II.--AN IMMATERIAL SUBSTANCE CANNOT EXIST.

1. We shall first endeavour to show what is absolutely _essential_

to the existence of all substance. It will be generally admitted

that space is essential to existence. Space, being boundless, all

substances must exist in space. Space is not the property of substance,

but the place of its existence. Infinite space has no qualities or

properties of any description excepting divisibility. Some eminent

philosophers have supposed _extension_ to be a property of space, but

such a supposition is absurd. Extension is space itself, and not a

property of space. As well might we say that _azote_ is a property of

nitrogen, whereas they are only two different names given to the same

substance, as to say that extension is a property of space. Infinite

space is divisible, but otherwise it cannot possibly be described,

for it has no other properties or qualities by which to describe it.

It has no boundaries--no figure--no other conceivable properties of

any description. It has a variety of names such as space, extension,

volume, magnitude, distance, &c., all of which are synonymous terms.

2. Duration is also essential to the existence of substance. There

can be no such thing as existence without duration. Duration, like

infinite space, is divisible, but otherwise it has no properties or

qualities of any description. Like space we can call it by different

names, as duration, time, period, &c; but to give it any other kind of

description would be absolutely impossible. Infinite space can only

be distinguished from duration by certain imaginary qualities, which

can be assigned to finite portions of it, but which cannot be assigned

to duration. We can conceive of cubical, prismatical and spherical

portions of space, but we cannot conceive of portions of duration under

any kind of shape. Both space and duration are entirely powerless,

being immovable, yet both are susceptible _of division_ to infinity.

To assist us in our future remarks we shall give the following

definitions:--

_Definition_ 1_.--_SPACE is magnitude, susceptible of division.

_Definition_ 2.--A POINT is the negative of space, or the zero at which

a magnitude begins or terminates; it is not susceptible of division.

_Definition_ 3.--DURATION is not magnitude, but time susceptible of

division.

_Definition_ 4.--AN INSTANT is the negative of duration, or the zero at

which duration begins or terminates; it is not susceptible of division.

_Definition_ 5.--MATTER is something that occupies space between any

two instants, and is susceptible of division and of being removed from

one portion of space to another.

_Definition_ 6.--NOTHING is the negative of space, of duration, and of

matter; it is the zero of all existence.

3. Modern immaterialists freely admit, as we have already shown, that

"_a disembodied spirit_" is NOWHERE. "We must no longer allow ourselves

to imagine," says the immaterialist, "that it is or can be, in any

place." (Taylor's Physical Theory of another Life. Chapter II.) But

that which does not occupy any place or space, has no magnitude, and is

not susceptible of division; therefore it must be an unextended _point_

or _nothing--_(see definitions 2 and 6,) the negative of both space and

matter, that is, the negative of all existence. _Immateriality_ is a

representative of _nothing: immaterial_ substance is only another name

for _no_ substance; therefore such a substance does not, and cannot

exist.

4. Having shown that an immaterial substance can have no existence,

because it has no relation to space, we shall next show that it can

have no existence, because it has no relation to duration. Isaac

Taylor says, "that which is wholly abstracted from matter, and in

speaking of which we deny that it has any property in common therewith,

_can in itself be subjected to none of its_ CONDITIONS." One of the

_conditions_ absolutely essential to the existence of matter is

duration or time. (See definition 5.) That which is not subjected

to the condition of duration, must be subjected to the condition of

an instant, which is the negative of duration; but nothing is also

the negative of duration and of substance; (see definition 4 and 6;)

therefore that which has no duration is _nothing,_ and cannot be a

substance; hence an immaterial substance cannot exist.

There are many truths which may be called FIRST TRUTHS, or self-evident

truths, which cannot be demonstrated, because there are no truths of

a simpler nature that can be adduced to establish them. Such truths

are the foundation of all reasoning. They must be admitted without

demonstration, because they are self-evident. That space and duration

are essential conditions to the existence of all substance, may be

denominated a self-evident truth; if so, it is useless to undertake to

prove it. And in this case, the foregoing need not be considered as a

demonstration, but merely different forms of expression representing

the same self-evident truth.

Absurdities of immaterialism · 第 4 / 10 题