The Prologue

_À sa Dame_

Inasmuch as it was by your command, illustrious and exalted lady, that

I have gathered together these stories to form the present little book,

you should the less readily suppose I have presumed to dedicate to your

Serenity this trivial offering because of my esteeming it to be not

undeserving of your acceptance. The truth is otherwise; and your

postulant now approaches as one not spurred toward you by vainglory but

rather by plain equity, and simply in acknowledgment of the fact that

he who seeks to write of noble ladies must necessarily implore at

outset the patronage of her who is the light and mainstay of our age.

In fine, I humbly bring my book to you as Phidyle approached another

and less sacred shrine, _farre pio et salente mica_, and lay before you

this my valueless mean tribute not as appropriate to you but as the

best I have to offer.

It is a little book wherein I treat of divers queens and of their

love-business; and with necessitated candor I concede my chosen field

to have been harvested, and even scrupulously gleaned, by many writers

of innumerable conditions. Since Dares Phrygius wrote of Queen Heleine

and Virgil (that shrewd necromancer) of Queen Dido, a preponderating

mass of clerks, in casting about for high and serious matter, have

chosen, as though it were by common instinct, to dilate upon the amours

of royal women. Even in romance we scribblers must contrive it so that

the fair Nicolette shall be discovered in the end to be no less than

the King's daughter of Carthage, and that Sir Doon of Mayence shall

never sink in his love-affairs beneath the degree of a Saracen

princess; and we are backed in this old procedure not only by the

authority of Aristotle but, oddly enough, by that of reason as well.

Kings have their policies and wars wherewith to drug each appetite.

But their consorts are denied these makeshifts; and love may rationally

be defined as the pivot of each normal woman's life, and in consequence

as the arbiter of that ensuing life which is eternal. Because--as of

old Horatius Flaccus demanded, though not, to speak the truth, of any

woman,--

_Quo fugis? ah demons! nulla est fuga, tu licet usque_

_Ad Tanaim fugias, usque sequetur amor._

And a dairymaid, let us say, may love whom she will, and nobody else be

a penny the worse for her mistaking of the preferable nail whereon to

hang her affections; whereas with a queen this choice is more

portentous. She plays the game of life upon a loftier table,

ruthlessly illuminated, and stakes by her least movement a tall pile of

counters, some of which are, of necessity, the lives and happiness of

persons whom she knows not, unless it be by vague report. Grandeur

sells itself at this hard price, and at no other. A queen must always

play, in fine, as the vicar of destiny, free to choose but very

certainly compelled to justify that choice in the ensuing action; as is

strikingly manifested by the authentic histories of Brunhalt, and of

Guenevere, and of swart Cleopatra, and of many others that were born to

the barbaric queenhoods of a now extinct and dusty time.

For royal persons are (I take it) the immediate and the responsible

stewards of Heaven; and since the nature of each man is like a troubled

stream, now muddied and now clear, their prayer must ever be, _Defenda

me, Dios, de me_! Yes, of exalted people, and even of their near

associates, life, because it aims more high than the aforementioned

Aristotle, demands upon occasion a more great catharsis which would

purge any audience of unmanliness, through pity and through terror,

because, by a quaint paradox, the players have been purged of all

humanity. For in that aweful moment would Destiny have thrust her

sceptre into the hands of a human being and Chance would have exalted a

human being into usurpal of her chair. These two--with what immortal

chucklings one may facilely imagine--would then have left the weakling

thus enthroned, free to direct the pregnant outcome, free to choose,

and free to steer the conjuration either in the fashion of Friar Bacon

or of his man, but with no intermediate course unbarred. _Now prove

thyself!_ saith Destiny; and Chance appends: _Now prove thyself to be

at bottom a god or else a beast, and now eternally abide that choice.

And now_ (O crowning irony!) _we may not tell thee clearly by which

choice thou mayst prove either_.

It is of ten such moments that I treat within this little book.

You alone, I think, of all persons living have learned, as you have

settled by so many instances, to rise above mortality in such a

testing, and unfailingly to merit by your conduct the plaudits and the

adoration of our otherwise dissentient world. You have sat often in

this same high chair of Chance; and in so doing have both graced and

hallowed it. Yet I forbear to speak of this, simply because I dare not

seem to couple your well-known perfection with any imperfect encomium.

_Therefore to you, madame--most excellent and noble lady,_

_to whom I love to owe both loyalty and love--_

_I dedicate this little book._

I

Chivalry · 第 16 / 78 题