CHAPTER VII.

GEORGE STEPHENSON'S FARTHER IMPROVEMENTS IN THE LOCOMOTIVE--THE HETTON

RAILWAY--ROBERT STEPHENSON AS VIEWER'S APPRENTICE AND STUDENT.

Stephenson's experiments on fire-damp, and his labors in connection

with the invention of the safety-lamp, occupied but a small portion

of his time, which was necessarily devoted, for the most part, to the

ordinary business of the colliery. From the day of his appointment as

engine-wright, one of the subjects which particularly occupied his

attention was the best practical method of winning and raising the

coal. Nicholas Wood has said of him that he was one of the first to

introduce steam machinery underground with that object. Indeed, the

Killingworth mines came to be regarded as the models of the district;

and when Mr. Robert Bald, the celebrated Scotch mining engineer, was

requested by Dr. (afterward Sir David) Brewster to prepare the article

"Mine" for the "Edinburg Encyclopædia," he proceeded to Killingworth

principally for the purpose of examining Stephenson's underground

machinery. Mr. Bald has favored us with an account of his visit made

with that object in 1818, and he states that he was much struck with

the novelty, as well as the remarkable efficiency of Stephenson's

arrangements, especially in regard to what is called the underdip

working.

"I found," he says, "that a mine had been commenced near the main

pit-bottom, and carried forward down the dip or slope of the coal,

the rate of dip being about one in twelve; and the coals were drawn

from the dip to the pit-bottom by the steam machinery in a very

rapid manner. The water which oozed from the upper winning was

disposed of at the pit-bottom in a barrel or trunk, and was drawn

up by the power of the engine which worked the other machinery.

The dip at the time of my visit was nearly a mile in length, but

has since been greatly extended. As I was considerably tired by my

wanderings in the galleries, when I arrived at the forehead of the

dip, Mr. Stephenson said to me, 'You may very speedily be carried

up to the rise by laying yourself flat upon the coal-baskets,'

which were laden and ready to be taken up the incline. This I at

once did, and was straightway wafted on the wings of fire to the

bottom of the pit, from whence I was borne swiftly up to the light

by the steam machinery on the pit-head."

The whole of the working arrangements seemed to Mr. Bald to be

conducted in the most skillful and efficient manner, reflecting the

highest credit on the colliery engineer.

Besides attending to the underground arrangements, the improved transit

of the coals above ground from the pit-head to the shipping-place

demanded an increasing share of Stephenson's attention. Every day's

experience convinced him that the locomotive constructed by him after

his patent of the year 1815 was far from perfect, though he continued

to entertain confident hopes of its complete eventual success. He even

went so far as to say that the locomotive would yet supersede every

other traction-power for drawing heavy loads. It is true, many persons

continued to regard his traveling engine as little better than a

dangerous curiosity; and some, shaking their heads, predicted for it "a

terrible blow-up some day." Nevertheless, it was daily performing its

work with regularity, dragging the coal-wagons between the colliery and

the staiths, and saving the labor of many men and horses.

There was not, however, so marked a saving in the expense of haulage as

to induce the colliery masters to adopt locomotive power generally as

a substitute for horses. How it could be improved, and rendered more

efficient as well as economical, was constantly present to Stephenson's

mind. He was fully conscious of the imperfections both in the road

and the engine, and gave himself no rest until he had brought the

efficiency of both up to a higher point. Thus he worked his way inch by

inch, slowly but surely, and every step gained was made good as a basis

for farther improvements.

At an early period of his labors, or about the time when he had

completed his second locomotive, he began to direct his particular

attention to the state of the Road, perceiving that the extended use

of the locomotive must necessarily depend in a great measure upon the

perfection, solidity, continuity, and smoothness of the way along

which the engine traveled. Even at that early period he was in the

habit of regarding the road and the locomotive as one machine, speaking

of the Rail and the Wheel as "Man and Wife."

All railways were at that time laid in a careless and loose manner,

and great inequalities of level were allowed to occur without much

attention being paid to repairs. The consequence was a great loss of

power, as well as much wear and tear of the machinery, by the frequent

jolts and blows of the wheels against the rails. Stephenson's first

object, therefore, was to remove the inequalities produced by the

imperfect junction between rail and rail.

At that time (1816) the rails were made of cast iron, each rail being

about three feet long; and sufficient care was not taken to maintain

the points of junction on the same level. The chairs, or cast-iron

pedestals into which the rails were inserted, were flat at the bottom,

so that whenever any disturbance took place in the stone blocks or

sleepers supporting them, the flat base of the chair upon which the

rails rested being tilted by unequal subsidence, the end of one rail

became depressed, while that of the other was elevated. Hence constant

jolts and shocks, the reaction of which very often caused the fracture

of the rails, and occasionally threw the engine off the road.

[Illustration: HALF-LAP JOINT.]

To remedy this imperfection, Mr. Stephenson devised a new chair, with

an entirely new mode of fixing the rails therein. Instead of adopting

the _butt-joint_ which had hitherto been used in all cast-iron rails,

he adopted the _half-lap joint_, by which means the rails extended a

certain distance over each other at the ends like a scarf-joint. These

ends, instead of resting on the flat chair, were made to rest upon the

apex of a curve forming the bottom of the chair. The supports were

also extended from three feet to three feet nine inches or four feet

apart. These rails were accordingly substituted for the old cast-iron

plates on the Killingworth Colliery Railway, and they were found to

be a very great improvement on the previous system, adding both to

the efficiency of the horse-power (still used on the railway) and to

the smooth action of the locomotive engine, but more particularly

increasing the efficiency of the latter.

This improved form of the rail and chair was embodied in a patent taken

out in the joint names of Mr. Losh, of Newcastle, iron founder, and

of Mr. Stephenson, bearing date the 30th of September, 1816. Mr. Losh

being a wealthy, enterprising iron-manufacturer, and having confidence

in George Stephenson and his improvements, found the money for the

purpose of taking out the patent, which in those days was a very costly

as well as troublesome affair. At the same time, Mr. Losh guaranteed

Stephenson a salary of £100 per annum, with a share in the profits

arising from his inventions, conditional on his attending at the Walker

Iron-works two days a week--an arrangement to which the owners of the

Killingworth Colliery cheerfully gave their sanction.

[Illustration: OLD KILLINGWORTH LOCOMOTIVE STILL IN USE.]

The specification of 1816 included various important improvements in

the locomotive itself. The wheels of the engine were improved, being

altered from cast to malleable iron, in whole or in part, by which

they were made lighter as well as more durable and safe. The patent

also included the ingenious and original contrivance by which the

steam generated in the boiler was made to serve as a substitute for

springs--an expedient already explained in a preceding chapter.

The result of the actual working of the new locomotive on the improved

road amply justified the promises held forth in the specification.

The traffic was conducted with greater regularity and economy, and

the superiority of the engine, as compared with horse traction,

became still more marked. And it is a fact worthy of notice, that

the identical engines constructed by Stephenson in 1816 are to this

day in regular useful work upon the Killingworth Railway, conveying

heavy coal-trains at the speed of between five and six miles an hour,

probably as economically as any of the more perfect locomotives now in

use.

George Stephenson's endeavors having been attended with such marked

success in the adaptation of locomotive power to railways, his

attention was called by many of his friends, about the year 1818, to

the application of steam to traveling on common roads. It was from this

point, indeed, that the locomotive had started, Trevithick's first

engine having been constructed with this special object. Stephenson's

friends having observed how far behind he had left the original

projector of the locomotive in its application to railroads, perhaps

naturally inferred that he would be equally successful in applying

it to the purpose for which Trevithick and Vivian had intended their

first engine. But the accuracy with which he estimated the resistance

to which loads were exposed on railways, arising from friction and

gravity, led him at a very early stage to reject the idea of ever

applying steam-power economically to common road traveling. In October,

1818, he made a series of careful experiments, in conjunction with

Mr. Nicholas Wood, on the resistance to which carriages were exposed

on railways, testing the results by means of a dynamometer of his own

contrivance. The series of practical observations made by means of

this instrument were interesting, as the first systematic attempt to

determine the precise amount of resistance to carriages moving along

railways. It was then for the first time ascertained by experiment that

the friction was a constant quantity at all velocities. Although this

theory had long before been developed by Vince and Coulomb, and was

well known to scientific men as an established truth, yet, at the time

when Stephenson made his experiments, the deductions of philosophers

on the subject were neither believed in nor acted upon by practical

engineers. To quote again from the MS. account supplied to the author

by Robert Stephenson for the purposes of his father's "Life:"

"It was maintained by many that the results of the experiments led

to the greatest possible mechanical absurdities. For instance, it

was maintained that, if friction were constant at all velocities

upon a level railway, when once a power was applied to a carriage

which exceeded the friction of that carriage by the smallest

possible amount, that same small excess of power would be able

to convey the carriage along a level railway at all conceivable

velocities. When this position was put by those who opposed

the conclusions at which my father had arrived, he felt great

hesitation in maintaining his own views; for it appeared to him

at first sight really to be--as it was put by his opponents--an

absurdity. Frequent repetition, however, of the experiments

to which I have alluded, left no doubt upon his mind that his

conclusion that friction was uniform at all velocities was a

fact which must be received as positively established; and he

soon afterward boldly maintained that that which was an apparent

absurdity was, instead, a necessary consequence. I well remember

the ridicule that was thrown upon this view by many of those

persons with whom he was associated at the time. Nevertheless, it

is undoubted, that, could you practically be always applying a

power in excess of the resistance, a constant increase of velocity

would of necessity follow without any limit. This is so obvious to

most professional men of the present day, and is now so axiomatic,

that I only allude to the discussion which took place when these

experiments of my father were announced for the purpose of showing

how small was the amount of science at that time blended with

engineering practice. A few years afterward, an excellent pamphlet

was published by Mr. Silvester on this question; he took up the

whole subject, and demonstrated in a very simple and beautiful

manner the correctness of all the views at which my father had

arrived by his course of experiments.

"The other resistances to which carriages were exposed were also

investigated experimentally by my father. He perceived that these

resistances were mainly three--the first being upon the axles

of the carriage; the second, which may be called the rolling

resistance, being between the circumference of the wheel and the

surface of the rail; and the third being the resistance of gravity.

"The amount of friction and gravity he accurately ascertained; but

the rolling resistance was a matter of greater difficulty, for it

was subject to great variation. He, however, satisfied himself

that it was so great, when the surface presented to the wheel was

of a rough character, that the idea of working steam-carriages

economically on common roads was out of the question. Even so early

as the period alluded to he brought his theoretical calculations to

a practical test; he scattered sand upon the rails when an engine

was running, and found that a small quantity was quite sufficient

to retard and even stop the most powerful locomotive engine that he

had at that time made. And he never failed to urge this conclusive

experiment upon the attention of those who were wasting their money

and time upon the vain attempt to apply steam to common roads.

"The following were the principal arguments which influenced his

mind to work out the use of the locomotive in a directly opposite

course to that pursued by a number of ingenious inventors, who,

between 1820 and 1836, were engaged in attempting to apply

steam-power to turnpike roads. Having ascertained that resistance

might be taken as represented by 10 lbs. to a ton weight on a level

railway, it became obvious to him that so small a rise as 1 in 100

would diminish the useful effort of a locomotive by upward of fifty

per cent. This fact called my father's attention to the question of

gradients in future locomotive lines. He then became convinced of

the vital importance, in an economical point of view, of reducing

the country through which a railway was intended to pass to as near

a level as possible. This originated in his mind the distinctive

character of railway works as contradistinguished from all other

roads; for in railroads he early contended that large sums would be

wisely expended in perforating barriers of hills with long tunnels,

and in raising low ground with the excess cut down from the

adjacent high ground. In proportion as these views fixed themselves

upon his mind, and were corroborated by his daily experience, he

became more and more convinced of the hopelessness of applying

steam locomotion to common roads; for every argument in favor of a

level railway was an argument against the rough and hilly course

of a common road. He never ceased to urge upon the patrons of road

steam-carriages that if, by any amount of ingenuity, an engine

could be made which could by possibility traverse a turnpike road

at a speed at least equal to that obtainable by horse-power, and at

a less cost, such an engine, if applied to the more perfect surface

of a railway, would have its efficiency enormously enhanced. For

instance, he calculated that if an engine had been constructed, and

had been found to travel uniformly between London and Birmingham

at an average speed of 10 miles an hour--conveying, say, 20 or

30 passengers at a cost of 1_s_. per mile, it was clear that the

same engine, if applied to a railway, instead of conveying 20 or

30 people, would have conveyed 200 or 300 people, and instead of a

speed of 10 or 12 miles an hour, a speed of at least 30 to 40 miles

an hour would have been obtained."

At this day it is difficult to understand how the sagacious and

strong common-sense views of Stephenson on this subject failed to

force themselves sooner upon the minds of those who were persisting

in their vain though ingenious attempts to apply locomotive power to

ordinary roads. For a long time they continued to hold with obstinate

perseverance to the belief that for such purposes a soft road was

better than a hard one--a road easily crushed better than one incapable

of being crushed; and they held to this after it had been demonstrated

in all parts of the mining districts that iron tram-ways were better

than paved roads. But the fallacy that iron was incapable of adhesion

upon iron continued to prevail, and the projectors of steam-traveling

on common roads only shared in the common belief. They still considered

that roughness of surface was essential to produce "bite," especially

in surmounting acclivities; the truth being that they confounded

roughness of surface with tenacity of surface and contact of parts,

not perceiving that a yielding surface which would adapt itself to the

tread of the wheel could never become an unyielding surface to form a

fulcrum for its progression.

Although Stephenson's locomotive engines were in daily use for

many years on the Killingworth Railway, they excited comparatively

little interest. They were no longer experimental, but had become an

established tractive power. The experience of years had proved that

they worked more steadily, drew heavier loads, and were, on the whole,

considerably more economical than horses. Nevertheless, eight years

passed before another locomotive railway was constructed and opened for

the purposes of coal or other traffic.

It is difficult to account for this early indifference on the part of

the public to the merits of the greatest mechanical invention of the

age. Steam-carriages were exciting much interest, and numerous and

repeated experiments were made with them. The improvements effected

by M'Adam in the mode of constructing turnpike roads were the subject

of frequent discussions in the Legislature, on the grants of public

money being proposed, which were from time to time made to him. Yet

here at Killingworth, without the aid of a farthing of government

money, a system of road locomotion had been in existence since 1814,

which was destined, before many years, to revolutionize the internal

communications of England and of the world, but of which the English

public and the English government as yet knew nothing.

But Stephenson had no means of bringing his important invention

prominently under the notice of the public. He himself knew well its

importance, and he already anticipated its eventual general adoption;

but, being an unlettered man, he could not give utterance to the

thoughts which brooded within him on the subject. Killingworth Colliery

lay far from London, the centre of scientific life in England. It was

visited by no savans nor literary men, who might have succeeded in

introducing to notice the wonderful machine of Stephenson. Even the

local chroniclers seem to have taken no notice of the Killingworth

Railway. The "Puffing Billy" was doing its daily quota of hard work,

and had long ceased to be a curiosity in the neighborhood. Blenkinsop's

clumsier and less successful engine--which has long since been

disused, while Stephenson's Killingworth engines continue working to

this day--excited far more interest, partly, perhaps, because it was

close to the large town of Leeds, and used to be visited by strangers

as one of the few objects of interest in that place. Blenkinsop was

also an educated man, and was in communication with some of the most

distinguished personages of his day on the subject of his locomotive,

which thus obtained considerable celebrity.

The first engine constructed by Stephenson to order, after the

Killingworth model, was made for the Duke of Portland in 1817, for use

upon his tram-road, about ten miles long, extending from Kilmarnock

to Troon, in Ayrshire. It was employed to haul the coals from the

duke's collieries along the line to Troon harbor. Its use was,

however, discontinued in consequence of the frequent breakages of the

cast-iron rails, by which the working of the line was interrupted, and

accordingly horses were again employed as before.[50]

There seemed, indeed, to be so small a prospect of introducing the

locomotive into general use, that Stephenson--perhaps conscious of the

capabilities within him--again recurred to his old idea of emigrating

to the United States. Before entering as sleeping partner in a small

foundery at Forth Banks, Newcastle, managed by Mr. John Burrell, he

had thrown out the suggestion to the latter that it would be a good

speculation for them to emigrate to North America, and introduce

steam-boats on the great inland lakes there. The first steamers were

then plying upon the Tyne before his eyes, and he saw in them the

germ of a great revolution in navigation. It occurred to him that the

great lakes of North America presented the finest field for trying

their wonderful powers. He was an engineer, and Mr. Burrell was an

iron-founder; and between them, he thought they might strike out a path

to fortune in the mighty West. Fortunately, this idea remained a mere

speculation so far as Stephenson was concerned, and it was left to

others to do what he had dreamed of achieving. After all his patient

waiting, his skill, industry, and perseverance were at length about to

bear fruit.

In 1819, the owners of the Hetton Colliery, in the county of Durham,

determined to have their wagon-way altered to a locomotive railroad.

The result of the working of the Killingworth Railway had been so

satisfactory that they resolved to adopt the same system. One reason

why an experiment so long continued and so successful as that at

Killingworth should have been so slow in producing results perhaps was,

that to lay down a railway and furnish it with locomotives, or fixed

engines where necessary, required a very large capital, beyond the

means of ordinary coal-owners; while the small amount of interest felt

in railways by the general public, and the supposed impracticability

of working them to a profit, as yet prevented the ordinary capitalists

from venturing their money in the promotion of such undertakings. The

Hetton Coal Company were, however, possessed of adequate means, and

the local reputation of the Killingworth engine-wright pointed him

out as the man best calculated to lay out their line and superintend

their works. They accordingly invited him to act as the engineer of the

proposed railway. Being in the service of the Killingworth Company,

Stephenson felt it necessary to obtain their permission to enter upon

this new work. This was at once granted. The best feeling existed

between him and his employers, and they regarded it as a compliment

that their colliery engineer should be selected for a work so important

as the laying down of the Hetton Railway, which was to be the longest

locomotive line that had, up to that time, been constructed in the

neighborhood. Stephenson accepted the appointment, his brother Robert

acting as resident engineer and personally superintending the execution

of the works.

The Hetton Railway extended from the Hetton Colliery, situated about

two miles south of Houghton-le-Spring, to the ship-places on the banks

of the Wear, near Sunderland. Its length was about eight miles; and

in its course it crossed Warden Law, one of the highest hills in the

district. The character of the country forbade the construction of

a flat line, or one of comparatively easy gradients, except by the

expenditure of a much larger capital than was placed at Stephenson's

command. Heavy works could not be executed; it was therefore

necessary to form the line with but little deviation from the natural

conformation of the district which it traversed, and also to adapt the

mechanical methods employed for its working to the character of the

gradients, which in some places were necessarily heavy.

Although George Stephenson had, with every step made toward its

increased utility, become more and more identified with the success

of the locomotive engine, he did not allow his enthusiasm to carry

him away into costly mistakes. He carefully drew the line between the

cases in which the locomotive could be usefully employed and those

in which stationary engines were calculated to be more economical.

This led him, as in the instance of the Hetton Railway, to execute

lines through and over rough countries, where gradients within the

powers of the locomotive engine of that day could not be secured,

employing in their stead stationary engines where locomotives were not

practicable. In the present case, this course was adopted by him most

successfully. On the original Hetton line there were five self-acting

inclines--the full wagons drawing the empty ones up--and two inclines

worked by fixed reciprocating engines of sixty-horse power each. The

locomotive traveling engine, or "the iron horse," as the people of

the neighborhood then styled it, worked the rest of the line. On the

day of the opening of the Hetton Railway, the 18th of November, 1822,

crowds of spectators assembled from all parts to witness the first

operations of this ingenious and powerful machinery, which was entirely

successful. On that day five of Stephenson's locomotives were at work

upon the railway, under the direction of his brother Robert; and the

first shipment of coal was then made by the Hetton Company at their new

staiths on the Wear. The speed at which the locomotives traveled was

about four miles an hour, and each engine dragged after it a train of

seventeen wagons weighing about sixty-four tons.

While thus advancing step by step--attending to the business of the

Killingworth Colliery, and laying out railways in the neighborhood--he

was carefully watching over the education of his son. We have already

seen that Robert was sent to school at Newcastle, where he remained

about four years. While Robert was at school, his father, as usual,

made his son's education instrumental to his own. He entered him a

member of the Newcastle Literary and Philosophical Institute, the

subscription to which was three guineas a year. Robert spent much of

his leisure hours there, reading and studying; and when he went home

in the afternoons, he was accustomed to carry home with him a volume

of the "Repertory of Arts and Sciences," or of some work on practical

science, which furnished the subject of interesting reading and

discussion in the evening hours. Both father and son were always ready

to acknowledge the great advantages they had derived from the use of so

excellent a library of books; and, toward the close of his life, the

latter, in recognition of his debt of gratitude to the institution,

contributed a large sum for the purpose of clearing off the debt, but

conditional on the annual subscription being reduced to a guinea, in

order that the usefulness of the Institute might be extended.

Robert left school in the summer of 1819, and was put apprentice to

Mr. Nicholas Wood, the head viewer at Killingworth, to learn the

business of the colliery. He served in that capacity for about three

years, during which time he became familiar with most departments of

underground work. His occupation was not unattended with peril, as

the following incident will show. Though the use of the Geordy lamp

had become general in the Killingworth pits, and the workmen were

bound, under a penalty of half a crown, not to use a naked candle, it

was difficult to enforce the rule, and even the masters themselves

occasionally broke it. One day Nicholas Wood, the head viewer, Moodie,

the under viewer, and Robert Stephenson, were proceeding along one

of the galleries, Wood with a naked candle in his hand, and Robert

following him with a lamp. They came to a place where a fall of stones

from the roof had taken place, on which Wood, who was first, proceeded

to clamber over the stones, holding high the naked candle. He had

nearly reached the summit of the heap, when the fire-damp, which had

accumulated in the hollow of the roof, exploded, and instantly the

whole party were blown down, and the lights extinguished. They were a

mile from the shaft, and quite in the dark. There was a rush of the

work-people from all quarters toward the shaft, for it was feared

that the fire might extend to more dangerous parts of the pit, where,

if the gas had exploded, every soul in the mine must inevitably have

perished. Robert Stephenson and Moodie, on the first impulse, ran back

at full speed along the dark gallery leading to the shaft, coming into

collision, on their way, with the hind quarters of a horse stunned

by the explosion. When they had gone half way, Moodie halted, and

bethought him of Nicholas Wood. "Stop, laddie!" said he to Robert,

"stop; we maun gang back and seek the maister." So they retraced

their steps. Happily, no farther explosion took place. They found the

master lying on the heap of stones, stunned and bruised, with his

hands severely burnt. They led him to the bottom of the shaft; and he

afterward took care not to venture into the dangerous parts of the mine

without the protection of a Geordy lamp.

The time that Robert spent at Killingworth as viewer's apprentice

was of advantage both to his father and himself. The evenings were

generally devoted to reading and study, the two from this time working

together as friends and co-laborers. One who used to drop in at the

cottage of an evening well remembers the animated and eager discussions

which on some occasions took place, more especially with reference

to the growing powers of the locomotive engine. The son was even more

enthusiastic than his father on the subject. Robert would suggest

numerous alterations and improvements in detail. His father, on the

contrary, would offer every possible objection, defending the existing

arrangements--proud, nevertheless, of his son's suggestions, and often

warmed and excited by his brilliant anticipations of the ultimate

triumph of the locomotive.

These discussions probably had considerable influence in inducing

Stephenson to take the next important step in the education of his

son. Although Robert, who was only nineteen years of age, was doing

well, and was certain, at the expiration of his apprenticeship, to

rise to a higher position, his father was not satisfied with the

amount of instruction which he had as yet given him. Remembering the

disadvantages under which he had himself labored through his ignorance

of practical chemistry during his investigations connected with the

safety-lamp, more especially with reference to the properties of

gas, as well as in the course of his experiments with the object of

improving the locomotive engine, he determined to furnish his son

with a better scientific culture than he had yet attained. He also

believed that a proper training in technical science was indispensable

to success in the higher walks of the engineer's profession, and he

determined to give Robert the education, in a certain degree, which he

so much desired for himself. He would thus, he knew, secure an able

co-worker in the elaboration of the great ideas now looming before him,

and with their united practical and scientific knowledge he probably

felt that they would be equal to any enterprise.

He accordingly took Robert from his labors as under viewer in the

West Moor Pit, and in October, 1822, sent him for a short course

of instruction to the Edinburg University. Robert was furnished

with letters of introduction to several men of literary eminence in

Edinburg, his father's reputation in connection with the safety-lamp

being of service to him in this respect. He lodged in Drummond Street,

in the immediate vicinity of the college, and attended the Chemical

Lectures of Dr. Hope, the Natural Philosophy Lectures of Sir John

Leslie, and the Natural History Class of Professor Jameson. He also

devoted several evenings in each week to the study of practical

Chemistry under Dr. John Murray, himself one of the numerous designers

of a safety-lamp. He took careful notes of the lectures, which he

copied out at night before he went to bed, so that, when he returned to

Killingworth, he might read them over to his father. He afterward had

the notes bound up and placed in his library.

Long years after, when conversing with Thomas Harrison, C.E., at his

house in Gloucester Square, he rose from his seat and took down a

volume from the shelves. Mr. Harrison observed that the book was in

MS., neatly written out. "What have we here?" he asked. The answer

was, "When I went to college, I knew the difficulty my father had

in collecting the funds to send me there. Before going I studied

short-hand; while at Edinburg I took down verbatim every lecture; and

in the evenings, before I went to bed, I transcribed those lectures

word for word. You see the result in that range of books." From this

it will be observed that the maxim of "Like father, like son," was one

that strictly applied to the Stephensons.

Robert was not without the pleasure of social intercourse either during

his stay at Edinburg. Among the letters of introduction which he took

with him was one to Robert Bald, the mining engineer, which proved of

much service to him. "I remember Mr. Bald very well," he said on one

occasion, when recounting his reminiscences of his Edinburg college

life. "He introduced me to Dr. Hope, Dr. Murray, and several of the

distinguished men of the North. Bald was the Buddle of Scotland. He

knew my father from having visited the pits at Killingworth, with

the object of describing the system of working them in his article

intended for the 'Edinburg Encyclopædia.' A strange adventure befell

that article before it appeared in print. Bald was living at Alloa when

he wrote it, and when finished he sent it to Edinburg by the hands of

young Maxton, his nephew, whom he enjoined to take special care of

it, and deliver it safely into the hands of the editor. The young man

took passage for New Haven by one of the little steamers which then

plied on the Forth; but on the voyage down the Firth she struck upon a

rock nearly opposite Queen's Ferry, and soon sank. When the accident

happened, Maxton's whole concern was about his uncle's article. He

durst not return to Alloa if he lost it, and he must not go on to

Edinburg without it. So he desperately clung to the chimney chains

with the paper parcel under his arm, while most of the other passengers

were washed away and drowned. And there he continued to cling until

rescued by some boatmen, parcel and all, after which he made his way to

Edinburg, and the article duly appeared."

Returning to the subject of his life in Edinburg, Robert continued:

"Besides taking me with him to the meetings of the Royal and other

societies, Mr. Bald introduced me to a very agreeable family, relatives

of his own, at whose house I spent many pleasant evenings. It was

there I met Jeannie M----. She was a bonnie lass, and I, being young

and susceptible, fairly fell in love with her. But, like most very

early attachments, mine proved evanescent. Years passed, and I had

all but forgotten Jeannie, when one day I received a letter from her,

from which it appeared that she was in great distress through the ruin

of her relatives. I sent her a sum of money, and continued to do so

for several years; but the last remittance not being acknowledged, I

directed my friend Sanderson to make inquiries. I afterward found that

the money had reached her at Portobello just as she was dying, and so,

poor thing, she had been unable to acknowledge it."

One of the practical sciences in the study of which Robert Stephenson

took special interest while at Edinburg was that of geology. The

situation of the city, in the midst of a district of highly interesting

geological formation, easily accessible to pedestrians, is indeed most

favorable to the pursuit of such a study; and it was the practice of

Professor Jameson frequently to head a band of his pupils, armed with

hammers, chisels, and clinometers, and take them with him on a long

ramble into the country, for the purpose of teaching them habits of

observation, and reading to them from the open book of Nature itself.

The professor was habitually grave and taciturn, but on such occasions

he would relax and even become genial. For his own special science he

had an almost engrossing enthusiasm, which on such occasions he did not

fail to inspire into his pupils, who thus not only got their knowledge

in the pleasantest possible way, but also fresh air and exercise in the

midst of glorious scenery and in joyous company.

At the close of this session, the professor took with him a select body

of his pupils on an excursion along the Great Glen of the Highlands,

in the line of the Caledonian Canal, and Robert formed one of the

party. They passed under the shadow of Ben Nevis, examined the famous

old sea-margins known as the "parallel roads of Glen Roy," and extended

their journey as far as Inverness, the professor teaching the young

men, as they traveled, how to observe in a mountain country. Not long

before his death, Robert Stephenson spoke in glowing terms of the

great pleasure and benefit which he had derived from that interesting

excursion. "I have traveled far, and enjoyed much," he said, "but that

delightful botanical and geological tour I shall never forget; and I am

just about to start in the _Titania_ for a trip round the east coast

of Scotland, returning south through the Caledonian Canal, to refresh

myself with the recollection of that first and brightest tour of my

life."

Toward the end of the summer the young student returned to Killingworth

to re-enter upon the active business of life. The six months' study

had cost his father £80--a considerable sum to him in those days; but

he was amply repaid by the additional scientific culture which his son

had acquired, and the evidence of ability and industry which he was

enabled to exhibit in a prize for mathematics which he had won at the

University.

[Illustration: WEST MOOR PIT, KILLINGWORTH.]

We may here add that by this time George Stephenson, after remaining

a widower fourteen years, had married, in 1820, his second wife,

Elizabeth Hindmarsh, the daughter of a respectable farmer at Black

Callerton. She was a woman of excellent character, sensible, and

intelligent, and of a kindly and affectionate nature. George's son

Robert, whom she loved as if he had been her own, to the last day of

his life spoke of her in the highest terms; and it is unquestionable

that she contributed in no small degree to the happiness of her

husband's home.

The story was for some time current that, while living at Black

Callerton in the capacity of engine-man, twenty years before, George

had made love to Miss Hindmarsh, and, failing to obtain her hand, in

despair he had married Paterson's servant. But the author has been

assured by Mr. Thomas Hindmarsh, of Newcastle, the lady's brother, that

the story was mere idle gossip, and altogether without foundation.

FOOTNOTE:

[50] The iron wheels of this engine were afterward removed, and

replaced with wooden wheels, when it was again put upon the road, and

continued working until quite recently. Its original cost was £750. It

was sold in 1848 for £13, and broken up as old materials.

The Life of George Stephenson and of his Son Robert Stephenson Comprising Also a History of the Invention and Introduction of the Railway Locomotive · 第 7 / 20 章