PARIS, 1895.

Do you know that shock? I mean, when you come, at your regular hour,

into the sick room where you have watched for months, and find the

medicine bottles all gone, the night table removed, the bed stripped,

the furniture set stiffly to rights, the windows up, the room cold,

stark, vacant--and you catch your breath. Do you know that shock?

The man who has written a long book has that experience the morning

after he has revised it for the last time, seen the bearers convey it

from the house, and sent it away to the printer. He steps into his study

at the hour established by the habit of months--and he gets that little

shock. All the litter and the confusion are gone. The piles of dusty

reference books are gone from the chairs, the maps from the floor; the

chaos of letters, manuscripts, notebooks, paper knives, pipes, matches,

photographs, tobacco jars, and cigar boxes is gone from the writing

table. The furniture is back where it use to be in the long ago. The

housemaid, forbidden the place for five months, has been there, and

tidied it up, and scoured it clean, and made it repellent and awful.

I stand here this morning, contemplating this desolation, and I realize

that if I would bring back the spirit that made this hospital homelike

and pleasant to me, I must restore the aids to lingering dissolution to

their wonted places, and nurse another patient through and send it forth

for the last rites, with many or few to assist there, as may happen; and

that I will do.

AS REGARDS PATRIOTISM

(About 1900)

It is agreed, in this country, that if a man can arrange his religion so

that it perfectly satisfies his conscience, it is not incumbent upon him

to care whether the arrangement is satisfactory to anyone else or not.

In Austria and some other countries this is not the case. There the

state arranges a man’s religion for him, he has no voice in it himself.

Patriotism is merely a religion--love of country, worship of country,

devotion to the country’s flag and honor and welfare.

In absolute monarchies it is furnished from the throne, cut and dried,

to the subject; in England and America it is furnished, cut and dried,

to the citizen by the politician and the newspaper.

The newspaper-and-politician-manufactured Patriot often gags in private

over his dose; but he takes it, and keeps it on his stomach the best he

can. Blessed are the meek.

Sometimes, in the beginning of an insane shabby political upheaval, he

is strongly moved to revolt, but he doesn’t do it--he knows better. He

knows that his maker would find it out--the maker of his Patriotism, the

windy and incoherent six-dollar subeditor of his village newspaper--and

would bray out in print and call him a Traitor. And how dreadful that

would be. It makes him tuck his tail between his legs and shiver. We all

know--the reader knows it quite well--that two or three years ago nine

tenths of the human tails in England and America performed just that

act. Which is to say, nine tenths of the Patriots in England and America

turned traitor to keep from being called traitor. Isn’t it true? You

know it to be true. Isn’t it curious?

Yet it was not a thing to be very seriously ashamed of. A man can

seldom--very, very seldom--fight a winning fight against his training;

the odds are too heavy. For many a year--perhaps always--the training of

the two nations had been dead against independence in political thought,

persistently inhospitable toward patriotism manufactured on a man’s own

premises, Patriotism reasoned out in the man’s own head and fire-assayed

and tested and proved in his own conscience. The resulting Patriotism

was a shop-worn product procured at second hand. The Patriot did not

know just how or when or where he got his opinions, neither did he care,

so long as he was with what seemed the majority--which was the main

thing, the safe thing, the comfortable thing. Does the reader believe he

knows three men who have actual reasons for their pattern of

Patriotism--and can furnish them? Let him not examine, unless he wants

to be disappointed. He will be likely to find that his men got their

Patriotism at the public trough, and had no hand in its preparation

themselves.

Training does wonderful things. It moved the people of this country to

oppose the Mexican War; then moved them to fall in with what they

supposed was the opinion of the majority--majority Patriotism is the

customary Patriotism--and go down there and fight. Before the Civil War

it made the North indifferent to slavery and friendly to the slave

interest; in that interest it made Massachusetts hostile to the American

flag, and she would not allow it to be hoisted on her State House--in

her eyes it was the flag of a faction. Then by and by, training swung

Massachusetts the other way, and she went raging South to fight under

that very flag and against that aforetime protected interest of hers.

There is nothing that training cannot do. Nothing is above its reach or

below it. It can turn bad morals to good, good morals to bad; it can

destroy principles, it can recreate them; it can debase angels to men

and lift men to angelship. And it can do any one of these miracles in a

year--even in six months.

Then men can be trained to manufacture their own Patriotism. They can be

trained to labor it out in their own heads and hearts and in the privacy

and independence of their own premises. It can train them to stop taking

it by command, as the Austrian takes his religion.

Europe and elsewhere · 第 78 / 98 题