Material. Authority. Time (A) (B) (C) (D) (E)

Navassa T. S. Gladding[115]{ ½ hour 65 0.00 0.00 2.53

rock, { ½ “ 65 0.733 gm 4.87

{ ½ “ 65 0.733 gm 1.22

South T. S. Gladding, { ½ “ 65 0.00 0.00 1.35

Carolina { ½ “ 65 0.733 “ 2.89

rock, { ½ “ 65 0.733 “ 1.06

Grand T. S. Gladding, { ½ “ 65 0.00 0.00 1.97

connetable, { ½ “ 65 0.733 “ 1.12

{ ½ “ 65 0.733 “ 11.44

Dissolved H. B. McDonnell, { ½ “ 65 0.00 0.00 2.49 11.51

bone-black { ½ “ 65 0.01 “ 2.42

and { ½ “ 65 0.01 “ 2.37

cottonseed-meal,

Ground H. B. McDonnell, { ½ “ 65 0.00 0.00 8.66 26.62

bone, { ½ “ 65 0.01 “ 9.18

{ ½ “ 65 0.01 “ 8.00

Calcined H. B. McDonnell, { ½ “ 65 0.00 0.00 30.61 45.11

Redonda, { ½ “ 65 0.01 “ 29.42

{ ½ “ 65 0.01 “ 32.47

Dissolved H. A. Huston, { ½ “ 65 0.00 0.00 2.24 11.32

bone-black { ½ “ 65 1.00 “ 2.24

and { ½ “ 65 1.00 “ 2.21

cottonseed-meal,

Ground H. A. Huston { ½ “ 65 0.00 0.00 8.78 26.35

bone, and W. J. { ½ “ 65 1.00 “ 13.48

Jones, Jr., { ½ “ 65 1.00 “ 5.35

Calcined H. A. Huston { ½ “ 65 0.00 0.00. 25.54 45.15

Redonda, and W. J. { ½ “ 65 1.00 “ 18.84

Jones, Jr., { ½ “ 65 1.00 “ 35.20

South H. A. Huston { ½ “ 65 0.00 0.00 1.81 27.67

Carolina and W. J. { ½ “ 65 1.00 “ 4.59

rock, Jones, Jr., { ½ “ 65 1.00 “ 0.74

Basic H. A. Huston { ½ “ 65 0.00 0.00 6.98 19.42

slag, and W. J. { ½ “ 65 1.0 “ 10.12

Jones, Jr., { ½ “ 65 1.0 “ 5.49

Pamunky H. A. Huston { 5 h’rs 65 0.00 0.00 11.80 13.84

phosphate, and W. J. { 5 “ 65 1.0 11.79

Jones, Jr., { 5 “ 65 1.0 “ 12.28

Raw bone, H. A. Huston { 2 “ 65 0.00 0.00 8.22 23.58

and W. J. { 2 “ 65 1.0 “ 11.20

Jones, Jr., { 2 “ 65 1.0 “ 4.02

Steamed H. A. Huston { 5 “ 65 0.00 0.00 17.94 27.67

bone, and W. J. { 5 “ 65 1.0 “ 22.55

Jones, Jr., { 5 “ 65 1.0 “ 9.64

Precipitated H. A. Huston { 2 “ 65 0.00 0.00 24.20 33.34

calcium and W. J. { 2 “ 65 1.0 “ 30.70

phosphate Jones, Jr., { 2 “ 65 1.0 “ 20.67

from glue works,

Florida H. A. Huston, { 2 “ 65 0.00 0.00 1.69 19.75

soft rock, and W. J. { 2 “ 65 1.0 “ 3.37

Jones, Jr., { 2 “ 65 1.0 “ 0.72

Calcined H. A. Huston { 5 “ 65 0.00 0.00 40.64 44.30

Redonda, and W. J. { 5 “ 65 1.0 “ 40.05

Jones, Jr., { 5 “ 65 1.0 “ 41.01

In the above tabulations no mention is made of the work of Fresenius,

Neubauer, and Luck, on whose researches the citrate method is based,

but an examination of their original paper shows that the temperature

conditions are not carefully enough controlled to justify us in

tabulating their results.[116] An attempt has been made to include in

the above tables, work made under well-defined conditions, which will

illustrate the various points under consideration. While each authority

of value upon the subject is represented, no attempt has been made

to include all the work done by any of them. One element that seems

to have been generally overlooked in discussing the problem is that

nearly all results have been obtained from one-half hour’s treatment of

the material. This means simply the study of an incomplete reaction,

and one which is interrupted while the solution is very rapidly going

on. This, of course, is only clearly brought out by a comparison of

long-time and short-time work in the various tables. In the opinion

of Huston very much more work will have to be done before it can be

assumed that we have any very clear knowledge of this subject, and

very likely the final result will be that all kinds of goods cannot be

examined by the same method. The fact that half a gram of dicalcium

phosphate is instantly soluble in 100 cubic centimeters of citrate

solution, at ordinary temperatures, while an equal amount of iron and

aluminum phosphate is acted upon very slowly at ordinary temperatures

will probably have to be taken into consideration, as well as the fact

that dicalcium phosphate is less soluble in hot solutions of ammonium

citrate than it is in cold solutions, while the reverse is true of the

precipitated iron and aluminum phosphate.

At present, the only conclusion that can be safely drawn from the work,

is that it would be unsafe to make any generalization upon the subject

until more facts are at hand, except that the present methods are

unscientific and, unsatisfactory. As the work progresses, new features

present themselves, and in such a way as to show that they must be

given careful consideration before drawing any final conclusions in the

matter.

=127. Arbitrary Determination of Reverted Phosphoric Acid.=—The

so-called reverted phosphoric acid, that is, the acid insoluble in

water and soluble in a solution of ammonium citrate, is the most

difficult constituent of commercial fertilizers from the point of

view of the scientific analyst. A review of all the standard methods

which have been given in the preceding pages for its determination

must convince every careful observer that, as a rule, each process is

based on arbitrary standards, and can give only concordant results when

carried out under strictly unvarying conditions. For this reason there

can be no just comparison between the results obtained by different

methods, which vary from each other only in slight particulars.

When, on the other hand, the processes are radically different, the

deviations in data become more pronounced.

In such a condition of affairs the analyst is left to choose between

methods. He must be guided in his choice not only by what seems to

be the most scientific and accurate process, but also, to a certain

extent, by the general practice of his professional brethren. For this

country, therefore, it is strongly urged that the methods adopted by

the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, be followed in every

detail.

By the phrase “reverted phosphoric acid,” was originally meant an acid

once soluble in water, as CaH₄(PO₄)₂, and afterwards changed to a form

insoluble in water, but soluble in ammonium citrate as Ca₂H₂(PO₄)₂. But

in practice this has never been the true signification of the term.

In the manufacture of acid and superphosphates there is formed, more

or less of the dicalcium phosphate, either directly or after a time,

and this salt which, in no sense can be called reverted, is entirely

soluble in ammonium citrate. The iron and aluminum phosphates are

also, to a certain degree, soluble in the same reagent. When an acid

phosphate, containing various forms of calcium phosphate, is applied to

a soil containing iron and alumina, the soluble parts of the compound

tend to become fixed by union with those bases, or by precipitation as

Ca₂H₂(PO₄)₂. But it is not alone reverted phosphate formed in this way,

which the analyst is called on to determine in a fertilizer, although

he may have occasion to treat it in soil analysis.

The expression “reverted phosphoric acid,” therefore, in practice not

only includes a dicalcium phosphate, which once may have been the

monocalcium salt, but also all of that salt originally existing in

the superphosphate, and formed directly during its manufacture, as

well as any iron and aluminum phosphates present which are soluble in

ammonium citrate. The expression “citrate-soluble” is, therefore, to be

preferred to “reverted” phosphoric acid.

In the reversion of the phosphoric acid in superphosphates the iron

plays a far more important role than the aluminum sulfate. It was

formerly supposed that the reversion took place as indicated in the

following formula: 2CaH₄(PO₄)₂ + Fe₂O₃ = 2(CaHPO₄, FePO₄) + 3H₂O, while

Wagner affirms that the reverted acid compounds consist of varying

quantities of ferric oxid, aluminum oxid, phosphorus pentoxid, and

calcium oxid, in various states of combination.[117] The more probable

reaction is the following: 3CaH₄(PO₄)₂ + Fe₂(SO₄)₃ + 4H₂O = 2(FePO₄,

2H₃PO₄, 2H₂O) + 3CaSO₄. This reaction can be demonstrated by adding

to a superphosphate solution one of a ferric salt. In addition to

free phosphoric acid, iron phosphate is separated, which gradually

passes into an insoluble form by the abstraction of water due to the

crystallization of the gypsum. The alumina present in a superphosphate

seems to have no direct influence on the process of reversion. Its

phosphate salt is not acted on by the acid calcium phosphate. Even when

a superphosphate solution is treated with alum no precipitation is

produced, except on warming, and this disappears when the mass is again

cold.

It is therefore not necessary in the process of manufacture to separate

the alumina by digestion with a hot soda-lye before treating the mass

with sulfuric acid.

In order to avoid the reversion of the phosphoric acid several plans

have been proposed. One of the best is to use a little excess of

sulfuric acid in the manufacture. This tends to hold the phosphoric

acid in soluble form but is objectionable on account of drying,

handling, and shipping the fertilizer. During the digestion, moreover,

it is important that the temperature does not rise above 120°. Another

method consists in adding to the dissolved rock a quantity of common

salt chemically equivalent to its iron content. Ammonium sulfate also

helps to hold the phosphoric acid water-soluble.

=128. Influence of Movement.=—The influence of time and temperature

of digestion, and of variations in the composition of the ammonium

citrate on the quantity of phosphoric acid dissolved by that reagent

has been pointed out. Of great importance also in the process is

the character of the movement to which the materials are subjected

during the digestion. For this reason various mechanical devices have

been constructed to secure uniformity of solution. Inasmuch as the

temperature factor must also be faithfully observed, the best of these

devices are so arranged as to admit of a uniform motion within a bath

of water kept at the desired temperature which, by the Association

method, is 65°.

[Illustration: FIGURE 8. HUSTON’S DIGESTING APPARATUS.]

=129. Digestion Apparatus for Reverted Phosphates.=—The digestion

apparatus used by Huston consists of two wheels twenty-five centimeters

in diameter, mounted on the same axis, having a clear space of four and

one-half centimeters between them.[118] In the periphery of each wheel

are cut twelve notches, which are to receive the posts bearing the

rings through which the necks of the flasks pass. The posts are held in

place by nuts which are screwed down on the faces of the wheel. Should

it become necessary to take the apparatus apart, it is only necessary

to loosen the nuts and the set screw holding one wheel to the shaft and

all the parts can at once be removed. The posts extend ten centimeters

beyond the face of the wheels, and the rings are four centimeters in

internal diameter. Perforated plates, bearing a cross-bar, and held in

place by strong spiral springs attached to the plate and the base of

the posts, serve to hold the flasks in place. Each plate has a number

stenciled through it for convenience in identifying the flasks when it

is time to remove them. Attached to the outside of each post, close

to the outer end, is a heavy wire which passes entirely around the

apparatus, serving to keep the plates in place after they are removed

from the flasks.

The apparatus is mounted on a substantial framework, thirty-six

centimeters high and thirty centimeters wide at the base. The space

in which the wheel revolves is fourteen centimeters wide. The base

bars connecting the two sides are extended seven centimeters beyond

one side, and serve for the attachment of lateral bracing. At the top

of the framework, at one side, is attached a heavy bar forty-five

centimeters long, which serves to carry the cog gearing which transmits

the power. The upright shaft carries a cone pulley to provide for

varying the speed. The usual speed is two revolutions a minute for the

wheel carrying the flasks. The entire apparatus is made of brass. The

details of construction are shown in Fig. 8. Round-bottomed flasks are

used, and rubber stoppers are held in place by tying or by a special

clamp shown at the lower right-hand of the figure.

When high temperatures are used, the plates and flasks are handled by

the hooks shown at the left and right-hand upper corners of the figure.

When any other than room temperature is desired, the whole apparatus is

immersed in water contained in the large galvanized tank forming the

back-ground of the figures. The tank is seventy-five centimeters long,

seventy-five centimeters high, and thirty centimeters wide. At one end,

near the top, is an extension to provide space for heating the fluid in

the flasks before introducing the solid in such cases as may be desired.

The apparatus is held in place by angle irons soldered to the bottom

of the tank and a brace resting against the upright bar bearing the

gear-wheels.

The water in the tank is heated by injecting steam, or by burners under

the tank. As the tank holds about 300 pounds of water the work is not

subject to sudden changes of temperature, and little trouble has been

experienced in raising and maintaining the temperature of the water,

especially when steam is used.

An electric motor, or a small water-motor with only a very moderate

head of water, will furnish ample power.

=130. Comparison of Results.=—The following data show the results

obtained by the digester as compared with those furnished by the

official method, temperature and time of digestion being the same in

each instance.

Principles and practice of agricultural analysis. Volume 2 (of 3), Fertilizers · 第 34 / 71 题