BABYLONIAN AND ASSYRIAN LETTERS.

A very large number of letters have been preserved to us from all

periods of Babylonian and Assyrian history. Many of them are addressed

to private correspondents, and concern matters of everyday life. They

are often most obscure, as they assume so much knowledge on the part of

the recipient which is withheld from us. Where we can grasp their

reference they furnish considerable light upon social conditions.

A large number, however, are royal letters or dispatches from the king

and his officers to subordinates, or _vice versa_. These more often

concern public affairs.

As yet few letters have come down to us which we can date before the

First Dynasty of Babylon, but some will be found in the _Inventaire des

tablettes de Tello_ (see p. 80), and among the various publications of

Temple accounts and contracts, as early as the times of Sargon of Akkad.

In the _Beiträge zur Assyriologie_, vol. ii, pp. 557-64, 572-9, MEISSNER

published _Altbabylonische Briefe_ (1893), with discussions.

In the times of Hammurabi, or the First Dynasty of Babylon, our sources

for epistolary correspondence become very ample. L. W. KING in his

magnificent work, _The Letters and Inscriptions of Hammurabi, King of

Babylon, about B. C. 2200; to which is added a series of letters of

other Kings of the First Dynasty of Babylon_ (vol. i, _Introduction and

Babylonian Texts_; vol. ii, _Babylonian Texts_, continued; vol. iii,

_English Translation, Commentary, Vocabularies, Introduction, etc._,

London, Luzac & Co., 1898), gave a complete edition of these letters.

The materials for history and social life were epoch-making. In the

_Beiträge zur Assyriologie_ G. NAGEL translated a number of these texts,

_Briefe Hammurabi’s an Sin-iddinam_, vol. iv, pp. 434-83, to which FR.

DELITZSCH added _Zusatzbemerkungen_, pp. 483-500. He, with J. A.

KNUDTZON, wrote on the same subject, vol. iv, pp. 88-100. M. W.

MONTGOMERY took _Briefe aus der Zeit des babylonischen Königs Hammurabi_

as subject for her doctor’s dissertation (Leipzig, Pries, 1901). A.

KLOSTERMANN published _Ein diplomatischer Briefwechsel aus dem 2.

Jahrtausend v. Chr._ (Leipzig, Deichert, 1903). C. V. GELDEREN

contributed _Ausgewählte babylonisch-assyrische Briefe_ to the _Beiträge

zur Assyriologie_, iv, 1902, pp. 501-45. Another great collection was

published by THUREAU-DANGIN in _Lettres et contrats de l’époque de la

première dynastie babylonienne_ (Paris, P. Geuthner, 1910). The author

transliterated, translated, and commented upon three of these texts as

_Lettres de l’époque de la première dynastie babylonienne_ in _The

Hilprecht Anniversary Volume_, pp. 156-63.

_Les Lettres de Hammurapi à Sin-idinnam, transcription, traduction et

commentaire, précédées d’une étude sur deux caractères du style

assyro-babylonien_, by F. C. JEAN (Paris, J. Gabalda, 1913), gives an

idea of the subject.

P. S. LANDERSDORFER, in 1908, had edited _Altbabylonische Privatbriefe,

transkribiert, übersetzt und kommentiert, nebst einer Einleitung und 4

Registern_ (Paderborn, Schöningh), and G. A. BARTON gave an article _On

an old Babylonian Letter addressed to Lushtamar_ in the _Journal of the

American Oriental Society_, pp. 220-22.

A. SCHOLLMEYER wrote on _Altbabylonische Privatbriefe_ in _Babyloniaca_,

vi, pp. 57-64, 1912, and in 1911 published _Neuveröffentlichte

altbabylonische Briefe und ihre Bedeutung für die Kultur des Orients:

Sechs Vorträge vor der Hildesheimer Generalversammlung_ (Köln, P.

Bachem).

E. EBELING contributed to the _Revue d’Assyriologie_, 1913, pp. 15 ff.,

105-56, articles on _Altbabylonische Briefe_. _The First Letter of

Rîm-Sin, King of Larsa_, was published by ST. LANGDON in the

_Proceedings of the Society for Biblical Archaeology_, 1911, pp. 221-2.

The period of the Third or Kassite Dynasty has not yet yielded much.

H. RADAU made as much as possible out of a number of fragments found at

Nippur in vol. xvii, 1 of Series A of _The Publications of the

Babylonian Expedition of the University of Pennsylvania_ called _Letters

to Cassite Kings from the Temple Archives of Nippur_ (1908).

Very little more is known of Epistolary Literature till we reach the

Sargonide Dynasty in Assyria. With the Library of Ashurbanipal at

Nineveh were found a large number of letters and dispatches, alike

royal, public and private, Assyrian and Neo-babylonian, which early

attracted notice. S. A. SMITH published a number from the collections in

the British Museum in his _Assyrian Letters from the Royal Library at

Nineveh, transcribed, translated, and explained_ (Leipzig, Pfeiffer,

1887-1888), and in _Miscellaneous Assyrian Texts of the British Museum

with Textual Notes_ (Leipzig, Pfeiffer, 1887), besides a series of

articles in the _Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology_ for

1887-1888 called _Assyrian Letters_.

The present writer dealt with _Sennacherib’s Letters to his Father

Sargon_, in the _Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology_,

1895, pp. 220-39. FR. DELITZSCH in the _Beiträge zur Assyriologie_, vol.

i, pp. 185-248, 613-31, and vol. ii, pp. 19-62, under the title _Zur

assyrisch-babylonischen Briefliteratur_, laid deep the foundations of

the study of letters, editing many fresh texts (1890-1894). H. WINCKLER

published a large number of letters in his _Sammlung von

Keilschrifttexten_ (Leipzig, Pfeiffer, 1894). T. G. PINCHES published

_Zwei assyrische Briefe_ (Leipzig, Pfeiffer, 1887).

R. F. HARPER has continued to edit the _Assyrian and Babylonian Letters

belonging to the Kouyunjik Collections of the British Museum_, vol. i,

1892; vol. ii, 1893; vol. iii, 1896; vol. iv, 1896; vol. v, 1900; vol.

vi, 1902; vol. vii, 1902; vol. viii, 1902; vol. ix, 1909; vol. x, 1911;

vol. xi, 1911; vol. xii, 1913; vol. xiii, 1913 (Chicago University

Press; Luzac & Co., London), which will contain all the British Museum

collections from Nineveh. These copies have been made with the greatest

care, and constitute the chief source of this material up to the present

time. Numerous works have been built upon them as foundation.

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSTON wrote on _The Epistolary Literature of the

Assyrians and Babylonians_ (Baltimore, 1898), reprinted from _Journal of

the American Oriental Society_. E. BEHRENS published in 1906 his

_Assyrisch-babylonische Briefe kultischen Inhalts aus der

Sargonidenzeit_ (Leipzig, Pries, 1905). LEHMANN-HAUPT gave _Zwei

unveröffentlichte Keilschrifttexte_ in _Hilprecht Anniversary Volume_

(1909), pp. 256-8.

In 1910 came M. ZEITLIN’S _Le style administratif chez les Assyriens;

choix de lettres assyriennes et babyloniennes, transcrites, traduites et

accompagnées de notes_ (Paris, Geuthner). In the _Zeitschrift für

Assyriologie_ C. BEZOLD gave _Zwei assyrische Berichte_ (vol. xxvi,

1912, p. 114-25).

In 1911, E. G. KLAUBER wrote _Zur babylonisch-assyrischen

Briefliteratur_ in _Babyloniaca_, iv, pp. 180-86; and in 1912 _Zur

Politik und Kultur der Sargonidenzeit: Untersuchungen auf Grand der

Brieftexte_ in the January and July numbers of vol. xxviii of the

_American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures_. In the January

number of this volume also appeared L. WATERMAN’S _Textual Notes on the

Letters of the Sargon Period_. A most valuable contribution to an

obscure period of Ashurbanipal’s reign was made by H. H. FIGULLA, _Der

Briefwechsel Bêlibni’s: Historische Urkunden aus der Zeit Asurbanipals_,

in _Mitteilungen der Vorderasiatischen Gesellschaft_ (Leipzig, Hinrichs,

1912). E. G. KLAUBER, in 1910, published _Assyrisches Beamtentum nach

Briefen aus der Sargonidenzeit_ (Leipzig, Hinrichs), and in _Der alte

Orient_, xii, Heft 2, _Keilschriftbriefe: Staat und Gesellschaft in der

babylonisch-assyrischen Briefliteratur_ (Leipzig, Hinrichs, 1911). V.

SCHEIL under the title _Diplomatica_ dealt with similar texts in the

_Hilprecht Anniversary Volume_, pp. 873 ff.

Letters of the Neo-Babylonian period are numerous but not much

published. R. C. THOMPSON published _Late Babylonian Letters_ (London,

Luzac & Co., 1906) with translations, &c. FR. MARTIN gave _Lettres

néo-babyloniennes_ (Paris, Champion, 1909), and _Trois lettres

néo-babyloniennes_ in the _Hilprecht Anniversary Volume_, 1909. In the

_Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology_, 1911, pp. 157-8,

T. G. PINCHES published _Two late Babylonian Letters_.

The Relations between the Laws of Babylonia and the Laws of the Hebrew Peoples The Schweich Lectures · 第 21 / 27 题