CHAPTER LXIII

INTELLECTUAL DRY-ROT

There are a few other universities, which in past times have established

reputations in America; for example, Cornell University, located at

Ithaca, New York, on the Lackawanna Railroad, with a Cornell trustee, a

Columbia trustee, and a Princeton trustee; also on the Lehigh Railroad,

with a trustee and recent president of Lehigh College, a trustee of the

University of Pennsylvania, and a trustee of Lafayette College for

directors. Cornell today has some six thousand students, and as choice

an outfit of trustees as a plutocratic imagination could invent. The

grand duke is Mr. George F. Baker, reputed to be, next to Rockefeller,

the richest man in America. I might take a page of this book to list all

the various institutions of which Mr. Baker is an interlocking director.

He is president of the First National Bank of New York, one of the three

great institutions of the Money Trust, and also a trustee of the Mutual

Life Insurance Company, a great treasure-chest. He is director in a

dozen railroads, and his son is director in many more.

Next to Mr. Baker stands Mr. Charles M. Schwab, president of Bethlehem

Steel, and H. H. Westinghouse, chairman of the Westinghouse Company. It

will suffice to indicate a few of the others—the head of the biggest

bank in Ithaca; the head of a great machinery company, president of a

national bank; a corporation lawyer and bank director; a metal

manufacturer, director of many railroads; an ex-governor and prominent

Republican politician; the chairman of the Bankers’ Trust Company of

Buffalo, president of a steamship company, a lumber company and a

railroad company; the vice-president and counsel of the New York Central

Railroad; a prominent corporation lawyer; a judge, ex-mayor of Ithaca,

and director of a national bank; the president of a national bank and

director of half a dozen others; the president of the Ithaca Trust

Company, director of many other banks; an official of Mr. Schwab’s

shipbuilding corporation; the chief justice, and another justice, of the

New York Court of Appeals; and, finally, that Major Seaman whose heroic

defense of the Chicago packers you may read about in Chapter IV of “The

Brass Check.”

Not so very long ago Cornell had a famous president, Schurman, who had

studied the Goose-step in three of the Kaiser’s universities. I received

an interesting account of him from Mr. W. E. Zeuch, who was on the

Cornell faculty, when the Bolshevik-hunters got hold of some letters,

written to him by another professor. This other professor was quite a

“red,” and Zeuch was trying to “tame him down”; the letters of Zeuch

were not published, but he was represented as a Bolshevist, and his

scalp was demanded. Cornell at this time was in the midst of a “drive”

for ten millions, and a lumber magnate wrote to President Schurman that

so long as Zeuch remained he would not lead the “drive.” The economics

department of the university appointed a committee, which endorsed Zeuch

and declared that a contract had been made, and that the university

should stand by a competent man. In twenty-five years the university had

never rejected the decision of such a faculty committee; nevertheless,

President Schurman proposed that Zeuch should resign from the faculty,

and accept a position as a “fellow,” to do the same amount of work and

receive the same salary!

Also they had a flurry at Cornell over Thorstein Veblen three or four

years ago. He had been scheduled for appointment; his courses had been

listed, and the members of the economics department had sent out to

various colleges a circular letter calling attention to the fact that

Veblen was to come to Cornell, and that graduate students could get work

with him there. But the interlocking trustees got busy, and the call was

countermanded. Nevertheless, in the interest of discrimination it must

be specified that Cornell is to be numbered among our less illiberal

universities. One professor made so bold during the war as to advocate

the financing of the war by taxation rather than by bonds. This would

have meant that the plutocracy would have to pay at least a part of the

costs instead of collecting it all by installments from you and me. The

trustees of the university heard this professor explain his ideas; they

did not take action to recommend this policy to the country—but they

refrained from firing the professor. Also there is another professor, an

elderly gentleman, who is a great favorite with the students, who take

his liberal ideas with playful good humor. Several of this old

gentleman’s friends assured me that he would tell me the story of his

twenty-five years’ struggle for the right to think for himself; but

apparently the old professor decided that he did not want to have any

more struggles!

Henrik Willem Van Loon, author of “The Story of Mankind,” was also a

member of this Cornell faculty, and gave me an amusing account of the

atmosphere of the place. President Schurman was selling four hundred

thousand dollars worth of education per year, “training boys to become

superintendents of sewage disposal plants and presidents of Rotary

clubs.” Van Loon was gravely rebuked by Schurman, because of a humorous

remark which created a scandal; he had been writing on the blackboard,

when a thunderstorm had come up, and he playfully compared himself to

Moses writing the Ten Commandments amid the thunders of Sinai. Van Loon

swears it is true, and I am compelled to believe him—that when he asked

to see the Dante collection they took him to inspect an electric manure

sprayer!

Or take Brown University, located at Providence, Rhode Island, on the

familiar New Haven Railroad. Here is an extremely wealthy institution,

catering to the sons of the plutocracy, and almost as snobbish as

Princeton. It was built in part out of Rockefeller money, and the man

who has been its president for the last twenty-three years is a Baptist

clergyman, for ten years pastor of Rockefeller’s Fifth Avenue church in

New York. For “chancellor” the university has an extremely wealthy

cotton manufacturer, president of a bank; for treasurer it has the

president of the Providence Banking Company, also treasurer of the

United Traction and Electric Company, and of the Rumford Chemical Works.

The three most active grand dukes of the board are Mr. Bedford, chairman

of the Standard Oil Company, who represents the Rockefeller interests;

Mr. Sharpe, head of the Brown & Sharpe Company, the largest

manufacturers of tools in the United States; and Mr. Metcalf, a big

textile manufacturer, president of the Providence “Journal” Company.

Also there is the manager of the Brown & Sharpe Company; the president

of the Cadillac Motor Car Company; the head of a big New York banking

company, president of a railroad and a coal company, director of three

railroads, three trust companies, a milk company, a patent medicine

company, and a brick company; a very wealthy manufacturing chemist; an

influential New England textile manufacturer; a steel magnate; a lawyer,

who is president of a land company and secretary of several railroads

and trust companies; the treasurer of the largest textile manufacturing

company in New England, who is director in half a dozen others, and in

half a dozen of the largest financial institutions; another Providence

banker; and, finally, Secretary of State Charles E. Hughes. Mr. Hughes

first came under my observation when I studied the life insurance

scandals in New York City. I noted that he sternly carried these

investigations to the point necessary to put Morgan and his group in

control, and stopped exactly at that point. For this service he was

awarded a national reputation and the governorship of New York State. He

has since occupied the Supreme Court bench, and come within a few votes

of being president, and is now guiding the foreign affairs of our

country, making a desperate and almost a successful effort to exceed the

futility of the Wilson administration.

What happens to a great and wealthy university under such a regime?

Brown has a high tradition, derived from Roger Williams, most famous of

New England’s religious rebels. But in 1899 its president, Andrews, was

ousted, because he had dared to back Bryan in the campaign of 1896.

Quite recently occurred a similar case, when William MacDonald,

professor of history, was forced out, to become one of the editors of

the “Nation.” Brown in its day had such outstanding men as Lester F.

Ward and Meikeljohn, now president of Amherst; but those days have

passed, and there has followed a regime of intellectual dry-rot. It is a

League of the Old Men, maintaining a caste system, based upon seniority;

any young instructor who arises to suggest a new idea is quickly taught

his place. A professor who knows the situation intimately writes:

In the fields of history, political science, economics and sociology

the policy under Faunce has been silent and safe decay. These

departments were once among the most eminent in the country. Now they

are absolutely dead. Except for some formal texts by Professor Dealey

no important publication has come from these departments in over a

decade. The economics department is now being made over into a

business school to train men to make more money. The general

educational policy throughout the institution under Faunce has been

that of comfortable quiescence. With the exception of one man in

physics and three biologists there has been practically no

intellectual activity or scholarly productivity at Brown for the last

fifteen years. This situation cannot be excused on the ground of lack

of resources. Brown has plenty of money and pays very high salaries.

It could get some of the best and most productive men in any line of

research and teaching if it cared to do so. The decline of scholarly

interests at Brown has been accompanied by a parallel growth of

interest in and expenditures for the safer field of physical outlet,

namely, athletics.

Under such a regime what becomes of the students? Exactly the same thing

as we found happening to students at Harvard, Wisconsin, and California;

they get drunk. In “The Book of Life,” Chapter XXX, I discussed the

morals of our young people, as set forth in an editorial in a student

paper of Brown University. Said this student editor:

The modern social bud drinks, not too much, often, but enough. She

smokes unguardedly, swears considerably, and tells “dirty” stories.

All in all, she is a most frivolous, passionate, sensation-seeking

little thing.

Let us move on to Wesleyan University, located at Middletown,

Connecticut, also on the New Haven Railroad. Here is an institution with

an old-time Methodist foundation and traditions of liberalism, and the

usual board of interlocking trustees, the grand duke being a

Philadelphia manufacturer of gas meters who is most versatile, being

director in four large gas companies, two street railways, a bank, a

trust company, four insurance companies, a publishing company, a sugar

company, and a transfer company. Nine years ago his university began its

downward course, with an especially notorious case of invasion of

academic freedom. Willard C. Fisher had been a member of the faculty for

twenty years, and professor of social economics for fifteen. He was one

of those college professors who insist upon being a citizen; he served

two years as councilman in the Middletown city government, and four

years as mayor. He was not a Socialist, on the contrary, an active

opponent of Socialism; but he considered himself a servant of the

people, and did not hesitate to warn them of the economic waste and

social peril of extreme inequality of wealth and the oppression of

labor.

As a teacher in a Christian community, he considered it his duty to

assert that industrial relations should be moralized. He organized the

Consumers’ League of Connecticut, and served it for many years as

president. He developed the habit of attending legislative hearings at

the capital, and speaking in support of progressive measures, such as

workmen’s compensation, income tax, industrial sanitation, factory

inspection, and prison reform. And there, of course, he came into

conflict with the interlocking trustees and the interlocking alumni. One

influential alumnus, a wealthy manufacturer, was always a member of one

House or the other, in order to watch out for the interests of

industrial employers; and naturally it vexed him to be opposed by a

professor of his own college. He declared this vexation openly; and also

a group of Wesleyan lawyers declared their vexation, when the

legislature employed Professor Fisher to write a workmen’s compensation

measure!

Also there arose an embarrassing situation, when Professor Fisher, as

mayor of Middletown, discovered a trustee of the college to be

delinquent with public school funds of which he was the custodian.

(Memo. for Brander Matthews!) Mayor Fisher exposed this situation; nor

did he consider it necessary to suppress his disapproval of President

Shanklin’s well-known habit of taking the thoughts and utterances of

other writers and giving them to the world as his own. This president,

who has been at Wesleyan for thirteen years, got his degree from the

Garrett Bible Institute at Evanston, Illinois; but apparently a number

of other college presidents have sympathized with his lack of

distinction, because no less than ten of them have showered honorary

degrees upon him!

Matters came to a head when President Shanklin started a drive for a

million dollars. In a public discussion the president of a Hartford

trust company asked Professor Fisher if he expected to go about the

state speaking as he did, and have trust company presidents contribute

to the support of the college in which he taught. It was widely rumored

at Wesleyan that President Shanklin got contributions upon the condition

that Fisher should be kicked off the faculty. A number of men of wealth

refused to contribute on other terms; and so the president cast about

for a handy pretext.

He found one. In the course of a public address, widely reported in

Connecticut newspapers, Professor Fisher made the playful suggestion

that it might be a good idea to close all the churches for a while, to

give the people a chance to find out the difference between true

religion and church formalities. Very soon thereafter Professor Fisher

was asked to resign, and the president gave the reason—not the

suggestion of the closing of the churches, but the broad publicity given

to this suggestion by the newspapers! Professor Fisher might have stayed

and made a fight, but he had been so humiliated by the changed spirit

and atmosphere of Wesleyan, that he quit; and now the university is on

the intellectual level of the Garrett Bible Institute of Evanston,

Illinois!

The Goose-step: A Study of American Education · 第 63 / 93 章