Their reputation as men of letters was established by the publication in

1854-5 of 'Histoire de la Societe Pendant la Revolution' and the same

'Pendant le Directoire' the aim of which, they said, was "to paint in

vivid, simple colors the France of 1789 to 1800." This object they

accomplished, so far as it concerned the society of which they

themselves were descendants; but the reactionary spirit in them was too

strong for an impartial view of the struggle, and their lack of true

philosophic spirit and broad human sympathy led them to make a picture

that, interesting as it is, is sadly distorted. Their vivid colors are

lavished mainly on the outrages of the rioters and the sufferings of the

aristocrats. But for wealth of detail, the result of tireless research,

the history is of value as a record of the manners and customs of the

fashionable set of the period. Of the same sort were their other

semi-historical works: 'Portraits Intimes du XVIIIieme Siecle,' separate

sketches of about a hundred more or less well-known figures of the age;

'L'Histoire de Marie Antoinette,' and 'La Femme au XVIIIieme Siecle,' in

which the gossip and anecdote of former generations are told again

almost as graphically as are those which the authors relate of their own

circle in their memoirs. Their most important contribution to literature

was their 'L'Art au XVIIIieme Siecle,' monographs gathered and published

in seventeen volumes, and representing a dozen years' labor. This was

indeed a labor of love, and it was not in vain; for it was these

appreciative studies more than anything else that turned public

attention to the almost forgotten delicacy of the school of painters

headed by Watteau, Fragonard, Latour, Boucher, Debricourt, and Greuze,

whose influence has ever since been manifested on the side of sound

taste and sanity in French art.

A volume entitled 'Idees et Sensations,' and their Journal and letters,

complete the list of the more important of their works outside the field

of fiction. The Journal will always be valuable as an almost complete

document of the literary history of France in their time, made up as it

is of impressions of and from the most important writers of the day,

with whom they were on terms of intimate friendship, including Flaubert,

Gautier, Renan, Sainte-Beuve, Hugo, Saint-Victor, Michelet, Zola, and

George Sand. In fiction the De Goncourts were less prolific, but it is

to their novels mainly that they owe their reputation for individuality,

and as true "path-breakers" in literature. They have been called the

initiators of modern French realism. Their friend Flaubert perhaps

better deserves the title. Their determination to see for themselves all

that could be seen, the result of which gave real worth to their

historical work, even where their prejudice robbed it of weight, was

what put the stamp of character upon their novels. How much importance

they attached to correct and comprehensive observation may be gathered

from their remark, "The art of learning how to see demands the longest

apprenticeship of all the arts." They took life as they found it,

examined it on every side,--rarely going far under the surface,--and

then sought to reproduce it on their pages as the artist would put it on

canvas. Capable of terseness, of suggestiveness, quick to note and

communicate the vital spark, they were yet rarely content with it alone.

Every minute particle of the body it vivified, they insisted on adding

to their picture. Nothing was to be taken for granted; as nothing was

accepted by them at second hand, so nothing was left to the imagination

of the reader until their comprehensive view was his. It was in this way

that they were realists. They did not seek out and expose to public view

the grossness and unpleasantness of life. Their own preference was for

the beautiful, and in their own lives they indulged their refined

tastes. But they looked squarely at the world about them, the ugly with

the beautiful, the impure with the pure, and they did not hesitate to

describe one almost as faithfully as the other.

Curiously, the discrimination against the masses and the bias that mar

their history do not appear in their fiction. "They began writing

history which was nothing but romance," says one of their critics, "and

later wrote romance which in reality is history." Indeed, their novels

are little more than sketches of what occurred around them. 'Madame

Gervaisais' is a character study of the aunt of strong literary

predilections who influenced Edmond; 'Germinie Lacerteux' is the

biography of their servant, at whose death, after long and faithful

service, they discovered that she had led a life of singular duplicity;

'Soeur Philomene' is a terribly true glimpse of hospital life, and

'Manette Salomon,' with its half-human monkey drawn from the life, is

transferred without change from the Parisian studios under the Empire.

'Renee Mauperin' comes nearest to the model of an ordinary novel; but no

one can read of the innocent tomboy girl struck down with fatal remorse

at the consequences of her own natural action, on learning of her

brother's dishonor, without feeling that this picture too was drawn from

the life. Several of their stories were dramatized, but with scant

success; and a play which they wrote, 'Henriette Marechal' and had

produced at the Comedie Francaise through the influence of Princess

Mathilde, their constant friend and patroness, was almost howled

down,--chiefly however for political reasons.

After the death of Jules de Goncourt, his brother wrote several books of

the same character as those which they produced in union, the best known

of which are 'La Fille Elisa,' and 'Cherie,' a study of a girl, said to

have been inspired by the Journal of Marie Bashkirtseff. The best

critics in France, notably Sainte-Beuve, have given the brothers

Goncourt a very high place in literature and conceded their originality.

English reviewers have been less ready to exalt them, mainly on account

of the offensive part of their realism. They have objected also to their

superficiality as historians, and to their sympathy with the sentimental

admirers of such types as Marie Antoinette; but they too have been ready

to praise the brothers as leaders of a new fashion, and especially for

their devotion to style. In this respect the Goncourts have few rivals

in French literature. Balzac himself was not more finical in the choice

of words, or more unsparing of his time and energy in writing and

re-writing until his exact meaning, no more or less, had been expressed;

and they covered up the marks of their toil better than he. In a letter

to Zola, Edmond de Goncourt said:--"My own idea is that my brother died

of work, and above all from the desire to elaborate the artistic form,

the chiseled phrase, the workmanship of style." He himself spent a long

life at this fine artistry, and died in Paris in July, 1896.

TWO FAMOUS MEN

From the Journal of the De Goncourts

March 3D [1862].--We took a walk and went off to find Theophile

Gautier.... The street in which he lives is composed of the most squalid

countrified buildings, of court-yards swarming with poultry, fruit shops

whose doors are ornamented with little brooms of black feathers: just

such a suburban street as Hervier might have painted.... We pushed open

the door of a house, and found ourselves in the presence of the lord of

epithet. The furniture was of gilded wood, covered with red damask,

after the heavy Venetian style; there were fine old pictures of the

Italian school; above the chimney a mirror innocent of quicksilver, on

which were scraped colored arabesques and various Persian

characters,--such a picture of meagre sumptuousness and faded splendor

as one would find in the rooms of a retired actress, who had come in for

some pictures through the bankruptcy of an Italian manager.

When we asked him if we were disturbing him, he answered: "Not at all. I

never work at home. I get through my 'copy' at the printing-office. They

set up the type as I write. The smell of the printers' ink is a sure

stimulant to work, for one feels the 'copy' must be handed in. I could

write only a novel in this way now; unless I saw ten lines printed I

could not get on to the next ten. The proof-sheet serves as a test to

one's work. That which is already done becomes impersonal, but the

actual 'copy' is part of yourself; it hangs like filaments from the root

of your literary life, and has not yet been torn away. I have always

been preparing corners where I should do my work, but when installed

there I found I could do nothing. I must be in the midst of things, and

can work only when a racket is going on about me; whereas, when I shut

myself up for work the solitude tells upon me and makes me sad."

From there Gautier got on the subject of the 'Queen of Sheba.' We

admitted our infirmity, our physical incapacity of taking in musical

sound; and indeed, a military band is the highest musical enjoyment of

which we are capable. Whereupon Gautier said, "Well, I'm delighted to

hear that: I am just like you; I prefer silence to music. I do know bad

music from good, because part of my life was spent with a singer, but

both are quite indifferent to me. Still it is curious that all the

literary men of our day feel the same about music. Balzac abhorred it,

Hugo cannot endure it, Lamartine has a horror of it. There are only a

few painters who have a taste for it."

Then Gautier fell to complaining of the times. "Perhaps I am getting an

old man, but I begin to feel as if there were no more air to breathe.

What is the use of wings if there is no air in which one can soar? I no

longer feel as if I belonged to the present generation. Yes, 1830 was a

glorious epoch, but I was too young by two or three years; I was not

carried away by the current; I was not ready for it. I ought to have

produced a very different sort of work."

There was then some talk of Flaubert, of his literary methods, of his

indefatigable patience, and of the seven years he devoted to a work of

four hundred pages. "Just listen," observed Gautier, "to what Flaubert

said to me the other day: 'It is finished. I have only ten more pages to

write; but the ends of my sentences are all in my head.' So that he

already hears in anticipation the music of the last words of his

sentences before the sentences themselves have been written. Was it not

a quaint expression to use? I believe he has devised a sort of literary

rhythm. For instance, a phrase which begins in slow measure must not

finish with a quick pace, unless some special effect is to be produced.

Sometimes the rhythm is only apparent to himself, and escapes our

notice. A story is not written for the purpose of being read aloud: yet

he shouts his to himself as he writes them. These shouts present to his

own ears harmonies, but his readers seem unaware of them."

Gautier's daughters have a charm of their own, a species of Oriental

languor, deep dreamy eyes, veiled by heavy eyelids, and a regularity in

their gestures and movements which they inherit from their father; but

this regularity is tempered in them by womanly grace. There is a charm

about them which is not all French; nevertheless there is a French

element about it, their little tomboyish tricks and expressions, their

habit of pouting, the shrugging of their shoulders, the irony which

escapes through the thin veil of childishness intended to conceal it.

All these points distinguish them from ordinary society girls, and make

clear a strong individuality of character which renders them fearless in

expressing their likings and antipathies. They display liberty of

speech, and have often the manner of a woman whose face is hidden by a

mask; and yet one finds here simplicity, candor, and a charming absence

of reserve, utterly unknown to the ordinary young girl.

* * * * *

November 23D [1863].--We have been to thank Michelet for the flattering

lines he wrote about us.

He lives in the Rue de l'Ouest, at the end of the Jardin du Luxembourg,

in a large house which might almost be workmen's dwellings. His flat is

on the third floor. A maid opened the door and announced us. We

penetrated into a small study.

The wife of the historian has a young, serious face; she was seated on a

chair beside the desk on which the lamp was placed, with her back to the

window. Michelet sat on a couch of green velvet, and was banked up by

cushions.

His attitude reminded us of his historical work: the lower portions of

his body were in full sight, whilst the upper were half concealed; the

face was a mere shadow surrounded with snowy white locks; from this

shadowy mass emerged a professorial, sonorous, singsong voice,

consciously important, and in which the ascending and descending scale

produced a continuous cooing sound.

He spoke to us in a most appreciative manner of our study of Watteau,

and then passed on to the interesting study which might be written on

French furniture.

"You gentlemen, who are observers of human nature," he cried suddenly,

"there is a history you should write,--the history of the lady's-maid. I

do not speak of Madame de Maintenon; but you have Mademoiselle de

Launai, the Duchesse de Grammont's Julie, who exercised on her mistress

so great an influence, especially in the Corsican affair. Madame Du

Deffand said sometimes that there were only two people sincerely

attached to her, D'Alembert and her maid. Oh! domesticity has played a

great part in history, though men-servants have been of comparative

unimportance....

"I was once going through England, traveling from York to Halifax. There

were pavements in the country lanes, with the grass growing on each side

as carefully kept as the pavements themselves; close by, sheep were

grazing, and the whole scene was lit up by gas. A singular sight!"

Then after a short pause:--"Have you noticed that the physiognomy of the

great men of to-day is so rarely in keeping with their intellect? Look

at their portraits, their photographs: there are no longer any good

portraits. Remarkable people no longer possess in their faces anything

which distinguishes them from ordinary folk. Balzac had nothing

characteristic. Would you recognize Lamartine if you saw him? There is

nothing in the shape of his head, or in his lustreless eyes, nothing but

a certain elegance which age has not affected. The fact is that in these

days there is too great an accumulation of people and things, much more

so than in former times. We assimilate too much from other people, and

this being the case, we lose even the individuality of our features; we

present the portrait of a collective set of people rather than of

ourselves."

We rose to take our leave; he accompanied us to the door; then by the

light of the lamp he carried in his hand we saw, for a second at least,

this marvelous historian of dreams, the great somnambulist of the past

and brilliant talker of the present.

THE SUICIDE

From 'Sister Philomene'

The next morning the whole hospital knew that Barnier, having scratched

his hand on the previous day while dissecting a body in a state of

purulent infection, was dying in terrible agonies.

When at four o'clock Malivoire, quitting for a few moments the bedside

of his friend, came to replace him in the service, the Sister went up to

him. She followed from bed to bed, dogging his steps, without however

accosting him, without speaking, watching him intently with her eyes

fixed on his. As he was leaving the ward:--

"Well?" she asked, in the brief tone with which women stop the doctor on

his last visit at the threshold of the room.

"No hope," said Malivoire, with a gesture of despair; "there is nothing

to be done. It began at his right ankle, went up the leg and thigh, and

has attacked all the articulations. Such agonies, poor fellow! It will

be a mercy when it's over."

"Will he be dead before night?" asked the Sister calmly.

"Oh no! He will live through the night. It is the same case as that of

Raguideau three years ago; and Raguideau lasted forty-eight hours."

That evening, at ten o'clock, Sister Philomene might be seen entering

the church of Notre Dame des Victoires.

The lamps were being lowered, the lighted tapers were being put out one

by one with a long-handled extinguisher. The priest had just left the

vestry.

The Sister inquired where he lived, and was told that his house was a

couple of steps from the church, in the Rue de la Banque.

The priest was just going into the house when she entered behind,

pushing open the door he was closing.

"Come in, Sister," he said, unfurling his wet umbrella and placing it on

the tiled floor in the ante-room. And he turned toward her. She was on

her knees. "What are you doing, Sister?" he said, astonished at her

attitude. "Get up, my child. This is not a fit place. Come, get up!"

"You will save him, will you not?" and Philomene caught hold of the

priest's hands as he stretched them out to help her to rise. "Why do you

object to my remaining on my knees?"

"Come, come, my child, do not be so excited. It is God alone, remember,

who can save. I can but pray."

"Ah! you can only pray," she said in a disappointed tone. "Yes, that is

true."

And her eyes sank to the ground. After a moment's pause the priest went

on:--

"Come, Sister, sit down there. You are calmer now, are you not? Tell me,

what is it you want?"

"He is dying," said Philomene, rising as she spoke. "He will probably

not live through the night;" and she began to cry. "It is for a young

man of twenty-seven years of age; he has never performed any of his

religious duties, never been near a church, never prayed to God since

his first communion. He will refuse to listen to anything. He no longer

knows a prayer even. He will listen neither to priest nor any one. And I

tell you it is all over with him,--he is dying. Then I remembered your

Confraternity of Notre Dame des Victoires, since it is devoted to those

who do not believe. Come, you must save him!"

"My daughter--"

"And perhaps he is dying at this very moment. Oh! promise me you will do

all at once, all that is in the Confraternity book; the

prayers,--everything, in short. You will have him prayed for at once,

won't you?"

"But, my poor child, it is Friday to-day, and the Confraternity only

meets on Thursday."

"Thursday only--why? It will be too late Thursday. He will never live

till Thursday. Come, you must save him; you have saved many another."

Sister Philomene looked at the priest with wide-opened eyes, in which

through her tears rose a glance of revolt, impatience, and command. For

one instant in that room there was no longer a Sister standing before a

priest, but a woman face to face with an old man.

The priest resumed:--

"All I can do at present for that young man, my dear daughter, is to

apply to his benefit all the prayers and good works that are being

carried on by the Confraternity, and I will offer them up to the Blessed

and Immaculate Heart of Mary to obtain his conversion. I will pray for

him to-morrow at mass, and again on Saturday and Sunday."

"Oh, I am so thankful," said Philomene, who felt tears rise gently to

her eyes as the priest spoke to her. "Now I am full of hope; he will be

converted, he will have pity on himself. Give me your blessing for him."

"But Sister, I only bless from the altar, in the pulpit, or in the

confessional. There only am I the minister of God. Here, my Sister, here

I am but a weak man, a miserable sinner."

"That does not signify; you are always God's minister, and you cannot,

you would not, refuse me; he is at the point of death."

She fell on her knees as she spoke. The priest blessed her, and added:--

"It is nearly eleven o'clock, Sister; you have nearly three miles to get

home, all Paris to cross at this late hour."

"Oh, I am not afraid," replied Philomene with a smile; "God knows why I

am in the street. Moreover, I will tell my beads on the way. The Blessed

Virgin will be with me."...

The same evening, Barnier, rousing himself from a silence that had

lasted the whole day, said to Malivoire, "You will write to my mother.

You will tell her that this often happens in our profession."

"But you are not yet as bad as all that, my dear fellow," replied

Malivoire, bending over the bed. "I am sure I shall save you."

"No, I chose my man too well for that. How well I took you in, my poor

Malivoire!" and he smiled almost. "You understand, I could not kill

myself. I did not wish to be the death of my old mother. But an

accident--that settles everything. You will take all my books, do you

hear? and my case of instruments also. I wish you to have all. You

wonder why I have killed myself, don't you? Come nearer. It is on

account of that woman. I never loved but her in all my life. They did

not give her enough chloroform; I told them so. Ah! if you had heard her

scream when she awoke--before it was over! That scream still re-echoes

in my ears! However," he continued, after a nervous spasm, "if I had to

begin again, I would choose some other way of dying, some way in which I

should not suffer so much. Then, you know, she died, and I fancied I had

killed her. She is ever before me,... covered with blood.... And then I

took to drinking. I drank because I love her still.... That's all!"

Barnier relapsed into silence. After a long pause, he again spoke, and

said to Malivoire:--

"You will tell my mother to take care of the little lad."

After another pause, the following words escaped him:--

"The Sister would have said a prayer."

Shortly after, he asked:--

"What o'clock is it?"

"Eleven."

"Time is not up yet;... I have still some hours to live.... I shall last

till to-morrow."

A little later he again inquired the time, and crossing his hands on his

breast, in a faint voice he called Malivoire and tried to speak to him.

But Malivoire could not catch the words he muttered.

Then the death-rattle began, and lasted till morn....

A candle lighted up the room.

It burnt slowly, it lighted up the four white walls on which the coarse

ochre paint of the door and of the two cupboards cut a sharp

contrast....

On the iron bedstead with its dimity curtains, a sheet lay thrown over a

motionless body, molding the form as wet linen might do, indicating with

the inflexibility of an immutable line the rigidity, from the tip of the

toes to the sharp outline of the face, of what it covered.

Near a white wooden table Malivoire, seated in a large wicker arm-chair,

watched and dozed, half slumbering and yet not quite asleep.

In the silence of the room nothing could be heard but the ticking of the

dead man's watch.

From behind the door something seemed gently to move and advance, the

key turned in the lock, and Sister Philomene stood beside the bed.

Without looking at Malivoire, without seeing him, she knelt down and

prayed in the attitude of a kneeling marble statue; and the folds of her

gown were as motionless as the sheet that covered the dead man.

At the end of a quarter of an hour she rose, walked away without once

looking round, and disappeared.

The next day, awaking at the hollow sound of the coffin knocking against

the narrow stairs, Malivoire vaguely recalled the night's apparition,

and wondered if he had dreamed it; and going mechanically up to the

table by the bedside, he sought for the lock of hair he had cut off for

Barnier's mother: the lock of hair had vanished.

THE AWAKENING

From 'Renee Mauperin'

A little stage had been erected at the end of the Mauperins'

drawing-room. The footlights were hidden behind a screen of foliage and

flowering shrubs. Renee, with the help of her drawing-master, had

painted the curtain, which represented a view on the banks of the Seine.

On either side of the stage hung a bill, on which were these words,

written by hand:--

LA BRICHE THEATRE

THIS EVENING,

'THE CAPRICE,'

To conclude with

'HARLEQUIN, A BIGAMIST.'

And then followed the names of the actors.

On all the chairs in the house, which had been seized and arranged in

rows before the stage, women in low gowns were squeezed together, mixing

their skirts, their lace, the sparkle of their diamonds, and the

whiteness of their shoulders. The folding doors of the drawing-room had

been taken down, and showed, in the little drawing-room which led to the

dining-room, a crowd of men in white neckties, standing on tiptoe.

Library of the World's Best Literature, Ancient and Modern — Volume 16 · 第 27 / 35 段