Paré's name has always been most conspicuously mentioned in connection

with the history of the introduction of the ligature as a substitute

for the cautery iron or boiling oil, previously in use for the

checking of hemorrhage, and for his teaching concerning the nature of

gun-shot wounds, which had been previously and universally considered

as necessarily poisoned wounds; but his new practice and his new views

in these respects were but a small part of the general services which

he rendered. It is not worth while to try to even epitomize here

to-day the history of the ligature; though while its introduction

has been widely credited to Paré, you must not forget that it was

in use many centuries before his time, and was frequently mentioned

by the early writers. What Paré really did was, first, to abolish a

barbarous and unscientific method of dealing with hemorrhage, and then

to re-introduce or promote the employment of the ligature as a far

preferable substitute, more humane, more clean, and more desirable.

And so rather than do scant justice by incomplete reference to Paré's

actual contributions to knowledge I prefer rather to speak of the other

side of this great man's character, and to remind you of some of the

many ways by which he secured such marvellous influence over those

around him, and made his remarkable personality of the greatest use.

As he passed through one campaign after another his reputation became

more and more firmly established, and inspired surgeons the world over

with the desire to visit him. In almost his every act his sagacity was

conspicuously displayed, while, whenever they were called for, his

personal courage and absolute lack of fear were equally apparent.

Deprived of the benefits of early and liberal training he probably, on

that very account, developed his power of thought, his memory and his

analytical powers all the more keenly, inasmuch as these were made to

take the place of what he might have learned from books.

The following anecdote will serve to illustrate, for instance, the

general esteem in which he was held. In October, 1552, the army of

Charles V. was besieging the city of Metz, and Charles himself came to

take command. In the beleaguered city were gathered the nobility and

the bluest blood of France, while at the head of the defending forces

was the Duke of Guise. The imprisoned soldiers and civilians suffered

alike from the onslaughts of the enemy, the rigors of a frightful

winter, the lack of food, and the presence of disease. The Duke had

established two hospitals for the soldiers, which he put in charge of

the barber surgeons of the city, and furnished them with money with

which to procure supplies, but owing to the wretched incompetence of

these same barber surgeons nearly all the wounded perished, and the

horrible suspicion arose that the soldiers were being poisoned. The

Duke sent word to the King of France that the place could hold out for

ten months, but that they needed more medicines. The King then sent

for Paré, gave him money, ordered him to take all the medicines and

other supplies he deemed necessary, and further aided him by bribing

an Italian captain to permit the celebrated surgeon, in some way,

to enter the besieged city. Braving all dangers, and being finally

successful, Paré entered Metz two months later. He had at this time

been with the armies for at least sixteen years, and was known by

sight to officers and soldiers alike. On the day after his arrival the

Duke of Guise dramatically presented him, on the ramparts, to all his

officers, who embraced him, and hailed him with loud acclaim, while

by the soldiers he was received with shouts of triumph. "We shall not

die," they exclaimed, "even though wounded, for Paré is among us." The

effect of this great surgeon's appearance was to give new vigor to the

defenders, and to it was due the fact that the city was saved.

In his time Paré met with success such as to-day would be pronounced

most extraordinary. He inspired the wounded with utmost confidence,

and displayed, always and everywhere, remarkable firmness. Not the

least notable feature in his personal history is it that he should have

so long retained favor at court with such outspoken independence of

character.

Equally reputable among army surgeons of the past, and one of the most

commanding figures in history, medical or other, was Baron Larrey. For

more than fifty years he was an army surgeon, and for a great part of

that period he stood really closer to Napoleon than almost any of the

men whom the latter attached to his person by one or another of those

traits that made him such a remarkable figure. That one of the greatest

murderers and one of the greatest life-savers of all time should

have been so closely drawn to each other, constitutes one of the most

noteworthy incidents of history. Alike in many respects, so unlike in

so many others, it is one of the most creditable features of Napoleon's

career that he should have accorded to Larrey that recognition which

he early gave and never withdrew. Never was such tribute more signally

deserved nor worthily bestowed. Though he passed through twenty-six

campaigns, "from Syria to Portugal, and from Moscow to Madrid," and

though his wonderful courage never failed him under the most trying

surroundings of carnage and conflict, it may still be questioned

whether it did not take a higher degree or order of courage to face

Napoleon in his tent, or tell him plain truths in the Tuilleries.

The history of campaigning affords innumerable incidents illustrating

heroism under fire, or equally trying circumstances, and it is

difficult and perhaps unjust to single out a few for individual

mention. Bravery is confined to no epoch and to no race; it is simply

a God-given trait, not by any means possessed by all men. Take, for

instance, one incident in the career of Larrey. During the landing of

the English on the shores of Aboukir Bay, when General Silly had his

knee crushed by a bullet, Larrey appreciated that immediate amputation

was imperative, and gaining consent performed it, in three minutes,

under the enemy's fire. Just as he was finished the English cavalry

charged upon them; in his own words, "I had scarcely time," he said,

"to take the wounded officer on my shoulders and carry him rapidly

toward our army which was in full retreat. I spied a series of ditches

across which I passed, while the enemy had to go around by a more

circuitous route. Thus I had the happiness to reach the rear guard

of our army before this corps of dragoons reached us. I arrived at

Alexandria with this honorable, wounded officer, where I completed his

cure."

Perhaps under no circumstance did Larrey's courage and zeal show to

better advantage than in the awful retreat from Moscow. For example,

after the terrible battle of Borodino, Larrey made two hundred

amputations, practically with his own hands, where there were neither

couches nor coverings of any kind, when the cold was so intense that

the instruments often fell from the benumbed fingers of the surgeons,

and when food consisted of horse flesh, cabbage stalks and a few

potatoes. And all this while the savage Cossacks were hovering around

equally ready to kill both surgeons and patients. Soon after came the

passage of the Beresina, with its attendant horrors. General Zayonchek,

over sixty years of age, had his knee crushed, and was in need of

immediate amputation, which Larrey performed under the enemy's fire,

amid the falling snow, with no shelter except a cloak, held by two

officers over the patient while the operation was being performed. The

General recovered, and died fourteen years later as Viceroy of Poland.

It was after this passage of the Beresina by the Imperial Guard that

it was discovered that all the requisites for the sick and wounded had

been left behind and on the other side. Larrey at once recrossed the

river, and found himself amidst a furious, struggling crowd, in danger

of being crushed to death, when suddenly the soldiers recognized him.

Immediately they took him up in their arms, crossed the river with him,

crying, "let us save him who saved us," and forgot their own safety

in their regard for him whose merciful kindness they had so often

experienced.

Another incident in Larrey's career: Ever faithful to Napoleon, his

adored master, through victory or reverse, Larrey stood one night with

a small group of medical men gazing over the field of Waterloo, and

upon the wounded and dying who lay groaning around him. Suddenly they

were charged by a squadron of Prussian Lancers, at whom Larrey fired

his pistols and galloped away, but was overtaken by the Prussians, who

shot his horse, sabred him, and left him for dead. After a while he

recovered his senses, and tried to make his way across lots to France,

but was again captured by another detachment of cavalry, who robbed

him of everything, and then took him to headquarters, where it was

ordered that he be shot. Think of such a fate for one who had saved so

many lives! But the order would have been carried out promptly had not

one of the Prussian surgeons recognized Larrey, having attended his

lectures several years previously. Accordingly he was brought before

Bülow, and finally before Marshall Blücher, whose son had been wounded

and captured by the French in the Austrian Campaign, and whose life had

been saved by Larrey's exertions. You may imagine that it did not take

long to reverse that order for execution.

Praise from Napoleon was most rare, but of Larrey he made this remark

in his will, along with a bequest of 100,000 francs, "He is the most

virtuous man I have ever known."

Let us mention a few other instances. For example, Surgeon Thomson, who

during the Crimean war, after the battle of the Alma, volunteered, with

his servant, John McGrath, to remain behind on the open, unsheltered

field, with five hundred Russians so wounded as to be disabled or even

at the point of death. For three days and nights these two Englishmen

remained practically alone upon that field, covered only with dead and

dying, among foreign foes, none of them able to help themselves, or

even to speak in a language that could be understood.

At the battle of Inkerman Assistant Surgeon Wolesley had established

his field hospital in that awful place of slaughter, the Sandbag

Battery. When its defenders were reduced to 150 men, and were forced to

leave it, most of them retreated in one direction to find, only thirty

paces away, a Russian battalion blocking their path. There was not one

competent officer left, so this surgeon took command. Seizing a bayonet

because he had no sword, he spoke hurriedly to the men, and explained

that their next fight was not merely for victory, but for their own

lives; then he led them in a charge that tore so fiercely through the

Russian detachment that but half of them reached the other side alive.

During the South African campaign the papers recorded (but how few read

of it?) the fate of Surgeon Landon, who was shot through the spine

while ministering to the wounded on Majuba Hill. Paralyzed below the

waist, he had himself propped up, and continued his work as best he

could until his strength failed, when he said, "I am dying; do what you

can for the wounded."

It may be of interest to devote here a few minutes to the consideration

of conditions obtaining at the time of our Revolutionary War. In

1776 the barber surgeon still had a place in the armies of the world

and was even then regarded as scarcely more than a menial. Never

was he accorded the respect or the honors of a gentleman, nor was

he allowed to carry a sword. On the other hand, he was subjected to

corporal punishment, and could be caned by his colonel, or almost

anyone else, whenever such an act was provoked. It may be said that

the English troops were somewhat better equipped than were the hired

Hessians, while the French, who came to our aid, brought with them

some far better men, who were in many respects a revelation during our

revolution and an inspiration to our own so-called surgeons. But our

colonial and general governments dealt very stingily with our army

medical department, and their professional equipments were of the most

meagre; in fact, the history of surgery of those days, either in the

army or in civil life, is practically the history of a few prominent

individuals, most of whom had spent the time and money required for

study abroad, and who had come home bringing back with them the best

of their day, such as it was. For instance, there were the Warren

brothers, in Boston, of whom the elder, Joseph, started Paul Revere on

his famous ride. He was elected President of the Provincial Congress,

and just before the battle of Bunker Hill was made Major General of the

Continental forces, a position which he preferred to that of Physician

General, which he had been offered. During the battle he fought with

a musket, as though a private, and was shot down just as the conflict

ended. The younger brother, John, lived to achieve fame and reputation,

and transmitted them to his posterity.

During the war some colonial regiments even came into camp without any

surgeon, or the slightest provision for disease or injury. In 1776

Congress ordered that there should be one surgeon and five assistants

to each 5,000 enlisted men, the former being paid $1.66 per day,

the latter $1 a day. Imagine the attention that could be bestowed

upon 5,000 soldiers by six men whose services were thus compensated.

Camp hygiene, hospital corps, and ambulance service were undreamed

of; nevertheless John Warren, then only twenty-three years of age,

accomplished a great deal in building up a medical corps, while as much

more was done by Benjamin Church, of Boston, who was styled Director

General and Chief Physician, and who was paid $4 a day. Unfortunately

Church was detected in traitorous correspondence with the enemy,

was court-martialed, imprisoned for a year, then allowed to leave

the country, and was probably lost at sea. He was succeeded by John

Morgan, of Philadelphia, who had to fight the politicians as well as

the foreign enemy and, failing to satisfy them, was dismissed from the

service, though acquitted from all blame. Thus you see that even in

those days the politicians made it hard to secure adequate and proper

care for our sick and wounded soldiers. Everywhere at that time were

unrest, excitement, and suspicion, and their demoralizing effects

showed in every department of military as of civil government. After

Morgan came Shippen, who held office from 1777 to 1781, under whose

guidance affairs in the medical department improved very much. Smallpox

had been perhaps the greatest scourge of the soldiers, as well as of

the people in general, but this was kept in subjection by the practice

of inoculation, which had been generally accepted in this country by

nearly all men from Washington down.

A word or two must also be said about that remarkable man, Benjamin

Rush, with his many-sided, versatile, erratic, obstinate and querulous

character, who nevertheless constituted in his day the most prominent

figure in the profession; who served two years in Congress; who signed

the Declaration of Independence; and who, in the same year, got his

first army medical experience. It was perhaps not strange that, with

his peculiar temperament, he failed to come under the influence of

Washington's peculiar personal magnetism, and that their personal

relations were not at all to Rush's credit, since he endeavored in many

ways to belittle his Commander-in-Chief, and suffered therefor a rather

ignominious exposure.

The temptation is always to place most stress upon accounts of heroism

which happens to be most publicly performed. While this is not

unnatural it is often an injustice, since an act of courage may be

performed in the lime-light of publicity, with a regard for notoriety,

that would be lost were it done in private. It perhaps is not kind

to think that anyone would ever be more courageous in public than in

private, and yet it is to be feared that human nature is not always

free from temptation of this kind. But the real silent heroes of

military or civil medical life are those who engage in duties which

nevertheless have even more of danger about them than spectacular

performances upon the battle field. Take for instance, the work done by

Major Reed and Dr. Carroll, who devoted themselves for months to the

study of yellow fever. Many a man will stand upon the field of battle

permitting himself to be fired upon, but how many will deliberately

submit to being bitten by insects believed to be carriers of the germs

of yellow fever. Dr. Carroll had this quiet kind of bravery, and

allowed himself to be bitten by a mosquito that twelve days previously

had filled himself with the blood of a yellow fever patient, and in

consequence suffered from a severe attack, barely escaping with his

life. Dr. Lazear permitted the same experiment upon himself, but was

not at that time infected; but some days later while in the yellow

fever ward he was bitten by a mosquito, made careful note of the fact,

acquired the disease in its most hideous form, and died a martyr to

science, as true a hero as ever died upon fortress or man-of-war.

Others, too, willingly exposed themselves, but there was at that time

no other fatality to record. But realizing the value of the service

rendered, the indisputable proof of the nature of the disease, and

the method by which it is carried, the value of the demonstration

becomes inestimable, since a true prophylaxis was demonstrated, and a

means furnished of ridding the community of this fearful pestilence.

Moreover, it was shown how unnecessary it is to destroy valuable

property, it being only necessary to kill the mosquitoes, and do away

with their breeding places. Major Reed died a few years after he had

led in this fight against the dread disease, but no monument, or other

testimonial which can be erected to the memory of Reed, Carroll and

Lazear can adequately express the value of the service which they have

rendered to the world.

"Peace hath her victories no less than war." This epigram is as true

of the conflicts in which the medical profession engage as of any

other. This same sentiment has been put in other words. It is said,

"That peace hath higher tests of manhood than battle ever knew." For

instance, in New York there is a simple tablet commemorating, in loving

remembrance, the death of eighteen young physicians who, one after

another, attended a ship load of emigrants sick of typhus fever on

Quarantine Island. They fought their good fight and were buried without

martial music, adding eighteen names to the innumerable list of victims

who have fought the silent battle of dealing with disease, public

gainers only in this, that someone has been thoughtful enough to record

their names in this semi-public fashion.

Taken again the case of Dr. Franz Muller, of Vienna, who contracted

the bubonic plague while working in the laboratory with its germs.

Just so soon as he realized that he himself was infected he locked

himself in an isolated room, and pasted upon the window pane a sheet

of paper containing this message, "I am suffering from plague. Do not

send a doctor to me, as in any event my end will come in four or five

days." He refused to admit those who were anxious to do for him, wrote

a letter to his parents which he placed against the window, so that it

could be copied from the outside, then burned the original, fearing

that if sent through the mail it might carry the elusive germ. Was not

this equal to any instance of valor under the excitement or the stress

of battle and cannonade? Could anyone more worthily win a Victorian

Cross, or any other emblem of courage and heroism?

Many of you have been in, or will go to Havana. It will be worth your

while to make a pilgrimage to the cemetery there, where were buried

sixteen young medical students who lost their lives under peculiar

circumstances, which afford as well an illustration of Spanish tyranny

and injustice. In 1871 one of the professors in the medical school

died, and was followed to his grave by the students whom he had taught,

and who loved him. Unfortunately they committed an indiscretion

by scribbling with a pencil in a public place some criticism on

the government; in consequence they were reported, arrested and

court-martialed. The written paragraphs were evidence sufficient, and

the Governor General ordered the ranks of students to be decimated.

There were 160 students all told, and in accordance with this sentence

sixteen of them were next day shot without any further ceremony. Of

these the youngest was not quite sixteen years old, and his father

offered his entire fortune for his life, but without avail. Later the

citizens of Havana erected a monument of white marble, at no small

cost, to commemorate this sacrifice.

There comes over me, as I prepare these words to read to you, a

feeling of their inadequacy, and of lack of personal justice to many

of my auditors. Brought up in civil life, with but a smattering of

military training, I am rehearsing incidents of which you may read

as easily as I, while at the same time I do not forget that from

the lives of many of my auditors there might be drawn just as many

illustrations of courage, fortitude, endurance and personal valor as

any that the Surgeon General's library records. Unfortunately I am not

familiar with them. They are, happily in one respect, too numerous to

mention, and again are not yet public property, because modesty is

ever the accompaniment of these other traits which we all admire so

much. Hence, gentlemen, if I seem to you to disregard or forget many an

incident in your lives or the careers of your friends, ascribe it to my

ignorance rather than to my intent, and to the fact that I have never

seen a battle, and that my fights with disease have not been fought

in camps, but within the walls of the quiet sick room or hospital

ward. Nevertheless I am never happier than when I can try to compel a

wider public recognition of what you are constantly doing and of your

valorous deeds.

Next to those general improvements in the service which have come about

through natural causes, and as results of a better appreciation of its

needs, and of a generally improved state of the profession, nothing

has come from outside during the past fifty years which has been so

helpful and advantageous as the support afforded by the Red Cross, and

the introduction of skilled nurses; in fact the greatest help which

the medical service of the army and navy can enjoy is that which comes

from this volunteer and outside source. By the way, I wonder how many

of you recall, or are familiar with, the beginnings of the Red Cross

movement? So important has it become that its history should be well

known to all. In June, 1859, was fought the bloody battle of Solferino,

at the conclusion of which some 36,000 French, Sardinian and Austrian

soldiers lay dead or dying on the field. The medical corps was, of

course, absolutely inadequate to the work thrown upon them, and as

usual thousands of wounded men had to care for themselves as best they

could. A Swiss traveler, Henri Dunant, viewing the scenes, and being

profoundly impressed by them, not only assisted in the work of relief,

but wrote a book entitled, "A Souvenir of Solferino," in which he urged

more humane, widespread and speedy aid to the wounded. M. Moynier,

president of the Society of Public Utility, of Geneva, a man of

independent means; Dr. Appia, a wise physician, and M. Ador, an eminent

lawyer of Geneva, also became interested in the movement. The attention

of the General of the Swiss Army was called to it and his co-operation

enlisted. In this way came about, in 1863, the formation of a permanent

society for the relief of wounded soldiers. At a meeting held in

October in the same year men from many countries joined in discussing

the subject, and an international conference was held, which resulted

in calling an international convention, to be held at Geneva in the

autumn of 1864.

Such was the beginning of the Red Cross movement, which has now

extended all over the world, and has afforded an opportunity for all

races, creeds and nationalities to care for those who are made victims

of war or pestilence, or who suffer from any other great disaster

with which private charity is unable to cope. It marks a step in the

evolution of mankind, and has now achieved such universal recognition

that national governments and individual potentates are glad to join

hands in the great work.

The Evil Eye, Thanatology, and Other Essays · 第 16 / 22 段