CHAPTER XIV

THE CITY AND ITS TEMPLES

By the first week in September I had visited all the most important

temples and monasteries in Lhasa. We generally went in parties of four

and five, and a company of Sikhs or Pathans was left in the courtyard in

case of accidents. We were well armed, as the monks were sullen, though

I do not think they were capable of any desperate fanaticism. If they

had had the abandon of dervishes, they might have rushed our camp long

before. They missed their chance at Gyantse, when a night attack pushed

home by overwhelming numbers could have wiped out our little garrison.

In Lhasa there was the one case of the Lama who ran amuck outside the

camp with the coat of mail and huge paladin's sword concealed beneath

his cloak, a medieval figure who thrashed the air with his brand like a

flail in sheer lust of blood. He was hanged medievally the next day

within sight of Lhasa. Since then the exploit has not been repeated, but

no one leaves the perimeter unarmed.

I have written of the squalor of the Lhasa streets. The environs of the

city are beautiful enough--willow groves intersected by clear-running

streams, walled-in parks with palaces and fish-ponds, marshes where the

wild-duck flaunt their security, and ripe barley-fields stretching away

to the hills. In September the trees were wearing their autumn tints,

the willows were mostly a sulphury yellow, and in the pools beneath the

red-stalked _polygonum_ and burnished dock-leaf glowed in brilliant

contrast. Just before dusk there was generally a storm in the valley,

which only occasionally reached the city; but the breeze stirred the

poplars, and the silver under the leaves glistened brightly against the

background of clouds. Often a rainbow hung over the Potala like a

nimbus.

On the Lingkhor, or circular road, which winds round Lhasa, we saw

pilgrims and devotees moving slowly along in prayer, always keeping the

Potala on their right hand. The road is only used for devotion. One

meets decrepit old women and men, halting and limping and slowly

revolving their prayer-wheels and mumbling charms. I never saw a healthy

yokel or robust Lama performing this rite. Nor did I see the pilgrims

whom one reads of as circumambulating the city on their knees by a

series of prostrations, bowing their heads in the dust and mud. All the

devotees are poor and ragged, and many blind. It seems that the people

of Lhasa do not begin to think of the next incarnation until they have

nothing left in this.

When one leaves the broad avenues between the walls of the groves and

pleasure-gardens, and enters the city, one's senses are offended by

everything that is unsightly and unclean. Pigs and pariah dogs are

nosing about in black oozy mud. The houses are solid but dirty. It is

hard to believe that they are whitewashed every year.

Close to the western entrance are the huts of the Ragyabas, beggars,

outcasts, and scavengers, who cut up the dead. The outer walls of their

houses are built of yak-horns.

Some of the houses had banks of turf built up outside the doors, with

borders of English flowers. The dwellings are mostly two or three

storied. Bird-cages hang from the windows.

The outside of the cathedral is not at all imposing. From the streets

one cannot see the golden roof, but only high blank walls, and at the

entrance a forest of dingy pillars beside a massive door. The door is

thrown open by a sullen monk, and a huge courtyard is revealed with more

dingy pillars that were once red. The entire wall is covered with

paintings of Buddhist myth and symbolism. The colours are subdued and

pleasing. In the centre of the yard are masses of hollyhocks, marigolds,

nasturtiums, and stocks. Beside the flower-borders is a pyramidical

structure in which are burnt the leaves of juniper and pine for

sacrifice.

The cloisters are two-storied; on the upper floor the monks have their

cells. Looking up, one can see hundreds of them gazing at us with

interest over the banisters. The upper story, as in every temple in

Tibet, is coated with a dark red substance which looks like rough paint,

but is really sacred earth, pasted on to evenly-clipped brushwood so as

to seem like a continuation of the masonry. On the face of the wall are

emblems in gilt, Buddhist symbols, like our Prince of Wales's feathers,

sun and crescent moon, and various other devices. A heavy curtain of

yak-hair hangs above the entrance-gate. On the roof are large cylinders

draped in yak-hair cloth topped by a crescent or a spear. Every

monastery and jong, and most houses in Tibet, are ornamented with these.

When one first sees them in the distance they look like men walking on

the roof.

Generally one ascends steps from the outer courtyard to the temple, but

in the Jokhang the floors are level. We enter the main temple by a dark

passage. The great doorway that opens into the street has been closed

behind us, but we leave a company of Pathans in the outer yard, as the

monks are sullen. Our party of four is armed with revolvers.

Service is being held before the great Buddhas as we enter, and a

thunderous harmony like an organ-peal breaks the interval for

meditation. The Abbot, who is in the centre, leans forward from his

chair and takes a bundle of peacock-feathers from a vase by his side. As

he points it to the earth there is a clashing of cymbals, a beating of

drums, and a blowing of trumpets and conch shells.

Then the music dies away like the reverberation of cannon in the hills.

The Abbot begins the chant, and the monks, facing each other like

singing-men in a choir, repeat the litany. They have extraordinary deep,

devotional voices, at once unnatural and impressive. The deepest bass of

the West does not approach it, and their sense of time is perfect.

The voice of the thousand monks is like the drone of some subterranean

monster, musically plaintive--the wail of the Earth God praying for

release to the God of the Skies.

The chant sounds like the endless repetition of the same formula; the

monks sway to it rhythmically. The temple would be dark if it were not

for the flickering of many thousands of votive candles and butter lamps.

Rows upon rows of them are placed before every shrine.

In an inner temple we found the three great images of the Buddhist

trinity--the Buddhas of the past, present, and future. The images were

greater than life-size, and set with jewels from foot to crown. As in

the cloisters of an English cathedral, there were little side-chapels,

which held sacred relics and shrines.

There were lamps of gold, and solid golden bowls set on altars, and

embossed salvers of copper and bronze.

A hanging grille of chainwork protected the precincts from sacrilege,

and an extended hand, bloody and menacing, was stretched from the wall,

terrible enough when suddenly revealed in that dim light to paralyze and

strike to earth with fright any profane thief who would dare to enter.

In the upper story we found a place which we called 'Hell,' where some

Lamas were worshipping the demon protectress of the Grand Lama. The

music here was harsh and barbaric. There were displayed on the pillars

and walls every freak of diabolical invention in the shape of scrolls

and devil-masks. The obscene object of this worship was huddled in a

corner--a dwarfish abortion, hideous and malignant enough for such

rites.

All about the Lamas' feet ran little white mice searching for grain.

They are fed daily, and are scrupulously reverenced, as in their frail

white bodies the souls of the previous guardians of the shrine are

believed to be reincarnated.

In another temple we found the Lamas holding service in worship of the

many-handed Buddha, Avalokitesvara. The picture of the god hung from

pillars by the altar. The chief Lamas were wearing peaked caps

picturesquely coloured with subdued blue and gold, and vestments of the

same hue. The lesser Lamas were bare-headed, and their hair was cropped.

When we first entered, an acolyte was pouring tea out of a massive

copper pot with a turquoise on the spout. Each monk received his tea in

a wooden bowl, and poured in barley-flour to make a paste.

During this interval no one spoke or whispered. The footsteps of the

acolytes were noiseless. Only the younger ones looked up at us

self-consciously as we watched them from a latticed window in the

corridor above.

Centuries ago this service was ordained, and the intervals appointed to

further the pursuit of truth through silence and abstraction. The monks

sat there quiet as stone. They had seen us, but they were seemingly

oblivious.

One wondered, were they pursuing truth or were they petrified by ritual

and routine? Did they regard us as immaterial reflexes, unsubstantial

and illusory, passing shadows of the world cast upon them by an

instant's illusion, to pass away again into the unreal, while they were

absorbed in the contemplation of changeless and universal truths? Or

were we noted as food for gossip and criticism when their self-imposed

ordeal was done?

The reek of the candles was almost suffocating. 'Thank God I am not a

Lama!' said a subaltern by my side. An Afridi Subadar let the butt of

his rifle clank from his boot to the pavement.

At these calls to sanity we clattered out of this unholy atmosphere of

dreams as if by an unquestioned impulse into the bright sunshine

outside.

In the bazaar there is a gay crowd. The streets are thronged by as

good-natured a mob as I have met anywhere. Sullenness and distrust have

vanished. Officers and men, Tommies, Gurkhas, Sikhs, and Pathans, are

stared at and criticised good-humouredly, and their accoutrements

fingered and examined. It is a bright and interesting crowd, full of

colour. In a corner of the square a street singer with a guitar and

dancing children attracts a small crowd. His voice is a rich baritone,

and he yodels like the Tyrolese. The crowd is parted by a Shapé riding

past in gorgeous yellow silks and brocades, followed by a mounted

retinue whose head-gear would be the despair of an operatic hatter. They

wear red lamp-shades, yellow motor-caps, exaggerated Gainsboroughs,

inverted cooking-pots, coal-scuttles, and medieval helmets. And among

this topsy-turvy, which does not seem out of place in Lhasa, the most

eccentrically-hatted man is the Bhutanese Tongsa Penlop, who parades the

streets in an English gray felt hat.

The Mongolian caravan has arrived in Lhasa, after crossing a thousand

miles of desert and mountain tracks. The merchants and drivers saunter

about the streets, trying not to look too rustic. But they are easily

recognisable--tall, sinewy men, very independent in gait, with faces

burnt a dark brick red by exposure to the wind and sun. I saw one of

their splendidly robust women, clad in a sheepskin cloak girdled at the

waist, bending over a cloth stall, and fingering samples as if shopping

were the natural business of her life.

On fine days the wares are spread on the cobbles of the street, and the

coloured cloth and china make a pretty show against the background of

garden flowers. At the doors of the shops stand pale Nuwaris, whose

ancestors from Nepal settled in Lhasa generations ago. They wear a flat

brown cap, and a dull russet robe darker than that of the Lamas. The

Cashmiri shopkeepers are turbaned, and wear a cloak of butcher's blue.

They and the Nuwaris and the Chinese seem to monopolize the trade of the

city.

British officers haunt the bazaars searching for curios, but with very

little success. Lhasa has no artistic industries; nearly all the

knick-knacks come from India and China. Cloisonné ware is rare and

expensive, as one has to pay for the 1,800 miles of transport from

Peking. Religious objects are not sold. Turquoises are plentiful, but

coarse and inferior. Hundreds of paste imitations have been bought.

There is a certain sale for amulets, rings, bells, and ornaments for the

hair, but these and the brass and copper work can be bought for half the

price in the Darjeeling bazaar. The few relics we have found of the West

must have histories. In the cathedral there was a bell with the

inscription 'Te Deum laudamus,' probably a relic of the Capuchins. In

the purlieus of the city we found a bicycle without tyres, and a

sausage-machine made in Birmingham.

With the exception of the cathedral, most of the temples and monasteries

are on the outskirts of the city. There is a sameness about these places

of worship that would make description tedious. Only the Ramo-ché and

Moru temples, which are solely devoted to sorcery, are different. Here

one sees the other soul-side of the people.

The Ramo-ché is as dark and dingy as a vault. On each side of the

doorway are three gigantic tutelary demons. In the vestibule is a

collection of bows, arrows, chain-armour, stag-horns, stuffed animals,

scrolls, masks, skulls, and all the paraphernalia of devil-worship. On

the left is a dark recess where drums are being beaten by an unseen

choir.

A Lama stands, chalice in hand, before a deep aperture cut in the wall

like a buttery hatch, and illumined by dim, flickering candles, which

reveal a malignant female fiend. As a second priest pours holy water

into a chalice, the Lama raises it solemnly again and again, muttering

spells to propitiate the fury.

In the hall there are neither ornaments, gods, hanging canopies, nor

scrolls, as in the other temples. There is neither congregation nor

priests. The walls are apparently black and unpainted, but here and

there a lamp reveals a Gorgon's head, a fiend's eye, a square inch or

two of pigment that time has not obscured.

The place is immemorially old. There are huge vessels of carved metal

and stone, embossed, like the roof, with griffins and skulls, which

probably date back to before the introduction of Buddhism into Tibet,

and are survivals of the old Bon religion. There is nothing bright here

in colour or sound, nothing vivid or animated.

Stricken men and women come to remove a curse, vindictive ones to

inflict one, bereaved ones to pay the initiated to watch the adventures

of the soul in purgatory and guide it on its passage to the new birth,

while demons and furies are lurking to snatch it with fiery claws and

drag it to hell.

All these beings must be appeased by magic rites. So in the Ramo-ché

there is no rapture of music, no communion with Buddha, no beatitudes,

only solitary priests standing before the shrines and mumbling

incantations, dismal groups of two or three seated Buddha-fashion on the

floor, and casting spells to exercise a deciding influence, as they

hope, in the continual warfare which is being waged between the tutelary

and malignant deities for the prize of a soul.

In the chancel of the temple, behind the altar, is a massive pile of

masonry stretching from floor to roof, under which, as folk believe, an

abysmal chasm leads down to hell. Round this there is a dark and narrow

passage which pilgrims circumambulate. The floor and walls are as

slippery as ice, worn by centuries of pious feet and groping hands. One

old woman in some urgent need is drifting round and round abstractedly.

Elsewhere one might linger in the place fascinated, but here in Lhasa

one moves among mysteries casually; for one cannot wonder, in this

isolated land where the elements are so aggressive, among these deserts

and wildernesses, heaped mountain chains, and impenetrable barriers of

snow, that the children of the soil believe that earth, air, and water

are peopled by demons who are struggling passionately over the destinies

of man.

I will not describe any more of the Lhasa temples. One shrine is very

like another, and details would be tedious. Personally, I do not care

for systematic sightseeing, even in Lhasa, but prefer to loiter about

the streets and bazaars, and the gardens outside the city, watch the

people, and enjoy the atmosphere of the place. The religion of Tibet is

picturesque enough in an unwholesome way, but to inquire how the layers

of superstition became added to the true faith, and trace the growth of

these spurious accretions, I leave to archæologists. Perhaps one reader

in a hundred will be interested to know that a temple was built by the

illustrious Konjo, daughter of the Emperor Tai-Tsung and wife of King

Srong-btsan-gombo, but I think the other ninety and nine will be

devoutly thankful if I omit to mention it.

Yet one cannot leave the subject of the Lhasa monasteries without

remarking on the striking resemblance between Tibetan Lamaism and the

Romish Church. The resemblance cannot be accidental. The burning of

candles before altars, the sprinkling of holy water, the chanting of

hymns in alternation, the giving alms and saying Masses for the dead,

must have their origin in the West. We know that for many centuries

large Christian communities have existed in Western China near the

Tibetan frontier, and several Roman Catholic missionaries have

penetrated to Lhasa and other parts of Tibet during the last three

centuries. As early as 1641 the Jesuit Father Grueber visited Lhasa, and

recorded that the Lamas wore caps and mitres, that they used rosaries,

bells, and censers, and observed the practice of confession, penance,

and absolution. Besides these points common to Roman Catholicism, he

noticed the monastic and conventual system, the tonsure, the vows of

poverty, chastity, and obedience, the doctrine of incarnation and the

Trinity, and the belief in purgatory and paradise.[18]

[18] It is interesting to compare Grueber's account with the journal

of Father Rubruquis, who travelled in Mongolia in the thirteenth

century. In 1253 he wrote of the Lamas:

'All their priests had their heads shaven quite over, and they are

clad in saffron-coloured garments. Being once shaven, they lead an

unmarried life from that time forward, and they live a hundred or

two of them in one cloister.... They have with them also,

whithersoever they go, a certain string, with a hundred or two

hundred nutshells thereupon, much like our beads which we carry

about with us; and they do always mutter these words, "Om mani

pectavi (om mani padme hom)"--"God, Thou knowest," as one of them

expounded it to me; and so often do they expect a reward at God's

hands as they pronounce these words in remembrance of God.... I

made a visit to their idol temple, and found certain priests

sitting in the outward portico, and those which I saw seemed, by

their shaven beards, as if they had been our countrymen; they wore

certain ornaments upon their heads like mitres made of paper.'

We occasionally saw a monk with the refined ascetic face of a Roman

Cardinal. Te Rinpoche, the acting regent, was an example. One or two

looked as if they might be humane and benevolent--men who might make one

accept the gentle old Lama in 'Kim' as a not impossible fiction; but

most of them appeared to me to be gross and sottish. I must confess that

during the protracted negociations at Lhasa I had little sympathy with

the Lamas. It is a mistake to think that they keep their country closed

out of any religious scruple. Buddhism in its purest form is not

exclusive or fanatical. Sakya Muni preached a missionary religion. He

was Christlike in his universal love and his desire to benefit all

living creatures. But Buddhism in Tibet has become more and more

degenerate, and the Lamaist Church is now little better than a political

mechanism whose chief function is the uncompromising exclusion of

foreigners. The Lamas know that intercourse with other nations must

destroy their influence with the people.

And Tibet is really ruled by the Lamas. Outside Lhasa are the three

great monasteries of Depung, Sera, and Gaden, whose Abbots, backed by a

following of nearly 30,000 armed and bigoted monks, maintain a

preponderating influence in the national assembly.[19] These men wield a

greater influence than the four Shapés or the Dalai Lama himself, and

practically dictate the policy of the country.

[19] 'It may be asked how the monastic influence is brought to bear

on a Government in which three out of the four principal

Ministers (Shapé) are laymen. The fact seems to be that lying

behind the Tak Lama, the Shapés, and all the machinery of the

Tibetan Government, as we have hitherto been acquainted with it,

there is an institution called the "Tsong-du-chembo," or

"Tsong-dugze-tsom," which may reasonably be compared with what we

call a "National Assembly," or, as the word implies, "Great

Assembly." It is constituted of the Kenpas or Abbots of the three

great monasteries, representatives from the four lings or small

monasteries actually in Lhasa city, and from all the other

monasteries in the province of U; and besides this, all the

officials of the Government are present--laymen and ecclesiastics

alike--to the number of several hundreds.'--Captain O'Connor's

Diary at Khamba Jong (Tibetan Blue-Book, 1904).

The three great monasteries are of ancient foundation, and intimately

associated with the history of the country. They are, in fact,

ecclesiastical Universities,[20] and resemble in many ways our

Universities of Oxford and Cambridge. The Universities are divided into

colleges. Each has its own Abbot, or Master, and disciplinary staff. The

undergraduates, or candidates for ordination, must attend lectures and

chapels, and pass examinations in set books, which they must learn from

cover to cover before they can take their degree. Failure in

examination, as well as breaches in discipline and manners, are punished

by flogging. Corporal punishment is also dealt out to the unfortunate

tutors, who are held responsible for their pupils' omissions. If a

candidate repeatedly fails to pass his examination, he is expelled from

the University, and can only enter again on payment of increased fees.

The three leading Universities are empowered to confer degrees which

correspond to our Bachelor and Doctor of Divinity. The monks live in

rooms in quadrangles, and have separate messing clubs, but meet for

general worship in the cathedral. If their code is strictly observed,

which I very much doubt, prayers and tedious religious observances must

take up nearly their whole day. But the Lamas are adept casuists, and

generally manage to evade the most irksome laws of their scriptures.

[20] I have derived most of my information regarding the discipline

and constitution of Depung from 'Lamaism in Tibet,' by Colonel

Augustine Waddell, who accompanied the expedition as Archæologist

and Principal Medical Officer.

Soon after our arrival in Lhasa we had occasion to visit Depung, which

is probably the largest monastery in the world. It stands in a natural

amphitheatre in the hillside two miles from the city, a huge collection

of temples and monastic buildings, larger, and certainly more imposing,

than most towns in Tibet.

The University was founded in 1414, during the reign of the first Grand

Lama of the Reformed Church. It is divided into four colleges, and

contains nearly 8,000 monks, amongst whom there is a large Mongolian

community. The fourth Grand Lama, a Mongolian, is buried within the

precincts. The fifth and greatest Dalai Lama, who built the Potala and

was the first to combine the temporal and spiritual power, was an Abbot

of Depung. The reigning Dalai Lama visits Depung annually, and a palace

in the university is reserved for his use. The Abbot, of course, is a

man of very great political influence.

All these facts I have collected to show that the monks have some reason

to be proud of their monastery as the first in Tibet. One may forgive

them a little pride in its historic distinctions. Even in our own alma

mater we meet the best of men who seem to gather importance from old

traditions and association with a long roll of distinguished names.

What, then, can we expect of this Tibetan community, the most

conservative in a country that has prided itself for centuries on its

bigotry and isolation--men who are ignorant of science, literature,

history, politics, everything, in fact, except their own narrow

priestcraft and confused metaphysics? We call the Tibetan 'impossible.'

His whole education teaches him to be so, and the more educated he is

the more 'impossible' he becomes.

Imagine, then, the consternation at Depung when a body of armed men rode

up to the monastery and demanded supplies. We had refrained from

entering the monasteries of Lhasa and its neighbourhood at the request

of the Abbots and Shapés, but only on condition that the monks should

bring in supplies, which were to be paid for at a liberal rate. The

Abbots failed to keep their promise, supplies were not forthcoming, and

it became necessary to resort to strong measures. An officer was sent to

the gate with an escort of three men and a letter saying that if the

provisions were not handed over within an hour we would break into the

monastery and take them, if necessary, by force. The messengers were met

by a crowd of excited Lamas, who refused to accept the letter, waved

them away, and rolled stones towards them menacingly, as an intimation

that they were prepared to fight. As the messengers rode away the tocsin

was heard, warning the villagers, women and children, who were gathered

outside with market produce, to depart.

General Macdonald with a strong force of British and native troops drew

up within 1,300 yards of the monastery, guns were trained on Depung, the

infantry were deployed, and we waited the expiration of the period of

grace intimated in the letter. An hour passed by, and it seemed as if

military operations were inevitable, when groups of monks came out with

a white flag, carrying baskets of eggs and a complimentary scarf.

Even in the face of this military display they began to temporize. They

bowed and chattered and protested in their usual futile manner, and

condescended so far as to say they would talk the matter over if we

retired at once, and send the supplies to our camp the next day, if they

came to a satisfactory decision. The Lamas are trained to wrangle and

dispute and defer and vacillate.[21] They seem to think that speech was

made only to evade conclusions. The curt ultimatum was repeated, and the

deputation was removed gently by two impassive sepoys, still chattering

like a flock of magpies.

[21] The highest degree which is conferred on the Lamas by their

Universities is the Rabs-jam-pa (verbally overflowing

endlessly).--Waddell, 'Lamaism in Tibet.'

In the meanwhile we sat and waited and smoked our pipes, and wondered if

there were going to be another Guru. It seemed the most difficult thing

in the world to save these poor fools from the effects of their

obstinate folly. The time-limit had nearly expired, the two batteries

were advanced 300 yards, the gunners took their sights again, and

trained the 10-pounders on the very centre of the monastery.

There were only five minutes more, and we were stirred, according to our

natures, by pity or exasperation or the swift primitive instinct for the

dramatic, which sweeps away the humanities, and leaves one to the

conflict of elemental passions.

At last a thin line of red-robed monks was seen to issue from the gate

and descend the hill, each carrying a bag of supplies. The crisis was

over, and we were spared the necessity of inflicting a cruel

punishment. I waited to see the procession, a group of sullen

ecclesiastics, who had never bowed or submitted to external influence in

their lives, carrying on their backs their unwilling contribution to the

support of the first foreign army that had ever intruded on their

seclusion. It must have been the most humiliating day in the history of

Depung.

It must be admitted that it was not a moment when the monks looked their

best. Yet I could not help comparing their appearance with that of the

simple honest-looking peasantry. Many of them looked sottish and

degraded; other faces showed cruelty and cunning; their brows were

contracted as if by perpetual scheming; some were almost simian in

appearance, and looked as if they could not harbour a thought that was

not animal or sensual. They waddled in their walk, and their right arms,

exposed from the shoulder, looked soft and flabby, as if they had never

done an honest day's work in their life.

One man had the face of an inquisitor--round, beady eyes, puffed cheeks,

and thin, tightly-shut mouth.

How they hated us! If one of us fell into their hands secretly, I have

no doubt they would rack him limb from limb, or cut him into small

pieces with a knife.

The Depung incident shows how difficult it was to make any headway with

the Tibetans without recourse to arms. We were present in the city to

insist on compliance with our demands. But an amicable settlement seemed

hopeless, and we could not stay in Lhasa indefinitely. What if these

monks were to say, 'You may stay here if you like. We will not molest

you, but we refuse to accept your terms'? We could only retire or train

our guns on the Potala. Retreat was, of course, impossible.

The Unveiling of Lhasa · 第 14 / 15 章