FOOTNOTES:

[1] Stephen Skinner, M.D. (Etymologicon linguae Anglicanae, Lond.,

1671), gives the derivation: "Frankincense, Thus, q.d. Incensum (i.e.

Thus Libere) seu Liberaliter, ut in sacris officiis par est,

adolendum."

[2] "Sic _olibanum_ dixere pro thure ex Graeco [Greek: o libanos]"

(Salmasius, C. S. _Plinianae exercitationes_, t. ii. p. 926, b. F.,

Traj. ad Rhen., 1689 fol.). So also Fuchs (Op. didact. pars. ii. p.

42, 1604 fol.), "Officinis non sine risu eruditorum, Graeco articulo

adjecto, _Olibanus_ vocatur." The term _olibano_ was used in

ecclesiastical Latin as early as the pontificate of Benedict IX., in

the 11th century. (See Ferd. Ughellus, _Italia sacra_, tom. i. 108,

D., Ven., 1717 fol.)

[3] So designated from its whiteness (J. G. Stuckius, _Sacror. et

sacrific. gent. descrip._, p. 79, Lugd. Bat., 1695, fol.; Kitto,

_Cycl. Bibl. Lit._ ii. p. 806, 1870); cf. _Laben_, the Somali name

for cream (R. F. Burton, _First Footsteps in E. Africa_, p. 178,

1856).

[4] Written _Louan_ by Garcias da Horta (_Aromat. et simpl.

medicament. hist., C. Clusii Atrebatis Exoticorum lib. sept._, p.

157, 1605, fol.), and stated to have been derived by the Arabs from

the Greek name, the term less commonly used by them being _Conder_:

cf. Sanskrit _Kunda_. According to Colebrooke (in _Asiatick Res._ ix.

p. 379, 1807), the Hindu writers on Materia Medica use for the resin

of _Boswellia thurifera_ the designation _Cunduru_.

[5] A term applied also to the resinous exudation of _Pinus

longifolia_ (see Dr E. J. Waring, _Pharmacopoeia of India_, p. 52,

Lond., 1868).

[6] See "Appendix," vol. i. p. 419 of Sir W. C. Harris's _Highland of

Aethiopia_ (2nd ed., Lond., 1844); and _Trans. Bombay Geog. Soc._

xiii. (1857), p. 136.

[7] Cruttenden, _Trans. Bombay Geog. Soc._ vii. (1846), p. 121; S. B.

Miles, J. Geog. Soc. (1872).

[8] Or Dhafar. The incense of "Dofar" is alluded to by Camoens, _Os

Lusiadas_, x. 201.

[9] H. J. Carter, "Comparative Geog. of the South-East Coast of

Arabia," in _J. Bombay Branch of R. Asiatic Soc._ iii. (Jan. 1851),

p. 296; and Mueller, _Geog. Graeci Minores_, i. p. 278 (Paris, 1855).

[10] J. Vaughan, _Pharm. Journ._ xii. (1853) pp. 227-229; and Ward,

_op. cit._ p. 97.

[11] Pereira, _Elem. of Mat. Med._ ii. pt. 2, p. 380 (4th ed., 1847).

[12] "_Boswellia thurifera_," ... says Waring (_Pharm. of India_, p.

52), "has been thought to yield East Indian olibanum, but there is no

reliable evidence of its so doing."

[13] "Libanus igitur est mons redolentie & summe aromaticitatis. nam

ibi herbe odorifere crescunt. ibi etiam arbores thurifere coalescunt

quarum gummi electum olibanum a medicis nuncupatur."--_Perigrinatio_,

p. 53 (1502, fol.).

[14] See, on the chemistry of frankincense, Braconnot, _Ann. de

chimie_, lxviii. (1808) pp. 60-69; Johnston, _Phil. Trans_. (1839),

pp. 301-305; J. Stenhouse, _Ann. der Chem. und Pharm_. xxxv. (1840)

p. 306; and A. Kurbatow, _Zeitsch. fuer Chem_. (1871), p. 201.

[15] "Praecipua autem gratia est mammoso, cum haerente lacryma priore

consecuta alia miscuit se" (_Nat. Hist._ xii. 32). One of the Chinese

names for frankincense, _Ju-hiang_, "milk-perfume," is explained by

the _Pen Ts'au_ (xxxiv. 45), a Chinese work, as being derived from

the nipple-like form of its drops. (See E. Bretschneider, _On the

Knowledge possessed by the Ancient Chinese of the Arabs_, &c., p. 19,

Lond., 1871.)

[16] _The Voyage of Nearchus, loc. cit._

[17] Vaughan (_Pharm. Journ._ xii. 1853) speaks of the Arabian Luban,

commonly called _Morbat_ or _Shaharree Luban_, as realizing higher

prices in the market than any of the qualities exported from Africa.

The incense of "Esher," i.e. Shihr or Shehr, is mentioned by Marco

Polo, as also by Barbosa. (See Yule, _op. cit._ ii. p. 377.) J.

Raymond Wellsted (_Travels to the City of the Caliphs_, p. 173,

Lond., 1840) distinguishes two kinds of frankincense--"_Meaty_,"

selling at $4 per cwt., and an inferior article fetching 20% less.

[18] "Es scheint, dass selber die Araber ihr eignes Raeuchwerk nicht

hoch schaetzen; denn die Vornehmen in Jemen brauchen gemeiniglich

indianisches Raeuchwerk, ja eine grosse Menge Mastix von der Insel

Scio" (_Beschreibung von Arabien_, p. 143, Kopenh., 1772).

[19] "De Arabibus minus mirum, qui nigricantem colorem, quo Thus

Indicum praeditum esse vult Dioscorides [lib. i. c. 70], Indum

plerumque vocent, ut ex Myrobalano nigro quem Indum appellant, patet"

(_op. sup. cit._ p. 157).

FRANKING, a term used for the right of sending letters or postal

packages free (Fr. _franc_) of charge. The privilege was claimed by the

House of Commons in 1660 in "a Bill for erecting and establishing a Post

Office," their demand being that all letters addressed to or sent by

members during the session should be carried free. The clause embodying

this claim was struck out by the Lords, but with the proviso in the Act

as passed for the free carriage of all letters to and from the king and

the great officers of state, and also the single inland letters of the

members of that present parliament during that session only. It seems,

however, that the practice was tolerated until 1764, when by an act

dealing with postage it was legalized, every peer and each member of the

House of Commons being allowed to send free ten letters a day, not

exceeding an ounce in weight, to any part of the United Kingdom, and to

receive fifteen. The act did not restrict the privilege to letters

either actually written by or to the member, and thus the right was very

easily abused, members sending and receiving letters for friends, all

that was necessary being the signature of the peer or M.P. in the corner

of the envelope. Wholesale franking grew usual, and M.P.'s supplied

their friends with envelopes already signed to be used at any time. In

1837 the scandal had become so great that stricter regulations came into

force. The franker had to write the full address, to which he had to add

his name, the post-town and the day of the month; the letter had to be

posted on the day written or the following day at the latest, and in a

post-town not more than 20 m. from the place where the peer or M.P. was

then living. On the 10th of January 1840 parliamentary franking was

abolished on the introduction of the uniform penny rate.

In the United States the franking privilege was first granted in January

1776 to the soldiers engaged in the American War of Independence. The

right was gradually extended till it included nearly all officials and

members of the public service. By special acts the privilege was

bestowed on presidents and their widows. By an act of the 3rd of March

1845, franking was limited to the president, vice-president, members and

delegates in Congress and postmasters, other officers being required to

keep quarterly accounts of postage and pay it from their contingent

funds. In 1851 free exchange of newspapers was re-established. By an act

of the 3rd of March 1863 the privilege was granted the president and his

private secretary, the vice-president, chiefs of executive departments,

such heads of bureaus and chief clerks as might be designated by the

postmaster-general for official letters only; senators and

representatives in Congress for all correspondence, senders of petitions

to either branch of the legislature, and to publishers of newspapers for

their exchanges. There was a limit as to weight. Members of Congress

could also frank, in matters concerning the federal department of

agriculture, "seeds, roots and cuttings," the weight to be fixed by the

postmaster-general. This act remained in force till the 31st of January

1873, when franking was abolished. Since 1875, by sundry acts, franking

for official correspondence, government publications, seeds, &c., has

been allowed to congressmen, ex-congressmen (for 9 months after the

close of their term), congressmen-elect and other government officials.

By special acts of 1881, 1886, 1902, 1909, respectively, the franking

privilege was granted to the widows of Presidents Garfield, Grant,

McKinley and Cleveland.

FRANKL, LUDWIG AUGUST (1810-1894), Austrian poet. He took part in the

revolution of 1848, and his poems on liberty had considerable vogue. His

lyrics are among his best work. He was secretary of the Jewish community

in Vienna, and did a lasting service to education by his visit to the

Orient in 1856. He founded the first modern Jewish school (the Von

Laemmel Schule) in Jerusalem. His brilliant volumes _Nach Jerusalem_

describing his eastern tour have been translated into English, as is the

case with many of his poems. His collected poems appeared in three

volumes in 1880. (I. A.)

FRANKLAND, SIR EDWARD (1825-1899), English chemist, was born at

Churchtown, near Lancaster, on the 18th of January 1825. After attending

the grammar school at Lancaster he spent six years as an apprentice to a

druggist in that town. In 1845 he went to London and entered Lyon

Playfair's laboratory, subsequently working under R. W. Bunsen at

Marburg. In 1847 he was appointed science-master at Queenwood school,

Hampshire, where he first met J. Tyndall, and in 1851 first professor of

chemistry at Owens College, Manchester. Returning to London six years

later he became lecturer in chemistry at St Bartholomew's hospital, and

in 1863 professor of chemistry at the Royal Institution. From an early

age he engaged in original research with great success.

Analytical problems, such as the isolation of certain organic radicals,

attracted his attention to begin with, but he soon turned to synthetical

studies, and he was only about twenty-five years of age when an

investigation, doubtless suggested by the work of his master, Bunsen, on

cacodyl, yielded the interesting discovery of the organo-metallic

compounds. The theoretical deductions which he drew from the

consideration of these bodies were even more interesting and important

than the bodies themselves. Perceiving a molecular isonomy between them

and the inorganic compounds of the metals from which they may be formed,

he saw their true molecular type in the oxygen, sulphur or chlorine

compounds of those metals, from which he held them to be derived by the

substitution of an organic group for the oxygen, sulphur, &c. In this

way they enabled him to overthrow the theory of conjugate compounds, and

they further led him in 1852 to publish the conception that the atoms of

each elementary substance have a definite saturation capacity, so that

they can only combine with a certain limited number of the atoms of

other elements. The theory of valency thus founded has dominated the

subsequent development of chemical doctrine, and forms the groundwork

upon which the fabric of modern structural chemistry reposes.

In applied chemistry Frankland's great work was in connexion with

water-supply. Appointed a member of the second royal commission on the

pollution of rivers in 1868, he was provided by the government with a

completely-equipped laboratory, in which, for a period of six years, he

carried on the inquiries necessary for the purposes of that body, and

was thus the means of bringing to light an enormous amount of valuable

information respecting the contamination of rivers by sewage,

trade-refuse, &c., and the purification of water for domestic use. In

1865, when he succeeded A. W. von Hofmann at the School of Mines, he

undertook the duty of making monthly reports to the registrar-general on

the character of the water supplied to London, and these he continued

down to the end of his life. At one time he was an unsparing critic of

its quality, but in later years he became strongly convinced of its

general excellence and wholesomeness. His analyses were both chemical

and bacteriological, and his dissatisfaction with the processes in vogue

for the former at the time of his appointment caused him to spend two

years in devising new and more accurate methods. In 1859 he passed a

night on the very top of Mont Blanc in company with John Tyndall. One of

the purposes of the expedition was to discover whether the rate of

combustion of a candle varies with the density of the atmosphere in

which it is burnt, a question which was answered in the negative. Other

observations made by Frankland at the time formed the starting-point of

a series of experiments which yielded far-reaching results. He noticed

that at the summit the candle gave a very poor light, and was thereby

led to investigate the effect produced on luminous flames by varying the

pressure of the atmosphere in which they are burning. He found that

pressure increases luminosity, so that hydrogen, for example, the flame

of which in normal circumstances gives no light, burns with a luminous

flame under a pressure of ten or twenty atmospheres, and the inference

he drew was that the presence of solid particles is not the only factor

that determines the light-giving power of a flame. Further, he showed

that the spectrum of a dense ignited gas resembles that of an

incandescent liquid or solid, and he traced a gradual change in the

spectrum of an incandescent gas under increasing pressure, the sharp

lines observable when it is extremely attenuated broadening out to

nebulous bands as the pressure rises, till they merge in the continuous

spectrum as the gas approaches a density comparable with that of the

liquid state. An application of these results to solar physics in

conjunction with Sir Norman Lockyer led to the view that at least the

external layers of the sun cannot consist of matter in the liquid or

solid forms, but must be composed of gases or vapours. Frankland and

Lockyer were also the discoverers of helium. In 1868 they noticed in the

solar spectrum a bright yellow line which did not correspond to any

substance then known, and which they therefore attributed to the then

hypothetical element, helium.

Sir Edward Frankland, who was made a K.C.B. in 1897, died on the 9th of

August 1899 while on a holiday at Golaa, Gudbrandsdalen, Norway.

A memorial lecture delivered by Professor H. E. Armstrong before the

London Chemical Society on the 31st of October 1901 contained many

personal details of Frankland's life, together with a full discussion

of his scientific work; and a volume of _Autobiographical Sketches_

was printed for private circulation in 1902. His original papers, down

to 1877, were collected and published in that year as _Experimental

Researches in Pure, Applied and Physical Chemistry_.

FRANKLIN, BENJAMIN (1706-1790), American diplomat, statesman and

scientist, was born on the 17th of January 1706 in a house in Milk

Street, opposite the Old South church, Boston, Massachusetts. He was the

tenth son of Josiah Franklin, and the eighth child and youngest son of

ten children borne by Abiah Folger, his father's second wife. The elder

Franklin was born at Ecton in Northamptonshire, England, where the

strongly Protestant Franklin family may be traced back for nearly four

centuries. He had married young and had migrated from Banbury to Boston,

Massachusetts, in 1685. Benjamin could not remember when he did not know

how to read, and when eight years old he was sent to the Boston grammar

school, being destined by his father for the church as a tithe of his

sons. He spent a year there and a year in a school for writing and

arithmetic, and then at the age of ten he was taken from school to

assist his father in the business of a tallow-chandler and soapboiler.

In his thirteenth year he was apprenticed to his half-brother James, who

was establishing himself in the printing business, and who in 1721

started the _New England Courant_, one of the earliest newspapers in

America.

Benjamin's tastes had at first been for the sea rather than the pulpit;

now they inclined rather to intellectual than to other pleasures. At an

early age he had made himself familiar with _The Pilgrim's Progress_,

with Locke, _On the Human Understanding_, and with a volume of _The

Spectator_. Thanks to his father's excellent advice, he gave up writing

doggerel verse (much of which had been printed by his brother and sold

on the streets) and turned to prose composition. His success in

reproducing articles he had read in _The Spectator_ led him to write an

article for his brother's paper, which he slipped under the door of the

printing shop with no name attached, and which was printed and attracted

some attention. After repeated successes of the same sort Benjamin threw

off his disguise and contributed regularly to the _Courant_. When, after

various journalistic indiscretions, James Franklin in 1722 was forbidden

to publish the _Courant_, it appeared with Benjamin's name as that of

the publisher and was received with much favour, chiefly because of the

cleverness of his articles signed "Dr Janus," which, like those

previously signed "Mistress Silence Dogood," gave promise of "Poor

Richard." But Benjamin's management of the paper, and particularly his

free-thinking, displeased the authorities; the relations of the two

brothers gradually grew unfriendly, possibly, as Benjamin thought,

because of his brother's jealousy of his superior ability; and Benjamin

determined to quit his brother's employ and to leave New England. He

made his way first to New York City, and then (October 1723) to

Philadelphia, where he got employment with a printer named Samuel

Keimer.[1]

A rapid composer and a workman full of resource, Franklin was soon

recognized as the master spirit of the shop. Sir William Keith

(1680-1749), governor of the province, urged him to start in business

for himself, and when Franklin had unsuccessfully appealed to his father

for the means to do so, Keith promised to furnish him with what he

needed for the equipment of a new printing office and sent him to

England to buy the materials. Keith had repeatedly promised to send a

letter of credit by the ship on which Franklin sailed, but when the

Channel was reached and the ship's mails were examined no such letter

was found. Franklin reached London in December 1724, and found

employment first at Palmer's, a famous printing house in Bartholomew

Close, and afterwards at Watts's Printing House. At Palmer's he had set

up a second edition of Wollaston's _Religion of Nature Delineated_. To

refute this book and to prove that there could be no such thing as

religion, he wrote and printed a small pamphlet, _A Dissertation on

Liberty and Necessity, Pleasure and Pain_, which brought him some

curious acquaintances, and of which he soon became thoroughly ashamed.

After a year and a half in London, Franklin was persuaded by a friend

named Denham, a Quaker merchant, to return with him to America and

engage in mercantile business; he accordingly gave up printing, but a

few days before sailing he received a tempting offer to remain and give

lessons in swimming--his feats as a swimmer having given him

considerable reputation--and he says that he might have consented "had

the overtures been sooner made." He reached Philadelphia in October

1726, but a few months later Denham died, and Franklin was induced by

large wages to return to his old employer Keimer; with Keimer he

quarrelled repeatedly, thinking himself ill used and kept only to train

apprentices until they could in some degree take his place. In 1728

Franklin and Hugh Meredith, a fellow-worker at Keimer's, set up in

business for themselves; the capital being furnished by Meredith's

father. In 1730 the partnership was dissolved, and Franklin, through the

financial assistance of two friends, secured the sole management of the

printing house. In September 1729 he bought at a merely nominal price

_The Pennsylvania Gazette_, a weekly newspaper which Keimer had started

nine months before to defeat a similar project of Franklin's, and which

Franklin conducted until 1765. Franklin's superior management of the

paper, his new type, "some spirited remarks" on the controversy between

the Massachusetts assembly and Governor Burnet, brought his paper into

immediate notice, and his success both as a printer and as a journalist

was assured and complete. In 1731 he established in Philadelphia one of

the earliest circulating libraries in America (often said to have been

the earliest), and in 1732 he published the first of his Almanacks,

under the pseudonym of Richard Saunders. These "Poor Richard's

Almanacks" were issued for the next twenty-five years with remarkable

success, the annual sale averaging 10,000 copies, and far exceeding the

sale of any other publication in the colonies.

Beginning in 1733 Franklin taught himself enough French, Italian,

Spanish and Latin to read these languages with some ease. In 1736 he was

chosen clerk of the General Assembly, and served in this capacity until

1751. In 1737 he had been appointed postmaster at Philadelphia, and

about the same time he organized the first police force and fire company

in the colonies; in 1749, after he had written _Proposals Relating to

the Education of Youth in Pensilvania_, he and twenty-three other

citizens of Philadelphia formed themselves into an association for the

purpose of establishing an academy, which was opened in 1751, was

chartered in 1753, and eventually became the University of Pennsylvania;

in 1727 he organized a debating club, the "Junto," in Philadelphia, and

later he was one of the founders of the American Philosophical Society

(1743; incorporated 1780); he took the lead in the organization of a

militia force, and in the paving of the city streets, improved the

method of street lighting, and assisted in the founding of a city

hospital (1751); in brief, he gave the impulse to nearly every measure

or project for the welfare and prosperity of Philadelphia undertaken in

his day. In 1751 he became a member of the General Assembly of

Pennsylvania, in which he served for thirteen years. In 1753 he and

William Hunter were put in charge of the post service of the colonies,

which he brought in the next ten years to a high state of efficiency and

made a financial success; this position he held until 1774. He visited

nearly every post office in the colonies and increased the mail service

between New York and Philadelphia from once to three times a week in

summer, and from twice a month to once a week in winter. When war with

France appeared imminent in 1754, Franklin was sent to the Albany

Convention, where he submitted his plan for colonial union (see ALBANY,

N.Y.). When the home government sent over General Edward Braddock[2]

with two regiments of British troops, Franklin undertook to secure the

requisite number of horses and waggons for the march against Ft.

Duquesne, and became personally responsible for payment to the

Pennsylvanians who furnished them. Notwithstanding the alarm occasioned

by Braddock's defeat, the old quarrel between the proprietors of

Pennsylvania and the assembly prevented any adequate preparations for

defence; "with incredible meanness" the proprietors had instructed their

governors to approve no act for levying the necessary taxes, unless the

vast estates of the proprietors were by the same act exempted. So great

was the confidence in Franklin in this emergency that early in 1756 the

governor of Pennsylvania placed him in charge of the north-western

frontier of the province, with power to raise troops, issue commissions

and erect blockhouses; and Franklin remained in the wilderness for over

a month, superintending the building of forts and watching the Indians.

In February 1757 the assembly, "finding the proprietary obstinately

persisted in manacling their deputies with instructions inconsistent not

only with the privileges of the people, but with the service of the

crown, resolv'd to petition the king against them," and appointed

Franklin as their agent to present the petition. He arrived in London on

the 27th of July 1757, and shortly afterwards, when, at a conference

with Earl Granville, president of the council, the latter declared that

"the King is the legislator of the colonies," Franklin in reply declared

that the laws of the colonies were to be made by their assemblies, to be

passed upon by the king, and when once approved were no longer subject

to repeal or amendment by the crown. As the assemblies, said he, could

not make permanent laws without the king's consent, "neither could he

make a law for them without theirs." This opposition of views distinctly

raised the issue between the home government and the colonies. As to the

proprietors Franklin succeeded in 1760 in securing an understanding that

the assembly should pass an act exempting from taxation the _unsurveyed_

waste lands of the Penn estate, the surveyed waste lands being assessed

at the usual rate for other property of that description. Thus the

proprietors finally acknowledged the right of the assembly to tax their

estates.

The success of Franklin's first foreign mission was, therefore,

substantial and satisfactory. During this sojourn of five years in

England he had made many valuable friends outside of court and political

circles, among whom Hume, Robertson and Adam Smith were conspicuous. In

1759, for his literary and more particularly his scientific attainments,

he received the freedom of the city of Edinburgh and the degree of

doctor of laws from the university of St Andrews. He had been made a

Master of Arts at Harvard and at Yale in 1753, and at the college of

William and Mary in 1756; and in 1762 he received the degree of D.C.L.

at Oxford. While in England he had made active use of his remarkable

talent for pamphleteering. In the clamour for peace following the death

of George II. (25th of October 1760), he was for a vigorous prosecution

of the war with France; he had written what purported to be a chapter

from an old book written by a Spanish Jesuit, _On the Meanes of

Disposing the Enemie to Peace_, which had a great effect; and in the

spring of 1760 there had been published a more elaborate paper written

by Franklin with the assistance of Richard Jackson, agent of

Massachusetts and Connecticut in London, entitled _The Interest of Great

Britain Considered with Regard to Her Colonies, and the Acquisitions of

Canada and Guadeloupe_ (1760). This pamphlet answered the argument that

it would be unsafe to keep Canada because of the added strength that

would thus be given to any possible movement for independence in the

English colonies, by urging that so long as Canada remained French there

could be no safety for the English colonies in North America, nor any

permanent peace in Europe. Tradition reports that this pamphlet had

considerable weight in determining the ministry to retain Canada.

Franklin sailed again for America in August 1762, hoping to be able to

settle down in quiet and devote the remainder of his life to experiments

in physics. This quiet was interrupted, however, by the "Paxton

Massacre" (Dec. 14, 1763)--the slaughter of a score of Indians

(children, women and old men) at Lancaster, Pennsylvania, by some young

rowdies from the town of Paxton, who then marched upon Philadelphia to

kill a few Christian Indians there. Franklin, appealed to by the

governor, raised a troop sufficient to frighten away the "Paxton boys,"

and for the moment there seemed a possibility of an understanding

between Franklin and the proprietors. But the question of taxing the

estates of the proprietors came up in a new form, and a petition from

the assembly was drawn by Franklin, requesting the king "to resume the

government" of Pennsylvania. In the autumn election of 1764 the

influence of the proprietors was exerted against Franklin, and by an

adverse majority of 25 votes in 4000 he failed to be re-elected to the

assembly. The new assembly sent Franklin again to England as its special

agent to take charge of another petition for a change of government,

which, however, came to nothing. Matters of much greater consequence

soon demanded Franklin's attention.

Early in 1764 Lord Grenville had informed the London agents of the

American colonies that he proposed to lay a portion of the burden left

by the war with France upon the shoulders of the colonists by means of a

stamp duty, unless some other tax equally productive and less

inconvenient were proposed. The natural objection of the colonies, as

voiced, for example, by the assembly of Pennsylvania, was that it was a

cruel thing to tax colonies already taxed beyond their strength, and

surrounded by enemies and exposed to constant expenditures for defence,

and that it was an indignity that they should be taxed by a parliament

in which they were not represented; at the same time the Pennsylvania

assembly recognized it as "their duty to grant aid to the crown,

according to their abilities, whenever required of them in the usual

manner." To prevent the introduction of the Stamp Act, which he

characterized as "the mother of mischief," Franklin used every effort,

but the bill was easily passed, and it was thought that the colonists

would soon be reconciled to it. Because he, too, thought so, and because

he recommended John Hughes, a merchant of Philadelphia, for the office

of distributor of stamps, Franklin himself was denounced--he was even

accused of having planned the Stamp Act--and his family in Philadelphia

was in danger of being mobbed. Of Franklin's examination, in February

1766, by the House in Committee of the Whole, as to the effects of the

Stamp Act, Burke said that the scene reminded him of a master examined

by a parcel of schoolboys, and George Whitefield said: "Dr Franklin has

gained immortal honour by his behaviour at the bar of the House. His

answer was always found equal to the questioner. He stood unappalled,

gave pleasure to his friends and did honour to his country."[3] Franklin

compared the position of the colonies to that of Scotland in the days

before the union, and in the same year (1766) audaciously urged a

similar union with the colonies before it was too late. The knowledge of

colonial affairs gained from Franklin's testimony, probably more than

all other causes combined, determined the immediate repeal of the Stamp

Act. For Franklin this was a great triumph, and the news of it filled

the colonists with delight and restored him to their confidence and

affection. Another bill (the Declaratory Act), however, was almost

immediately passed by the king's party, asserting absolute supremacy of

parliament over the colonies, and in the succeeding parliament, by the

Townshend Acts of 1767, duties were imposed on paper, paints and glass

imported by the colonists; a tax was imposed on tea also. The imposition

of these taxes was bitterly resented in the colonies, where it quickly

crystallized public opinion round the principle of "No taxation without

representation." In spite of the opposition in the colonies to the

Declaratory Act, the Townshend Acts and the tea tax, Franklin continued

to assure the British ministry and the British public of the loyalty of

the colonists. He tried to find some middle ground of reconciliation,

and kept up his quiet work of informing England as to the opinions and

conditions of the colonies, and of moderating the attitude of the

colonies toward the home government; so that, as he said, he was accused

in America of being too much an Englishman, and in England of being too

much an American. He was agent now, not only of Pennsylvania, but also

of New Jersey, of Georgia and of Massachusetts. Hillsborough, who became

secretary of state for the colonies in 1768, refused to recognize

Franklin as agent of Massachusetts, because the governor of

Massachusetts had not approved the appointment, which was by resolution

of the assembly. Franklin contended that the governor, as a mere agent

of the king, could have nothing to do with the assembly's appointment of

its agent to the king; that "the King, and not the King, Lords, and

Commons collectively, is their sovereign; and that the King, with

_their_ respective Parliaments, is their only legislator." Franklin's

influence helped to oust Hillsborough, and Dartmouth, whose name

Franklin suggested, was made secretary In 1772 and promptly recognized

Franklin as the agent of Massachusetts.

In 1773 there appeared in the _Public Advertiser_ one of Franklin's

cleverest hoaxes, "An Edict of the King of Prussia," proclaiming that

the island of Britain was a colony of Prussia, having been settled by

Angles and Saxons, having been protected by Prussia, having been

defended by Prussia against France in the war just past, and never

having been definitely freed from Prussia's rule; and that, therefore,

Great Britain should now submit to certain taxes laid by Prussia--the

taxes being identical with those laid upon the American colonies by

Great Britain. In the same year occurred the famous episode of the

Hutchinson Letters. These were written by Thomas Hutchinson, Governor of

Massachusetts, Andrew Oliver (1706-1774), his lieutenant-governor, and

others to William Whately, a member of Parliament, and private secretary

to George Grenville, suggesting an increase of the power of the governor

at the expense of the assembly, "an abridgement of what are called

English liberties," and other measures more extreme than those

undertaken by the government. The correspondence was shown to Franklin

by a mysterious "member of parliament" to back up the contention that

the quartering of troops in Boston was suggested, not by the British

ministry, but by Americans and Bostonians. Upon his promise not to

publish the letters Franklin received permission to send them to

Massachusetts, where they were much passed about and were printed, and

they were soon republished in English newspapers. The Massachusetts

assembly on receiving the letters resolved to petition the crown for the

removal of both Hutchinson and Oliver. The petition was refused and was

condemned as scandalous, and Franklin, who took upon himself the

responsibility for the publication of the letters, in the hearing before

the privy council at the Cockpit on the 29th of January 1774 was

insulted and was called a thief by Alexander Wedderburn (the

solicitor-general, who appeared for Hutchinson and Oliver), and was

removed from his position as head of the post office in the American

colonies.

Satisfied that his usefulness in England was at an end, Franklin

entrusted his agencies to the care of Arthur Lee, and on the 21st of

March 1775 again set sail for Philadelphia. During the last years of his

stay in England there had been repeated attempts to win him (probably

with an under-secretaryship) to the British service, and in these same

years he had done a great work for the colonies by gaining friends for

them among the opposition, and by impressing France with his ability and

the excellence of his case. Upon reaching America, he heard of the

fighting at Lexington and Concord, and with the news of an actual

outbreak of hostilities his feeling toward England seems to have changed

completely. He was no longer a peacemaker, but an ardent war-maker. On

the 6th of May, the day after his arrival in Philadelphia, he was

elected by the assembly of Pennsylvania a delegate to the Continental

Congress in Philadelphia. In October he was elected a member of the

Pennsylvania assembly, but, as members of this body were still required

to take an oath of allegiance to the crown, he refused to serve. In the

Congress he served on as many as ten committees, and upon the

organization of a continental postal system, he was made

postmaster-general, a position he held for one year, when (in 1776) he

was succeeded by his son-in-law, Richard Bache, who had been his deputy.

With Benjamin Harrison, John Dickinson, Thomas Johnson and John Jay he

was appointed in November 1775 to a committee to carry on a secret

correspondence with the friends of America "in Great Britain, Ireland

and other parts of the world." He planned an appeal to the king of

France for aid, and wrote the instructions of Silas Deane who was to

convey it. In April 1776 he went to Montreal with Charles Carroll,

Samuel Chase and John Carroll, as a member of the commission which

conferred with General Arnold, and attempted without success to gain the

co-operation of Canada. Immediately after his return from Montreal he

was a member of the committee of five appointed to draw up the

Declaration of Independence, but he took no actual part himself in

drafting that instrument, aside from suggesting the change or insertion

of a few words in Jefferson's draft. From July 16 to September 28 he

acted as president of the Constitutional Convention of Pennsylvania.

With John Adams and Edward Rutledge he was selected by Congress to

discuss with Admiral Howe (September 1776, at Staten Island) the terms

of peace proposed by Howe, who had arrived in New York harbour in July

1776, and who had been an intimate friend of Franklin; but the

discussion was fruitless, as the American commissioners refused to treat

"_back_ of this step of independency." On the 26th of September in the

same year Franklin was chosen as commissioner to France to join Arthur

Lee, who was in London, and Silas Deane, who had arrived in France in

June 1776. He collected all the money he could command, between L3000

and L4000, lent it to Congress before he set sail, and arrived at Paris

on the 22nd of December. He found quarters at Passy,[4] then a suburb of

Paris, in a house belonging to Le Ray de Chaumont, an active friend of

the American cause, who had influential relations with the court, and

through whom he was enabled to be in the fullest communication with the

French government without compromising it in the eyes of Great Britain.

At the time of Franklin's arrival in Paris he was already one of the

most talked about men in the world. He was a member of every important

learned society in Europe; he was a member, and one of the managers, of

the Royal Society, and was one of eight foreign members of the Royal

Academy of Sciences in Paris. Three editions of his scientific works had

already appeared in Paris, and a new edition had recently appeared in

London. To all these advantages he added a political purpose--the

dismemberment of the British empire--which was entirely congenial to

every citizen of France. "Franklin's reputation," wrote John Adams with

characteristic extravagance, "was more universal than that of Leibnitz

or Newton, Frederick or Voltaire; and his character more esteemed and

beloved than all of them.... If a collection could be made of all the

gazettes of Europe, for the latter half of the 18th century, a greater

number of panegyrical paragraphs upon _le grand Franklin_ would appear,

it is believed, than upon any other man that ever lived." "Franklin's

appearance in the French salons, even before he began to negotiate,"

says Friedrich Christoph Schlosser, "was an event of great importance to

the whole of Europe.... His dress, the simplicity of his external

appearance, the friendly meekness of the old man, and the apparent

humility of the Quaker, procured for Freedom a mass of votaries among

the court circles who used to be alarmed at its coarseness and

unsophisticated truths. Such was the number of portraits,[5] busts and

medallions of him in circulation before he left Paris that he would have

been recognized from them by any adult citizen in any part of the

civilized world."

Franklin's position in France was a difficult one from the start,

because of the delicacy of the task of getting French aid at a time when

France was unready openly to take sides against Great Britain. But on

the 6th of February 1778, after the news of the defeat and surrender of

Burgoyne had reached Europe, a treaty of alliance and a treaty of amity

and commerce between France and the United States were signed at Paris

by Franklin, Deane and Lee. On the 28th of October this commission was

discharged and Franklin was appointed sole plenipotentiary to the French

court. Lee, from the beginning of the mission to Paris, seems to have

been possessed of a mania of jealousy toward Franklin, or of

misunderstanding of his acts, and he tried to undermine his influence

with the Continental Congress. John Adams, when he succeeded Deane

(recalled from Paris through Lee's machinations) joined in the chorus of

fault-finding against Franklin, dilated upon his social habits, his

personal slothfulness and his complete lack of business-like system; but

Adams soon came to see that, although careless of details, Franklin was

doing what no other man could have done, and he ceased his harsher

criticism. Even greater than his diplomatic difficulties were Franklin's

financial straits. Drafts were being drawn on him by all the American

agents in Europe, and by the Continental Congress at home. Acting as

American naval agent for the many successful privateers who harried the

English Channel, and for whom he skilfully got every bit of assistance

possible, open and covert, from the French government, he was

continually called upon for funds in these ventures. Of the vessels to

be sent to Paris with American cargoes which were to be sold for the

liquidation of French loans to the colonies made through Beaumarchais,

few arrived; those that did come did not cover Beaumarchais's advances,

and hardly a vessel came from America without word of fresh drafts on

Franklin. After bold and repeated overtures for an exchange of

prisoners--an important matter, both because the American frigates had

no place in which to stow away their prisoners, and because of the

maltreatment of American captives in such prisons as Dartmoor--exchanges

began at the end of March 1779, although there were annoying delays, and

immediately after November 1781 there was a long break in the agreement;

and the Americans discharged from English prisons were constantly in

need of money. Franklin, besides, was constantly called upon to meet the

indebtedness of Lee and of Ralph Izard (1742-1804), and of John Jay, who

in Madrid was being drawn on by the American Congress. In spite of the

poor condition in Europe of the credit of the struggling colonies, and

of the fact that France was almost bankrupt (and in the later years was

at war), and although Necker strenuously resisted the making of any

loans to the colonies, France, largely because of Franklin's appeals,

expended, by loan or gift to the colonies, or in sustenance of the

French arms in America, a sum estimated at $60,000,000.

In 1781 Franklin, with John Adams, John Jay, Jefferson, who remained in

America, and Henry Laurens, then a prisoner in England, was appointed on

a commission to make peace with Great Britain. In the spring of 1782

Franklin had been informally negotiating with Shelburne, secretary of

state for the home department, through the medium of Richard Oswald, a

Scotch merchant, and had suggested that England should cede Canada to

the United States in return for the recognition of loyalist claims by

the states. When the formal negotiations began Franklin held closely to

the instructions of Congress to its commissioners, that they should

maintain confidential relations with the French ministers and that they

were "to undertake nothing in the negotiations for peace or truce

without their knowledge and concurrence," and were ultimately to be

governed by "their advice and opinion." Jay and Adams disagreed with him

on this point, believing that France intended to curtail the territorial

aspirations of the Americans for her own benefit and for that of her

ally, Spain. At last, after the British government had authorized its

agents to treat with the commissioners as representatives of an

independent power, thus recognizing American independence before the

treaty was made, Franklin acquiesced in the policy of Jay. The

preliminary treaty was signed by the commissioners on the 30th of

November 1782, the final treaty on the 3rd of September 1783. Franklin

had repeatedly petitioned Congress for his recall, but his letters were

unanswered or his appeals refused until the 7th of March 1785, when

Congress resolved that he be allowed to return to America; on the 10th

of March Thomas Jefferson, who had joined him in August of the year

before, was appointed to his place. Jefferson, when asked if he replaced

Franklin, replied, "No one can replace him, sir; I am only his

successor." Before Franklin left Paris on the 12th of July 1785 he had

made commercial treaties with Sweden (1783) and Prussia (1785; signed

after Franklin's departure by Jefferson and John Adams). Franklin

arrived in Philadelphia on the 13th of September, disembarking at the

same wharf as when he had first entered the city. He was immediately

elected a member of the municipal council of Philadelphia, becoming its

chairman; and was chosen president of the Supreme Executive Council (the

chief executive officer) of Pennsylvania, and was re-elected in 1786 and

1787, serving from October 1785 to October 1788. In May 1787 he was

elected a delegate to the Convention which drew up the Federal

Constitution, this body thus having a member upon whom all could agree

as chairman, should Washington be absent. He opposed over-centralization

of government and favoured the Connecticut Compromise, and after the

work of the Convention was done used his influence to secure the

adoption of the Constitution.[6] As president of the Pennsylvania

Society for Promoting the Abolition of Slavery, Franklin signed a

petition to Congress (12th February 1790) for immediate abolition of

slavery, and six weeks later in his most brilliant manner parodied the

attack on the petition made by James Jackson (1757-1806) of Georgia,

taking off Jackson's quotations of Scripture with pretended texts from

the Koran cited by a member of the Divan of Algiers in opposition to a

petition asking for the prohibition of holding Christians in slavery.

These were his last public acts. His last days were marked by a fine

serenity and calm; he died in his own house in Philadelphia on the 17th

of April 1790, the immediate cause being an abscess in the lungs. He was

buried with his wife in the graveyard (Fifth and Arch Streets) of Christ

Church, Philadelphia.

Physically Franklin was large, about 5 ft. 10 in. tall, with a

well-rounded, powerful figure; he inherited an excellent constitution

from his parents--"I never knew," says he, "either my father or mother

to have any sickness but that of which they dy'd, he at 89, and she at

85 years of age"--but injured it somewhat by excesses; in early life he

had severe attacks of pleurisy, from one of which, in 1727, it was not

expected that he would recover, and in his later years he was the victim

of stone and gout. When he was sixteen he became a vegetarian for a

time, rather to save money for books than for any other reason, and he

always preached moderation in eating, though he was less consistent in

his practice in this particular than as regards moderate drinking. He

was always enthusiastically fond of swimming, and was a great believer

in fresh air, taking a cold air bath regularly in the morning, when he

sat naked in his bedroom beguiling himself with a book or with writing

for a half-hour or more. He insisted that fresh, cold air was not the

cause of colds, and preached zealously the "gospel of ventilation." He

was a charming talker, with a gay humour and a quiet sarcasm and a

telling use of anecdote for argument. Henri Martin, the French

historian, speaks of him as "of a mind altogether French in its grace

and elasticity." In 1730 he married Deborah Read, in whose father's

house he had lived when he had first come to Philadelphia, to whom he

had been engaged before his first departure from Philadelphia for

London, and who in his absence had married a ne'er-do-well, one Rogers,

who had deserted her. The marriage to Franklin is presumed to have been

a common law marriage, for there was no proof that Miss Read's former

husband was dead, nor that, as was suspected, a former wife, alive when

Rogers married Miss Read, was still alive, and that therefore his

marriage to Deborah was void. His "Debby," or his "dear child," as

Franklin usually addressed her in his letters, received into the family,

soon after her marriage, Franklin's illegitimate son, William Franklin

(1729-1813),[7] with whom she afterwards quarrelled, and whose mother,

tradition says, was Barbara, a servant in the Franklin household.

Another illegitimate child became the wife of John Foxcroft of

Philadelphia. Deborah, who was "as much dispos'd to industry and

frugality as" her husband, was illiterate and shared none of her

husband's tastes for literature and science; her dread of an ocean

voyage kept her in Philadelphia during Franklin's missions to England,

and she died in 1774, while Franklin was in London. She bore him two

children, one a son, Francis Folger, "whom I have seldom since seen

equal'd in everything, and whom to this day [thirty-six years after the

child's death] I cannot think of without a sigh," who died (1736) when

four years old of small-pox, not having been inoculated; the other was

Sarah (1744-1808), who married Richard Bache (1737-1811), Franklin's

successor in 1776-1782 as postmaster-general. Franklin's gallant

relations with women after his wife's death were probably innocent

enough. Best known of his French _amies_ were Mme Helvetius, widow of

the philosopher, and the young Mme Brillon, who corrected her "Papa's"

French and tried to bring him safely into the Roman Catholic Church.

With him in France were his grandsons, William Temple Franklin, William

Franklin's natural son, who acted as private secretary to his

grandfather, and Benjamin Franklin Bache (1769-1798), Sarah's son, whom

he sent to Geneva to be educated, for whom he later asked public office

of Washington, and who became editor of the _Aurora_, one of the leading

journals in the Republican attacks on Washington.

Franklin early rebelled against New England Puritanism and spent his

Sundays in reading and in study instead of attending church. His

free-thinking ran its extreme course at the time of his publication in

London of _A Dissertation on Liberty and Necessity, Pleasure and Pain_

(1725), which he recognized as one of the great _errata_ of his life. He

later called himself a deist, or theist, not discriminating between the

terms. To his favourite sister he wrote: "There are some things in your

New England doctrine and worship which I do not agree with; but I do not

therefore condemn them, or desire to shake your belief or practice of

them." Such was his general attitude. He did not believe in the divinity

of Christ, but thought "his system of morals and his religion, as he

left them to us, the best the world ever saw, or is like to see." His

intense practical-mindedness drew him away from religion, but drove him

to a morality of his own (the "art of virtue," he called it), based on

thirteen virtues each accompanied by a short precept; the virtues were

Temperance, Silence, Order, Resolution, Frugality, Industry, Sincerity,

Justice, Moderation, Cleanliness, Tranquility, Chastity and Humility,

the precept accompanying the last-named virtue being "Imitate Jesus and

Socrates." He made a business-like little notebook, ruled off spaces for

the thirteen virtues and the seven days of the week, "determined to give

a week's strict attention to each of the virtues successively ...

[going] thro' a course compleate in thirteen weeks and four courses in a

year," marking for each day a record of his adherence to each of the

precepts. "And conceiving God to be the fountain of wisdom," he "thought

it right and necessary to solicit His assistance for obtaining it," and

drew up the following prayer for daily use: "O powerful Goodness!

bountiful Father! merciful Guide! Increase in me that wisdom which

discovers my truest interest. Strengthen my resolution to perform what

that wisdom dictates. Accept my kind offices to Thy other children, as

the only return in my power for Thy continual favours to me." He was by

no means prone to overmuch introspection, his great interest in the

conduct of others being shown in the wise maxims of Poor Richard, which

were possibly too utilitarian but were wonderfully successful in

instructing American morals. His _Art of Virtue_ on which he worked for

years was never completed or published in any form.

"Benjamin Franklin, Printer," was Franklin's own favourite description

of himself. He was an excellent compositor and pressman; his

workmanship, clear impressions, black ink and comparative freedom from

errata did much to get him the public printing in Pennsylvania and New

Jersey, and the printing of the paper money[8] and other public matters

in Delaware. The first book with his imprint is _The Psalms of David

Imitated in the Language of the New Testament and apply'd to the

Christian State and Worship. By I. Watts ..., Philadelphia: Printed by

B. F. and H. M. for Thomas Godfrey, and Sold at his Shop, 1729._ The

first novel printed in America was Franklin's reprint in 1744 of

_Pamela_; and the first American translation from the classics which was

printed in America was a version by James Logan (1674-1751) of Cato's

_Moral Distichs_ (1735). In 1744 he published another translation of

Logan's, Cicero _On Old Age_, which Franklin thought typographically the

finest book he had ever printed. In 1733 he had established a press in

Charleston, South Carolina, and soon after did the same in Lancaster,

Pa., in New Haven, Conn., in New York, in Antigua, in Kingston, Jamaica,

and in other places. Personally he had little connexion with the

Philadelphia printing office after 1748, when David Hall became his

partner and took charge of it. But in 1753 he was eagerly engaged in

having several of his improvements incorporated in a new press, and more

than twenty years after was actively interested in John Walter's scheme

of "logography." In France he had a private press in his house in Passy,

on which he printed "bagatelles." Franklin's work as a publisher is for

the most part closely connected with his work in issuing the _Gazette_

and _Poor Richard's Almanack_ (a summary of the proverbs from which

appeared in the number for 1758, and has often been reprinted--under

such titles as _Father Abraham's Speech_, and _The Way to Wealth_).[9]

Of much of Franklin's work as an author something has already been said.

Judged as literature, the first place belongs to his _Autobiography_,

which unquestionably ranks among the few great autobiographies ever

written. His style in its simplicity, facility and clearness owed

something to De Foe, something to Cotton Mather, something to Plutarch,

more to Bunyan and to his early attempts to reproduce the manner of the

third volume of the _Spectator_; and not the least to his own careful

study of word usage. From Xenophon's _Memorabilia_ he learned when a boy

the Socratic method of argument. Swift he resembled in the occasional

broadness of his humour, in his brilliantly successful use of sarcasm

and irony,[10] and in his mastery of the hoax. Balzac said of him that

he "invented the lightning-rod, the hoax ('le canard') and the

republic." Among his more famous hoaxes were the "Edict of the King of

Prussia" (1773), already described; the fictitious supplement to the

Boston _Chronicle_, printed on his private press at Passy in 1782, and

containing a letter with an invoice of eight packs of 954 cured, dried,

hooped and painted scalps of rebels, men, women and children, taken by

Indians in the British employ; and another fictitious _Letter from the

Count de Schaumberg to the Baron Hohendorf commanding the Hessian Troops

in America_ (1777)--the count's only anxiety is that not enough men will

be killed to bring him in moneys he needs, and he urges his officer in

command in America "to prolong the war ... for I have made arrangements

for a grand Italian opera, and I do not wish to be obliged to give it

up."[11]

Closely related to Franklin's political pamphlets are his writings on

economics, which, though undertaken with a political or practical

purpose and not in a purely scientific spirit, rank him as the first

American economist. He wrote in 1729 _A Modest Enquiry into the Nature

and Necessity of a Paper Currency_, which argued that a plentiful

currency will make rates of interest low and will promote immigration

and home manufactures, and which did much to secure the further issue of

paper money in Pennsylvania. After the British Act of 1750 forbidding

the erection or the operating of iron or steel mills in the colonies,

Franklin wrote _Observations concerning the Increase of Mankind and the

Peopling of Countries_ (1751); its thesis was that manufactures come to

be common only with a high degree of social development and with great

density of population, and that Great Britain need not, therefore, fear

the industrial competition of the colonies, but it is better known for

the estimate (adopted by Adam Smith) that the population of the colonies

would double every quarter-century; and for the likeness to

Malthus's[12] "preventive check" of its statement: "The greater the

common fashionable expense of any rank of people the more cautious they

are of marriage." His _Positions to be examined concerning National

Wealth_ (1769) shows that he was greatly influenced by the French

physiocrats after his visit to France in 1767. His _Wail of a Protected

Manufacturer_ voices a protest against protection as raising the cost of

living; and he held that free trade was based on a natural right. He

knew Kames, Hume and Adam Smith, and corresponded with Mirabeau, "the

friend of Man." Some of the more important of his economic theses, as

summarized by W. A. Wetzel, are: that money as coin may have more than

its bullion value; that natural interest is determined by the rent of

land valued at the sum of money loaned--an anticipation of Turgot; that

high wages are not inconsistent with a large foreign trade; that the

value of an article is determined by the amount of labour necessary to

produce the food consumed in making the article; that manufactures are

advantageous but agriculture only is truly productive; and that when

practicable (as he did not think it practicable at the end of the War of

Independence) state revenue should be raised by direct tax.

Franklin as a scientist[13] and as an inventor has been decried by

experts as an amateur and a dabbler; but it should be remembered that it

was always his hope to retire from public life and devote himself to

science. In the American Philosophical Society (founded 1743) scientific

subjects were much discussed. Franklin wrote a paper on the causes of

earthquakes for his _Gazette_ of the 15th of December 1737; and he

eagerly collected material to uphold his theory that waterspouts and

whirlwinds resulted from the same causes. In 1743, from the circumstance

that an eclipse not visible in Philadelphia because of a storm had been

observed in Boston, where the storm although north-easterly did not

occur until an hour after the eclipse, he surmised that storms move

_against_ the wind along the Atlantic coast. In the year before (1742)

he had planned the "Pennsylvania fire-place," better known as the

"Franklin stove," which saved fuel, heated all the room, and had the

same principle as the hot-air furnace; the stove was never patented by

Franklin, but was described in his pamphlet dated 1744. He was much

engaged at the same time in remedying smoking chimneys, and as late as

1785 wrote to Jan Ingenhousz, physician to the emperor of Austria, on

chimneys and draughts; smoking street lamps he remedied by a simple

contrivance. The study of electricity he took up in 1746 when he first

saw a Leyden jar, in the manipulation of which he became expert and

which he improved by the use of granulated lead in the place of water

for the interior armatures; he recognized that condensation is due to

the dielectric and not to the metal coatings. A note in his diary, dated

the 7th of November 1749, shows that he had then conjectured that

thunder and lightning were electrical manifestations; in the same year

he planned the lightning-rod (long known as "Franklin's rod"), which he

described and recommended to the public in 1753, when the Copley medal

of the Royal Society was awarded him for his discoveries. The famous

experiment with the kite, proving lightning an electrical phenomenon,

was performed by Franklin in June 1752. He overthrew entirely the

"friction" theory of electricity and conceived the idea of plus and

minus charges (1753); he thought the sea the source of electricity. On

light Franklin wrote to David Rittenhouse in June 1784; the sum of his

own conjectures was that the corpuscular theory of Newton was wrong, and

that light was due to the vibration of an elastic aether. He studied

with some care the temperature of the Gulf Stream. In navigation he

suggested many new contrivances, such as water-tight compartments,

floating anchors to lay a ship to in a storm, and dishes that would not

upset during a gale; and beginning in 1757 made repeated experiments

with oil on stormy waters. As a mathematician he devised various

elaborate magic squares and novel magic circles, of which he speaks

apologetically, because they are of no practical use. Always much

interested in agriculture, he made an especial effort (like Robert R.

Livingston) to promote the use of plaster of Paris as a fertiliser. He

took a prominent part in aeronautic experiments during his stay in

France. He made an excellent clock, which because of a slight

improvement introduced by James Ferguson in 1757 was long known as

Ferguson's clock. In medicine Franklin was considered important enough

to be elected to the Royal Medical Society of Paris in 1777, and an

honorary member of the Medical Society of London in 1787. In 1784 he was

on the committee which investigated Mesmer, and the report is a document

of lasting scientific value. Franklin's advocacy of vegetarianism, of

sparing and simple diet, and of temperance in the use of liquors, and of

proper ventilation has already been referred to. His most direct

contribution to medicine was the invention for his own use of bifocal

eyeglasses.

A summary of so versatile a genius is impossible. His services to

America in England and France rank him as one of the heroes of the

American War of Independence and as the greatest of American diplomats.

Almost the only American scientist of his day, he displayed remarkably

deep as well as remarkably varied abilities in science and deserved the

honours enthusiastically given him by the _savants_ of Europe.

BIBLIOGRAPHY.--Franklin's works were not collected in his own

lifetime, and he made no effort to publish his writings. _Experiments

and Observations on Electricity_ (London, 1769) was translated into

French by Barbeu Dubourg (Paris, 1773); Vaughan attempted a more

complete edition, _Political, Miscellaneous and Philosophical Pieces_

(London, 1779); an edition in three volumes appeared after Franklin's

death (London, 1806); what seemed the authentic _Works_, as it was

under the care of Temple Franklin, was published at London (6 vols.,

1817-1819; 3 vols., 1818) and with some additional matter at

Philadelphia (6 vols., 1818). Sparks's edition (10 vols., Boston,

1836-1842; revised, Philadelphia, 1858) also contained fresh matter;

and there are further additions in the edition of John Bigelow

(Philadelphia, 1887-1888; 5th ed., 1905) and in that by Albert Henry

Smyth (10 vols., New York, 1905-1907). There are important

Frankliniana, about 13,000 papers, in the possession of the American

Philosophical Society, to which they were conveyed by the son of

Temple Franklin's executor, George Fox. Other papers which had been

left to Fox lay for years in barrels in a stable garret; they were

finally cleared out, their owner, Mary Fox, intending to send them to

a paper mill. One barrel went to the mill. The others, it was found,

contained papers belonging to Franklin, and this important collection

was bought and presented to the university of Pennsylvania. The

valuable Frankliniana collected by Henry Stevens were purchased by

Congress in 1885. These MS. collections were first carefully gone over

for the edition of the _Works_ by A. H. Smyth. Franklin's

_Autobiography_ was begun in 1771 as a private chronicle for his son,

Governor William Franklin; the papers, bringing the story of his

father's life down to 1730, were lost by the governor during the War

of Independence, and in 1783 came into the possession of Abel James,

who restored them to Franklin and urged him to complete the sketch. He

wrote a little in 1784, more in 1788, when he furnished a copy to his

friend le Veillard, and a little more in 1790. The original manuscript

was long in the possession of Temple Franklin, who spent years

rearranging the matter in it and making over into politer English his

grandfather's plain-spokenness. So long was the publication delayed

that it was generally believed that Temple Franklin had sold all the

papers to the British government; a French version, _Memoires de la

vie privee_ (Paris, 1791), was retranslated into English twice in 1793

(London), and from one of these versions (by Robinson) still another

French version was made (Paris, 1798). Temple Franklin, deciding to

print, got from le Veillard the copy sent to him in 1788 (sending in

return the original with autograph alterations and the final

addition), and from the copy published (London, 1817) an edition

supposed to be authentic and complete. The complete autograph of the

biography, acquired by John Bigelow in 1867 from its French owners,

upon collation with Temple Franklin's edition showed that the latter

contained 1200 emasculations and that it omitted entirely what had

been written in 1790. Bigelow published the complete _Autobiography_

with additions from Franklin's correspondence and other writings in

1868; a second edition (3 vols., Philadelphia, 1888) was published

under the title, _The Life of Benjamin Franklin, Written by Himself_.

In addition to the _Autobiography_ see James Parton, _Life and Times

of Benjamin Franklin_ (2 vols., New York, 1864); John T. Morse, Jr.,

_Benjamin Franklin_ (Boston, 1889, in the American Statesmen series);

J. B. McMaster, _Benjamin Franklin as a Man of Letters_ (Boston, 1887,

in American Men of Letters series); Paul L. Ford, _The Many-Sided

Franklin_ (New York, 1899) and _Franklin Bibliography_ (Brooklyn,

1889); E. E. Hale and E. E. Hale, Jr., _Franklin in France_ (2 vols.,

Boston, 1888); J. H. A. Doniol, _Histoire de la participation de la

France a l'etablissement des Etats-Unis d'Amerique_ (Paris, 6 vols.,

1886-1900); S. G. Fisher, _The True Benjamin Franklin_ (Philadelphia,

1899); E. Robins, _Benjamin Franklin_ (New York, 1898, in the American

Men of Energy series); W. A. Wetzel, "Benjamin Franklin as an

Economist," No. 9, in series 13 of _Johns Hopkins Studies in

Historical and Political Science_; and the prefaces and biographical

matter in A. H. Smyth's edition of the _Works_ (New York, 10 vols.,

1905-1907). (R. We.)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Franciscans" to "French Language" Volume 11, Slice 1 · 第 22 / 38 题