Grammont's letter got

a paragraph inserted, purporting the great neglect of the English in

having brought no presents for the princes of the blood, nor for the

Emperor's ministers. This false and malicious paragraph was said to be

followed by another, insinuating that those for the Emperor were common

articles of little value. Another pretended to give a catalogue of them,

and included an elephant about the size of a rat, giants, dwarfs,

wishing pillows, and such like nonsense. These, however, and other

publications, were industriously kept from our sight. Under the

generous idea of being the Emperor's guests, we were not allowed to

purchase any thing. He alone was to supply our wants, but his officers

took the liberty of judging what these wants should consist in.

It is a singular phenomenon in the history of nations, how the

government of an empire, of such vast magnitude as that of China, should

have preserved its stability without any material change, for more than

two thousand years; for, dropping their pretensions to an extravagant

antiquity, for which however they have some grounds, there can be no

doubt they were pretty much in the same state, regulated by the same

laws, and under the same form of government as they now are, four

hundred years before the birth of Christ, about which time their

renowned philosopher flourished, whose works are still held in the

highest reputation. They contain indeed all the maxims on which their

government is still grounded, and all the rules by which the different

stations of life take their moral conduct; and the monarchy is supposed

to have been established two thousand years before his time.

If the test of a good government be made to depend on the length of its

continuance, unshaken and unchanged by revolutions, China may certainly

be allowed to rank the first among civilized nations. But, whether good

or bad, it has possessed the art of moulding the multitude to its own

shape in a manner unprecedented in the annals of the world. Various

accidents, improved by policy, seem to have led to its durability.

Among these the natural barriers of the country, excluding any foreign

enemy, are not to be reckoned as the least favourable; whilst the

extreme caution of the government in admitting strangers kept the world

in ignorance, for many ages, of the existence even of the most

extensive, powerful, and populous empire among men. Secluded thus from

all intercourse with the rest of the world, it had time and leizure to

mould its own subjects into the shape it wished them to retain; and the

event has sufficiently proved its knowledge in this respect.

A number of fortunate circumstances, seldom combined in the same

country, have contributed to the preservation of internal tranquillity

in China. The language is of a nature well calculated to keep the mass

of the people in a state of ignorance. They are neither prohibited from

embracing any religion of which they may make a choice, nor coerced to

contribute towards the support of one they do not approve. The pains

that have been taken to inculcate sober habits, to destroy mutual

confidence, and render every man reserved and suspicious of his

neighbour, could not fail to put an end to social intercourse. No

meetings were held, even for convivial purposes, beyond the family

circle, and these only at the festival of new year. Those kind of

turbulent assemblies, where real or imagined grievances are discussed

with all the rancour and violence that malicious insinuations against

government, added to the effects of intoxicating draughts, too

frequently inspire, never happen among the Chinese. Contented in having

no voice in the government, it has never occurred to them that they have

any rights[32]: and they certainly enjoy none but what are liable to be

invaded and trampled on, whenever the sovereign, or any of his

representatives, from interest, malice, or caprice, think fit to

exercise the power that is within their grasp. The doctrine of employing

resistence against oppression, applied to the people and the government,

is so contrary to every sentiment of the former, that the latter has

little to fear on that score.

[32] When the mischievous doctrines of _Tom Paine_, expounded in his

"Rights of Man," were translated into various languages, and

industriously attempted to be propagated among the eastern nations, by

means of French emissaries; when one of those assiduous disturbers of

the peace of mankind had actually succeeded in furnishing the Seiks with

an abstract of this precious work in their own language, he next turned

his attention to the vast empire of China, a glorious theatre for those

zealous cosmopolites to play their parts in, if they could once contrive

to suit their drama to the taste of the people. The experiment, however,

failed of success. The golden opinions of _Tom Paine_ could not be

transfused into the Chinese language; and these unfortunate people

understood no other but their own; so that three hundred and

thirty-three millions were doomed to remain in ignorance and misery on

account of their language being incapable of conveying the enlightened

doctrines of _Tom Paine_.

Travels in China, Containing Descriptions, Observations, and Comparisons, Made and Collected in the Course of a Short Residence at the Imperial Palace of Yuen-Min-Yuen, and on a Subsequent Journey through the Country from Pekin to Canton · 第 26 / 43 段