Even now some of these ancient superstitions remain in recognizable

form. The moon is supposed to exert a baneful or lucky influence

according as it is first viewed; the mystic horse-shoe, which is a

purely uterine symbol, is still widely employed; lucky and unlucky

days are still regarded; our playing cards are indicated by phallic

symbols, the spade, the triadic club, the omphallic distaff and

eminence disguised as the heart and the diamonds. Dionysius reappears

as St. Denys, or in France as St. Bacchus; Satan is revered as St.

Satur or St. Swithin; the Holy Virgin, Astraea, whose return was

heralded by Virgil as introducing the Golden Age, is now designated

as the Blessed Virgin, Queen of Heaven. The Mother and Child are

to-day in Catholic countries adored as much as were Ceres and Bacchus,

or Isis and the infant Horus, centuries ago. The nuns of Christian

to-day are the nuns of the Buddhists or of the Egyptian worshippers

of Isis, and the phallic import is not lost even in their case since

they are the "Brides of the Savior." The libations of human blood

which were formerly offered to Bacchus found most tragic imitation in

the sacrifices of later days. The screechings of the ancient prophets

of Baal, and of the Egyptian worshippers, preceded the flagellations

of the penitentes. Even recently, during Holy Week in Rome, devotees

lash themselves until the blood runs, as did the young men in ancient

Rome during the Lupercalia. And even yet in New Mexico the Indian

_penitentes_ repeat the cruel flagellations and cross-bearing taught by

the Spanish priest, to the extent--sometimes--of an actual crucifixion.

In the ancient Roman catacombs are found portraits of the utensils

and furniture of the ancient mysteries, and one drawing shows a woman

standing before an altar offering buns to a certain god. In fact we may

say there is no Christian fast nor festival, procession nor sacrament,

custom nor example, that do not come quite naturally from previous

paganism.

The Creation is in fact a _human rather than a divine product_, in

this sense that it was suggested to the mind of man by the existence

of things, while its method was, at least at first, suggested by the

operations of nature; thus man saw the living bird emerge from the

egg, after a certain period of incubation, a phenomenon equivalent to

actual creation as apprehended by his simple mind. Incubation obviously

then associated itself with Creation, and this fact will explain

the universality with which the egg was received as a symbol in the

earlier systems of cosmogony. By a similar process creation came to be

symbolized in the form of a phallus, and so the Egyptians, in their

refinement of these ideas, adopted as their symbol of the first great

cause, a Scarabaeus, indicating the great hermaphroditic unity since

they believed this insect to be both male and female.

Further exemplification of the same underlying principle is seen in the

fact that most all of the ancient deities were paired, thus we have

heaven and earth, sun and moon, fire and earth, father and mother, etc.

Faber says,--"The Ancient Pagans of almost every part of the globe were

wont to symbolize the world by an egg; hence this symbol is introduced

into the cosmogonies of nearly all nations, and there are few persons

even among those who have made mythology their study to whom the

mundane egg is not perfectly familiar; it is the emblem not only of

earth and life but also of the universe in its largest extent."

I began this essay with the intention of demonstrating the recondite

but positive connection between the symbolism of the Church of to-day

and the phallic and iatric cults of pre-christian centuries. (Much

of the subject matter contained in the previous essay (III) may be

profitably read in this connection). As a humble disciple of that

Aesculapius who was the reputed founder of our craft, I have felt

that every genuine scholar in medicine should be familiar with these

relations between the past and the present.

V

THE RELATION OF THE GRECIAN MYSTERIES TO THE FOUNDATION OF CHRISTIANITY

Ever since mentality has been an attribute of mankind, man has

appreciated that he is surrounded by a vast incomprehensible mystery

which ever closes in upon him, and from whose environment he may never

free himself. The endeavor to solve this mystery has on one hand

stimulated his reasoning power, and on the other nearly paralyzed it.

Having no better guidance he has in all time attributed to a Great

First Cause powers and faculties, even shape and form, more or less

human; thus from time immemorial God or the Gods have been given a

kingdom, a throne, some definite form, and even offspring. To him

or them have been given purely human attributes, and they have been

supposed to possess human passions and to be capable of love, wrath,

strength, etc. In nearly all ages lightning, for instance, has been

regarded as an expression of divine fury. As intelligence advanced

the number of Gods was reduced and their manifestations classified

and studied more or less imaginatively; and so while men have always

acknowledged the impossibility of explaining the great mysteries of

creation and of space, they have seemed to find it necessary to create

other equally inscrutable mysteries of purely human invention, such as

the incarnation, the trinity, the resurrection, vicarious salvation,

metempsychosis, and the like.

History shows the love of mystery to be contagious as well as

productive of its kind, and the origin of mystic teachings as well as

of most secret societies bears out these statements. Secrets, guarded

by fearful oaths, personified by meaningless emblems, concealed either

in language unintelligible to others, or else hidden in terms whose

special meaning is known only to the initiated, made attractive by

special signs, symbols, innocent rites, or barbarous observances,--all

of these means were designed solely to keep men banded together for

the purpose of forming a propaganda intended to perpetuate yet other

mysteries in which the initiates were especially interested. Since

history began such associations of men have existed for most diverse

ends, all having this in common, that only by this means could they

secure and maintain influence and power.

And so the series of pictures which represent man in this role may be

regarded as a panorama, led by garlanded priests carrying images of

Isis or droning hymns to Demeter of Eleusis, or Druids preparing for

their human sacrifices; followed by gay and voluptuous Bacchantes,

succeeded by white-robed Pythagoreans; next may come the suffering

Essenes bearing crosses, then the Latin Brotherhoods, followed by the

German and English Guilds, the Stone Masons with their implements,

the Crusader Knights, those coming first having an appearance of

actual humility and devotion, while those who follow are haughty and

contemptuous to a degree. Then would follow the black-robed Penitentes

and the members of the Society of Jesus, sanctimonious, with eyes cast

down, human machines, mere tools in the hands of their superiors; the

panorama continuing with a widely assorted lot of scholars, artisans

and men of all conditions in various regalia, and terminated with an

indistinguishable multitude of variously adorned men, some sleek and

fat, others ill-conditioned, some devout and sincere, others mere

jesters and knaves from every walk of life.

It was most natural and to be expected that primitive man should be

most profoundly impressed with the forces of nature, often terrifying

and frightful, often winsome and attractive, and that he should bow

himself down to the unknown cause of these manifestations. With his

extremely finite mind he necessarily personified them; after having

done this he proceeded to propitiate them by worship with certain forms

of ritual. Perhaps fire first and most of all attracted him in this

way, and drew from him the earliest acts of worship, for in spite of

the general views to the contrary fire is often of natural origin,

and must have been known to men before they became able to produce

it by their own efforts. From practical to generalized concepts was

a natural step, and thus mythology had its beginnings; the earliest

distinctions were as between that which is overhead, i. e. Heaven, and

that which is beneath, namely, the earth; these are the beginnings

of all cosmogonies. Next the Gods were given the attributes of sex;

Heaven was represented as masculine, fructifying, powerful; Earth as

conceptive, female and gentle. By the union of these two were produced

sun, moon and their progeny--the stars. Later the sun became Poseidon

or Neptune, because he appeared from and disappeared into the sea. Then

the imagination began to run riot, and gave rise to many individual

divinities, gods and goddesses, all with human passions and attributes,

mingling and propagating after human fashion, and begetting dynasties

and half human races, whose doings were the subject of countless epics,

dramas, myths and romances.

Thus time passed on and the original sense or meaning of these

myths, descending slowly by oral tradition, became lost, while the

myths themselves were for a long time accepted as historical facts.

Nevertheless in all ages there have been men who, like Aristotle,

Cicero and Plutarch, have questioned the accuracy of these statements

and shown themselves intelligent and active sceptics. During all these

times, however, a wily priest-craft had lived and thrived on the

superstitions of the common people and the practices in which they have

indulged; by these men, thus conditioned, any active doubt was regarded

as subversive of the system by which they were supported, and as one

not to be tolerated;--this condition pertaining not only to antiquity,

since it is too significant a feature even of the early years of this

twentieth century. A more or less honest though misinformed priesthood

has, in all times, been in favor of the purification of the theology

in vogue in their times and among their inner circles, and has in the

main given the most rationalistic interpretation to the obscure things

which they taught, and practised what their education and environment

would permit. But in order to preserve the mysteries, to maintain them

as such, and save themselves from becoming superfluous, not to say

intolerable, these same mysteries have been tricked out with mysticism,

symbolism of the most fantastic character, and allegory of the most

bewildering kind; moreover this has often been accomplished by dramatic

representations and by moralizing or demoralizing ceremonies. The

countries in which these "mysteries," as they have since been known,

were most commonly practised and most widely believed were Egypt,

Chaldea and Greece.

The sources of the Egyptian mysteries, like those of Egyptian

civilization, are the most difficult to discover. The Nile is

necessarily the basis of Egyptian history, geography, activity and

habits, and consequently must be also of the Egyptian cult. The people

who were known as Egyptians invaded the land of the Nile from the

direction of Asia, and found there a race of negro type whom they

subdued and with whom they later mingled. The Semites called the land

Misraim; the Greeks finally changed the name of its great river to

Neilos. The country is a land of enigmas. Who built those pyramids, and

why? Who originated the system of pictorial writing which we call the

hieroglyphic? Who planned those wonderful temples now either in ruins,

as in upper Egypt, or buried beneath the desert sands, as in lower

Egypt? Who brought and erected those mighty blocks of stone or massive

slabs from enormous distances, and handled them as we could scarcely do

to-day with the best of modern machinery?

In course of time two hereditary classes were formed, the priests who

dominated the minds, and the warriors who controlled the bodies of the

conquered people and the lower classes. The latter kept the throne of

Egypt occupied, while the former, having a monopoly of the knowledge of

the time, prescribed for the people what they must believe, yet were

very far from accepting these precepts for themselves, and in their

inner circles made light of that which they preached to the despised

classes without.

The Egyptians named their Sun God RE, but assigned the various

attributes of the sun to different personalities; they had moreover not

only Gods for the whole land, but Ptah was God of Memphis, Ammon God

of Thebes, etc. Local deities were often constructed out of inspiring

objects or from animals inhabited by spirits, and thus the fetichism

of the original negro race exerted no little influence upon the higher

cult of their lighter colored conquerors. Worship was paid to animals

not for their own sake but because of the Gods who were supposed to

reside within them; thus their prominent Gods were represented with

the head of some animal. This honor belonged not to any individual

animal but of necessity to the entire species, certain representatives

of which were maintained at public expense in the temples, where they

were carefully guarded and waited upon by the faithful. To harm one of

these animals was to be severely punished, to kill one of them was to

die. Conversely when a God failed in responding to the prayers of the

faithful his fetich had to suffer, and the priests first threatened the

animal, and if menaces were unavailing they killed the sacred beast,

albeit in secret, lest the people should learn of it.

As time went on there was less of zoölatry, and the Sun-Gods and their

associates figured more largely among the cult of the people. The sun's

course was not represented as that of a chariot, as among the Persians

and Greeks, but rather as the voyage of a Nile boat, upon which the

God Re navigated the heavens; from which it will appear that the

priestly religion was making slow progress to monotheism by means of

oligotheism. The secret teaching of the priests was now more and more

to the effect that the Gods stood not so much for themselves as for

something else. During the fourth dynasty the lower Egyptian city Anu

was known as the City of the Sun, hence the Greek name for the place,

Heliopolis. Still more characteristic was the giving of the name of

Osiris, who figured as God of Abdu, which the Greeks called Abydos,

in upper Egypt, to the God of the Sunset, who was king of the lower

domains and of death, brother and at the same time husband of Isis,

brother also of Set, who slew him, and father of Horus, i. e. God of

the new sun, who figures after each sunset. Horus fought with Set,

but being unable to completely destroy him left him the desert as his

kingdom, while himself holding to the Nile valley. This story of the

Gods was publicly represented in various scenes on certain holidays,

but only the priests, i. e., the initiated, knew the real meaning of

the representations. Even the name of Osiris and his abode were kept

secret, and outsiders heard only of the "great God" dwelling somewhere

in "the West."

These were the most famous of all the old Egyptian mysteries, though

to them were added many others, including that of Apis, the sacred

bull of Memphis, who served also as the symbol of the Sun and of the

fructifying Nile; beneath his tongue was to be seen the sacred beetle,

and the behavior of the great animal was supposed to be prophetic and

his actions to mean oracular sayings. The Sphinx again was a sun-God,

his image being repeated throughout the Nile region, and was always

thought of as a male; the head was represented as that of some king,

while the whole figure stood for the Sun-God Harmachis; although the

sphinx later introduced into Greece was always female.

While the Egyptians did not attribute to their numerous Gods divine

perfection, they nevertheless regarded religious practices as a means

of currying favor with their divinities, a custom apparently still in

favor. The priests believed in a Sun-God as the only true deity, but

not so the people; thus the priests in the various cities praised their

local and tutelary God as supreme and made him identical with Re, whose

name they appended to the original, as for instance _Amon-Re_. The

king, no matter where he was, prayed always to the local deity as lord

of heaven and earth, yet in words always the same.

At last during the eighteenth dynasty, about 1460 B. C., Amenhotep IV

realized that the power of the priesthood was a menace to the crown

and therefore proclaimed the Sun as the sole God, not in human shape,

but in that of a disk. He ordered all other images of other Gods

associated with the sun to be destroyed; the priests of these deposed

Gods lost their places and estates, which latter were confiscated.

But his sons-in-law who succeeded him restored the deposed monarchs.

Nevertheless they were marked as heretics by those priests who were

reinstated in their former power. In consequence of this conflict,

which was violent and prolonged, the intellectual life of Egypt was

paralyzed and the mystic teachings of the priests were henceforth not

disturbed by any wave of progress or advance.

The people again sank into a stupid and unredeemable formalism,

demonism and sorcery. With the purpose of amusing them the priests

furnished gorgeous sacrificial processions and festivals, while at

the same time drawing them away from the true God by teaching them a

worship of deceased kings and queens. They also built temples, to only

the outer portion of which were the people generally admitted, while

the innermost portions were guarded by these priests lest the mysteries

thus protected be such no longer. They also procured the building of

the ancient Labyrinth, near Lake Moeris, of which Herodotus tells us

that there were fifteen hundred chambers above ground and as many more

under ground, which latter were never shown except to the initiated,

and which contained the remains of sacred crocodiles and of the

Pharaohs.

The Egyptian priests taught that man was made up of _body_, a material

essence or the _soul_, which in the shape of a bird left the body

at death, and an _immaterial spirit_ which held to the man the same

relation which a God held to the animal in which he dwelt, and which

at death departed from the body like the image of a dream. They taught

also that, if the soul and spirit were to live on, the body should be

embalmed and laid in a rock chamber, and that then the relatives must

supply meat, drink, and clothing for its use. The spirit took its way

to Osiris and by means of a magic formula the dead would be made one

with Osiris; hence in the Egyptian "Book of the Dead" the deceased was

addressed as Osiris with his own name added, and could now lead a happy

life in the other world, which life was portrayed on the walls of the

Sepulchres in pictures which are still to be seen, showing how the

creature comforts of this world were to be enhanced in the next. Having

reached the outer world, and having escaped the host of demons that

threatened him on his passage, he could then revisit this earth at will

in any form.

The Egyptian priests also taught that there was a judgment of the dead,

and that new comers had to appear before Osiris, with his forty-two

Assessors, and disclaim the commission of each one of forty-two sins;

all of which was a magic formula for obtaining bliss according to

their notion rather than anything intended as a true statement. The

hippopotamus figured as an active agent in the Book of the Dead,

appearing always as the accuser, when the sins and the good deeds were

being weighed in the balance, while the God Thot was the "attorney for

the defense."

All these secret doctrines of a priestcraft necessitated secret

associations, at least of the higher priests, to which the king was

always admitted, the only Egyptian outside of the priesthood to be

thus taught their secrets. This was purely for protection; having less

fear of foreigners these priests often initiated distinguished men

from foreign lands, Greeks especially. Thus Orpheus, Homer, Lycurgus,

Solon, Herodotus, Pythagoras, Plato, Archimedes, and many others,

received the secret doctrine. The ritual was a long and tedious but

significant ceremony, taught by degrees like the Masonry of to-day, and

necessitated in some cases the right of circumcision; all who passed

it were pledged to the most strict silence. According to Diodorus the

Orphic Mysteries were in large degree a repetition of the Egyptian,

while the Greek legislators, philosophers and mathematicians whom I

have named drew their knowledge from the same source; all of which is

probably a very gross exaggeration. Nevertheless it would appear from

the hieroglyphic remains that high grade schools were conducted by the

Egyptian priests, and that foreign scholars could obtain for themselves

instruction in the exact sciences of the day. Only the priests,

however, were able to write the hieroglyphics, at least in the earlier

centuries of Egyptian history.

There can be no doubt but that the secret doctrine of the Egyptian

priests was both philosophic and religious, and was sharply

distinguished from the popular belief which mistook tradition for

truth; that it was monotheistic, that it rejected polytheism and

zoölatry, and that the true signification of Egyptian mythology was

expounded in private. Moreover an essential part of this mystery

concerned the interpretation of myths as allegorical accounts of

personified natural phenomena. For instance Plutarch ("Isis and

Osiris") writes--"When we hear of the Egyptian myths of the Gods, their

wanderings, their dismemberment and other like incidents, we must

recall the remarks already made, so as to understand that the stories

told are not to be taken literally as recounting actual occurrences."

Without now going into the subject of the relative age of the Egyptian

and Chaldean cults, I will remind you that the secret wisdom of

one race was not excelled by that of the other. The Chaldean races

are undoubtedly of Turanian origin, and their form of religion was

peculiar to the Ural-Altaic stock and the Turkic races, who originated

the Cuneiform writing. Their most ancient writings represented evil

spirits as coming from the desert in groups of seven, and contained

formulas for exorcising them; they were presided over by the heavens,

while from the higher spirits evolved Gods and Goddesses in countless

number. Upon the original ground work of Chaldean ideas a Semitic race

built a superstructure, and the first traces of the Babylonians and

Assyrians appeared some four thousand years B. C. Their highest God was

an individual whom they named Baal, while the sun and moon were his

images. As in Egypt the priests were held in great reverence, standing

next after the king, who was _ex officio_ high priest; they too had a

secret doctrine withheld from the vulgar. Although the Chaldeans were

astrologers rather than astronomers, they were yet familiar enough with

the heavens to estimate astral phenomena for what they really were,

instead of holding them to be Gods, though they may have represented

them as such to the common people. Their literature contained numerous

mythological poems, so obscure that to understand them a key was

required, which key was only in the possession of the priests. Inasmuch

as Abraham came from Ur in Chaldea, with him crept into biblical

literature much of the Chaldean tradition and folklore. The Chaldeans

had also their Noah, and their deluge, in which the dove figured as in

the biblical account. When the proprietor of the Ark finally freed the

animals he erected an altar and offered sacrifice, to which the Gods

gathered "like masses of flies." This story contributes but one section

of the great Chaldean epic in which are recounted the exploits of a

hero corresponding with the Nimrod of the Hebrew Bible, dating from the

twenty-third century B. C., and reminding one forcibly of the Herculean

and many other myths recounted in other ancient languages.

An off-shoot of the Chaldean culture was that of Persia, whose priestly

class were far removed above the warriors and farmers that constituted

the other two classes. Priests married only among their own race,

possessed all the knowledge, made their king _ex officio_ one of

themselves, and practised itinerant teaching, but solely among their

own caste. In the holy city, Ragha, the priests alone held rule and no

secular power prevailed; Zoroaster was their founder; they were the

physicians, astrologers, interpreters of dreams, scribes and officers

of justice, while they impressed upon the minds of the people their

exclusive duties;--to reverence the holy fire, which was their greatest

mystery, to listen to the teaching of passages from the sacred book,

and to perform numerous ceremonies of purification. Only the initiated

were taught the meaning of the strife between the good Ormuzd and the

evil Ahriman, which was probably the alternation of day and night, and

of summer and winter.

The Evil Eye, Thanatology, and Other Essays · 第 5 / 22 段