_Renovabitur ut aquila juventus tua_--thy youth shall be renewed as an

eagle--that is what we all desire! Indeed it would seem at first sight

that, to gain happiness, the best way would be, if one could, to

prolong the untroubled zest of childhood, when everything was

interesting and exciting, full of novelty and delight. Some few people

by their vitality can retain that freshness of spirit all their life

long. I remember how a friend of R. L. Stevenson told me, that

Stevenson, when alone in London, desperately ill, and on the eve of a

solitary voyage, came to see him; he himself was going to start on a

journey the following day, and had to visit the lumber-room to get out

his trunks; Stevenson begged to be allowed to accompany him, and,

sitting on a broken chair, evolved out of the drifted accumulations of

the place a wonderful romance. But that sort of eager freshness we

most of us find to be impossible as we grow older; and we are

confronted with the problem of how to keep care and dreariness away,

how to avoid becoming mere trudging wayfarers, dully obsessed by all

we have to do and bear. Can we not find some medicine to revive the

fading emotion, to renew the same sort of delight in new thoughts and

problems which we found in childhood in all unfamiliar things, to

battle with the dreariness, the daily use, the staleness of life?

The answer is that it is possible, but only possible if we take the

same pains about it that we take to provide ourselves with comforts,

to save money, to guard ourselves from poverty. Emotional poverty is

what we most of us have to dread, and we must make investments if we

wish for revenues. We are many of us hampered, as I have said, by the

dreariness and dulness of the education we receive. But even that is

no excuse for sinking into melancholy bankruptcy, and going about the

world full of the earnest capacity for woe, disheartened and

disheartening.

A great teacher has the extraordinary power, not only of evoking the

finest capacities from the finest minds, but of actually giving to

second-rate minds a belief that knowledge is interesting and worth

attention. What we have to do, if we have missed coming under the

influence of a great teacher, is resolutely to put ourselves in touch

with great minds. We shall not burst into flame at once perhaps, and

the process may seem but the rubbing of one dry stick against another;

one cannot prescribe a path, because we must advance upon the slender

line of our own interests; but we can surely find some one writer who

revives us and inspires us; and if we persevere, we find the path

slowly broadening into a road, while the landscape takes shape and

design around us. The one thing fortunately of which there is enough

and to spare in the world is good advice, and if we find ourselves

helpless, we can consult some one who seems to have a view of finer

things, whose delight is fresh and eager, whose handling of life

seems gracious and generous. It is as possible to do this, as to

consult a doctor if we find ourselves out of health; and here we stiff

and solitary Anglo-Saxons are often to blame, because we cannot bring

ourselves to speak freely of these things, to be importunate, to ask

for help; it seems to us at once impertinent and undignified; but it

is this sort of dreary consideration, which is nothing but distorted

vanity, and this still drearier dignity, which withholds from us so

much that is beautiful.

The one thing then that I wish to urge is that we should take up the

pursuit in an entirely practical way; as Emerson said, with a splendid

mixture of common sense and idealism, "hitch our waggon to a star." It

is easy enough to lose ourselves in a vague sentimentalism, and to

believe that only our cramped conditions have hindered us from

developing into something very wonderful. It is easy too to drift into

helpless materialism, and to believe that dulness is the natural lot

of man. But the realm of thought is a very free citizenship, and a

hundred doors will open to us if we only knock at them. Moreover, that

realm is not like an over-populated country; it is infinitely large,

and virgin soil; and we have only to stake out our claim; and then, if

we persevere, we shall find that our _Joyous Gard_ is really rising

into the air about us--where else should we build our castles?--with

all the glory of tower and gable, of curtain-wall and battlement,

terrace and pleasaunce, hall and corridor; our own self-built

paradise; and then perhaps the knight, riding lonely from the sunset

woods, will turn in to keep us company, and the wandering minstrel

will bring his harp; and we may even receive other visitors, like the

three that stood beside the tent of Abraham in the evening, in the

plain of Mamre, of whom no one asked the name or lineage, because the

answer was too great for mortal ears to hear.

VII

INTERPRETATION

Is the secret of life then a sort of literary rapture, a princely

thing, only possible through costly outlay and jealously selected

hours, like a concert of stringed instruments, whose players are

unknown, bursting on the ear across the terraces and foliaged walls of

some enchanted garden? By no means! That is the shadow of the artistic

nature, that the rare occasions of life, where sound and scent and

weather and sweet companionship conspire together, are so exquisite,

so adorable, that the votary of such mystical raptures begins to plan

and scheme and hunger for these occasions, and lives in discontent

because they arrive so seldom.

No art, no literature, are worth anything at all unless they send one

back to life with a renewed desire to taste it and to live it.

Sometimes as I sit on a sunny day writing in my chair beside the

window, a picture of the box-hedge, the tall sycamores, the

stone-tiled roof of the chapel, with the blue sky behind, globes

itself in the lense of my spectacles, so entrancingly beautiful, that

it is almost a disappointment to look out on the real scene. We like

to see things mirrored thus and framed, we strangely made creatures of

life; why, I know not, except that our finite little natures love to

select and isolate experiences from the mass, and contemplate them so.

But we must learn to avoid this, and to realise that if a particle of

life, thus ordered and restricted, is beautiful, the thing itself is

more beautiful still. But we must not depend helplessly upon the

interpretations, the skilled reflections, of finer minds than our own.

If we learn from a wise interpreter or poet the quality and worth of a

fraction of life, it is that we may gain from him the power to do the

same for ourselves elsewhere; we must learn to walk alone, not crave,

like a helpless child, to be for ever led and carried in kindly arms.

The danger of culture, as it is unpleasantly called, is that we get to

love things because poets have loved them, and as they loved them;

and there we must not stay; because we thus grow to fear and mistrust

the strong flavours and sounds of life, the joys of toil and

adventure, the desire of begetting, giving life, drawing a soul from

the unknown; we come to linger in a half-lit place, where things reach

us faintly mellowed, as in a vision, through enfolding trees and at

the ends of enchanted glades. This book of mine lays no claim to be a

pageant of all life's joys; it leaves many things untouched and

untold; but it is a plea for this; that those who have to endure the

common lot of life, who cannot go where they would, whose leisure is

but a fraction of the day, before the morning's toil and after the

task is done, whose temptation it is to put everything else away

except food and sleep and work and anxiety, not liking life so but

finding it so;--it is a plea that such as these should learn how

experience, even under cramped conditions, may be finely and

beautifully interpreted, and made rich by renewed intention. Because

the secret lies hid in this, that we must observe life intently,

grapple with it eagerly; and if we have a hundred lives before us, we

can never conquer life till we have learned to ride above it, not

welter helplessly below it. And the cramped and restricted life is all

the grander for this, that it gives us a nobler chance of conquest

than the free, liberal, wealthy, unrestrained life.

In the _Romaunt of the Rose_ a little square garden is described, with

its beds of flowers, its orchard-trees. The beauty of the place lies

partly in its smallness, but more still in its running waters, its

shadowy wells, wherein, as the writer says quaintly enough, are "_no

frogs_," and the conduit-pipes that make a "noise full-liking." And

again in that beautiful poem of Tennyson's, one of his earliest, with

the dew of the morning upon it, he describes _The Poet's Mind_ as a

garden:

In the middle leaps a fountain

Like sheet lightning,

Ever brightening

With a low melodious thunder;

All day and all night it is ever drawn

From the brain of the purple mountain

Which stands in the distance yonder: ...

And the mountain draws it from Heaven above,

And it sings a song of undying love.

That is a power which we all have, in some degree, to draw into our

souls, or to set running through them, the streams of Heaven--for

like water they will run in the dullest and darkest place if only they

be led thither; and the lower the place, the stronger the stream! I am

careful not to prescribe the source too narrowly, for it must be to

our own liking, and to our own need. And so I will not say "love this

and that picture, read this and that poet!" because it is just thus,

by following direction too slavishly, that we lose our own particular

inspiration. Indeed I care very little about fineness of taste,

fastidious critical rejections, scoffs and sneers at particular

fashions and details. One knows the epicure of life, the man who

withdraws himself more and more from the throng, cannot bear to find

himself in dull company, reads fewer and fewer books, can hardly eat

and drink unless all is exactly what he approves; till it becomes

almost wearisome to be with him, because it is such anxious and

scheming work to lay out everything to please him, and because he will

never take his chance of anything, nor bestir himself to make anything

out of a situation which has the least commonness or dulness in it. Of

course only with the command of wealth is such life possible; but the

more delicate such a man grows, the larger and finer his maxims

become, and the more he casts away from his philosophy the need of

practising anything. One must think, such men say, clearly and finely,

one must disapprove freely, one must live only with those whom one can

admire and love; till they become at last like one of those sad

ascetics, who spent their time on the top of pillars, and for ever

drew up stones from below to make the pillar higher yet.

One is at liberty to mistrust whatever makes one isolated and

superior; not of course that one's life need be spent in a sort of

diffuse sociability; but one must practise an ease that is never

embarrassed, a frankness that is never fastidious, a simplicity that

is never abashed; and behind it all must spring the living waters,

with the clearness of the sky and the cleanness of the hill about

them, running still swiftly and purely in our narrow garden-ground,

and meeting the kindred streams that flow softly in many other glad

and desirous hearts.

In the beautiful old English poem, _The Pearl_, where the dreamer

seems to be instructed by his dead daughter Marjory in the heavenly

wisdom, she tells him that "all the souls of the blest are equal in

happiness--that they are all kings and queens."[1] That is a heavenly

kind of kingship, when there are none to be ruled or chidden, none to

labour and serve; but it means the fine frankness and serenity of mind

which comes of kingship, the perfect ease and dignity which springs

from not having to think of dignity or pre-eminence at all.

Long ago I remember how I was sent for to talk with Queen Victoria in

her age, and how much I dreaded being led up to her by a majestic

lord-in-waiting; she sate there, a little quiet lady, so plainly

dressed, so simple, with her hands crossed on her lap, her sanguine

complexion, her silvery hair, yet so crowned with dim history and

tradition, so great as to be beyond all pomp or ceremony, yet wearing

the awe and majesty of race and fame as she wore her plain dress. She

gave me a little nod and smile, and began at once to talk in the sweet

clear voice that was like the voice of a child. Then came my

astonishment. She knew, it seemed, all about me and my doings, and

the doings of my relations and friends--not as if she had wished to be

prepared to surprise me; but because her motherly heart had wanted to

know, and had been unable to forget. The essence of that charm, which

flooded all one's mind with love and loyalty, was not that she was

great, but that she was entirely simple and kind; because she loved,

not her great part in life, but life itself.

That kingship and queenship is surely not out of the reach of any of

us; it depends upon two things: one, that we keep our minds and souls

fresh with the love of life, which is the very dew of heaven; and the

other that we claim not rights but duties, our share in life, not a

control over it; if all that we claim is not to rule others, but to be

interested in them, if we will not be shut out from love and care,

then the sovereignty is in sight, and the nearer it comes the less

shall we recognise it; for the only dignity worth the name is that

which we do not know to be there.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 1: See Professor W. P. Ker's _English Literature, Mediæval_,

p. 194.]

VIII

EDUCATION

It is clear that the progress of the individual and the world alike

depends upon the quickening of ideas. All civilisation, all law, all

order, all controlled and purposeful life, will be seen to depend on

these ideas and emotions. The growing conception of the right of every

individual to live in some degree of comfort and security is nothing

but the taking shape of these ideas and emotions; for the end of all

civilisation is to ensure that there shall be freedom for all from

debasing and degrading conditions, and that is perhaps as far as we

have hitherto advanced; but the further end in sight is to set all men

and women free to some extent from hopeless drudgery, to give them

leisure, to provide them with tastes and interests; and further still,

to contrive, if possible, that human beings shall not be born into

the world of tainted parentage, and thus to stamp out the tyranny of

disease and imbecility and criminal instinct. More and more does it

become clear that all the off-scourings and failures of civilisation

are the outcome of diseased brains and nerves, and that self-control

and vigour are the results of nature rather than nurture. All this is

now steadily in sight. The aim is personal freedom, the freedom which

shall end where another's freedom begins; but we recognise now that it

is no use legislating for social and political freedom, if we allow

the morally deficient to beget offspring for whom moral freedom is an

impossibility. And perhaps the best hope of the race lies in firmly

facing this problem.

But, as I say, we have hardly entered upon this stage. We have to deal

with things as they are, with many natures tainted by moral

feebleness, by obliquity of vision, by lack of proportion. The hope at

present lies in the endeavour to find some source of inspiration, in a

determination not to let men and women grow up with fine emotions

atrophied; and here the whole system of education is at fault. It is

all on the lines of an intellectual gymnastic; little or nothing is

done to cultivate imagination, to feed the sense of beauty, to arouse

interest, to awaken the sleeping sense of delight. There is no doubt

that all these emotions are dormant in many people. One has only to

reflect on the influence of association, to know how children who grow

up in a home atmosphere which is fragrant with beautiful influences,

generally carry on those tastes and habits into later life. But our

education tends neither to make men and women efficient for the simple

duties of life, nor to-arouse the gentler energies of the spirit. "You

must remember you are translating poetry," said a conscientious master

to a boy who was construing Virgil. "It's not poetry when I translate

it!" said the boy. I look back at my own schooldays, and remember the

bare, stately class-rooms, the dry wind of intellect, the dull murmur

of work, neither enjoyed nor understood; and I reflect how small a

part any fanciful or beautiful or leisurely interpretation ever played

in our mental exercises; the first and last condition of any fine sort

of labour--that it should be enjoyed--was put resolutely out of sight,

not so much as an impossible adjunct, as a thing positively

enervating and contemptible. Yet if one subtracts the idea of

enjoyment from labour, there is no beauty-loving spirit which does not

instantly and rightly rebel. There must be labour, of course,

effective, vigorous, brisk labour, overcoming difficulties, mastering

uncongenial details; but the end should be enjoyment; and it should be

made clear that the greater the mastery, the richer the enjoyment; and

that if one cannot enjoy a thing without mastering it, neither can one

ever really master it without enjoying it.

What we need, in education, is some sense of far horizons and

beautiful prospects, some consciousness of the largeness and mystery

and wonder of life. To take a simple instance, in my own education. I

read the great books of Greece and Rome; but I knew hardly anything of

the atmosphere, the social life, the human activity out of which they

proceeded. One did not think of the literature of the Greeks as of a

fountain of eager beauty springing impulsively and instinctively out

of the most ardent, gracious, sensitive life that any nation has ever

lived. One knew little of the stern, businesslike, orderly, grasping

Roman temperament, in which poetry flowered so rarely, and the arts

not at all, until the national fibre began to weaken and grow

dissolute. One studied history in those days, as if one was mastering

statute-books, blue-books, gazettes, office-files; one never grasped

the clash of individualities, or the real interests and tastes of the

nations that fought and made laws and treaties. It was all a dealing

with records and monuments, just the things that happened to survive

decay--as though one's study of primitive man were to begin and end

with sharpened flints!

What we have now to do, in this next generation, is not to leave

education a dry conspectus of facts and processes, but to try rather

that children should learn something of the temper and texture of the

world at certain vivid points of its history; and above all perceive

something of the nature of the world as it now is, its countries, its

nationalities, its hopes, its problems. That is the aim, that we

should realise what kind of a thing life is, how bright and yet how

narrow a flame, how bounded by darkness and mystery, and yet how vivid

and active within its little space of sun.

IX

KNOWLEDGE

"Knowledge is power," says the old adage; and yet so meaningless now,

in many respects, do the words sound, that it is hard even to

recapture the mental outlook from which it emanated. I imagine that it

dates from a time when knowledge meant an imagined acquaintance with

magical secrets, short cuts to wealth, health, influence, fame. Even

now the application of science to the practical needs of man has some

semblance of power about it; the telephone, wireless telegraphy, steam

engines, anæsthetics--these are powerful things. But no man is

profited by his discoveries; he cannot keep them to himself, and use

them for his own private ends. The most he can do is to make a large

fortune out of them. And as to other kinds of knowledge, erudition,

learning, how do they profit the possessor? "No one knows anything

nowadays," said an eminent man to me the other day; "it is not worth

while! The most learned man is the man who knows best where to find

things." There still appears, in works of fiction, with pathetic

persistence, a belief that learning still lingers at Oxford and

Cambridge; those marvellous Dons, who appear in the pages of novels,

men who read folios all the morning and drink port all the evening,

where are they in reality? Not at Cambridge, certainly. I would travel

many miles, I would travel to Oxford, if I thought I could find such

an adorable figure. But the Don is now a brisk and efficient man of

business, a paterfamilias with provision to make for his family. He

has no time for folios and no inclination for port. Examination papers

in the morning, and a glass of lemonade at dinner, are the notes of

his leisure days. The belief in uncommercial knowledge has indeed died

out of England. Eton, as Mr. Birrell said, can hardly be described as

a place of education; and to what extent can Oxford and Cambridge be

described as places of literary research? A learned man is apt to be

considered a bore, and the highest compliment that can be paid him is

that one would not suspect him of being learned.

There is, indeed, a land in which knowledge is respected, and that is

America. If we do not take care, the high culture will desert our

shores, like Astræa's flying hem, and take her way Westward, with the

course of Empire.

A friend of mine once told me that he struggled up a church-tower in

Florence, a great lean, pale brick minaret, designed, I suppose, to be

laminated with marble, but cheerfully abandoned to bareness; he came

out on to one of those high balustraded balconies, which in mediæval

pictures seem to have been always crowded with fantastically dressed

persons, and are now only visited by tourists. The silvery city lay

outspread beneath him, with the rapid mud-stained river passing to the

plain, the hill-side crowded with villas embowered in green gardens,

and the sad-coloured hills behind. While he was gazing, two other

tourists, young Americans, came quietly out on to the balcony, a

brother and sister, he thought. They looked out for a time in silence,

leaning on the parapet; and then the brother said softly, "How much

we should enjoy all this, if we were not so ignorant!" Like all

Americans, they wanted to know! It was not enough for them to see the

high houses, the fantastic towers, the great blind blocks of mediæval

palaces, thrust so grimly out above the house-tops. It all meant life

and history, strife and sorrow, it all needed interpreting and

transfiguring and re-peopling; without that it was dumb and silent,

vague and bewildering. One does not know whether to admire or to sigh!

Ought one not to be able to take beauty as it comes? What if one does

not want to know these things, as Shelley said to his lean and

embarrassed tutor at Oxford? If knowledge makes the scene glow and

live, enriches it, illuminates it, it is well. And perhaps in England

we learn to live so incuriously and naturally among historical things

that we forget the existence of tradition, and draw it in with the air

we breathe, just realising it as a pleasant background and not caring

to investigate it or master it. It is hard to say what we lose by

ignorance, is hard to say what we should gain by knowledge. Perhaps to

want to know would be a sign of intellectual and emotional activity;

but it could not be done as a matter of duty--only as a matter of

enthusiasm.

The poet Clough once said, "It makes a great difference to me that

Magna Charta was signed at Runnymede, but it does not make much

difference to me to know that it was signed." The fact that it was so

signed affects our liberties, the knowledge only affects us, if it

inspires us to fresh desire of liberty, whatever liberty may be. It is

even more important to be interested in life than to be interested in

past lives. It was Scott, I think, who asked indignantly,

Lives there the man with soul so dead,

Who never to himself hath said

This is my own, my native land?

I do not know how it may be in Scotland! Dr. Johnson once said rudely

that the finest prospect a Scotchman ever saw was the high road that

might take him to England; but I should think that if Scott's is a

fair test of deadness of soul, there must be a good many people in

England who are as dead as door-nails! The Englishman is not very

imaginative; and a farmer who was accustomed to kneel down like

Antæus, and kiss the soil of his orchard, would be thought an

eccentric!

Joyous Gard · 第 2 / 10 段