VII

_A Word of Caution_

Before we enter upon this topic a word of caution may be needed. I do

not wish the purpose of the foregoing questions to be misunderstood. The

serial nature of human thinking and speaking makes it impossible to

express one's thought on any great subject in a solid block; one must

needs give it forth in consecutive fragments, so that parts of it run

the risk of being lost upon the reader or hearer, while other parts are

made to assume undue proportions. Moreover, there are many minds that

habitually catch at the fragments of a thought, and never seize it in

the block; and in such manner do strange misconceptions arise. I never

could have dreamed, until taught by droll experience, that the foregoing

allusions to the garden of Eden could be understood as a glorification

of sin, and an invitation to my fellow-men to come forth with me and be

wicked! But even so it was, on one occasion when I was trying, somewhat

more scantily than here, to state the present case. In the midst of my

endeavour to justify the grand spirit of faith which our fathers showed

when from abysmal depths of affliction they never failed to cry that God

doeth all things well, I was suddenly interrupted with queries as to

just what percentage of sin and crime I regarded as needful for the

moral equilibrium of the universe; how much did I propose to commit

myself, how much would I advise people in general to commit, and just

where would I have them stop! Others deemed it necessary to remind me

that there is already too much suffering in the world, and we ought not

to seek to increase it; that the difference between right and wrong is

of great practical importance; and that if we try to treat evil as good

we shall make good no better than evil.

When one has sufficiently recovered one's gravity, it is permissible to

reply to such criticisms that the sharp antithesis between good and evil

is essential to every step of my argument, which would entirely collapse

if the antagonism were for one moment disregarded. The quantity of

suffering in the world is unquestionably so great as to prompt us to do

all in our power to diminish it; such we shall presently see must be the

case in a world that proceeds through stages of evolution. When one

reverently assumes that it was through some all-wise and holy purpose

that sin was permitted to come into the world, it ought to be quite

superfluous to add that the fulfilment of any such purpose demands that

sin be not cherished, but suppressed. If one seeks, as a philosopher, to

explain and justify God's wholesale use of death in the general economy

of the universe, is one forsooth to be charged with praising murder as a

fine art and with seeking to found a society of Thugs?

[Illustration]

Through Nature to God · 第 41 / 84 题