Each day brought to the Brahmans its routine of ceremonies, studies, and

duties. Their whole life was mapped out into four clearly defined stages

of discipline. For their existence, in its full religious significance,

commenced not at birth, but on being invested at the close of childhood

with the sacred thread of the Twice-born. Their youth and early manhood

were to be entirely spent in learning the Veda by heart from an older

Brahman, tending the sacred fire, and serving their preceptor. Having

completed his long studies, the young Brahman entered on the second

stage of his life, as a householder. He married, and commenced a course

of family duties. When he had reared a family, and gained a practical

knowledge of the world, he retired into the forest as a recluse, for the

third period of his life; feeding on roots or fruits, practising his

religious duties with increased devotion. The fourth stage was that of

the ascetic or religious mendicant, wholly withdrawn from earthly

affairs, and striving to attain a condition of mind which, heedless of

the joys, or pains, or wants of the body, is intent only on its final

absorption into the deity. The Brahman, in this fourth stage of his

life, ate nothing but what was given to him unasked, and abode not more

than one day in any village, lest the vanities of the world should find

entrance into his heart. This was the ideal life prescribed for a

Brahman, and ancient Indian literature shows that it was to a large

extent practically carried out. Throughout his whole existence the true

Brahman practised a strict temperance; drinking no wine, using a simple

diet, curbing the desires; shut off from the tumults of war, as his

business was to pray, not to fight, and having his thoughts ever fixed

on study and contemplation. "What is this world?" says a Brahman sage.

"It is even as the bough of a tree, on which a bird rests for a night,

and in the morning flies away."

The Brahmans, therefore, were a body of men who, in an early stage of

this world's history, bound themselves by a rule of life the essential

precepts of which were self-culture and self-restraint. The Brahmans of

the present India are the result of 3000 years of hereditary education

and temperance; and they have evolved a type of mankind quite distinct

from the surrounding population. Even the passing traveller in India

marks them out, alike from the bronze-cheeked, large-limbed,

leisure-loving Rajput or Kchatryas, the warrior caste of Aryan descent;

and from the dark-skinned, flat-nosed, thick-lipped low castes of

non-Aryan origin, with their short bodies and bullet heads. The Brahman

stands apart from both, tall and slim, with finely-modelled lips and

nose, fair complexion, high forehead, and slightly cocoanut shaped

skull--the man of self-centred refinement. He is an example of a class

becoming the ruling power in a country, not by force of arms, but by

the vigor of hereditary culture and temperance. One race has swept

across India after another, dynasties have risen and fallen, religions

have spread themselves over the land and disappeared. But since the dawn

of history the Brahman has calmly ruled; swaying the minds and receiving

the homage of the people, and accepted by foreign nations as the highest

type of Indian mankind. The position which the Brahmans won resulted in

no small measure from the benefits which they bestowed. For their own

Aryan countrymen they developed a noble language and literature. The

Brahmans were not only the priests and philosophers, but also the

lawgivers, the men of science and the poets of their race. Their

influence on the aboriginal peoples, the hill and forest races of India,

was even more important. To these rude remnants of the flint and stone

ages they brought in ancient times a knowledge of the metals and the

gods.

As a social league, Hinduism arranged the people into the old division

of the "Twice-born" Aryan castes, namely, the Brahmans, Kchatryas,

Vaisyas; and the "Once-born" castes, consisting of the non-Aryan Sudras

and the classes of mixed descent. This arrangement of the Indian races

remains to the present day. The "Twice-born" castes still wear the

sacred thread, and claim a joint, although an unequal, inheritance in

the holy books of the Veda. The "Once-born" castes are still denied the

sacred thread; and they were not allowed to study the holy books, until

the English set up schools in India for all classes of the people. But

while caste is thus founded on the distinctions of race, it has been

influenced by two other systems of division, namely, the employments of

the people, and the localities in which they live. Even in the oldest

times, the castes had separate occupations assigned to them. They could

be divided either into Brahmans, Kchatryas, Vaisyas, and Sudras; or into

priests, warriors, husbandmen, and serfs. They are also divided

according to the parts of India in which they live. Even the Brahmans

have among themselves ten distinct classes, or rather nations. Five of

these classes or Brahman nations live to the north of the Vindhya

mountains; five of them live to the south. Each of the ten feels itself

to be quite apart from the rest; and they have among themselves no

fewer than 1886 subdivisions or separate Brahmanical tribes. In like

manner, the Kchatryas or Rajputs number 590 separate tribes in different

parts of India.

While, therefore, Indian caste seems at first a very simple arrangement

of the people into four classes, it is in reality a very complex one.

For it rests upon three distinct systems of division: namely, upon race,

occupation, and geographical position. It is very difficult even to

guess at the number of the Indian castes. But there are not fewer than

3,000 of them which have separate names, and which regard themselves as

separate classes. The different castes cannot intermarry with each

other, and most of them cannot eat together. The ordinary rule is that

no Hindu of good caste can touch food cooked by a man of inferior caste.

By rights, too, each caste should keep to its own occupation. Indeed,

there has been a tendency to erect every separate kind of employment or

handicraft in each separate province into a distinct caste. But, as a

matter of practice, the castes often change their occupation, and the

lower ones sometimes raise themselves in the social scale. Thus the

Vaisya caste were in ancient times the tillers of the soil. They have in

most provinces given up this toilsome occupation, and the Vaisyas are

now the great merchants and bankers of India. Their fair skins,

intelligent faces, and polite bearing must have altered since the days

when their forefathers ploughed, sowed, and reaped under the hot sun.

Such changes of employment still occur on a smaller scale throughout

India.

The system of caste exercises a great influence upon the industries of

the people. Each caste is, in the first place, a trade-guild. It insures

the proper training of the youth of its own special craft; it makes

rules for the conduct of the caste-trade; it promotes good feeling by

feasts or social gatherings. The famous manufactures of mediæval India,

its muslins, silks, cloth of gold, inlaid weapons, and exquisite work in

precious stones--were brought to perfection under the care of the castes

or trade-guilds. Such guilds may still be found in full work in many

parts of India, Thus, in the northwestern districts of Bombay all heads

of artisan families are ranged under their proper trade-guild. The

trade-guild or caste prevents undue competition among the members, and

upholds the interest of its own body in any dispute arising with other

craftsmen.

In 1873, for example, a number of the bricklayers in Ahmadabad could not

find work. Men of this class sometimes added to their daily wages by

rising very early in the morning, and working overtime. But when several

families complained that they could not get employment, the bricklayers'

guild met, and decided that as there was not enough work for all, no

member should be allowed to work in extra hours. In the same city, the

cloth dealers in 1872 tried to cut down the wages of the sizers or men

who dress the cotton cloth. The sizers' guild refused to work at lower

rates, and remained six weeks on strike. At length they arranged their

dispute, and both the trade-guilds signed a stamped agreement fixing the

rates for the future. Each of the higher castes or trade-guilds in

Ahmadabad receives a fee from young men on entering their business. The

revenue derived from these fees, and from fines upon members who break

caste rules, is spent in feasts to the brethren of the guild, and in

helping the poorer craftsmen or their orphans. A favorite plan of

raising money in Surat is for the members of the trade to keep a certain

day as a holiday, and to shut up all their shops except one. The right

to keep open this one shop is put up to auction, and the amount bid is

expended on a feast. The trade-guild or caste allows none of its members

to starve. It thus acts as a mutual assurance society and takes the

place of a poor-law in India. The severest social penalty which can be

inflicted upon a Hindu is to be put out of his caste.

Hinduism is, however, not only a social league resting upon caste--it is

also a religious alliance based upon worship. As the various race

elements of the Indian people have been welded into caste, so the simple

old beliefs of the Veda, the mild doctrines of Buddha, and the fierce

rites of the non-Aryan tribes, have been thrown into the melting-pot,

and poured out thence as a mixture of precious metal and dross, to be

worked up into the complex worship of the Hindu gods.

FALL OF TROY

B.C. 1184

GEORGE GROTE

The siege of Troy is an event not to be reckoned as history,

although Herodotus, the "Father of History," speaks of it as such,

and it would be quite impossible to understand the history and

character of the Greek people without a study of the _Iliad_ and

_Odyssey_ poems attributed to "a blind bard of Scio's

isle"--immortal Homer. The campaign of the Greek heroes in Asia is

to be referred to a hazy point in the past when Europe was just

beginning to have an Eastern Question. A vast circle of tales and

poems has gathered round this mythical event, and the _Iliad_--Song

of Ilium, or Troy--is still a poem of unfailing interest and

fascination.

Ilium, or Troy, was a city of Asia Minor, a little south of the

Hellespont. It was the centre of a powerful state, Grecian in race

and language; and when Paris, son of King Priam, visited Sparta and

carried off the beautiful wife of Menelaus, king of Sparta, all the

heroes of Greece banded together and invaded Priam's dominions.

The twelve hundred ships that sailed for Troy transported one

hundred thousand warriors to the valley of Simois and Scamander.

Among them was Agamemnon, "king of men," brother of Menelaus. He

was the leader, and in his train were Achilles, "swift of foot";

"god-like, wise" Ulysses, King of Ithaca, the two Ajaxes, and the

aged Nestor. The narrative of their adventures is told in the

Homeric poems with a power of musical expression, a charm of

language, and a vividness of imagery unsurpassed in poetry.

For ten years the besiegers encircled the city of Priam. After many

engagements and single combats on "the windy plain of Troy" the

great hero of the Greeks, Achilles of Thessaly, is wronged by

Agamemnon, who carries away Briseis, a fair captive girl allotted

as the spoils of war to the "Swift-footed." The hero of Thessaly

thenceforth refuses to join in the war, and sullenly shuts himself

up in his tent. It is only when his dear friend Patroclus has been

slain by the valiant Hector, eldest son of Priam, that he sallies

forth, meets Hector in single combat, and finally slays him.

Achilles then attaches the body of Hector to his chariot and

insultingly trails it in the dust as he drives three times around

the walls of Troy. The _Iliad_ closes with the funeral rites

celebrated over the corpse of Hector.

We now arrive at the capital and culminating point of the Grecian

epic--the two sieges and captures of Troy, with the destinies of the

dispersed heroes, Trojan as well as Grecian, after the second and most

celebrated capture and destruction of the city.

It would require a large volume to convey any tolerable idea of the vast

extent and expansion of this interesting fable, first handled by so many

poets, epic, lyric, and tragic, with their endless additions,

transformations, and contradictions,--then purged and recast by

historical inquirers, who, under color of setting aside the

exaggerations of the poets, introduced a new vein of prosaic

invention,--lastly, moralized and allegorized by philosophers. In the

present brief outline of the general field of Grecian legend, or of that

which the Greeks believed to be their antiquities, the Trojan war can be

regarded as only one among a large number of incidents upon which

Hecatæus and Herodotus looked back as constituting their fore-time.

Taken as a special legendary event, it is, indeed, of wider and larger

interest than any other, but it is a mistake to single it out from the

rest as if it rested upon a different and more trustworthy basis. I

must, therefore, confine myself to an abridged narrative of the current

and leading facts; and amid the numerous contradictory statements which

are to be found respecting every one of them, I know no better ground of

preference than comparative antiquity, though even the oldest tales

which we possess--those contained in the _Iliad_--evidently presuppose

others of prior date.

The primitive ancestor of the Trojan line of kings is Dardanus, son of

Zeus, founder and eponymus of Dardania: in the account of later authors,

Dardanus was called the son of Zeus by Electra, daughter of Atlas, and

was further said to have come from Samothrace, or from Arcadia, or from

Italy; but of this Homer mentions nothing. The first Dardanian town

founded by him was in a lofty position on the descent of Mount Ida; for

he was not yet strong enough to establish himself on the plain. But his

son Erichthonius, by the favor of Zeus, became the wealthiest of

mankind. His flocks and herds having multiplied, he had in his pastures

three thousand mares, the offspring of some of whom, by Boreas, produced

horses of preternatural swiftness. Tros, the son of Erichthonius, and

the eponym of the Trojans, had three sons--Ilus, Assaracus, and the

beautiful Ganymedes, whom Zeus stole away to become his cup-bearer in

Olympus, giving to his father Tros, as the price of the youth, a team of

immortal horses.

From Ilus and Assaracus the Trojan and Dardanian lines diverge; the

former passing from Ilus to Laomedon, Priam, and Hector; the latter from

Assaracus to Capys, Anchises, and Æneas. Ilus founded in the plain of

Troy the holy city of Ilium; Assaracus and his descendants remained

sovereigns of Dardania.

It was under the proud Laomedon, son of Ilus, that Poseidon and Apollo

underwent, by command of Zeus, a temporary servitude; the former

building the walls of the town, the latter tending the flocks and herds.

When their task was completed and the penal period had expired, they

claimed the stipulated reward; but Laomedon angrily repudiated their

demand, and even threatened to cut off their ears, to tie them hand and

foot, and to sell them in some distant island as slaves. He was punished

for this treachery by a sea-monster, whom Poseidon sent to ravage his

fields and to destroy his subjects. Laomedon publicly offered the

immortal horses given by Zeus to his father Tros, as a reward to any one

who would destroy the monster. But an oracle declared that a virgin of

noble blood must be surrendered to him, and the lot fell upon Hesione,

daughter of Laomedon himself. Heracles, arriving at this critical

moment, killed the monster by the aid of a fort built for him by Athene

and the Trojans, so as to rescue both the exposed maiden and the people;

but Laomedon, by a second act of perfidy, gave him mortal horses in

place of the matchless animals which had been promised. Thus defrauded

of his due, Heracles equipped six ships, attacked and captured Troy, and

killed Laomedon, giving Hesione to his friend and auxiliary Telamon, to

whom she bore the celebrated archer Teucros. A painful sense of this

expedition was preserved among the inhabitants of the historical town of

Ilium, who offered no worship to Heracles.

Among all the sons of Laomedon, Priam was the only one who had

remonstrated against the refusal of the well-earned guerdon of

Heracles; for which the hero recompensed him by placing him on the

throne. Many and distinguished were his sons and daughters, as well by

his wife Hecuba, daughter of Cisseus, as by other women. Among the sons

were Hector, Paris, Deiphobus, Helenus, Troilus, Polites, Polydorus;

among the daughters, Laodice, Creusa, Polyxena, and Cassandra.

The birth of Paris was preceded by formidable presage; for Hecuba

dreamed that she was delivered of a firebrand, and Priam, on consulting

the soothsayers, was informed that the son about to be born would prove

fatal to him. Accordingly he directed the child to be exposed on Mount

Ida; but the inauspicious kindness of the gods preserved him; and he

grew up amid the flocks and herds, active and beautiful, fair of hair

and symmetrical in person, and the special favorite of Aphrodite.

It was to this youth, in his solitary shepherd's walk on Mount Ida, that

the three goddesses, Here, Athene, and Aphrodite, were conducted, in

order that he might determine the dispute respecting their comparative

beauty, which had arisen at the nuptials of Peleus and Thetis,--a

dispute brought about in pursuance of the arrangement, and in

accomplishment of the deep-laid designs of Zeus. For Zeus, remarking

with pain the immoderate numbers of the then existing heroic race,

pitied the earth for the overwhelming burden which she was compelled to

bear, and determined to lighten it by exciting a destructive and

long-continued war. Paris awarded the palm of beauty to Aphrodite, who

promised him in recompense the possession of Helen, wife of the Spartan

Menelaus,--the daughter of Zeus and the fairest of living women. At the

instance of Aphrodite, ships were built for him, and he embarked on the

enterprise so fraught with eventual disaster to his native city, in

spite of the menacing prophecies of his brother Helenus, and the always

neglected warnings of Cassandra.

Paris, on arriving at Sparta, was hospitably entertained by Menelaus as

well as by Castor and Pollux, and was enabled to present the rich gifts

which he had brought to Helen. Menelaus then departed to Crete, leaving

Helen to entertain his Trojan guest--a favorable moment, which was

employed by Aphrodite to bring about the intrigue and the elopement.

Paris carried away with him both Helen and a large sum of money

belonging to Menelaus, made a prosperous voyage to Troy, and arrived

there safely with his prize on the third day.

Menelaus, informed by Iris in Crete of the perfidious return made by

Paris for his hospitality, hastened home in grief and indignation to

consult with his brother Agamemnon, as well as with the venerable

Nestor, on the means of avenging the outrage. They made known the event

to the Greek chiefs around them, among whom they found universal

sympathy; Nestor, Palamedes, and others went round to solicit aid in a

contemplated attack of Troy, under the command of Agamemnon, to whom

each chief promised both obedience and unwearied exertion until Helen

should be recovered. Ten years were spent in equipping the expedition.

The goddesses Here and Athene, incensed at the preference given by Paris

to Aphrodite, and animated by steady attachment to Argos, Sparta, and

Mycenæ, took an active part in the cause, and the horses of Here were

fatigued with her repeated visits to the different parts of Greece.

By such efforts a force was at length assembled at Aulis in Boeotia,

consisting of 1,186 ships and more than one hundred thousand men--a

force outnumbering by more than ten to one anything that the Trojans

themselves could oppose, and superior to the defenders of Troy even with

all her allies included. It comprised heroes with their followers from

the extreme points of Greece--from the northwestern portions of Thessaly

under Mount Olympus, as well as the western islands of Dulichium and

Ithaca, and the eastern islands of Crete and Rhodes. Agamemnon himself

contributed 100 ships manned with the subjects of his kingdom Mycenæ,

besides furnishing 60 ships to the Arcadians, who possessed none of

their own. Menelaus brought with him 60 ships, Nestor from Pylus, 90,

Idomeneus from Crete and Diomedes from Argos, 80 each. Forty ships were

manned by the Elians, under four different chiefs; the like number under

Meges from Dulichium and the Echinades, and under Thoas from Calydon and

the other Ætolian towns. Odysseus from Ithaca, and Ajax from Salamis,

brought 12 ships each. The Abantes from Euboea, under Elphenor, filled

40 vessels; the Boeotians, under Peneleos and Leitus, 50; the

inhabitants of Orchomenus and Aspledon, 30; the light-armed Locrians,

under Ajax son of Oileus, 40; the Phocians as many. The Athenians, under

Menestheus, a chief distinguished for his skill in marshalling an army,

mustered 50 ships; the Myrmidons from Phthia and Hellas, under Achilles,

assembled in 50 ships; Protesilaus from Phylace and Pyrasus, and

Eurypylus from Ormenium, each came with 40 ships; Machaon and

Podaleirius, from Trikka, with 30; Eumelus, from Pheræ and the lake

Boebeis, with 11; and Philoctetes from Meliboea with 7; the Lapithæ,

under Polypoetes, son of Peirithous, filled 40 vessels, the Ænianes and

Perrhæbians, under Guneus, 22; and the Magnetes, under Prothous, 40;

these last two were from the northernmost parts of Thessaly, near the

mountains Pelion and Olympus. From Rhodes, under Tlepolemus, son of

Heracles, appeared 9 ships; from Syme, under the comely but effeminate

Nireus, 3; from Cos, Crapathus, and the neighboring islands, 30, under

the orders of Pheidippus and Antiphus, sons of Thessalus and grandsons

of Heracles.

Among this band of heroes were included the distinguished warriors Ajax

and Diomedes, and the sagacious Nestor; while Agamemnon himself,

scarcely inferior to either of them in prowess, brought with him a high

reputation for prudence in command. But the most marked and conspicuous

of all were Achilles and Odysseus; the former a beautiful youth born of

a divine mother, swift in the race, of fierce temper and irresistible

might; the latter not less efficient as an ally, from his eloquence, his

untiring endurance, his inexhaustible resources under difficulty, and

the mixture of daring courage with deep-laid cunning which never

deserted him: the blood of the arch-deceiver Sisyphus, through an

illicit connection with his mother Anticleia, was said to flow in his

veins, and he was especially patronized and protected by the goddess

Athene. Odysseus, unwilling at first to take part in the expedition, had

even simulated insanity; but Palamedes, sent to Ithaca to invite him,

tested the reality of his madness by placing in the furrow where

Odysseus was ploughing his infant son Telemachus. Thus detected,

Odysseus could not refuse to join the Achæan host, but the prophet

Halitherses predicted to him that twenty years would elapse before he

revisited his native land. To Achilles the gods had promised the full

effulgence of heroic glory before the walls of Troy; nor could the

place be taken without both his coöperation and that of his son after

him. But they had forewarned him that this brilliant career would be

rapidly brought to a close; and that if he desired a long life, he must

remain tranquil and inglorious in his native land. In spite of the

reluctance of his mother Thetis he preferred few years with bright

renown, and joined the Achæan host. When Nestor and Odysseus came to

Phthia to invite him, both he and his intimate friend Patroclus eagerly

obeyed the call.

The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 01 · 第 8 / 37 段