CHAPTER V

ADAPTATION FOR THE SPECIES

The strife, as we have described it thus far, is a purely selfish

struggle. Every point gained is a point favorable to the welfare of

the individual animal. But nature is uncommonly careless of the

individual unless the advantage gained is also of use to the species

as a whole. Very often the life of an animal ceases when provision has

been made for its young. The male garden spider may have a long and

dangerous courtship, in which the uncertain temper of his ladylove may

lead her to bite off four or five of his eight legs. But her

ingratitude is not yet complete. He may have barely accomplished his

desperate purpose of fertilizing her eggs at all hazards, when she

ends the process by eating him. The male bumblebee fertilizes the

female in the late summer and then dies. She does not lay her eggs

before the next season. So it happens that no bumblebee ever sees its

own father, and no father bumblebee ever sees his own children. In the

honey bee the male, which has been fortunate enough to fertilize the

queen, pays for his honor by death within the hour. Superfluous

bachelors, among the honey bees, when the bridal season has passed,

are driven from the hive to die of starvation.

An animal need not always be successful himself, but it is more

essential that he hand down his successful traits to those who come

after him. It is more important for the future generation that an

animal should have had it in him to do great things, though he himself

really have never done them, than that he should have learned to do

great things on a meager original endowment. Not what an animal

accomplishes is important to his children, but what he has it in him

to accomplish. Accordingly Nature is full of devices by which those

who have proved their original endowment by winning out in the

struggle shall hand on this endowment to a subsequent generation. In

other words, Nature is anxious that they may successfully mate. Here

we are again on distinctly debatable ground. Darwin himself believed

thoroughly in what he called sexual selection. It is the essence of

this idea that the males and females have grown unlike, more

technically have developed secondary sexual characters, through the

choice of the mating pair. It would usually be the more serious loss

if accident should come to the female, for she may carry fertilized

eggs for some time. Hence, if both sexes may not become attractive, it

is usually the male that develops fine colors, ornamental appendages

or a captivating voice.

An interesting reversal of this process has taken place in civilized

man. His more savage ancestor adorned himself more lavishly than he

permitted his mate to do. With the advance of civilization man has

undertaken to defend his own mate most valorously. The result is it is

safe for her to be beautiful. Under these circumstances, however, it

is more necessary to her welfare that her consort be vigorous rather

than that he be handsome. Hence in the human species beauty has become

the prerogative of the woman, and this is increasingly the case the

higher the civilization. Whether woman suffrage and self-support will

reverse this process remains to be seen. There are indications that

point that way.

There are many biologists who are at present expressing serious doubt

as to the validity of sexual selection. As in the previous cases of

protective coloration, I believe it will be wise for us to retain,

even though with an interrogation point behind it, the idea of sexual

selection until such time as those who object to it have furnished us

with another theory which will more nearly account for the observed

facts. While entirely conscious of the possibility that there is a

weak spot in the theory, we will still tentatively hold to sexual

selection. The fact that beauty in women is so intensely attractive

to man, and that vigor and manliness in man are so attractive to

women, leads us to infer that among the lower animals, although of

course in a vastly less degree, vigor and beauty are also attractive.

The weakest point of the position lies in the fact that it probably

presupposes a higher degree of capacity for appreciation on the part

of lower animals than they possess. Those who deny the truth of the

theory laugh at the idea that a butterfly can see clearly enough and

care enough for what it sees to notice whether its mate has wings of

one type or of another. The size, number and position of the spots on

the wings of many butterflies are so nearly constant that they cannot

of themselves have been entirely determined by the choice of the

insect. Yet this may not preclude the possibility of the fact that,

while the spots were produced through some other agency, certain types

of them were selected by sexual preference.

If attractive coloration is effective anywhere in the animal world, it

will possibly be found among the insects, but it is especially likely

to be found among the birds. Very many field workers in these groups

feel quite sure of the value of attractiveness. When butterflies chase

each other up and down, circling and doubling, following each other

for long distances, it would certainly seem as if they were pleased

with each other's appearance. Some naturalists, especially those who

have worked chiefly in the laboratory, insist that it is the odor, not

the color of these insects, which is attractive, and some experiments

which have been made would seem to point in this direction. But the

creatures experimented upon most carefully were night-flying moths,

and it is quite possible that the sense of sight in the night-flying

moths has lost its vigor.

The great difficulty in understanding sexual attraction in insects, as

based upon beauty, lies in the undoubtedly lower development of their

nervous activity; in other words, in the apparent absence of anything

worth calling mind. I think no one imagines that a butterfly, looking

upon two other butterflies who are competing for her affections,

deliberates between them and determines to admit to the circle of her

friendship the more brilliantly colored male. Moths are so

irresistibly attracted to a light as to fly into it without apparent

power to withstand its influence. They repeat the flight again and

again until they are destroyed. If they react so vigorously to the

stimulus of the light, it seems not impossible that they may also act

vigorously to the stimulus of color pattern, and that the male most

beautifully colored, according to the nervous ideal of the female,

should win her unconscious regard. At least it is certain that, in

very many of the butterflies and moths, the attractive coloration is

chiefly displayed when they are moving actively about; and when they

alight and their enemies can the more easily capture them, they

conceal their brilliant colorings. Most butterflies are very brilliant

on the upper surface of the wings and very much duller on the under

surface. Hence in flight they show their colorings exquisitely, but

when they alight, and are thus more likely to be captured, they fold

the brilliant surfaces together in an upright position. In this way

not only is the dull side of the wings placed outward, but the wings

themselves are placed edgewise to the sky, and it is from this

direction that their enemies, the birds, are most likely to see them.

Once upon the wing these creatures display their beauty with much

greater safety because they can escape the birds very readily by use

of their exceedingly jerky flight. The butterfly's motion is as

irregular as any we have except the bat's. This eccentricity is one

great element in their safety, and makes it less dangerous for them to

display their attractive colorations.

One very large group of the night-flying moths have been named the

"underwings," because of the fact that their hind wings are very much

more brilliant than the front, and in lighting they fold the dull pair

back over the bright, completely concealing them. These creatures are

in the habit of resting in the daytime against walls, or stones, or

the bark of trees. The similarity in color between their front wings,

which alone show while sitting, and the background on which they rest,

is most remarkable. One may pass them again and again, although they

are of considerable size, and not notice them at all. Once let them

display their hind wings and the brilliancy of their color always

attracts immediate attention.

It is among birds, however, that brilliant coloration serves its most

effective purpose. The birds are alert, exceedingly quick of sight,

and are much more discriminating than insects in almost every respect.

It is not so impossible that these creatures might even voluntarily

prefer a distinctly more brilliant mate, though the voluntary

character of the process is not essential to its success. Men

certainly are constantly attracted to women for whose charm it would

puzzle them to account. If this is true with regard to men, it is

certainly probable that birds would be largely influenced by phases of

attractiveness, of which they were observant, but unconscious.

Certain it is that in many birds the males are far more beautiful than

the females. Perhaps the commonest illustration, and, at the same

time, one of the best is found in the so-called red-wing or swamp

blackbird. The male of this creature is a brilliant black, excepting

that upon the angle of the wing, spoken of roughly as his shoulder,

though in reality it is equivalent to our wrist, there appears a

splendid orange patch with a border of lemon yellow. When he folds his

wing he pushes this colored angle of the wing so deftly under the

feathers of his shoulder as almost to conceal it. When in flight the

bird is exceedingly conspicuous, showing, with every bend and twist of

his body, his gorgeous epaulets. Meanwhile, the female is likely to

pass unnoticed. She is dull in color and streaked like the grass among

which she lives. During the mating season the male hovers about her,

swaying from side to side in such a way as certainly to make it appear

as if he realized his good points and was bringing them to bear as

effectively as he knew how. After his mate has nested and is rearing

her young, it would appear that the male uses his brilliancy to lure

the observing enemy away from the nest containing his wife and

children.

Another illustration of the remarkable superiority of the male over

the female, in many parts of the bird world, is seen in the case of

the common barnyard fowl. The rooster is so much more gorgeous than

the hen that anyone reasonably acquainted with these birds cannot have

failed to notice the fact. In some of our modern varieties we have by

breeding colored them nearly alike. The original chicken is colored

much like the common Leghorns. Shades of red and yellow decorate his

neck and back, while the flight feathers of his wings and of his tail

and the sickle feathers which ornament the rear of his back and hang

over his tail are lustrous dark green. The hen meanwhile is very much

less brilliant in her contrasts. I shall speak more fully of this in

discussing polygamy.

The attraction of beauty is not the only lure by which a creature may

win its mate. Sound may captivate as effectively as beauty. This is

true of insects as well as of birds. Certain insects at least advise

their mates of their presence by means of a sound which they emit.

This is particularly noticeable among the group of straight-winged

insects to which the grasshopper, katydid and cricket belong. The

grasshopper has a ridge on the angle of his wing and a roughness on

the side of his leg. When these two are rubbed together the result is

sometimes a fiddling, sometimes a snapping or cracking sound,

differing in different grasshoppers. I doubt not these sounds are

pleasing to the female of the species, for they are always made by the

male. The katydid, instead of fiddling in this way, has a sort of drum

on the angle of his one wing, which he can rub over a tooth in the

corresponding angle of his other wing, thus producing the familiar

"katydid" sound. I have never succeeded in making a dead grasshopper

fiddle, but I have long known how to make a dead katydid say "ka."

Quite recently I have added to my accomplishment in this respect and

can make it say "katy." The "did" part of the song still lies beyond

my power. The crickets produce their sharp notes in much the same

fashion as the katydids.

One observer of the chirping of the cricket says that the pitch of the

song varies with the temperature. He has even worked out a formula by

which one can tell the pitch of the chirp, if he knows the

temperature, or, knowing the temperature, can determine the pitch. Of

course this is too mechanical; yet it indicates that there must be

considerable relation between the two; the warmer the cricket the

happier he is.

It is the males among insects that chirp their love songs. The females

never answer them. There is a peculiar notion that the female katydid,

when thus accused of some offense, replies "katy didn't." The truth of

the matter is that no female katydid ever replied to the accusations

of her lover, if accusation it be. She is absolutely dumb, not having

the drum upon her wings with which to reply. She is provided with ears

wherewith to hear, and, strange to say, she keeps them on her elbow,

as does also the cricket, while the grasshopper has his ears upon the

side of his body.

Everyone who lives in the country, or goes into the country in the

summertime, is sure to know the humming of the so-called locust. It is

an unfortunate fact that the word locust may have several meanings. It

is properly applied to one group of the grasshoppers. The creature

most commonly called a locust is a cicada, or harvest fly. When the

weather gets quite warm the cicada starts his love song. He has two

long flaps to his vest, and under each flap he has a vibrating drum

head. This is set shivering by a muscle on its under side. The female

cicada again is silent.

It is among birds that the love song reaches its finest development.

It may consist simply of a little chirp as in the chippy. It may

consist of two notes of a different pitch repeated steadily, as in the

tufted titmouse. It may attain considerable variation, as in the

robin. But in the choir of our best singers, like the catbird,

thrasher, and mocking bird, there is unending variation of notes. It

seems almost impossible to doubt the charming quality of this voice

upon the mate. It certainly is chiefly confined to the mating season,

and is indulged in almost entirely by the males. This does not mean

that a male does not sing excepting when he wishes to charm his mate.

But the time when he is in his most exquisite feather and most

charming mood is the time when he sings most sweetly, and this is the

time when he is taking to himself a mate. The love joy may so

overcrowd his life that he sings much and often, but the increase in

its amount and character during the mating season seems to proclaim

its purpose beyond a doubt.

In addition to the allurements above described there are certain

peculiar behaviors of the animal during the mating season which are

intensely interesting. Sometimes they consist simply of a wild

delirium of joy, which overpowers the animal completely and makes him

do wonderful things. Birds will fly with impetuous leaps in the air,

mount higher and higher, singing wildly, only to turn suddenly at the

top of the flight and drop promptly to the ground. I have seen such

ecstatic flights in the oven bird and in our rollicking gold finch. I

have seen a catbird on his way to a tree turn three somersaults, much

like those performed by a tumbler pigeon, after which he alighted upon

the bough. None of these acts seemed deliberately performed in front

of the females, but I have seen three or four killdeer parading in

most stately and precise manner, spreading their wings and fluffing

their feathers, performing a sublimated cup-and-cake walk amid a

circle of attracted females.

Even our little English sparrow, as I have previously mentioned,

fluffs himself up and spreads his wings and prances around in front of

his presumably adoring ladylove. But the weirdest performance of this

sort I have ever seen is that shown by the male ostrich. When he

becomes excited, swaying his body from side to side, he sinks slowly

upon his knees, until his body touches the ground, his wings spread on

either side and the feathers fluffed up so as to show every exquisite

plume in all its splendid beauty. The long neck is laid back until the

head, which is doubled sharply forward, is pressed almost against the

back, and in this strange position he sways from side to side,

apparently utterly oblivious, for a time, of everything. After about a

minute of this performance, he seems slowly to come to himself and

rise again to his feet. Now he is particularly likely to make vicious

attack upon anything within reach.

It is not only necessary that the animal should be able to attract a

mate. There may be more than one claimant for the damsel's affection.

In many animals we see provisions whereby the male may effectively

deal with his rivals. This is especially likely to be the case if the

animal be a polygamist. In every species there are produced about as

many males as females. If the polygamous habit leads one male to

gather about him a group of females, with whom he mates, it is evident

that he is displacing an equal number of rivals, and they are not

willingly displaced. Accordingly we find that polygamy is usually

accompanied by a belligerent disposition on the part of the males. In

our ordinary barnyard fowl this trait is very evident. The rooster not

only domineers over the hens, not only struts about among them in

stately fashion and gives vent to his feelings by his sonorous voice,

he must also drive away from the neighborhood any rivals for the

affections of his wives. Hence the rooster attacks upon sight the

neighboring rooster, and battles with him to his entire discomfiture

and sometimes to the death.

Among the members of the deer family this particular phase of the

relation between the sexes has produced in the males, and only very

rarely in the females, the magnificent branching horns. These are

intended not so much as a protection against the enemy as for an

offensive weapon in the battle for the mates.

Beautiful and stately as are these magnificent horns, they last only

for a part of the year. We begin to understand their meaning. When the

wolf is hungriest, toward the close of the bitter winter, the deer is

without horns. When the time for mating comes, the deer within a few

weeks grows his horns, which at first are covered with a plushlike

coating, known as velvet. After a while this dries and he rubs his

horns against the trees until they are clean and smooth. Now he is

ready for the battle royal.

In the case of the fur seals polygamy has carried its specialization

of the males to a remarkable extent. The bull seals are several times

as large as the cows, and are provided with terrific canine teeth.

With these they battle with a violence that very often results in the

death of one of the combatants. A successful bull seal who has

gathered about him a cluster of seal cows is seamed and scarred with

the marks of his annual combats.

One more type of adaptation can be profitably considered. Animals have

developed many devices which serve for the protection of their young.

The wonderful silk spun by the spider was evidently primarily intended

to serve as a covering for the eggs. Probably all of our spiders agree

in using the silk for this purpose. Many of them employ it for

practically no other, though there are half a dozen different uses to

which different spiders may put their silk. Under these conditions we

have a right to infer that silk was primarily developed as a coating

for the eggs. In the case of some of our spiders a little fluffy mass

of silk covers the egg, while a firmly woven sheet of silk covers both

egg mass and fluff, holding it flat against a wall or the trunk of a

tree. In some of the higher spiders, notably our bank spiders, the

silken covering becomes an effective cocoon, spherical in shape, with

a little opening at the top like the neck of a small bottle. The egg

cocoon is woven in a mass of tangled silk between the branches of some

tough weed which will be sure to outlast the winter. Into the egg

cocoon the spider may place one thousand or more eggs. Having thus

provided her children with a snug winter home, the spider dies. When

spring comes with the warm rays of the sun, the eggs hatch and the

cocoon becomes a creeping mass of minute spiders. At the time these

spiders appear there is nothing for them to eat. The obvious way out

of this difficulty is taken. At once there begins a progressive party.

Spider fights with spider, and the prize in each conflict is the body

of the victim, which is promptly eaten. The winners in the first round

pair off again, and a little later, as hunger drives them, another set

of combats comes on, resulting in another halving of the number of

spiders in the cocoon. This process continues until not more than

one-tenth of the original number of spiders remains. By this time they

have gained sufficient strength of leg and jaw, and sufficient

dexterity in the use of both, to make it safe for them to venture out

and try their fortunes among the accidents of a strenuous world. There

can be little doubt after this long process has worked its final

results which tenth remains. Chance plays but small part in this

game. It is the fittest that survive. When this procedure goes on

generation after generation, the result must necessarily be that the

spiders grow fitter and fitter for their work. This method is hard on

the little spider, but it makes good spiders.

Most insects die before their eggs hatch; accordingly they can pay no

attention to their own children. Whatever arrangements are provided

for the safety and strength of these offspring must be provided before

they appear. About the only care the majority of insects take in this

direction is to see that the eggs are placed where the young shall

find food as soon as they emerge. Insects' eggs are very small, and as

a consequence the creatures which emerge from them are likewise

exceedingly minute. As a result they cannot be expected to hunt far

for their food. Different insects use different devices by which to

overcome this difficulty. The katydid, for instance, must die with the

approach of fall. Her children will not appear until the following

year. Her food consists of leaves, but to lay the eggs in such a

situation would be a fatal process, because the leaf will drop off

before the eggs hatch. Accordingly, the katydid lays its shield-shaped

eggs in a double row near the end of a young twig. Next year when the

weather is sufficiently warm to hatch katydids, it is also warm enough

to force the buds on the end of the twigs. When the katydids arrive

their jaws are young and tender, but so are the leaves upon which they

are born. Hence there is little difficulty on the part of the young

katydids in finding an abundance of food. By the time the leaves have

grown tougher, the katydid's jaws are stronger, and the leaves will

still serve as food.

Everyone who is at all familiar with country life and gardening is

familiar with what is called the potato or tomato worm. It is a long,

green, smooth, caterpillar, as long and as fat as your finger and

provided with a horn upon his tail. The gardener may not know that

after a while this creature will burrow into the ground, and there

change into an oblong brown mass with a sort of a pitcher handle at

one side. Next year this pupa will split down the back, and from out

of the brown case will come a hawk-moth, which soon will fly with

rapidly quivering wings and feast upon the nectar of our moon flowers

or on that of the "Jimson" weed. Those who have cleaned these pests

from the potato or tomato vines will often have noticed one of them

covered with what look almost like grains of rice. This appearance

reveals an interesting story. Some time earlier an insect that looked

very much like a dainty wasp with a rather long sting in its tail

hovered over the caterpillar. This is the ichneumon fly. Eventually

lighting upon the caterpillar's back, it punctured the skin with its

sting, and deposited eggs within the caterpillar's body. These eggs

soon hatched and the little grubs worked their way through the body of

its host. The infested victim feeds upon leaves and fills itself with

rich food. These parasites eat the food, and, try as it may, the

caterpillar does not succeed in getting fat. After the grubs have

gotten their full growth, each of them eats its way through a little

hole to the outside of the caterpillar's body. Here it spins around

itself a little white case, and looks like a rice grain. As the

caterpillar moves about, these seeming rice grains are rubbed off and

fall to the ground. Next year there will come up new ichneumon flies

to sting fresh caterpillars and repeat the entire process.

Another remarkable provision for the young on the part of insects is

seen in the behavior of the big sphex wasp, known as the cicada

killer. The cicada, it will be remembered, is what is commonly called

a locust. The cicada killer is a magnificent big wasp, whose body is

nearly an inch long, banded with black and yellow, while the wings are

colored a smoky brown. This muscular wasp digs a long tunnel eight or

ten inches deep, which ends in a slightly larger room. Having provided

the location, he now sallies forth in search of the cicada. The heavy

song of the male probably serves as a guide to the wasp in case of

scarcity of cicadas, but the killer has apparently little difficulty

in finding his prey. The wasp pounces upon the insect, and in spite of

its strength and the thrashing of its vigorous wings punctures it with

his sting again and again. The poison of the sting entering into the

nerve centers gradually paralyzes, but usually does not kill, the

cicada. Now the killer carries its prey home, pushes it to the bottom

of the tunnel and deposits upon it a single egg. The wasp closes up

the hole and leaves the place. When the egg hatches and the grub of

the wasp emerges, it finds a big cicada just at hand, upon which it

feeds. By the time the cicada is completely devoured, the wasp grub

has obtained its full growth. After a short period of development a

new sphex wasp is ready to work its way out of the tunnel, find a

mate, dig a hole, and safely provide for its own children.

Still more remarkable adaptations for the care of the young appear

among the birds. Here the eggs are not to be deserted, but are to be

cared for until the young appear. These again must have attention

until such time as they are quite able to take care of themselves. The

birds are warm-blooded animals, and even their young, while they are

developing in the egg, are warm-blooded. Consequently the temperature

of the egg must be maintained evenly and uniformly, or there will be

no development.

The fish may drop its eggs carelessly upon the bottom of the stream. A

frog may deposit them in a mass of jelly and leave them forever. A

turtle may bury its eggs in a sand bank and abandon them to their

fate. The warm blood of the young bird demands more attention than

this. Accordingly, the parent bird has learned to make for itself some

sort of nest, in which the young may be kept properly warm until they

are developed. The ancestral bird, who was to be the progenitor of the

entire bird class, must have had some very simple method of providing

a place in which its eggs might be hatched. As the descendants of this

original bird have passed into new situations, the various lines have

taken upon themselves different shapes until we have the multiform

birds of to-day. The habits of the birds have also varied. Each has

adapted itself to the situation in which it found itself, and no

adaptation has been more varied and effective than the adjustment of

the nesting site. Nests are found upon the ground, in the bushes, on

the lower limbs, in the crotches of the trees, in the trunks of the

trees, upon their very summits, and on the tops of inaccessible crags.

To every sort of situation some bird has been enabled to adapt itself.

This has made it possible for very many more birds to thrive than

could have found a place in the world, had they all lived upon the

same plan.

In the case of the bank swallow his nest may be a very simple

contrivance, consisting only of a tunnel running back into a bank, and

widening at the back. Some material that will soften the bed upon

which eggs are to be laid must be placed in this cavity. The whole

home is a very simple and crude affair. But little better is the

arrangement which the woodpecker calls a home. This has been cut into

the dry wood of a defective tree. No woodpecker can make his home in

absolutely solid sapwood. Hence the first labor of the woodpecker must

consist in finding a place in which it can dig. If there is an old

stump of a limb sticking up, the problem is readily solved. Such wood

has no sap in it, and is brittle enough to be easily dug out. But, if

there be no such stub, the woodpecker will find a suitable place in

most trees. At some time or other almost every tree loses a big limb.

When such accident occurs there will always be in the old trunk a

region through which sap once went to this limb. This region, deprived

of its function, goes completely dry, like the heartwood of the tree,

and it is into such material as this that the woodpecker succeeds in

drilling his well-protected home.

As birds rise higher in the scale the nest-building becomes a more

complicated affair, and after a while we find a well-woven substantial

nest, through which even the air will not chill the eggs enough to

prevent their hatching, while the warmth is supplied by the mother's

body. It is often a matter of surprise to many people that a bird

should contrive to build a nest so exquisitely circular. The trick,

after all, is not quite so difficult as it looks. The robin gathers up

a few sticks and places them as the beginning of the platform. More

and more are brought and woven into each other, making a framework

altogether too big for the nest. Then mud is brought and plastered

inside of this. With the plastering of this mud the careful

circularity of the work begins. Every time a little material has been

added the robin sits down in the nest and revolves her body, in this

way shaping the interior much as the potter shapes a pot. In the case

of the artisan, it is the pot that revolves. In the case of the robin,

the bird itself revolves. The effect is the same in both cases--a

circular vessel is produced. A little lining added to the interior of

the nest softens it for the reception of the eggs. In this exquisite

home the robin lays her eggs, and sits upon them until they are

developed enough to hatch, and then feeds the young until they are old

enough to feed themselves.

Far more remarkable than any of the devices thus far described are the

wonderful developments which have come in the class of animals known

as the mammals. Here the most wonderful protection is made for the

care and feeding of the young. But this is to be the subject of a

separate chapter.

As long as we thought of each sort of animal as being a separate

species shaped in the beginning by the hands of the Creator, each of

these devices seemed to us a new manifestation of the Divine

Providence, whose fertile planning had conceived so many methods of

providing for his children. Unconsciously we thought of God acting as

man acted. Each animal seemed a purely separate invention purposely

designed for an especial place. Now we understand the plan in creation

better, and see that each animal has come from another not quite like

itself, some distance back, and this from still another. Our

admiration for these devices as they arise through evolution is no

less, but takes on another form.

The Meaning of Evolution · 第 5 / 11 章