BY SPENCER TROTTER

A science becomes part of the general stock of knowledge only after it

has entered into the literature of a people. The bare skeleton of facts

must be clothed with the flesh and blood of imagination, through the

humanizing influence of literary expression, before it can be

assimilated by the average intellectual being. The scientific

investigator is rarely endowed with the gift of weaving the facts into a

story that will charm, and the man of letters is too often devoid of

that patience which is the chief virtue of the scientist. These gifts of

the gods are bestowed upon mankind under the guiding genius of the

division of labor. The name of Buffon will always be associated with

natural history, though in the man himself the spirit of science was

conspicuously absent. In this respect he was in marked contrast with his

contemporary Linnæus, whose intellect and labor laid the foundations of

much of the scientific knowledge of to-day.

[ILLUSTRATION: BUFFON]

George Louis le Clerc Buffon was born on the 7th of September, 1707, at

Montbar, in Burgundy. His father, Benjamin le Clerc, who was possessed

of a fortune, appears to have bestowed great care and liberality on the

education of his son. While a youth Buffon made the acquaintance of a

young English nobleman, the Duke of Kingston, whose tutor, a man well

versed in the knowledge of physical science, exerted a profound

influence on the future career of the young Frenchman. At twenty-one

Buffon came into his mother's estate, a fortune yielding an annual

income of £12,000. But this wealth did not change his purpose to gain

knowledge. He traveled through Italy, and after living for a short

period in England returned to France and devoted his time to literary

work. His first efforts were translations of two English works of

science--Hale's 'Vegetable Statics' and Newton's 'Fluxions'; and he

followed these with various studies in the different branches of

physical science.

The determining event in his life, which led him to devote the rest of

his years to the study of natural history, was the death of his friend

Du Fay, the Intendant of the Jardin du Roi (now the Jardin des Plantes),

who on his death-bed recommended Buffon as his successor. A man of

letters, Buffon saw before him the opportunity to write a natural

history of the earth and its inhabitants; and he set to work with a zeal

that lasted until his death in 1788, at the age of eighty-one. His great

work, 'L'Histoire Naturelle,' was the outcome of these years of labor,

the first edition being complete in thirty-six quarto volumes.

The first fifteen volumes of this great work, published between the

years 1749 and 1767, treated of the theory of the earth, the nature of

animals, and the history of man and viviparous quadrupeds; and was the

joint work of Buffon and Daubenton, a physician of Buffon's native

village. The scientific portion of the work was done by Daubenton, who

possessed considerable anatomical knowledge, and who wrote accurate

descriptions of the various animals mentioned. Buffon, however, affected

to ignore the work of his co-laborer and reaped the entire glory, so

that Daubenton withdrew his services. Later appeared the nine volumes on

birds, in which Buffon was aided by the Abbé Sexon. Then followed the

'History of Minerals' in five volumes, and seven volumes of

'Supplements,' the last one of which was published the year after

Buffon's death.

One can hardly admire the personal character of Buffon. He was vain and

superficial, and given to extravagant speculations. He is reported to

have said, "I know but five great geniuses--Newton, Bacon, Leibnitz,

Montesquieu, and myself." His natural vanity was undoubtedly fostered by

the adulation which he received from those in authority. He saw his own

statue placed in the cabinet of Louis XVI., with the inscription

"Majestati Naturæ par ingenium." Louis XV. bestowed upon him a title of

nobility, and crowned heads "addressed him in language of the most

exaggerated compliment." Buffon's conduct and conversation were marked

throughout by a certain coarseness and vulgarity that constantly appear

in his writings. He was foppish and trifling, and affected religion

though at heart a disbeliever.

The chief value of Buffon's work lies in the fact that it first brought

the subject of natural history into popular literature. Probably no

writer of the time, with the exception of Voltaire and Rousseau, was so

widely read and quoted as Buffon. But the gross inaccuracy which

pervaded his writings, and the visionary theories in which he constantly

indulged, gave the work a less permanent value than it might otherwise

have attained. Buffon detested the scientific method, preferring

literary finish to accuracy of statement. Although the work was widely

translated, and was the only popular natural history of the time, there

is little of it that is worthy of a place in the world's best

literature. It is chiefly as a relic of a past literary epoch, and as

the pioneer work in a new literary field, that Buffon's writings appeal

to us. They awakened for the first time a wide interest in natural

history, though their author was distinctly _not_ a naturalist.

Arabella Buckley has said of Buffon and his writings that though "he

often made great mistakes and arrived at false conclusions, still he had

so much genius and knowledge that a great part of his work will always

remain true." Cuvier has left us a good memoir of Buffon in the

'Biographic Universelle.'

[Illustration: Signature: Spencer Trotter]

Library of the World's Best Literature, Ancient and Modern — Volume 06 · 第 251 / 262 题