I think it a very able and valuable Magazine.

* * * * *

_Frank Holland, Cement, Cal._

Yours of recent date received. As I wrote to you some time ago, I am a

migratory cuss, and therefore rely upon the news-stands for my magazine.

I read WATSON’S, _Everybody’s_ and _McClure’s_, regularly, and any others

that in glancing over, interest me. I have no time to read stories. What

I want is political and scientific.

I like WATSON’S. Prize it highly and after reading it, treat it as I do

all the others, i. e., hand it to someone else to read. I cannot suggest

any way in which your work can be improved. I will do what I can to

induce others to read your Magazine.

* * * * *

_S. M. McDougal, Arkinda, Ark._

I think it all right. Just what we need. I don’t see that I can add

anything better to it. I am doing all I can for you.

I am 60 years old, and have been a reformer ever since Tilden ran for

President. I said then there wasn’t a hair’s length difference in the old

parties.

* * * * *

_John S. Van Dyck, Van Dyck, Tenn._

Your Magazine is simply grand, glorious, rich and racy. It makes ’em

wiggle.

I consider Tom Watson the grandest, greatest and most brilliant man of

this or any other age, and may God grant him strength to continue the

fight for human liberty and human right until the fight is won.

* * * * *

_C. E. Skinner, Modoc, Ind._

I am very much interested in the wave of reform that is sweeping over our

country as indicated by the recent elections. Keep hammering away, Bro.

Watson, you have my entire sympathy and support.

* * * * *

_M. E. Rose, South Rutland, N. Y._

I think your Magazine is doing a great deal of good in waking up the dull

minds of the common people, which I hope in 1908 will sweep the cussedest

set of rascals into—well, say the penitentiary.

* * * * *

_George S. Harley, Laurel, Ind._

I think it is “just about right.” It just suits me. I can’t see how it

could be made any better. The last number (December) is worth the price

of a year’s subscription. It is full of good things.

* * * * *

_E. E. Ropes, Deland, Fla._

I am a Massachusetts Yankee, a Republican. I served under Jim Lane in

Kansas; under Sherman in Georgia. When I first received your magazine I

told your old school-mates Alex and Lee Morris that I might vote for you

for President. It seems, however, that you oppose protection. That lets

me out. I believe every honest, intelligent, patriotic American is a

protectionist.

* * * * *

_Jonas Welch, Oakdale. La._

I do not think that it could be improved. All it needs is for the people

to read it more and educate themselves on the reforms that the Populists

advocate.

* * * * *

_A. H. Ellis, Hayward, O. T._

I have been a reader of your splendid Magazine from the first issue. I

saw by the papers prior to the time you commenced your publication that

you were going to edit a magazine. I immediately began to plan to stop

the circulation of a 50-cent dollar long enough to get it to you for one

year’s subscription, but son beat me to it, he having no taxes to pay,

nor no overalls to buy, went barefooted, wore a seven cent straw hat and

a thirty cent hickory shirt and saved his money and sent it in to you

while I was sweating blood trying to pry a money lender loose from one of

his idols.

I’m glad to know that I am not disappointed in the character and make-up

of your magazine. You call a spade a spade. You did that while you

were in Congress and it is a reproach to the grand old Commonwealth of

Georgia that a hide-bound, moss back, clay-eating democracy could not

have been broad enough to have let you stay in Congress. Who was the man

that defeated you? I don’t know. I doubt if his name is known outside of

the Congressional District. Georgia has produced but four men that have

challenged the serious attention of the people of the country. Viz:—Old

James Oglethorp, Alexander Stevens, Bob Toombs and Thomas E. Watson.

I see that many of your correspondents hope to see you President. No,

Thomas, you will never be President of the United States. Why? First, you

are too big, have convictions and the honesty and courage to express

them. Second, too many fools (with an adjective prefixing “fools”).

Your editorials are very fine. I have seldom read anything finer than

“Dropping Corn,” “A Tragedy in a Tree-top.” Then there is your insurance

policy which is a source of joy. “Monarchy Within the Republic” by Mr.

Fox was instructive. The cartoons are superb. The McCurdy family, in your

last, conveys the idea that the McCurdy’s are “agin” race suicide, but

you must remember that sapsuckers are more numerous than eagles. You very

skillfully put the good to Bryan, but say what you will, he stands head

and shoulders above any other Democrat of this day. Compare him, if you

please, to Alton B. Parker. When I hear the name of Bryan, I think of the

American Eagle soaring the blue ether of Heaven. When I hear the name of

Parker, I think of a tomtit sitting on a watering trough.

Best wishes for THOMAS WATSON’S MAGAZINE and a long life for its brainy,

honest and fearless editor.

* * * * *

_Orlando K. Fitzsimmons, Buffalo, N. Y._

I have taken your magazine from the first number and am much pleased with

the good work you are doing.

* * * * *

_Warren Beebe, Burlington, Ia._

Of several magazines which I read, I like yours the best.

* * * * *

_Katharyne Clarke, North McGregor, Ia._

I have read every issue of your Magazine since the beginning and would

like to say a word of praise. Your work and efforts are casting seed that

will surely cause “two blades of grass to grow where before there was

only one.” Success to you.

* * * * *

_H. V. Hill, Kell, Ill._

Watson's Magazine, Vol. IV, No. 1, March, 1906 · 第 40 / 113 题