DEAR SIR,

I have had much gratification and pleasure in the receipt of your

obliging communication. Allow me to thank you for it, in the first

place, with great cordiality.

Although I cannot say that I came without any prepossessions to the

perusal of your play (for I had favourable inclinings towards it before

I began), I _can_ say that I read it with the closest attention, and

that it inspired me with a strong interest, and a genuine and high

admiration. The parts that involve some of the greatest difficulties of

your task appear to me those in which you shine most. I would

particularly instance the end of Julia as a very striking example of

this. The delicacy and beauty of her redemption from her weak rash

lover, are very far, indeed beyond the range of any ordinary dramatist,

and display the true poetical strength.

As your hopes now centre in Mr. Phelps, and in seeing the child of your

fancy on his stage, I will venture to point out to you not only what I

take to be very dangerous portions of "Love's Martyrdom" as it stands,

_for presentation on the stage_, but portions which I believe Mr. Phelps

will speedily regard in that light when he sees it before him in the

persons of live men and women on the wooden boards. Knowing him, I think

he will be then as violently discouraged as he is now generously

exalted; and it may be useful to you to be prepared for the

consideration of those passages.

I do not regard it as a great stumbling-block that the play of modern

times best known to an audience proceeds upon the main idea of this,

namely, that there was a hunchback who, because of his deformity,

mistrusted himself. But it is certainly a grain in the balance when the

balance is going the wrong way, and therefore it should be most

carefully trimmed. The incident of the ring is an insignificant one to

look at over a row of gaslights, is difficult to convey to an audience,

and the least thing will make it ludicrous. If it be so well done by Mr.

Phelps himself as to be otherwise than ludicrous, it will be

disagreeable. If it be either, it will be perilous, and doubly so,

because you revert to it. The quarrel scene between the two brothers in

the third act is now so long that the justification of blind passion and

impetuosity--which can alone bear out Franklyn, before the bodily eyes

of a great concourse of spectators, in plunging at the life of his own

brother--is lost. That the two should be parted, and that Franklyn

should again drive at him, and strike him, and then wound him, is a

state of things to set the sympathy of an audience in the wrong

direction, and turn it from the man you make happy to the man you leave

unhappy. I would on no account allow the artist to appear, attended by

that picture, more than once. All the most sudden inconstancy of

Clarence I would soften down. Margaret must act much better than any

actress I have ever seen, if all her lines fall in pleasant places;

therefore, I think she needs compression too.

All this applies solely to the theatre. If you ever revise the sheets

for readers, will you note in the margin the broken laughter and the

appeals to the Deity? If, on summing them up, you find you want them

all, I would leave them as they stand by all means. If not, I would blot

accordingly.

It is only in the hope of being slightly useful to you by anticipating

what I believe Mr. Phelps will discover--or what, if ever he should pass

it, I have a strong conviction the audience will find out--that I have

ventured on these few hints. Your concurrence with them generally, on

reconsideration, or your preference for the poem as it stands, can not

in the least affect my interest in your success. On the other hand, I

have a perfect confidence in your not taking my misgivings ill; they

arise out of my sincere desire for the triumph of your work.

With renewed thanks for the pleasure you have afforded me,

The Letters of Charles Dickens. Vol. 1, 1833-1856 · 第 609 / 770 题