CHAPTER IV

Shell Deities and Early Trade

Early Culture and Early Races--Did Civilization originate in

Europe?--An Important Clue--Trade in Shells between Red Sea

and Italy--Traces of Early Trade in Central Europe--Religious

Value of Personal Ornaments--Importance of Shell Lore--Links

between Far East and Europe--Shell Deities--A Hebridean Shell

Goddess--"Milk of Wisdom"--Ancient Goddesses as Providers of

Food--Gaelic "Spirit Shell" and Japanese "God Body"--Influence

of Deities in Jewels, &c.--A Shakespearean Reference--Shells

in Crô-Magnon Graves--Early Sacrifices--Hand Colours in

Palæolithic Caves--Finger Lore and "Hand Spells".

When the question is asked, "Whence came the Crô-Magnon people of

the Aurignacian phase of culture?" the answer usually given is,

"Somewhere in the East". The distribution of the Aurignacian sites

indicates that the new-comers entered south-western France by way of

Italy--that is, across the Italian land-bridge from North Africa. Of

special significance in this connection is the fact that Aurignacian

culture persisted for the longest period of time in Italy. The

tallest Crô-Magnons appear to have inhabited south-eastern France

and the western shores of Italy. "It is probable", says Osborn,

referring to the men six feet four and a half inches in height, "that

in the genial climate of the Riviera these men obtained their finest

development; the country was admirably protected from the cold winds

of the north, refuges were abundant, and game by no means scarce, to

judge from the quantity of animal bones found in the caves. Under

such conditions of life the race enjoyed a fine physical development

and dispersed widely."[24]

[24] _Men of the Old Stone Age_, pp. 297-8.

It does not follow, however, that the tall people originated

Aurignacian culture. As has been indicated, the stumpy people

represented by Combe-Capelle skeletons were likewise exponents of

it. "It must not be assumed", as Elliot Smith reminds us, "that the

Aurignacian culture was necessarily invented by the same people who

introduced it into Europe, and whose remains were associated with

it ... for any culture can be transmitted to an alien people, even

when it has not been adopted by many branches of the race which was

responsible for its invention, just as gas illumination, oil lamps,

and even candles are still in current use by the people who invented

the electric light, which has been widely adopted by many foreign

peoples. This elementary consideration is so often ignored that it

is necessary thus to emphasize it, because it is essential for any

proper understanding of the history of early civilization."[25]

[25] Primitive Man (_Proceedings of the British Academy_, Vol.

VII).

No trace of Aurignacian culture has, so far, been found outside

Europe. "May it not, therefore," it may be asked, "have originated

in Italy or France?" In absence of direct evidence, this possibility

might be admitted. But an important discovery has been made at

Grimaldi in La Grotte des Enfants (the "grotto of infants"--so called

because of the discovery there of the skeletons of young Crô-Magnon

children). Among the shells used as amulets by those who used the

grotto as a sepulchre was one (_Cassis rufa_) that had been carried

either by a migrating folk, or by traders, along the North African

coast and through Italy from some south-western Asian beach. The find

has been recorded by Professor Marcellin Boule.[26]

[26] _Les Grottes de Grimaldi (Baousse-Rousse)_, Tome I, fasc.

II--_Géologie et Paléontologie_ (Monaco, 1906), p. 123.

In a footnote, G. Dollfus writes:

"_Cassis rufa, L._, an Indian ocean shell, is represented in

the collection at Monaco by two fragments; one was found in the

lower habitation level D, the other is probably of the same

origin. The presence of this shell is extraordinary, as it has

no analogue in the Mediterranean, neither recent nor fossil;

there exists no species in the North Atlantic or off Senegal

with which it could be confounded. The fragments have traces of

the reddish colour preserved, and are not fossil; one of them

presents a notch which has determined a hole that seems to have

been made intentionally. The species has not yet been found in

the Gulf of Suez nor in the raised beaches of the Isthmus. M.

Jousseaume has found it in the Gulf of Tadjoura at Aden, but it

has not yet been encountered in the Red Sea nor in the raised

beaches of that region. The common habitat of _Cassis rufa_ is

Socotra, besides the Seychelles, Madagascar, Mauritius, New

Caledonia, and perhaps Tahiti. The fragments discovered at

Mentone have therefore been brought from a great distance at a

very ancient epoch by prehistoric man."

After the Crô-Magnon peoples had spread into Western and Central

Europe they imported shells from the Mediterranean. At Laugerie

Basse in the Dordogne, for instance, a necklace of pierced shells

from the Mediterranean was found in association with a skeleton.

Atlantic shells could have been obtained from a nearer sea-shore.

It may be that the Rhone valley, which later became a well-known

trade route, was utilized at an exceedingly remote period, and that

cultural influences occasionally "flowed" along it. "Prehistoric man"

had acquired some experience as a trader even during the "hunting

period", and he had formulated definite religious beliefs.

It has been the habit of some archæologists to refer to shell and

other necklaces, &c., as "personal ornaments". The late Dr. Robert

Munro wrote in this connection:

"We have no knowledge of any phase of humanity in which the

love of personal ornament does not play an important part in

the life of the individual. The savage of the present day,

who paints or tattoos his body, and adorns it with shells,

feathers, teeth, and trinkets made of the more gaudy materials

at his disposal, may be accepted as on a parallel with the

Neolithic people of Europe.... Teeth are often perforated

and used as pendants, especially the canines of carnivorous

animals, but such ornaments are not peculiar to Neolithic

times, as they were equally prevalent among the later

Palæolithic races of Europe."[27]

[27] _Prehistoric Britain_, pp. 142-3.

Modern savages have very definite reasons for wearing the so-called

"ornaments", and for painting and tattooing their bodies. They

believe that the shells, teeth, &c., afford them protection, and

bring them luck. Earpiercing, distending the lobe of the ear,

disfiguring the body, the pointing, blackening, or knocking out

of teeth, are all practices that have a religious significance.

Even such a highly civilized people as the Chinese perpetuate, in

their funerary ceremonies, customs that can be traced back to an

exceedingly remote period in the history of mankind. It is not due to

"love of personal ornament" that they place cowries, jade, gold, &c.,

in the mouth of the dead, but because they believe that by so doing

the body is protected, and given a new lease of life. The Far Eastern

belief that an elixir of ground oyster shells will prolong life in

the next world is evidently a relic of early shell lore. Certain

deities are associated with certain shells. Some deities have, like

snails, shells for "houses"; others issue at birth from shells. The

goddess Venus (Aphrodite) springs from the froth of the sea, and is

lifted up by Tritons on a shell; she wears a love-girdle. Hathor, the

Egyptian Venus, had originally a love-girdle of shells. She appears

to have originated as the personification of a shell, and afterwards

to have personified the pearl within the shell. In early Egyptian

graves the shell-amulets have been found in thousands. The importance

of shell lore in ancient religious systems has been emphasized by

Mr. J. Wilfrid Jackson in his _Shells as Evidence of the Migrations

of Early Culture_.[28] He shows why the cowry and snail shells were

worn as amulets and charms, and why men were impelled "to search

for them far and wide and often at great peril". "The murmur of the

shell was the voice of the god, and the trumpet made of a shell

became an important instrument in initiation ceremonies and in temple

worship." Shells protected wearers against evil, including the evil

eye. In like manner protection was afforded by the teeth and claws

of carnivorous animals. In Asia and Africa the belief that tigers,

lions, &c., will not injure those who are thus protected is still

quite widespread.

[28] London, 1917.

[Illustration: Necklace of Sea Shells, from the cave of

Crô-Magnon. (After E. Lartet.)]

It cannot have been merely for love of personal ornaments that the

Crô-Magnons of southern France imported Indian Ocean shells, and

those of Central and Western Europe created a trade in Mediterranean

shells. Like the ancient inhabitants of the Nile Valley who in

remote pre-dynastic times imported shells, not only from the

Mediterranean but from the Red Sea, along a long and dangerous

desert trade-route, they evidently had imparted to shells a definite

religious significance. The "luck-girdle" of snail-shells worn by

the "Red Man of Paviland" has, therefore, an interesting history.

When the Crô-Magnons reached Britain they brought with them not

only implements invented and developed elsewhere, but a heritage

of religious beliefs connected with shell ornaments and with the

red earth with which the corpse was smeared when laid in its last

resting-place.

The ancient religious beliefs connected with shells appear to have

spread far and wide. Traces of them still survive in districts

far separated from one another and from the area of origin--the

borderlands of Asia and Africa. In Japanese mythology a young god,

Ohonamochie--a sort of male Cinderella--is slain by his jealous

brothers. His mother makes appeal to a sky deity who sends to her aid

the two goddesses Princess Cockleshell and Princess Clam. Princess

Cockleshell burns and grinds her shell, and with water provided by

Princess Clam prepares an elixir called "nurse's milk" or "mother's

milk". As soon as this "milk" is smeared over the young god, he is

restored to life. In the Hebrides it is still the custom of mothers

to burn and grind the cockle-shell to prepare a lime-water for

children who suffer from what in Gaelic is called "wasting". In

North America shells of _Unio_ were placed in the graves of Red

Indians "as food for the dead during the journey to the land of

spirits". The pearls were used in India as medicines. "The burnt

powder of the gems, if taken with water, cures hæmorrhages, prevents

evil spirits working mischief in men's minds, cures lunacy and all

mental diseases, jaundice, &c.... Rubbed over the body with other

medicines it cures leprosy and all skin diseases."[29] The ancient

Cretans, whose culture was carried into Asia and through Europe by

their enterprising sea-and-land traders and prospectors, attached

great importance to the cockle-shell which they connected with their

mother goddess, the source of all life and the giver of medicines

and food. Sir Arthur Evans found a large number of cockle-shells,

some in Faeince, in the shrine of the serpent goddess in the ruins

of the Palace of Knossos. The fact that the Cretans made artificial

cockle-shells is of special interest, especially when we find that in

Egypt the earliest use to which gold was put was in the manufacture

of models of snail-shells in a necklace.[30] In different countries

cowrie shells were similarly imitated in stone, ivory, and metal.[31]

[29] _Shells as Evidence of the Migrations of Early Culture_, pp.

84-91.

[30] G. A. Reisner. _Early Dynastic Cemeteries of Naga-ed-Der_,

Vol. I, 1908, Plates 6 and 7.

[31] Jackson's _Shells_, pp. 128, 174, 176, 178.

Shells were thought to impart vitality and give protection, not only

to human beings, but even to the plots of the earliest florists

and agriculturists. "Mary, Mary, quite contrairie", who in the

nursery rhyme has in her garden "cockle-shells all in row", was

perpetuating an ancient custom. The cockle-shell is still favoured

by conservative villagers, and may be seen in their garden plots and

in graveyards. Shells placed at cottage doors, on window-sills, and

round fire-places are supposed to bring luck and give security, like

the horse-shoe on the door.

The mother goddess, remembered as the fairy queen, is still

connected with shells in Hebridean folk-lore. A Gaelic poet refers

to the goddess as "the maiden queen of wisdom who dwelt in the

beauteous bower of the single tree where she could see the whole

world and where no fool could see her beauty". She lamented the

lack of wisdom among women, and invited them to her knoll. When

they were assembled there the goddess appeared, holding in her hand

the _copan Moire_ ("Cup of Mary"), as the blue-eyed limpet shell is

called. The shell contained "the ais (milk) of wisdom", which she

gave to all who sought it. "Many", we are told, "came to the knoll

too late, and there was no wisdom left for them."[32] A Gaelic poet

says the "maiden queen" was attired in emerald green, silver, and

mother-of-pearl.

[32] Dr. Alexander Carmichael, _Carmina Gadeiica_, Vol. II,

pp.247 _et seq._ Mr. Wilfrid Jackson, author of _Shells as

Evidence of the Migrations of Early Culture_, tells me that the

"blue-eyed limpet" is our common limpet--_Patella vulgata_--the

Lepas, Patelle, Jambe, OEil de boue, Bernicle, or Flie of the

French. In Cornwall it is the "Crogan", the "Bornigan", and

the "Brennick". It is "flither" of the English, "flia" of the

Faroese, and "lapa" of the Portuguese. A Cornish giant was once,

according to a folk-tale, set to perform the hopeless task of

emptying a pool with a single limpet which had a hole in it.

Limpets are found in early British graves and in the "kitchen

middens". They are met with in abundance in cromlechs, on the

Channel Isles and in Brittany, covering the bones and the skulls

of the dead. Mr. Jackson thinks they were used like cowries for

vitalizing and protecting the dead.

Here a particular shell is used by an old goddess for a specific

purpose. She imparts knowledge by providing a magic drink referred to

as "milk". The question arises, however, if a deity of this kind was

known in early times. Did the Crô-Magnons of the Aurignacian stage of

culture conceive of a god or goddess in human form who nourished her

human children and instructed them as do human mothers? The figure

of a woman, holding in her hand a horn which appears to have been

used for drinking from, is of special interest in this connection. As

will be shown, the Hebridean "maiden" links with other milk-providing

deities.

The earliest religious writings in the world are the Pyramid Texts

of ancient Egypt which, as Professor Breasted so finely says,

"vaguely disclose to us a vanished world of thought and speech". They

abound "in allusions to lost myths, to customs and usages long since

ended". Withal, they reflect the physical conditions of a particular

area--the Nile Valley, in which the sun and the river are two

outstanding natural features. There was, however, a special religious

reason for connecting the sun and the river.

In these old Pyramid Texts are survivals from a period apparently

as ancient as that of early Aurignacian civilization in Europe,

and perhaps, as the clue afforded by the Indian shell found in the

Grimaldi cave, not unconnected with it. The mother goddess, for

instance, is prayed to so that she may suckle the soul of the dead

Pharaoh as a mother suckles her child and never wean him.[33] Milk

was thus the elixir of life, and as the mother goddess of Egypt is

found to have been identified with the cowrie--indeed to have been

the spirit or personification of the shell--the connection between

shells and milk may have obtained even in Aurignacian times in

south-western Europe. That the mother goddess of Crô-Magnons had a

human form is suggested by the representations of mothers which have

been brought to light. An Aurignacian statuette of limestone found

in the cave of Willendorf, Lower Austria, has been called the "Venus

of Willendorf". She is very corpulent--apparently because she was

regarded as a giver of life. Other statues of like character have

been unearthed near Mentone, and they have a striking resemblance

to the figurines of fat women found in the pre-dynastic graves

of Egypt and in Crete and Malta. The bas-relief of the fat woman

sculptured on a boulder inside the Aurignacian shelter of Laussel may

similarly have been a goddess. In her right hand she holds a bison's

horn--perhaps a drinking horn containing an elixir. Traces of red

colouring remain on the body. A notable fact about these mysterious

female forms is that the heads are formal, the features being

scarcely, if at all, indicated.

[33] Breasted, _Religion and Thought in Ancient Egypt_, p. 130.

Even if no such "idols" had been found, it does not follow that

the early people had no ideas about supernatural beings. There are

references in Gaelic to the _coich anama_ (the "spirit case", or

"soul shell", or "soul husk"). In Japan, which has a particularly

rich and voluminous mythology, there are no idols in Shinto temples.

A deity is symbolized by the _shintai_ (God body), which may be a

mirror, a weapon, or a round stone, a jewel or a pearl. A pearl is

a _tama_; so is a precious stone, a crystal, a bit of worked jade,

or a necklace of jewels, ivory, artificial beads, &c. The soul of

a supernatural being is called _mi-tama--mi_ being now a honorific

prefix, but originally signifying a water serpent (dragon god). The

shells, of which ancient deities were personifications, may well have

been to the Crô-Magnons pretty much what a _tama_ is to the Japanese,

and what magic crystals were to mediæval Europeans who used them for

magical purposes. It may have been believed that in the shells, green

stones, and crystals remained the influence of deities as the power

of beasts of prey remained in their teeth and claws. The ear-rings

and other Pagan ornaments which Jacob buried with Laban's idols

under the oak at Shechem were similarly supposed to be god bodies or

coagulated forms of "life substance". All idols were temporary or

permanent bodies of deities, and idols were not necessarily large.

It would seem to be a reasonable conclusion that all the so-called

ornaments found in ancient graves were supposed to have had an

intimate connection with the supernatural beings who gave origin to

and sustained life. These ornaments, or charms, or amulets, imparted

vitality to human beings, because they were regarded as the substance

of life itself. The red jasper worn in the waist girdles of the

ancient Egyptians was reputed, as has been stated, to be a coagulated

drop of the blood of the mother goddess Isis. Blood was the essence

of life.

The red woman or goddess of the Laussel shelter was probably coloured

so as to emphasize her vitalizing attributes; the red colour animated

the image.

An interesting reference in Shakespeare's _Hamlet_ to ancient

burial customs may here be quoted, because it throws light on the

problem under discussion. When Ophelia's body is carried into

the graveyard[34] one of the priests says that as "her death was

doubtful" she should have been buried in "ground unsanctified"--that

is, among the suicides and murderers. Having taken her own life, she

was unworthy of Christian burial, and should be buried in accordance

with Pagan customs. In all our old churchyards the takers of life

were interred on the north side, and apparently in Shakespeare's

day traditional Pagan rites were observed in the burials of those

regarded as Pagans. The priest in _Hamlet_, therefore, says of

Ophelia:

She should in ground unsanctified have lodged

Till the last trumpet; _for charitable prayers,

Shards, flints, and pebbles should be thrown on her_.

[34] _Hamlet_, V. i.

There are no shards (fragments of pottery) in the Crô-Magnon graves,

but flints and pebbles mingle with shells, teeth, and other charms

and amulets. Vast numbers of perforated shells have been found in the

burial caves near Mentone. In one case the shells are so numerous

that they seem to have formed a sort of burial mantle. "Similarly,"

says Professor Osborn, describing another of these finds, "the female

skeleton was enveloped in a bed of shells not perforated; the legs

were extended, while the arms were stretched beside the body; there

were a few pierced shells and a few bits of silex. One of the large

male skeletons of the same grotto had the lower limbs extended,

the upper limbs folded, and was decorated with a gorget and crown

of perforated shells; the head rested on a block of red stone." In

another case "heavy stones protected the body from disturbance; the

head was decorated with a circle of perforated shells _coloured in

red_, and implements of various types were carefully placed on the

forehead and chest". The body of the Combe-Capelle man "was decorated

with a necklace of perforated shells and surrounded with a great

number of fine Aurignacian flints. It appears", adds Osborn, "that

in all the numerous burials of these grottos of Aurignacian age and

industry of the Crô-Magnon race we have the burial standards which

prevailed in western Europe at this time."[35]

[35] _Men of the Old Stone Age_, pp.304-5.

It has been suggested by one of the British archæologists that the

necklaces of perforated cowrie shells and the red pigment found

among the remains of early man in Britain were used by children.

This theory does not accord with the evidence afforded by the

Grimaldi caves, in which the infant skeletons are neither coloured

nor decorated. Occasionally, however, the children were interred in

burial mantles of small perforated shells, while female adults were

sometimes placed in beds of unperforated shells. Shells have been

found in early British graves. These include _Nerita litoralis_, and

even _Patella vulgata_, the common limpet. Holes were rubbed in them

so that they might be strung together. In a megalithic cist unearthed

in Phoenix Park, Dublin, in 1838, two male skeletons had each beside

them perforated shells (_Nerita litoralis_). During the construction

of the Edinburgh and Granton railway there was found beside a

skeleton in a stone cist a quantity of cockle-shell rings. Two dozen

perforated oyster-shells were found in a single Orkney cist. Many

other examples of this kind could be referred to.[36]

[36] A Red Sea cowry shell (_Cyproea minor_) found on the site of

Hurstbourne station (L. & S. W. Railway, main line) in Hampshire,

was associated with "Early Iron Age" artifacts. (Paper read by J.

R. le B. Tomlin at meeting of Linnæan Society, June 14, 1921.)

In the Crô-Magnon caverns are imprints of human hands which had been

laid on rock and then dusted round with coloured earth. In a number

of cases it is shown that one or more finger joints of the left hand

had been cut off.

The practice of finger mutilation among Bushman, Australian, and Red

Indian tribes, is associated with burial customs and the ravages

of disease. A Bushman woman may cut off a joint of one of her

fingers when a near relative is about to die. Red Indians cut off

finger-joints when burying their dead during a pestilence, so as

"to cut off deaths"; they sacrificed a part of the body to save the

whole. In Australia finger mutilation is occasionally practised.

Highland Gaelic stories tell of heroes who lie asleep to gather power

which will enable them to combat with monsters or fierce enemies.

Heroines awake them by cutting off a finger joint, a part of the ear,

or a portion of skin from the scalp.[37]

[37] For references see my _Myths of Crete and Pre-Hellenic

Europe_, pp.30-31.

The colours used in drawings of hands in Palæolithic caves are black,

white, red, and yellow, as the Abbé Breuil has noted. In Spain and

India, the hand prints are supposed to protect dwellings from evil

influences. Horse-shoes, holly with berries, various plants, shells,

&c, are used for a like purpose among those who in our native land

perpetuate ancient customs.

The Arabs have a custom of suspending figures of an open hand from

the necks of their children, and the Turks and Moors paint hands upon

their ships and houses, "as an antidote and counter charm to an evil

eye; for five is with them an unlucky number; and 'five (fingers,

perhaps) in your eyes' is their proverb of cursing and defiance". In

Portugal the hand spell is called the _figa_. Southey suggests that

our common phrase "a fig for him" was derived from the name of the

Portuguese hand amulet.[38]

[38] Notes to _Thalaba_, Book V, Canto 36.

"The figo for thy friendship" is an interesting reference by

Shakespeare.[39] Fig or figo is probably from _fico_, a snap of

the fingers, which in French is _faire la figue_, and in Italian

_far le fiche_. Finger snapping had no doubt originally a magical

significance.

[39] _Henry V_, V, iii, 6.

Ancient Man in Britain · 第 4 / 17 章