HIM WITH HIS TAIL IN HIS MOUTH

Answer a fool according to his folly, philosophy ditto.

Solemnity is a sign of fraud.

Religion and philosophy both have the same dual purpose: to get at the

beginning of things, and at the goal of things. They have both decided

that the serpent has got his tail in his mouth, and that the end is one

with the beginning.

It seems to me time someone gave that serpent of eternity another dummy

to suck.

They’ve all decided that the beginning of all things is the life-stream

itself, energy, ether, libido, not to mention the Sanskrit joys of

Purusha, Pradhana, Kala.

Having postulated the serpent of the beginning, now see all the heroes

from Moses and Plato to Bergson, wrestling with him might and main, to

push his tail into his mouth.

Jehovah creates man in his Own Image, according to His Own Will. If man

behaves according to the ready-made Will of God, formulated in a bunch

of somewhat unsavoury commandments, then lucky man will be received

into the bosom of Jehovah.

Man isn’t very keen. And that is Sin, original and perpetual.

Then Plato discovers how lovely the intellectual idea is: in fact, the

only perfection is ideal.

But the old dragon of creation, who fathered us all, didn’t have an idea

in his head.

Plato was prepared. He popped the Logos into the mouth of the dragon,

and the serpent of eternity was rounded off. The old dragon, ugly and

venomous, wore yet the precious jewel of the Platonic idea in his head.

Unable to find the dragon wholesale, modern philosophy sets up a retail

shop. You can’t lay salt on the old scoundrel’s tail, because, of

course, he’s got it in his mouth, according to postulate. He doesn’t

seem to be sprawling in his old lair, across the heavens. In fact, he

appears to have vamoosed. Perhaps, instead of being one big old boy, he

is really an infinite number of little tiny boys: atoms, electrons,

units of force or energy, tiny little birds all spinning with their

tails in their beaks. Just the same in detail as in the gross. Nothing

will come out of the egg that isn’t in it. Evolution sings away at the

same old song. Out of the amœba, or some such old-fashioned entity, the

dragon of evolved life stretches himself enormous and more enormous,

only, at last, to return each time, and put his tail into his own

mouth, and be an amœba once more. The amœba, or the electron, or

whatever it may lately be--the rose would be just as scentless--is the

constant, from which all manifest living creation starts out, and to

which it all returns.

There was a time when man was not, nor monkey, nor cow, not catfish. But

the amœba (or the electron, or the atom, or whatever it is) always was

and always will be.

Boom! tiddy-ra-ta! Boom!

Boom! tiddy-ra-ta! Boom!

How do you know? How does anyone know, what always was or wasn’t? Bunk

of geology, and strata, and all that, biology or evolution.

“One, two, three four five,

Catch a little fish alive.

Six, seven, eight nine ten,

I have let him go again....”

Bunk of beginnings and of ends, and heads and tails. Why does man always

want to know so damned much? Or rather, so damned little? If he can’t

draw a ring round creation, and fasten the serpent’s tail into its mouth

with the padlock of one final clinching idea, then creation can go to

hell, as far as man is concerned.

There is such a thing as life, or life energy. We know, because we’ve

got it, or had it. It isn’t a constant. It comes and it goes. But we

_want_ it.

This I think is incontestable.

More than anything else in the world, we want to have life, and

life-energy abundant in us. We think if we eat yeast, vitamines and

proteids, we’re sure of it. We’re had. We diddle ourselves for the

million millionth time.

What we want is life, and life-energy inside us. Where it comes from, or

what it is, we don’t know, and never shall. It is the capital X of all

our knowledge.

But we want it, we must have it. It is the all in all.

This we know, now, for good and all: that which is good, and moral, is

that which brings into us a stronger, deeper flow of life and

life-energy: evil is that which impairs the life-flow.

But man’s difficulty is, that he can’t have life for the asking. “He

asked life of Thee, and Thou gavest it him: even length of days for ever

and ever.” There’s a pretty motto for the tomb!

It isn’t length of days for ever and ever that a man wants. It is strong

life within himself, while he lives.

But how to get it? You may be as healthy as a cow, and yet have fear

inside you, because your life is not enough.

We know, really, that we can’t have life for the asking, nor find it by

seeking, nor get it by striving. The river flows into us from behind and

below. We must turn our backs to it, and go ahead. The faster we go

ahead, the stronger the river rushes into us. The moment we turn round

to embrace the river of life, it ebbs away, and we see nothing but a

stony fiumara.

We must go ahead.

But which way is ahead?

We don’t know.

We only know that, continuing in the way we are going, the river of life

flows feebler and feebler in us, and we lose all sense of vital

direction. We begin to talk about vitamines. We become idiotic. We

cunningly prepare our own suicide.

This is the philosophic problem: to find the way ahead.

_Allons!_--there is no road before us.

Plato said that ahead, ahead was the perfect Idea, gleaming in the brow

of the dragon.

We have pretty well caught up with the perfect Idea, and we find it a

sort of vast, white, polished tomb-stone.

If the mouth of the serpent is the open grave, into which the tail

disappears, then three cheers for the Logos, and down she goes.

We children of a later Pa, know that Life is real, Life is earnest, and

the Grave is not its Goal.

Let us side-step.

All goals become graves.

Every goal is a grave, when you get there.

Well, I came out of an egg-cell, like an amœba, and I go into the grave.

I can’t help it. It’s not my fault, and it’s not my business.

I don’t want eternal life, nor length of days for ever and ever. Nothing

so long drawn out.

Reflections on the death of a porcupine and other essays · 第 27 / 40 题