IV. TRANSLATIONS ALONE.

Of translations there was early no lack. SCHEIL’s appeared in October,

1902, WINCKLER’s first, the following month. _The Oldest Code of Laws in

the World_, a baldly literal translation of the Code alone, with a short

introduction and index of subjects by C. H. W. JOHNS, appeared in

February, 1903 (T. & T. Clark, Edinburgh).

_Le leggi di Hammurabi re di Babilonia (a. 2285-2242 a. C.) con

prefazione e note_, by P. BONFANTE (Milano, 1903), and _Il codice di

Hammurabi e la Bibbia_, by FR. MARI (Roma, Desclée, 1903), witness to

the interest shown in Italy.

In the _New York Independent_ for December 11, 18, 1902, and January 8,

15, 22, 1903, W. HAYES WARD gave a translation of the Code, following

WINCKLER closely; as did C. F. KENT in his article, _The Recently

Discovered Civil Code of Hammurabi_, published in the _Biblical World_

(Chicago University Press, March, 1903).

A translation of the Code also appeared in W. ST. CHAD BOSCAWEN’s _The

First of Empires_, along with comments and notes. The book presented a

clear and readable account of the life and times of Hammurabi and the

dynasty to which he belonged. It gave many interesting views upon

Babylonian history and the relations to Israelite legislation; but it

must be used with great caution, as it is often inaccurate and full of

misprints (London and New York, Harper’s, 1903).

The many criticisms which had appeared on his first translation and the

desirability of a less expensive presentation led V. SCHEIL, in 1903, to

put out a fresh translation as _La loi de Hammurabi_ (Paris, E. Leroux);

in which, however, he accepted little from his critics. A second edition

came out in 1904.

Other translations have appeared in connexion with particular

discussions. Thus the present writer was induced to set out a fresh

translation for his _Babylonian and Assyrian Laws, Contracts, and

Letters_ in the _Library of Ancient Inscriptions_ (Edinburgh, T. & T.

Clark, 1904). This work covered most of the helps to the study of the

subjects referred to in this survey available up to that date. R. W.

ROGERS included an excellent translation and transliteration of the text

in his useful work, _Cuneiform Parallels to the Old Testament_ (Oxford,

Clarendon Press, 1912).

Several of those who have discussed the relation of the Code to the laws

of Moses have given translations based upon SCHEIL, WINCKLER, or MÜLLER.

_The Hammurabi Code and the Sinaitic Legislation_, by CHILPERIC EDWARDS

(London, Watts & Co., 1904), _The Codes of Hammurabi and_ _Moses_, W.

W. DAVIES (New York, Eaton & Maine, 1905), _The Code of Hammurabi_, by

C. H. W. JOHNS, in the Extra Volume of _A Dictionary of the Bible_

(Edinburgh, T. & T. Clark, 1904), pp. 584-612, may be named. In the

second and third editions of his excellent work, _The Old Testament in

the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and

Babylonia_ (London, S. P. C. K., 1903), T. G. PINCHES translated the

Code (1903, pp. 487-536; 1908, pp. 487-538). The treatment is full of

acute observation and accurate scholarship.

A. UNGNAD has contributed a fresh translation to _Altorientalische Texte

und Bilder zum alten Testamente, herausgegeben von_ H. GRESSMANN,

_erster Band_, pp. 140-71 (Tübingen, J. C. B. Mohr, 1909).

The Relations between the Laws of Babylonia and the Laws of the Hebrew Peoples The Schweich Lectures · 第 13 / 27 题