CHAPTER VII.

VALOUR.

"He that would venture nothing must not get on horseback," says a

Spanish proverb, and the same caution seems applicable to most manly

amusements or pursuits. We cannot enter a boat, put on a pair of skates,

take a gun in hand for covert shooting, or even run downstairs in a

hurry without encountering risk; but the amount of peril to which a

horseman subjects himself seems proportioned inversely to the

unconsciousness of it he displays.

"Where there is no fear there is no danger," though a somewhat reckless

aphorism, is more applicable, I think, to the exercise of riding than to

any other venture of neck and limbs. The horse is an animal of

exceedingly nervous temperament, sympathetic too, in the highest degree,

with the hand from which he takes his instructions. Its slightest

vacillation affects him with electric rapidity, but from its steadiness

he derives moral encouragement rather than physical support, and on

those rare occasions when his own is insufficient, he seems to borrow

daring and resolution from his rider.

If the man's heart is in the right place, his horse will seldom fail

him; and were we asked to name the one essential without which it is

impossible to attain thorough proficiency in the saddle, we should not

hesitate to say nerve.

_Nerve_, I repeat, in contradistinction to _pluck_. The latter takes us

into a difficulty, the former brings us out of it. Both are comprised in

the noble quality we call emphatically valour, but while the one is a

brilliant and imposing costume, so is the other an honest wear-and-tear

fabric, equally fit for all weathers, fine and foul.

"You shiver, Colonel--you are afraid," said an insubordinate Major, who

ought to have been put under arrest then and there, to his commanding

officer on the field of Prestonpans. "I _am_ afraid, sir," answered the

Colonel; "and if you were as much afraid as I am, _you would run away_!"

I have often thought this improbable anecdote exemplifies very clearly

that most meritorious of all courage which asserts the dominion of our

will over our senses. The Colonel's answer proves he was full of valour.

He had lots of pluck, but as he was bold enough to admit, a deficiency

of nerve.

Now the field of Diana happily requires but a slight per-centage of

daring and resolution compared with the field of Mars. I heard the late

Sir Francis Head, distinguished as a soldier, a statesman, an author,

and a sportsman, put the matter in a few words, very tersely--and

exceedingly to the point. "Under fire," said he, "there is a

guinea's-worth of danger, but it comes to you. In the hunting-field,

there is only three-ha'p 'orth, but _you go to it_!" In both cases, the

courage required is a mere question of degree, and as in war, so in the

chase, he is most likely to distinguish himself whose daring, not to be

dismayed, is tempered with coolness, whose heart is always stout and

hopeful, while he never loses his head.

Now as I understand the terms pluck and nerve, I conceive the first to

be a moral quality, the result of education, sentiment, self-respect,

and certain high aspirations of the intellect; the second, a gift of

nature dependent on the health, the circulation, and the liver. As

memory to imagination in the student, so is nerve to pluck in the

horseman. Not the more brilliant quality, nor the more captivating, but

sound, lasting, available for all emergencies, and sure to conquer in

the long run.

We will suppose two sportsmen are crossing a country equally well

mounted, and each full of valour to the brim. A, to quote his admiring

friends, "has the pluck of the devil!" B, to use a favourite expression

of the saddle-room, "has a good nerve." Both are bound to come to grief

over some forbidding rails at a corner, the only way out, in the line

hounds are running, and neither has any more idea of declining than had

poor Lord Strathmore on a similar occasion when Jem Mason halloaed to

him, "Eternal misery on this side my lord, and certain death on the

other!" So they harden their hearts, sit down in their saddles, and this

is what happens:--

A's horse, injudiciously sent at the obstacle, _because_ it is awkward,

a turn too fast, slips in taking off, and strikes the top-rail, which

neither bends nor breaks, just below its knees. A flurried snatch at the

bridle pulls its head in the air, and throws the animal skilfully to the

ground at the moment it most requires perfect freedom for a desperate

effort to keep on its legs. Rider and horse roll over in an "imperial

crowner," and rise to their feet looking wildly about them, totally

disconnected, and five or six yards apart.

This is not encouraging for B, who is obliged to follow, inasmuch as

the place only offers room for one at a time, but as soon as his leader

is out of the way, he comes steadily and quietly at the leap. His horse

too, slips in the tracks of its fallen comrade, but as it is going in a

more collected form, it contrives to get its fore-legs over the

impediment, which catches it, however, inside the hocks, so that,

balancing for a moment, it comes heavily on its nose. During these

evolutions, B sits motionless in the saddle, giving the animal complete

liberty of rein. An instinct of self-preservation and a good pair of

shoulders turn the scale at the last moment, and although there is no

denying they "had a squeak for it" in the scramble, B and his horse come

off without a fall.

Now it was pluck that took both these riders into the difficulty, but

nerve that extricated one of them without defeat.

I am not old enough to have seen the famous Mr. Assheton Smith in the

hunting-field, but many of my early Leicestershire friends could

remember him perfectly at his best, when he hunted that fine and

formidable country, with the avowed determination, daily carried out,

_of going into every field with his hounds_!

The expenditure of valour, for it really deserves the name necessary to

carry out such a style of riding can only be appreciated by those who

have tried to keep in a good place during thirty or forty minutes, over

any part of the Quorn and Cottesmore counties lying within six miles of

Billesdon. Where should we be but for the gates? I think I may answer,

neither there nor thereabouts! I have reason to believe the many stories

told of "Tom Smith's" skill and daring are little, if at all,

exaggerated. He seems admitted by all to have been the boldest, as he

was one of the best, horsemen that ever got into a saddle with a

hunting-whip in his hand.

Though subsequently a man of enormous wealth, in the prime of life, he

lived on the allowance, adequate but not extravagant, made him by his

father, and did by no means give those high prices for horses, which, on

the principle that "money makes the mare to go," are believed by many

sportsmen to ensure a place in the front rank. He entertained no fancies

as to size, action, above all, peculiarities in mouths and tempers.

Little or big, sulky, violent, or restive, if a horse could gallop and

jump, he was a hunter the moment he found himself between the legs of

Tom Smith.

There is a namesake of his hunting at present from Melton, who seems to

have taken several leaves out of his book. Captain Arthur Smith, with

every advantage of weight, nerve, skill, seat, and hand, is never away

from the hounds. Moreover, he always likes his horse, and his horse

always seems to like him. This gentleman, too, is blessed with an

imperturbable temper, which I have been given to understand the squire

of Tedworth was _not_.

Instances of Tom Smith's daring are endless. How characteristic was his

request to a farmer near Glengorse, that he would construct such a fence

as should effectually prevent the field from getting away in too close

proximity to his hounds. "I can make you up a stopper," said the

good-natured yeoman, "and welcome; but what be you to do yourself,

Squire, for I know you like well to be with 'em when they run?"

"Never mind me," was the answer, "you do what I ask you. I never saw a

fence in this country I couldn't get over _with a fall_!" and, sure

enough, the first day the hounds found a fox in that well-known covert,

Tom Smith was seen striding along in the wake of his darlings, having

tumbled neck-and-crop over the obstacle he had demanded, in perfect good

humour and content.

If valour then, is a combination of pluck and nerve, he may be called

the most valorous sportsman that ever got upon a horse, while affording

another example of the partiality with which fortune favours the bold,

for although he has had between eighty and ninety falls in a season, he

was never really hurt, I believe, but once in his life.

"That is a _brave_ man!" I have heard Lord Gardner say in good-humoured

derision, pointing to some adventurous sportsman, whose daring so far

exceeded his dexterity as to bring horse and rider into trouble; but his

lordship's own nerve was so undeniable, that like many others, he may

have undervalued a quality of which he could not comprehend the want.

Most hunting-men, I fancy, will agree with me, that of all obstacles we

meet with in crossing a country, timber draws most largely on the

reserve fund of courage hoarded away in that part of a hero's heart

which is nearest his mouth. The highest rails I ever saw attempted were

ridden at by Lord Gardner some years ago, while out with Mr. Tailby's

hounds near the Ram's Head. With a fair holding scent, and the pack

bustling their fox along over the grass, there was no time for

measurement, but I remember perfectly well that being in the same field,

some fifty yards behind him, and casting longing looks at the fence,

totally impracticable in every part, I felt satisfied the corner he made

for was simply an impossibility.

"We had better turn round and go home!" I muttered in my despair.

The leap consisted of four strong rails, higher than a horse's withers,

an approach down hill, a take-off poached by cattle, and a landing into

a deep muddy lane. I can recall at this moment, the beautiful style in

which my leader brought his horse to its effort. Very strong in the

saddle, with the finest hands in the world, leaning far back, and

sitting well down, he seemed to rouse as it were, and concentrate the

energies of the animal for its last half-stride, when, rearing itself

almost perpendicularly, it contrived to get safe over, only breaking the

top rail with a hind leg.

This must have lowered the leap by at least a foot, yet when I came to

it, thus reduced, and "made easy," it was still a formidable obstacle,

and I felt thankful to be on a good jumper.

Of late years I have seen Mr. Powell, who is usually very well mounted,

ride over exceedingly high and forbidding timber so persistently, as to

have earned from that material, the _nom de chasse_ by which he is known

amongst his friends.

But perhaps the late Lord Cardigan, the last of the Brudenells,

afforded in the hunting-field, as in all other scenes of life, the most

striking example of that "pluck" which is totally independent of youth,

health, strength, or any other physical advantage. The courage that in

advanced middle-age governed the steady manoeuvres of Bulganak, and

led the death-ride at Balaclava, burned bright and fierce to the end.

The graceful seat might be less firm, the tall soldier-like figure less

upright, but Mars, one of his last and best hunters, was urged to charge

wood and water by the same bold heart at seventy, that tumbled Langar

into the Uppingham road over the highest gate in Leicestershire at

twenty-six. The foundation of Lord Cardigan's whole character was

valour. He loved it, he prized it, he admired it in others, he was

conscious and proud of it in himself.

So jealous was he of this chivalrous quality, that even in such a matter

of mere amusement as riding across a country, he seemed to attach some

vague sense of disgrace to the avoidance of a leap, however dangerous,

if hounds were running at the time, and was notorious for the

recklessness with which he would plunge into the deepest rivers though

he could not swim a stroke!

This I think is to court _real_ danger for no sufficient object.

Lord Wolverton, than whom no man has ridden straighter and more

enthusiastically to hounds, ever since he left Oxford, once crossed the

Thames in this most perilous fashion, for he, too, has never learnt to

swim, during a run with "the Queen's." "But," said I, protesting

subsequently against such hardihood, "you were risking your life at

every stroke."

"I never thought of that," was the answer, "till I got safe over, and it

was no use bothering about it then."

Lord Cardigan however, seemed well aware of his danger, and, in my own

recollection, had two very narrow escapes from drowning in these

uncalled-for exploits.

The gallant old cavalry officer's death was in keeping with his whole

career. At threescore years and ten he insisted on mounting a dangerous

animal that he would not have permitted any friend to ride. What

happened is still a mystery. The horse came home without him, and he

never spoke again, though he lived till the following day.

But these are sad reflections for so cheerful a subject as daring in

the saddle. Red is our colour, not black, and, happily, in the sport we

love, there are few casualties calling forth more valour than is

required to sustain a bloody nose, a broken collar-bone, or a sound

ducking in a wet ditch. Yet it is extraordinary how many good fellows

riding good horses find themselves defeated in a gallop after hounds,

from indecision and uncertainty, rather than want of courage, when the

emergency actually arises. Though the danger, according to Sir Francis

Head, is about a hap'orth, it might possibly be valued at a penny, and

nobody wants to discover, in his own person, the exact amount. Therefore

are the chivalry of the Midland Counties to be seen on occasion

panic-stricken at the downfall or disappearance of a leader. And a dozen

feet of dirty water will wholly scatter a field of horsemen who would

confront an enemy's fire without the quiver of an eye-lash. Except

timber, of which the risk is obvious, at a glance, nothing frightens the

_half_-hard, so much as a brook. It is difficult, you see, to please

them, the uncertainty of the limpid impediment being little less

forbidding than the certainty of the stiff!

But it does require dash and coolness, pluck and nerve, a certain spice

of something that may fairly be called valour, to charge cheerfully at a

brook when we have no means of ascertaining its width, its depth, or the

soundness of its banks. Horses too are apt to share the misgivings of

their riders, and water-jumping, like a loan to a poor relation, if not

done freely, had better not be done at all.

The fox, and consequently the hounds, as we know, will usually cross at

the narrowest place, but even if we can mark the exact spot, fences, or

the nature of the ground may prevent our getting there. What are we to

do? If we follow a leader, and he drops short, we are irretrievably

defeated, if we make our own selection, the gulf may be as wide as the

Thames. "Send him at it!" says valour, "and take your chance!" Perhaps

it is the best plan after all. There is something in luck, a good deal

in the reach of a horse's stride at a gallop, and if we _do_ get over,

we _rather_ flatter ourselves for the next mile or two that we have

"done the trick!"

To enter on the subject of "hard riding," as it is called, without

honourable mention of the habit and the side-saddle, would in these days

betray both want of observation and politeness; but ladies, though they

seem to court danger no less freely than admiration, possess, I think,

as a general rule, more pluck than nerve. I can recall an instance very

lately, however, in which I saw displayed by one of the gentlest of her

sex, an amount of courage, coolness, and self-possession, that would

have done credit to a hero. This lady, who had not quite succeeded in

clearing a high post-and-rail with a boggy ditch on the landing side,

was down and under her horse. The animal's whole weight rested on her

legs, so as to keep her in such a position, that her head lay between

its fore and hind feet, where the least attempt at a struggle, hemmed in

by those four shining shoes, must have dashed her brains out. She seemed

in no way concerned for her beauty, or her life, but gave judicious

directions to those who rescued her as calmly and courteously as if she

had been pouring out their tea.

The horse, though in that there is nothing unusual, behaved like an

angel, and the fair rider was extricated without very serious injury;

but I thought to myself, as I remounted and rode on, that if a legion of

Amazons could be rendered amenable to discipline they would conquer the

world.

No man, till he has tried the experiment, can conceive how awkward and

powerless one feels in a lady's seat. They themselves affirm that with

the crutch, or second pommel on the near side, they are more secure than

ourselves; but when I see those delicate, fragile forms flying over wood

and water, poised on precipitous banks, above all, crashing through

strong bullfinches, I am struck with admiration at the mysteries of

nature, among which not the least wonderful seems the feminine desire to

excel. And they _do_ excel when resolved they will, even in those sports

and exercises which seem more naturally belonging to the masculine

department. It was but the other day, a boatman in the Channel told me

he saw a lady swimming alone more than half a mile off shore. Now that

the universal rink has brought skating into fashion, the "many-twinkling

feet," that smoothest glide and turn most deftly, are shod with such

dainty boots as never could be worn by the clumsier sex. At lawn-tennis

the winning service is offered by some seductive hoyden in her teens;

and, although in the game of cricket the Graces have as yet been males,

at no distant day we may expect to see the best batsman at the Oval

bowled out, or perhaps caught by a woman!

Yes, the race is in the ascendant. It takes the heaviest fish,--I mean

_real_ fish--with a rod and line. It kills its grouse right and left--in

the moor among the heather. It shoulders a rifle no heavier than a

pea-shooter, but levels the toy so straight that, after some cunning

stalk, a "stag of ten" goes down before the white hand and taper finger,

as becomes his antlers and his sex. Lastly, when it gets upon Bachelor,

or Benedict, or Othello, or any other high-flyer with a suggestive name,

it sails away close, often too close, to the hounds, leaving brothers,

husbands, even admirers hopelessly in the rear.

Now, I hope I am not going to express a sentiment that will offend

their prejudices, and cause young women to call me an old one, but I do

consider that, in these days, ladies who go out hunting _ride a turn too

hard_. Far be it from me to assert that the Field is no place for the

fair; on the contrary, I hold that their presence adds in every respect

to its charms. Neither would I protest against their jumping, and

relegate them to the bridle-roads or lanes. Nothing of the kind. Let the

greatest care be taken in the selection of their horses; let their

saddles and bridles be fitted to such a nicety that sore backs and sore

mouths are equally impossible, and let trustworthy servants be told off

to attend them during the day. Then, with everything in their favour,

over a fair country, fairly fenced, why should they not ride on and take

their pleasure?

But even if their souls disdain to follow a regular pilot (and I may

observe his office requires no little nerve, as they are pretty quick on

to a leader if he gets down), I would entreat them not to try "cutting

out the work," as it is called, but rather to wait and see one rider, at

least, over a leap before they attempt it themselves. It is frightful to

think of a woman landing in a pit, a water-course, or even so deep a

ditch as may cause the horse to roll over her when he falls. With her

less muscular frame she is more easily injured than a man; with her

finer organisation she cannot sustain injury as well. It turns one sick

to think of her dainty head between a horse's hind-legs, or of those

cruel pommels bruising her delicate ribs and bosom. It is at least

twenty to one in _our_ favour every time we fall, whereas with her the

odds are all the other way, and it is almost twenty to one she must be

hurt.

What said the wisest of kings concerning a fair woman without

discretion? We want no Solomon to remind us that with her courage

roused, her ambition excited, all the rivalry of her nature called into

play, she has nowhere more need of this judicious quality than in the

hunting-field.

Riding Recollections, 5th ed. · 第 7 / 14 章