ROUMANIA

The future of Roumania is of interest to the Jews for two especial

reasons: first, because the Jews of Roumania are deprived of their

rights as citizens in contravention of a solemn promise made by

Roumania to the Great Powers at the Berlin Congress in 1878;

secondly, because it will no doubt be Roumania’s aim to win back from

Austria-Hungary certain large territories, including Transylvania and

Bukowina, in which the bulk of the population is of Roumanian descent,

thus, if successful, incidentally, increasing the number of Jews under

Roumanian rule from about 250,000 to more than one million.

During the present war Roumania has given evidence of its hostile

attitude towards the Jews. Thousands of Jewish refugees who fled before

the savagery of the Russian army which invaded Bukowina, sought refuge

in Roumania. These were treated with great brutality by Roumanian

officials in the border towns. At the beginning of July, 1915, the

Government issued an order to the administrative authorities of all

the districts bordering on Austria-Hungary to expel all the Jews from

the localities near the frontier, and to send them to the interior of

the country. The officials took advantage of this edict to expel not

only the refugees, but also hundreds of Jewish citizens of Roumania

who had been living in the border towns for generations. The order

of expulsion was executed summarily, and the Jews were forced to

leave within forty-eight and in some cases with all their goods in

twenty-four hours. As a rule, they were not permitted to take their

belongings with them, and even under the most favorable circumstances

they had perforce to leave them behind because they knew neither their

destination nor their fate.

This action of the Government caused a great deal of adverse comment in

the press. “Vitorul” the official organ of the Liberal Party, now in

power, met these attacks, in its issue of July 12, 1915, as follows:

“Some of the newspapers pretend that the Ministry of Internal Affairs

has given orders that the native-born Jews established in the towns

bordering upon the northern frontier of Moldavia be sent into the

interior of the country. This news is inexact. The Minister of

Internal Affairs was not aiming at the Jews established in the towns

near the frontier or in any other place when he issued his order

of expulsion. The order given by the Minister of Internal Affairs

concerns only the alien subjects of a foreign country, and the

native-born Jews who, though not living in frontier towns go there on

business, acting as cereal brokers. And the purpose of the order is to

prevent such people from committing acts dangerous to the interests

of the population of the state. The peaceful Jewish population

living near the frontier is not the object of any hounding, as the

irresponsible newspapers would have it.”

The Bucharest “Adeverul” (Truth), an independent organ, and one of the

two newspapers in Bucharest which sympathize with the Jews, replied:

“In answer to the attacks of the Government organ upon the

‘irresponsible’ newspapers, we are in a position to publish a list of

the ‘peaceful Jewish population’ which has been the subject of the

most terrible persecutions by the authorities. =We can give the names

of the reserves, mobilized at the very moment, whose children have

been driven from their homes.= It is possible that the Minister of

Internal Affairs did not mean to ‘aim,’ as the official organ says,

at the Jews. If the Minister is innocent of the charge, we would like

to know what punishment to inflict upon his subordinates who wilfully

misrepresented his order.

“But it is not we who are irresponsible. It is the Government that

tries to mislead the public with ambiguous statements. It says that

the order referred only to the brokers, who may commit dangerous

acts. We know that the law punishes crimes and delinquencies which

_have_ been committed, but does not anticipate crimes that _may_ be

committed. Then again, the law provides strict punishment for each

delinquency and not a general and preventive punishment, such as

deportation. Why is it that those who have committed the infraction

have not been arrested and peaceful people are being punished instead?

“Even the Government recognizes that this preventive punishment is

applied to the alien and such Jews as are only doing business though

not living in those places. It means that the suspicion rests equally

upon the alien and the Roumanian Jew, because the Jew, although not

an alien, is of another religion. The suspicion then falls upon all

the native-born Jews. Thus we see, that even if the official organ’s

public interpretation of the law be correct, it is still the Jews who

will suffer. But we cannot accept the explanation. It is false.

“It is an absolute fact that not transient traders but people who are

innocent, who are paying taxes in those localities have been expelled.”

It is idle to speculate as to what Roumania may do if she becomes

involved in the war. But it is well to consider whether, if she does

not become involved, it will be possible to bring to the attention of

the belligerent powers at a future peace conference the question of the

status of the Jews of Roumania. These are in the anomolous position of

people virtually without a country. They are subjects of Roumania, pay

taxes and support the Government. But even the native-born and those

whose parents and grandparents were native-born subjects of Roumania,

cannot become citizens, and are also discriminated against by the

Government. In this respect, Roumania may be called “Little Russia.”

The situation of Roumania as a nation is exceptional. She was made an

independent country by the European Powers, meeting at the Congress of

Berlin, after the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–8. In a treaty which was

then signed by all the great Powers of Europe, the following articles

were inserted:

XLIII. The High contracting parties recognize the independence of

Roumania, subject to the conditions set forth in the two following

articles.

XLIV. In Roumania the difference of religious creeds and confessions

shall not be alleged against any person as a ground for exclusion or

incapacity in matters relating to the enjoyment of civil and political

rights, admission to public employments, functions and honors, or the

exercise of the various professions and industries in any locality

whatsoever.

“The freedom and outward exercise of all forms of worship shall be

assured to all persons belonging to the Roumanian State, as well

as to foreigners, and no hindrance shall be offered either to the

hierarchical organizations of the different communions, or to their

relations with their spiritual chiefs. The subjects and citizens of

all the Powers, traders or others, shall be treated in Roumania,

without distinction of creed, on a footing of perfect equality.”

Roumania having become an independent nation upon its recognition

by these Powers, and upon the conditions set forth in the treaty of

Berlin, it may be possible at the conclusion of the war that the

violations of this treaty on the part of the Roumanian Government may

be considered by the Powers whose honor is thus flaunted by an open

violation of a treaty to which they solemnly became parties.

The Jews in the Eastern War Zone · 第 57 / 69 题