Diplomats in Post-Communist Countries

In 2001, the most unusual event has gone unnoticed in the

international press. A former minister of finance has

accused the more prominent members of the diplomatic

corps in his country of corruption. He insisted that these

paragons of indignant righteousness and hectoring

morality have tried to blackmail him into paying them

hefty commissions from money allotted to exigent

humanitarian aid. This was immediately and from afar -

and, therefore, without proper investigation - denied by

their superiors in no uncertain terms.

The facts are these: most (though by no means all)

Western diplomats in the nightmarish wasteland that is

East Europe and the Balkan, the unctuously fulsome and

the frowzily wizened alike, are ageing and sybaritic basket

cases. They have often failed miserably in their bootless

previous posts - or have insufficiently submerged in the

Byzantine culture of their employers. Thus emotionally

injured and cast into the frigorific outer darkness of a

ravaged continent, they adopt the imperial patina of

Roman procurators in narcissistic compensation. Their

long suffering wives - bored to distraction in the

impassibly catatonic societies of post communism -

impose upon a reluctant and flummoxed population the

nescient folderol of their distaff voluntary urges or

exiguous artistic talents. Ever more crapulous, they

aestivate and hibernate, the queens of tatty courts and

shabby courtiers.

The cold war having ebbed, these emissaries of

questionable provenance engage in the promotion of the

narrow interests of specific industries or companies. They

lobby the local administration, deploying bare threats and

obloquies where veiled charm fails. They exert subtle or

brutal pressure through the press. They co-opt name-

dropping bureaucrats and bribe pivotal politicians. They

get fired those who won't collaborate or threaten to expose

their less defensible misdeeds. They are glorified delivery

boys, carrying apocryphal messages to and fro. They are

bloviating PR campaigners, seeking to aggrandize their

meagre role and, incidentally, that of their country. They

wine and dine and banter endlessly with the provincial

somnolent variety of public figures, members of the venal

and pinchbeck elites that now rule these tortured

territories. In short - forced to deal with the bedizened

miscreants that pass for businessmen and politicians in

this nether world - they are transformed, assuming in the

process the identity of their obdurately corrupted hosts.

Thus, they help to sway elections and hasten to endorse

their results, however disputed and patently fraudulent.

They intimidate the opposition, negotiate with

businessmen, prod favoured politicians, spread roorbacks

and perambulate their fiefdom to gather intelligence.

More often than not, they cross the limpid lines between

promotion and extortion, lagniappe and pelf, friendship

and collusion, diplomacy and protectorate, the kosher and

the criminal.

They are the target and the address of a legion of

pressures and demands. Their government may ask them

to help depose one coalition and help install another.

Their secret services - disguised as intrusive NGOs or

workers at the embassy - often get them involved in shady

acts and unscrupulous practices. Real NGOs ask for their

assiduous assistance and protection. Their hosts - and

centuries old protocol - expect them to surreptitiously

provide support while openly refrain from intervening,

maintaining equipoise. Other countries protest, compete,

or leak damaging reports to an often hostile media. The

torpid common folk resent them for their colonial ways

and hypocritical demarches. Lacking compunction, they

are nobody's favourites and everybody's scapegoats at one

time or another.

And they are ill-equipped to deal with these subtleties.

Not of intelligence, they end where they now are and wish

they weren't. Ignorant of business and entrepreneurship,

they occupy the dead end, otiose and pension-orientated

jobs they do. Devoid of the charm, negotiating skills and

human relations required by the intricacies of their

profession - they are relegated to the Augean outskirts of

civilization. Dishonest and mountebank, they persist in

their mortifying positions, inured to the conniving they

require.

This blatantly discernible ineptitude provokes the

"natives" into a wholesale rejection of the West, its values

and its culture. The envoys are perceived as the cormorant

reification of their remote controllers. Their voluptuary

decadence is a distant echo of the West's decay, their

nonage greed - a shadow of its avarice, their effrontery

and hidebound peremptory nature - its mien. They are in

no position to preach or teach.

The diplomats of the West are not evil. Some of them

mean well. To the best of their oft limited abilities, they

cadge and beg and press and convince their governments

to show goodwill and to contribute to their hosts. But soon

their mettle is desiccated by the vexatious realities of their

new habitation. Reduced to susurrus cynicism and

sardonic contempt, they perfunctorily perform their

functions, a distant look in their now empty eyes. They

have been assimilated, rendered useless to their

dispatchers and to their hosts alike.

Financial Crime and Corruption · 第 53 / 74 题