Section I[2] 1 (141)

Produced by David Starner, Jason Isbell and the Online Distributed

Proofreading Team.

Transcribers Note: Typographic errors in the original have been

retained. In the table of contents there are two sets of page numbers.

The first appears to be the page numbers from the original MS. The

second set in parentheses are the page numbers from this facsimile.

As the body of the text is referred to by line numbers, that section

has not been rewrapped.

YALE STUDIES IN ENGLISH

ALBERT S. COOK, EDITOR

XLVIII

GENESIS A

TRANSLATED FROM THE OLD ENGLISH

BY

LAWRENCE MASON, PH.D.

INSTRUCTOR IN ENGLISH IN YALE COLLEGE

NEW YORK

HENRY HOLT AND COMPANY

1915

PREFACE

The purpose of the translator in offering to the public this

version of the _Genesis_ is to aid in forwarding--be it by but one

jot or tittle--the general knowledge and appreciation of Old English

literature. Professed students in this department will always have

an incentive to master the language; but to the public at large the

strangeness of this medium will prove an insurmountable barrier, and

the general reader must therefore either remain in ignorance of our

older literary monuments or else employ translations. The present

contribution[1] to the growing body of such translations possesses,

perhaps, more than a single interest or appeal, in that it renders

accessible not only a poem of considerable intrinsic worth, a poem

associated with the earliest of the great names in English literary

history, and a forerunner and possible source of _Paradise Lost_, but

also an important example of a literary _genre_ once immensely popular,

though now quite fallen into abeyance--namely, the lengthy versified

Scriptural paraphrase. For some idea of the prominent part played by

this form, even so late as the seventeenth century, the reader is

referred to any comprehensive manual of English literature.

In this translation, prose has been employed instead of verse, for two

reasons. In the first place, no metrical form has yet been found which,

in the writer's judgment, at all adequately represents in modern English

the effect of the Old English alliterative verse, or stave-rime. And in

the second place, to the writer's thinking, no one but a poet should

attempt to write verse: and on that principle, translations would be few

and far between, unless prose were used.

But even granting the value of the _Genesis_ as a fit subject for

translation, and the necessity for the employment of prose, the reader

may still quarrel with the particular _kind_ of prose hereinbelow

essayed; so a brief explanation and, it is hoped, vindication of the

theory of translation here followed would seem desirable, inasmuch as

considerable divergence is intended from the methods adopted by the

various translators of the _Beowulf_, for example. First, Biblical

phraseology has been eschewed, partly because in a modern writer it

savors of affectation, but chiefly because his Bible was the point

of departure for the Old English author, and to return now in the

translation to our Bible would be a stultification of his purposes by a

sort of _argumentum in circulo_. Secondly, archaisms, poetic diction,

and unusual constructions (the "translation English" anathematized by

the Rhetorics) have been so far as possible avoided, contrary to the

practice of most translators from Old English poetry, because it is

felt strongly that such usages will not produce upon modern readers the

effect that this poetry produced originally upon the readers or hearers

for whom it was intended. For this poetry could not have seemed alien

or exotic to its original public: either through familiar poetic

convention, or owing to the staccato and ejaculatory character of

ordinary spoken language at the time, this spasmodic, apostrophic poetry

must have seemed natural and beautiful, in the seventh or eighth

century. But--

Why take the style of those heroic times?

For nature brings not back the mastodon,

Nor we those times.

To translate is to modernize. This rendering, therefore, is not an

artificial, pseudo-antique hybrid, but frankly endeavors to convey its

original to modern readers in idiomatic modern literary English, devoid

of any conscious mannerisms whatsoever. The writer has aimed at the

utmost literal fidelity consistent with the observance of all the usages

of current standard English; he has not attempted, however, to convert

the explosive appositions, with prevailing asyndeton and excessive

synonymy, of his original into the easy, flowing sentences more familiar

to modern eyes and ears, for the change would sacrifice altogether too

much of the distinctive character and flavor of Old English poetry.

The text upon which this work is based is that of the Grein-Wülker

_Bibliothek der Angelsächsischen Poesie,_ 1894, save for a few minor

changes in punctuation and the few departures recorded in the Notes.

Grein's translation of the poem into modern German stave-rime, 1857, has

been frequently consulted, but the writer's real indebtedness to it is

felt to be slight. He takes great pleasure, finally, in acknowledging

his deep sense of obligation, on many grounds, to the general editor of

this series, Professor Albert S. Cook; the work was undertaken at his

suggestion, and he has been most kind in giving advice and criticism.

Lawrence Mason.

YALE UNIVERSITY,

_July 17, 1913._

TABLE OF CONTENTS

With Specification of the Biblical Chapters and Verses

represented in each Section of the Poem

PAGE

PREFACE III (135)

TABLE OF CONTENTS VI (138)

GENESIS A:

Section I[2] 1 (141)

Genesis A · 第 1 / 29 章