Born in Venice in fair social position, Goldoni spent his childhood

chiefly in Chiozza, a ruder and humbler miniature of the island city

some twenty-five miles away. Though an incurable wanderer,--indeed, so

filled with the true Bohemian's feverish love for change that he never

could endure even success anywhere for many summers,--he yet gave more

of his best years, and a heartier loyalty, to Venice than to any other

home. He knew best, and delineated best, the ordinary life of the

lagoons. Mr. Howells, himself by long residence and love a

half-Venetian, declares that the comedies in the local dialect are

invariably the best, and next best the Italian plays whose scenes are at

least laid in Venice. Perhaps the critic is here himself unduly swayed

by his affections. Goldoni knew well nearly all Italian lands. He had

even, for a series of years, a career as an advocate in Pisa. "My comic

genius was not extinguished, but suppressed," he explains. He did not

even then give up play-writing, and a traveling theatre manager easily

beguiled him back to Venice. This was in 1747, and this same manager,

Medebac, setting up a new theatre in Venice, absorbed Goldoni's energies

for several years. It was in 1750 that he successfully carried out a

rash vow to produce sixteen new comedies in a single year! Among these

are a goodly number of his best, including 'The Coffee-House,' from

which a few scenes are given below.

Though he passed over into the service of a different theatre, traveled

constantly with his actors, accepted invitations to Parma, Rome, etc.,

to oversee the performance of his plays, yet he never gave up his home

in Venice altogether, until summoned to Paris in 1761. These fourteen

years, moreover, form the happiest period of his life. His income from

the theatres, from published editions of his comedies, and from his

inherited property, would have made him wealthy, but for his extravagant

and careless mode of life.

Despite one notable success in French with the comedy 'The Surly

Benefactor' (1771), Goldoni's life in France was relatively unprofitable

and ignoble. He became Italian teacher of various royal princesses, with

the utmost uncertainty and delay as to his salaries or pensions. Yet he

could never break the fascination of Paris. The art of the French actors

was a never-failing delight to him. There, at the age of eighty, in

French, he wrote and published his 'Memoirs.' The Revolution swept away

his negligent patrons. In poverty and utter neglect he died at last,

just as the republicans were ready to restore his royal pension.

Goldoni was the child of Italy and of the eighteenth century. He had no

serious quarrel with his environment. He was not greatly superior, in

actual character or aspirations, to his associates. His affection for

his devoted wife did not save him from many a wandering passion. The

promising prima donnas, in particular, found in him an all too devoted

instructor and protector. The gaming-table and the lottery are

apparently irresistible to any true Italian, and Goldoni knew by heart

the passions which he ridicules or condemns, though without bitterness,

upon his stage. His oft-repeated claim to have reformed the Italian

theatre meant chiefly this: that between the lyrical drama of Metastasio

on the one hand, and the popular masque with stock characters on the

other,--and while contributing to both these forms of art,--he did

firmly establish the comedy of plot and dialogue, carefully learned and

rehearsed, in which the players must speak the speech as it is

pronounced to them by the poet.

Goldoni himself acknowledges, perhaps not too sincerely, in his Parisian

memoirs, the superiority, the mastership, of Moliere. In truth, the

great Frenchman stands, with Aristophanes and Shakespeare, upon a lonely

height quite unapproached by lesser devotees of Thalia. We must not seek

in Goldoni a prober of the human heart, not even a fearless satirist of

social conditions. In his rollicking good-humor and content with the

world as he finds it, Goldoni is much like Plautus. He is moreover under

a censorship hardly less severe. He dares not, for instance, introduce

upon his stage any really offensive type of Venetian nobleman. As for

religious dictation, the convent must not even be mentioned, though the

_aunt_ with whom the young lady is visiting sometimes becomes as

transparent an idiom as the "uncle" of a spendthrift cockney! The

audience, moreover, demand only diversion, not serious instruction (as

Goethe complains, even of his grave Germans, in the 'Prolog im

Theater'). It is remarkable, under all these conditions, how healthy,

how kindly, how proper, most of Goldoni's work is. Doubtless, like

Goldsmith, he could preach the more gracefully, persuasively, and

unobservedly, because he never attempted to escape from the very vices

or indulgences that he satirizes. But even the most determined seeker

for the moral element in art will find little indeed thereof in

Goldoni's merry comedies. Incredible as it seems to us Puritans, he

really made it his mission to amuse. Thoroughly in love with the rather

ignoble, trivial life of his day, he holds the dramatic mirror up to it

with lifelong optimism and enjoyment. His wit is not keen, his poetic

imagination is slight indeed. Aside from the true dramatist's skill in

construction, in plot, his power lies chiefly in the rapid, clear, firm

outlines of his character-drawing. These characters are for the most

part just about such men and women, such creatures of impulse and whim,

such genial mingling of naughtiness and good intentions, as we see about

us. He never delineates a saint or a hero; hardly a monster of

wickedness. He had never known either, and would not have been

interested if he had. The charm of Goldoni is felt chiefly in Venice, or

at least in Italy, while listening to his comedy and watching the

enjoyment mirrored in the faces of his own audience. It evaporates in

translation, and his plays are meant only to be heard, not read. To Mr.

Howells's own affectionate testimony we may add his happy citation from

Goethe, who is writing from Venice in 1786:

"Yesterday, at the theatre of St. Luke, was performed 'Le

Baruffe-Chiozotte,' which I should interpret 'The Frays and

Feuds of Chiozza.' The _dramatis personae_ are principally

seafaring people, inhabitants of Chiozza, with their wives,

sisters, and daughters. The usual noisy demonstrations of

such sort of people in their good or ill luck,--their

dealings one with another, their vehemence but goodness of

heart, commonplace remarks and unaffected manners, their

naive wit and humor,--all this was excellently imitated. The

piece moreover is Goldoni's, and as I had been only the day

before in the place itself, and as the tones and manners of

the sailors and people of the seaport still echoed in my ears

and floated before my eyes, it delighted me very much; and

although I did not understand a single allusion, I was

nevertheless, on the whole, able to follow it pretty well....

I never witnessed anything like the noisy delight the people

evinced at seeing themselves and their mates represented with

such truth of nature. It was one continued laugh and

tumultuous shout of exultation from beginning to end....

Great praise is due to the author, who out of nothing has

here created the most amusing _divertissement_. However, he

never could have done it with any other people than his own

merry and light-hearted countrymen."

Of Goldoni's one hundred and sixty comedies, only a scanty handful have

been tolerably translated in English. As accessible and agreeable an

introduction as any, perhaps, is the version of four notable plays by

Miss Helen Zimmern in the series 'Masterpieces of Foreign Authors.' The

'Memoirs' have been fairly rendered by John Black, and this version,

considerably abridged, was served up by Mr. Howells in 1877 among his

series of 'Choice Autobiographies.' Mr. Howells's introductory essay

appeared also in the Atlantic Monthly. It has been drawn upon somewhat

in the present sketch.

[Signature: William Cranston Lawton]

FIRST LOVE AND PARTING

From the 'Memoirs of Carlo Goldoni'

I was intrusted some time afterwards with another commission, of a much

more agreeable and amusing nature. This was to carry through an

investigation, ten leagues from the town, into the circumstances of a

dispute where firearms had been made use of and dangerous wounds

received. As the country where this happened was flat, and the road lay

through charming estates and country-houses, I engaged several of my

friends to follow me; we were in all twelve, six males and six females,

and four domestics. We all rode on horseback, and we employed twelve

days in this delicious expedition....

In this party there were two sisters, one married and the other single.

The latter was very much to my liking, and I may say I made the party

for her alone. She was as prudent and modest as her sister was

headstrong and foolish; the singularity of our journey afforded us an

opportunity of coming to an explanation, and we became lovers.

My investigation was concluded in two hours; we selected another road

for our return, to vary our pleasure.... The six gentlemen of our party

proposed another species of entertainment. In the palace of the governor

there was a theatre, which they wished to put to some use; and they did

me the honor to tell me that they had conceived the project on my

account, and they left me the power of choosing the pieces and

distributing the characters. I thanked them, and accepted the

proposition; and with the approbation of his Excellency and my

chancellor, I put myself at the head of this new entertainment. I could

have wished something comic, but I was not fond of buffoonery, and there

were no good comedies; I therefore gave the preference to tragedy. As

the operas of Metastasio were then represented everywhere, even without

music, I put the airs into recitative; I endeavored as well as I could

to approximate the style of that charming author; and I made choice of

'Didone' and 'Siroe' for our representation. I distributed the parts

according to the characters of my actors, whom I knew, and I reserved

the worst for myself. In this I acted wisely, for I was completely

unsuited for tragedy. Fortunately, I had composed two small pieces in

which I played two parts of character, and redeemed my reputation.

The first of these pieces was 'The Good Father,' and the second 'La

Cantatrice.' Both were approved of, and my acting was considered

passable for an amateur. I saw the last of these pieces some time

afterwards at Venice, where a young advocate thought proper to give it

out as his own work, and to receive compliments on the subject; but

having been imprudent enough to publish it with his name, he experienced

the mortification of seeing his plagiarism unmasked.

I did what I could to engage my beautiful Angelica to accept a part in

our tragedies, but it was impossible; she was timid, and had she even

been willing, her parents would not have given their permission. She

visited us; but this pleasure cost her tears, for she was jealous, and

suffered much from seeing me on such a familiar footing with my fair

companions. The poor little girl loved me with tenderness and sincerity,

and I loved her also with my whole soul; I may say she was the first

person whom I ever loved. She aspired to become my wife, which she would

have been if certain singular reflections, that however were well

founded, had not turned me from the design. Her elder sister had been

remarkably beautiful, and after her first child she became ugly. The

youngest had the same skin and the same features; she was one of those

delicate beauties whom the air injures, and whom the smallest fatigue or

pain discomposes: of all of which I saw a convincing proof. The fatigue

of our journey produced a visible change upon her: I was young, and if

my wife were in a short time to have lost her bloom, I foresaw what

would have been my despair. This was reasoning curiously for a lover;

but whether from virtue, weakness, or inconstancy, I quitted Feltre

without marrying her.

THE ORIGIN OF "MASKS" IN THE ITALIAN COMEDY

From the 'Memoirs of Carlo Goldoni'

The amateurs of the old comedy, on seeing the rapid progress of the new,

declared everywhere that it was unworthy of an Italian to give a blow to

a species of comedy in which Italy had attained great distinction, and

which no other nation had ever yet been able to imitate. But what made

the greatest impression on the discontented was the suppression of

masks, which my system appeared to threaten. It was said that these

personages had for two centuries been the amusement of Italy, and that

it ought not to be deprived of a species of comic diversion which it had

created and so well supported.

Before venturing to give any opinion on this subject, I imagine the

reader will have no objection to listen for a few minutes to a short

account of the origin, employment, and effects of these four masks.

Comedy, which in all ages has been the favorite entertainment of

polished nations, shared the fate of the arts and sciences, and was

buried under the ruins of the Empire during the decay of letters. The

germ of comedy, however, was never altogether extinguished in the

fertile bosom of Italy. Those who first endeavored to bring about its

revival, not finding in an ignorant age writers of sufficient skill, had

the boldness to draw out plans, to distribute them into acts and scenes,

and to utter extempore the subjects, thoughts, and witticisms which they

had concerted among themselves. Those who could read (and neither the

great nor the rich were of the number) found that in the comedies of

Plautus and Terence there were always duped fathers, debauched sons,

enamored girls, knavish servants, and mercenary maids; and, running over

the different districts of Italy, they took the fathers from Venice and

Bologna, the servants from Bergamo, and the lovers and waiting-maids

from the dominions of Rome and Tuscany. Written proofs are not to be

expected of what took place in a time when writing was not in use; but I

prove my assertion in this way: Pantaloon has always been a Venetian,

the Doctor a Bolognese, and Brighella and Harlequin Bergamasks; and from

these places, therefore, the comic personages called the four masks of

the Italian comedy were taken by the players. What I say on this subject

is not altogether the creature of my imagination; I possess a manuscript

of the fifteenth century, in very good preservation and bound in

parchment, containing a hundred and twenty subjects or sketches of

Italian pieces, called comedies of art, and of which the basis of the

comic humor is always Pantaloon, a Venetian merchant; the Doctor, a

Bolognese jurisconsult; and Brighella and Harlequin, Bergamask

valets,--the first clever and sprightly, and the other a mere dolt.

Their antiquity and their long existence indicate their origin.

With respect to their employment, Pantaloon and the Doctor, called by

the Italians the two old men, represent the part of fathers, and the

other parts where cloaks are worn. The first is a merchant, because

Venice in its ancient times was the richest and most extensively

commercial country of Italy. He has always preserved the ancient

Venetian costume; the black dress and the woolen bonnet are still worn

in Venice; and the red under-waistcoat and breeches, cut out like

drawers, with red stockings and slippers, are a most exact

representation of the equipment of the first inhabitants of the Adriatic

marshes. The beard, which was considered as an ornament in those remote

ages, has been caricatured and rendered ridiculous in subsequent

periods.

The second old man, called the Doctor, was taken from among the lawyers,

for the sake of opposing a learned man to a merchant; and Bologna was

selected because in that city there existed a university, which,

notwithstanding the ignorance of the times, still preserved the offices

and emoluments of the professors. In the dress of the Doctor we observe

the ancient costume of the university and bar of Bologna, which is

nearly the same at this day; and the idea of the singular mask which

covers his face and nose was taken from a wine stain which disfigured

the countenance of a jurisconsult in those times. This is a tradition

still existing among the amateurs of the comedy of art.

Brighella and Harlequin, called in Italy the two Zani, were taken from

Bergamo; because, the former being a very sharp fellow and the other a

stupid clown, these two extremes are only to be found among the lower

orders of that part of the country. Brighella represents an intriguing,

deceitful, and knavish valet. His dress is a species of livery; his

swarthy mask is a caricature of the color of the inhabitants of those

high mountains, tanned by the heat of the sun. Some comedians, in this

character, have taken the name of Fenocchio, Fiqueto, and Scapin; but

they have always represented the same valet and the same Bergamask. The

harlequins have also assumed other names: they have been sometimes

Tracagnins, Truffaldins, Gradelins, and Mezetins; but they have always

been stupid Bergamasks. Their dress is an exact representation of that

of a poor devil who has picked up pieces of stuffs of different colors

to patch his dress; his hat corresponds with his mendicity, and the

hare's tail with which it is ornamented is still common in the dress of

the peasantry of Bergamo.

I have thus, I trust, sufficiently demonstrated the origin and

employment of the four masks of the Italian comedy; it now remains for

me to mention the effects resulting from them. The mask must always be

very prejudicial to the action of the performer, either in joy or

sorrow: whether he be in love, cross, or good-humored, the same features

are always exhibited; and however he may gesticulate and vary the tone,

he can never convey by the countenance, which is the interpreter of the

heart, the different passions with which he is inwardly agitated. The

masks of the Greeks and Romans were a sort of speaking-trumpets,

invented for the purpose of conveying the sound through the vast extent

of their amphitheatres. Passion and sentiment were not in those times

carried to the pitch of delicacy now actually necessary. The actor must

in our days possess a soul; and the soul under a mask is like a fire

under ashes. These were the reasons which induced me to endeavor the

reform of the Italian theatre; and to supply the place of farces with

comedies. But the complaints became louder and louder: I was disgusted

with the two parties, and I endeavored to satisfy both; I undertook to

produce a few pieces merely sketched, without ceasing to give comedies

of character. I employed the masks in the former, and I displayed a more

noble and interesting comic humor in the others: each participated in

the species of pleasure with which they were most delighted; with time

and patience I brought about a reconciliation between them; and I had

the satisfaction at length to see myself authorized in following my own

taste, which became in a few years the most general and prevailing in

Italy. I willingly pardoned the partisans of the comedians with masks

the injuries they laid to my charge; for they were very able amateurs,

who had the merit of giving themselves an interest to sketched

comedies.

PURISTS AND PEDANTRY

From the 'Memoirs of Carlo Goldoni'

My journey to Parma, and the pension and diploma conferred on me,

excited the envy and rage of my adversaries. They had reported at Venice

during my absence that I was dead; and there was a monk who had even the

temerity to say he had been at my funeral. On arriving home safe and

sound, the evil-disposed began to display their irritation at my good

fortune. It was not the authors, my antagonists, who tormented me, but

the partisans of the different theatres of Venice.

I was defended by literary men, who entertained a favorable opinion of

me; and this gave rise to a warfare in which I was very innocently the

victim of the irritation which had been excited. My system has always

been never to mention the names of my adversaries: but I cannot avoid

expressing the honor which I feel in proclaiming those of my advocates.

Father Roberti, a Jesuit, at present the Abbe Roberti, one of the most

illustrious poets of the suppressed society, published a poem in blank

verse, entitled 'Comedy'; and by dwelling on the reformation effected by

me, and analyzing several scenes in my pieces, he encouraged his

countrymen and mine to follow the example and the system of the Venetian

author. Count Verri, a Milanese, followed the Abbe Roberti.... Other

patricians of Venice wrote in my favor, on account of the disputes which

were every day growing warmer and warmer.... Every day witnessed some

new composition for or against me; but I had this advantage,--that those

who interested themselves for me, from their manners, their talents, and

their reputation, were among the most prudent and distinguished men in

Italy.

One of the articles for which I was most keenly attacked was a violation

of the purity of the language. I was a Venetian, and I had had the

disadvantage of sucking in with my mother's milk the use of a very

agreeable and seductive patois, which however was not Tuscan. I learned

by principle, and cultivated by reading, the language of the good

Italian authors; but first impressions will return at times,

notwithstanding every attention used in avoiding them. I had undertaken

a journey into Tuscany, where I remained for four years, with the view

of becoming familiar with the language; and I printed the first edition

of my works at Florence, under the eyes and the criticism of the

learned of that place, that I might purify them from errors of language.

All my precautions were insufficient to satisfy the rigorists: I always

failed in one thing or other; and I was perpetually reproached with the

original sin of Venetianism.

Amidst all this tedious trifling, I recollected one day that Tasso had

been worried his whole lifetime by the Academicians della Crusca, who

maintained that his 'Jerusalem Delivered' had not passed through the

sieve which is the emblem of their society. I was then in my closet, and

I turned my eyes towards the twelve quarto volumes of the works of that

author, and exclaimed, "Oh heavens! must no one write in the Italian

language who has not been born in Tuscany?" I turned up mechanically the

five volumes of the Dictionary della Crusca, where I found more than six

hundred words, and a number of expressions, approved of by the academy

and rejected by the world; I ran over several ancient authors considered

as classical, whom it would be impossible to imitate in the present day

without censure; and I came to this conclusion--that we must write in

good Italian, but write at the same time so as to be understood in every

corner of Italy. Tasso was therefore wrong in reforming his poem to

please the Academicians della Crusca: his 'Jerusalem Delivered' is read

by everybody, while nobody thinks of reading his 'Jerusalem Conquered.'

A POET'S OLD AGE

From the 'Memoirs of Carlo Goldoni'

I return to my regimen,--you will say here also, perhaps, that I ought

to omit it: you are in the right; but all this is in my head, and I must

be delivered of it by degrees; I cannot spare you a single comma. After

dinner I am not fond of either working or walking. Sometimes I go to the

theatre, but I am most generally in parties till nine o'clock in the

evening. I always return before ten o'clock. I take two or three small

cakes with a glass of wine and water, and this is the whole of my

supper. I converse with my wife till midnight; I very soon fall asleep,

and pass the night tranquilly.

It sometimes happens to me, as well as every other person, to have my

head occupied with something capable of retarding my sleep. In this

case I have a certain remedy to lull myself asleep, and it is this: I

had long projected a vocabulary of the Venetian dialect, and I had even

communicated my intention to the public, who are still in expectation of

it. While laboring at this tedious and disgusting work, I soon

discovered that it threw me asleep. I laid it therefore aside, and I

profited by its narcotic faculty. Whenever I feel my mind agitated by

any moral cause, I take at random some word of my national language and

translate it into Tuscan and French. In the same manner I pass in review

all the words which follow in the alphabetical order, and I am sure to

fall asleep at the third or fourth version. My recipe has never once

failed me. It is not difficult to demonstrate the cause and effect of

this phenomenon. A painful idea requires to be replaced by an opposite

or indifferent idea; and the agitation of the mind once calmed, the

senses become tranquil and are deadened by sleep.

Library of the World's Best Literature, Ancient and Modern — Volume 16 · 第 20 / 35 段