"This great democratic movement is coming down into modern society with

a march as irresistible as the glacier moves down from the mountains.

Its front is in America,--and behind are England, France, Italy,

Prussia, and the Mohammedan countries. In all, the rights of the

laboring masses are a living force, bearing slowly and inevitably all

before it. Our war has been a marshalling of its armies, commanded by a

hard-handed, inspired man of the working-class. An intelligent American,

recently resident in Egypt, says it was affecting to notice the interest

with which the working-classes there were looking upon our late struggle

in America, and the earnestness of their wishes for the triumph of the

Union. 'It is our cause, it is for us,' they said, as said the

cotton-spinners of England and the silk-weavers of Lyons. The forces of

this mighty movement are still directed by a man from the lower orders,

the sworn foe of exclusive privileges and landed aristocracies. If Andy

Johnson is consistent with himself, with the principles which raised him

from a tailor's bench to the head of a mighty nation, he will see to it

that the work that Lincoln began is so thoroughly done, that every man

and every woman in America, of whatever race or complexion, shall have

exactly equal rights before the law, and be free to rise or fall

according to their individual intelligence, industry, and moral worth.

So long as everything is not strictly in accordance with our principles

of democracy, so long as there is in any part of the country an

aristocratic upper class who despise labor, and a laboring lower class

that is denied equal political rights, so long this grinding and discord

between the two will never cease in America. It will make trouble not

only in the South, but in the North,--trouble between all employers and

employed,--trouble in every branch and department of labor,--trouble in

every parlor and every kitchen.

"What is it that has driven every American woman out of domestic

service, when domestic service is full as well paid, is easier,

healthier, and in many cases far more agreeable, than shop and factory

work? It is, more than anything else, the influence of slavery in the

South,--its insensible influence on the minds of mistresses, giving them

false ideas of what ought to be the position and treatment of a female

citizen in domestic service, and its very marked influence on the minds

of freedom-loving Americans, causing them to choose _any_ position

rather than one which is regarded as assimilating them to slaves. It is

difficult to say what are the very worst results of a system so

altogether bad as that of slavery; but one of the worst is certainly the

utter contempt it brings on useful labor, and the consequent utter

physical and moral degradation of a large body of the whites; and this

contempt of useful labor has been constantly spreading like an infection

from the Southern to the Northern States, particularly among women, who,

as our friend here has truly said, are by our worship and exaltation of

them made peculiarly liable to take the malaria of aristocratic society.

Let anybody observe the conversation in good society for an hour or two,

and hear the tone in which servant-girls, seamstresses, mechanics, and

all who work for their living, are sometimes mentioned, and he will see,

that, while every one of the speakers professes to regard useful labor

as respectable, she is yet deeply imbued with the leaven of aristocratic

ideas.

"In the South the contempt for labor bred of slavery has so permeated

society, that we see great, coarse, vulgar _lazzaroni_ lying about in

rags and vermin, and dependent on government rations, maintaining, as

their only source of self-respect, that they never have done and never

_will_ do a stroke of useful work, in all their lives. In the North

there are, I believe, no _men_ who would make such a boast; but I think

there are many women--beautiful, fascinating _lazzaroni_ of the parlor

and boudoir--who make their boast of elegant helplessness and utter

incompetence for any of woman's duties with equal _naïveté_. The

Spartans made their slaves drunk, to teach their children the evils of

intoxication; and it seems to be the policy of a large class in the

South now to keep down and degrade the only working-class they have, for

the sake of teaching their children to despise work.

"We of the North, who know the dignity of labor, who know the value of

free and equal institutions, who have enjoyed advantages for seeing

their operation, ought, in true brotherliness, to exercise the power

given us by the present position of the people of the Southern States,

and put things thoroughly right _for_ them, well knowing, that, though

they may not like it at the moment, they will like it in the end, and

that it will bring them peace, plenty, and settled prosperity, such as

they have long envied here in the North. It is no kindness to an invalid

brother, half recovered from delirium, to leave him a knife to cut his

throat with, should he be so disposed. We should rather appeal from

Philip drunk to Philip sober, and do real kindness, trusting to the

future for our meed of gratitude.

"Giving equal political rights to all the inhabitants of the Southern

States will be their shortest way to quiet and to wealth. It will avert

what is else almost certain,--a war of races; since all experience shows

that the ballot introduces the very politest relations between the

higher and lower classes. If the right be restricted, let it be by

requirements of property and education, applying to all the population

equally.

"Meanwhile, we citizens and citizenesses of the North should remember

that Reconstruction means something more than setting things right in

the Southern States. We have saved our government and institutions, but

we have paid a fearful price for their salvation; and we ought to prove

now that they are worth the price.

"The empty chair, never to be filled,--the light gone out on its

candlestick, never on earth to be rekindled,--gallant souls that have

exhaled to heaven in slow torture and starvation,--the precious blood

that has drenched a hundred battle-fields,--all call to us with warning

voices, and tell us not to let such sacrifices be in vain. They call on

us by our clear understanding of the great principles of democratic

equality, for which our martyred brethren suffered and died, to show to

all the world that their death was no mean and useless waste, but a

glorious investment for the future of mankind.

"This war, these sufferings, these sacrifices, ought to make every

American man and woman look on himself and herself as belonging to a

royal priesthood, a peculiar people. The blood of our slain ought to be

a gulf, wide and deep as the Atlantic, dividing us from the opinions and

the practices of countries whose government and society are founded on

other and antagonistic ideas. Democratic republicanism has never yet

been perfectly worked out either in this or any other country. It is a

splendid edifice, half built, deformed by rude scaffolding, noisy with

the clink of trowels, blinding the eyes with the dust of lime, and

endangering our heads with falling brick. We make our way over heaps of

shavings and lumber to view the stately apartments,--we endanger our

necks in climbing ladders standing in the place of future staircases;

but let us not for all this cry out that the old rat-holed mansions of

former ages, with their mould, and moss, and cockroaches, are better

than this new palace. There is no lime-dust, no clink of trowels, no

rough scaffolding there, to be sure, and life goes on very quietly; but

there is the foul air of slow and sure decay.

"Republican institutions in America are in a transition state; they have

not yet separated themselves from foreign and antagonistic ideas and

traditions, derived from old countries; and the labors necessary for the

upbuilding of society are not yet so adjusted that there is mutual

pleasure and comfort in the relations of employer and employed. We still

incline to class-distinctions and aristocracies. We incline to the

scheme of dividing the world's work into two orders: first, physical

labor, which is held to be rude and vulgar, and the province of a lower

class; and second, brain labor, held to be refined and aristocratic,

and the province of a higher class. Meanwhile, the Creator, who is the

greatest of levellers, has given to every human being _both_ a physical

system, needing to be kept in order by physical labor, and an

intellectual or brain power, needing to be kept in order by brain labor.

_Work_, use, employment, is the condition of health in both; and he who

works either to the neglect of the other lives but a half-life, and is

an imperfect human being.

"The aristocracies of the Old World claim that their only labor should

be that of the brain; and they keep their physical system in order by

violent exercise, which is made genteel from the fact only that it is

not useful or productive. It would be losing caste to refresh the

muscles by handling the plough or the axe; and so foxes and hares must

be kept to be hunted, and whole counties turned into preserves, in order

that the nobility and gentry may have physical exercise in a way

befitting their station,--that is to say, in a way that produces

nothing, and does good only to themselves.

"The model republican uses his brain for the highest purposes of brain

work, and his muscles in _productive_ physical labor; and useful labor

he respects above that which is merely agreeable.

"When this equal respect for physical and mental labor shall have taken

possession of every American citizen, there will be no so-called

laboring class; there will no more be a class all muscle without brain

power to guide it, and a class all brain without muscular power to

execute. The labors of society will be lighter, because each individual

will take his part in them; they will be performed better, because no

one will be overburdened.

"In those days, Miss Jennie, it will be an easier matter to keep house,

because, housework being no longer regarded as degrading drudgery, you

will find a superior class of women ready to engage in it.

"Every young girl and woman, who in her sphere and by her example shows

that she is not ashamed of domestic labor, and that she considers the

necessary work and duties of family life as dignified and important, is

helping to bring on this good day. Louis Philippe once jestingly

remarked,--'I have this qualification for being a king in these days,

that I have blacked my own boots, and could black them again.'

"Every American ought to cultivate, as his pride and birthright, the

habit of self-helpfulness. Our command of the labors of good _employés_

in any department is liable to such interruptions, that he who has

blacked his own boots, and can do it again, is, on the whole, likely to

secure the most comfort in life.

"As to that which Mr. Ruskin pronounces to be a deep, irremediable

ulcer in society, namely, domestic service, we hold that the last

workings of pure democracy will cleanse and heal it. When right ideas

are sufficiently spread,--when everybody is self-helpful and capable of

being self-supporting,--when there is a fair start for every human being

in the race of life, and all its prizes are, without respect of persons,

to be obtained by the best runner,--when every kind of useful labor is

thoroughly respected,--then there will be a clear, just, wholesome basis

of intercourse on which employers and employed can move without

wrangling or discord.

"Renouncing all claims to superiority on the one hand, and all thought

of servility on the other, service can be rendered by fair contracts and

agreements, with that mutual respect and benevolence which every human

being owes to every other.

"But for this transition period, which is wearing out the life of so

many women, and making so many households uncomfortable, I have some

alleviating suggestions, which I shall give in my next chapter."

IV.

IS WOMAN A WORKER?

"Papa, do you see what the Evening Post says of your New-Year's article

on Reconstruction?" said Jennie, as we were all sitting in the library

after tea.

"I have not seen it."

"Well, then, the charming writer, whoever he is, takes up for us girls

and women, and maintains that no work of any sort ought to be expected

of us; that our only mission in life is to be beautiful, and to refresh

and elevate the spirits of men by being so. If I get a husband, my

mission is to be always becomingly dressed, to display most captivating

toilettes, and to be always in good spirits,--as, under the

circumstances, I always should be,--and thus 'renew his spirits' when he

comes in weary with the toils of life. Household cares are to be far

from me: they destroy my cheerfulness and injure my beauty.

"He says that the New England standard of excellence as applied to

woman has been a mistaken one; and, in consequence, though the girls are

beautiful, the matrons are faded, overworked, and uninteresting; and

that such a state of society tends to immorality, because, when wives

are no longer charming, men are open to the temptation to desert their

firesides, and get into mischief generally. He seems particularly to

complain of your calling ladies who do nothing the 'fascinating

_lazzaroni_ of the parlor and boudoir.'"

"There was too much truth back of that arrow not to wound," said

Theophilus Thoro, who was ensconced, as usual, in his dark corner,

whence he supervises our discussions.

"Come, Mr. Thoro, we won't have any of your bitter moralities," said

Jennie; "they are only to be taken as the invariable bay-leaf which

Professor Blot introduces into all his recipes for soups and stews,--a

little elegant bitterness, to be kept tastefully in the background. You

see now, papa, I should like the vocation of being beautiful. It would

just suit me to wear point-lace and jewelry, and to have life revolve

round me, as some beautiful star, and feel that I had nothing to do but

shine and refresh the spirits of all gazers, and that in this way I was

truly useful, and fulfilling the great end of my being; but alas for

this doctrine! all women have not beauty. The most of us can only hope

not to be called ill-looking, and, when we get ourselves up with care,

to look fresh and trim and agreeable; which fact interferes with the

theory."

"Well, for my part," said young Rudolph, "I go for the theory of the

beautiful. If ever I marry, it is to find an asylum for ideality. I

don't want to make a culinary marriage or a business partnership. I want

a being whom I can keep in a sphere of poetry and beauty, out of the

dust and grime of every-day life."

"Then," said Mr. Theophilus, "you must either be a rich man in your own

right, or your fair ideal must have a handsome fortune of her own."

"I never will marry a rich wife," quoth Rudolph. "My wife must be

supported by me, not I by her."

Rudolph is another of the _habitués_ of our chimney-corner, representing

the order of young knighthood in America, and his dreams and fancies, if

impracticable, are always of a kind to make every one think him a good

fellow. He who has no romantic dreams at twenty-one will be a horribly

dry peascod at fifty; therefore it is that I gaze reverently at all

Rudolph's chateaus in Spain, which want nothing to complete them except

solid earth to stand on.

"And pray," said Theophilus, "how long will it take a young lawyer or

physician, starting with no heritage but his own brain, to create a

sphere of poetry and beauty in which to keep his goddess? How much a

year will be necessary, as the English say, to _do_ this garden of Eden,

whereinto shall enter only the poetry of life?"

"I don't know. I haven't seen it near enough to consider. It is because

I know the difficulty of its attainment that I have no present thoughts

of marriage. Marriage is to me in the bluest of all blue distances,--far

off, mysterious, and dreamy as the Mountains of the Moon or sources of

the Nile. It shall come only when I have secured a fortune that shall

place my wife above all necessity of work or care."

"I desire to hear from you," said Theophilus, "when you have found the

sum that will keep a woman from care. I know of women now inhabiting

palaces, waited on at every turn by servants, with carriages, horses,

jewels, laces, cashmeres, enough for princesses, who are eaten up by

care. One lies awake all night on account of a wrinkle in the waist of

her dress; another is dying because no silk of a certain inexpressible

shade is to be found in New York; a third has had a dress sent home,

which has proved such a failure that life seems no longer worth having.

If it were not for the consolations of religion, one doesn't know what

would become of her. The fact is, that care and labor are as much

correlated to human existence as shadow is to light; there is no such

thing as excluding them from any mortal lot. You may make a canary-bird

or a goldfish live in absolute contentment without a care or labor, but

a human being you cannot. Human beings are restless and active in their

very nature, and will do something, and that something will prove a

care, a labor, and a fatigue, arrange it how you will. As long as there

is anything to be desired and not yet attained, so long its attainment

will be attempted; so long as that attainment is doubtful or difficult,

so long will there be care and anxiety. When boundless wealth releases

woman from every family care, she immediately makes herself a new set of

cares in another direction, and has just as many anxieties as the most

toilful housekeeper, only they are of a different kind. Talk of labor,

and look at the upper classes in London or in New York in the

fashionable season. Do any women work harder? To rush from crowd to

crowd all night, night after night, seeing what they are tired of,

making the agreeable over an abyss of inward yawning, crowded, jostled,

breathing hot air, and crushed in halls and stairways, without a moment

of leisure for months and months, till brain and nerve and sense reel,

and the country is longed for as a period of resuscitation and relief!

Such is the release from labor and fatigue brought by wealth. The only

thing that makes all this labor at all endurable is, that it is utterly

and entirely useless, and does no good to any one in creation; this

alone makes it genteel, and distinguishes it from the vulgar toils of a

housekeeper. These delicate creatures, who can go to three or four

parties a night for three months, would be utterly desolate if they had

to watch one night in a sick-room; and though they can exhibit any

amount of physical endurance and vigor in crowding into assembly rooms,

and breathe tainted air in an opera-house with the most martyr-like

constancy, they could not sit one half-hour in the close room where the

sister of charity spends hours in consoling the sick or aged poor."

"Mr. Theophilus is quite at home now," said Jennie; "only start him on

the track of fashionable life, and he takes the course like a hound. But

hear, now, our champion of the Evening Post:--

"'The instinct of women to seek a life of repose, their eagerness to

attain the life of elegance, does not mean contempt for labor, but it is

a confession of unfitness for labor. Women were not intended to

work,--not because work is ignoble, but because it is as disastrous to

the beauty of a woman as is friction to the bloom and softness of a

flower. Woman is to be kept in the garden of life; she is to rest, to

receive, to praise; she is to be kept from the workshop world, where

innocence is snatched with rude hands, and softness is blistered into

unsightliness or hardened into adamant. No social truth is more in need

of exposition and illustration than this one; and, above all, the people

of New England need to know it, and, better, they need to believe it.

"'It is therefore with regret that we discover Christopher Crowfield

applying so harshly, and, as we think so indiscriminatingly, the theory

of work to women, and teaching a society made up of women sacrificed in

the workshops of the state, or to the dust-pans and kitchens of the

house, that women must work, ought to work, and are dishonored if they

do not work; and that a woman committed to the drudgery of a household

is more creditably employed than when she is charming, fascinating,

irresistible, in the parlor or boudoir. The consequence of this fatal

mistake is manifest throughout New England,--in New England, where the

girls are all beautiful and the wives and mothers faded, disfigured, and

without charm or attractiveness. The moment a girl marries in New

England she is apt to become a drudge, or a lay figure on which to

exhibit the latest fashions. She never has beautiful hands, and she

would not have a beautiful face if a utilitarian society could "apply"

her face to anything but the pleasure of the eye. Her hands lose their

shape and softness after childhood, and domestic drudgery destroys her

beauty of form and softness and bloom of complexion after marriage. To

correct, or rather to break up, this despotism of household cares, or of

work, over woman, American society must be taught that women will

inevitably fade and deteriorate, unless it insures repose and comfort to

them. It must be taught that reverence for beauty is the normal

condition, while the theory of work, applied to women, is disastrous

alike to beauty and morals. Work, when it is destructive to men or

women, is forced and unjust.

"'All the great masculine or creative epochs have been distinguished by

spontaneous work on the part of men, and universal reverence and care

for beauty. The praise of work, and sacrifice of women to this great

heartless devil of work, belong only to, and are the social doctrine of,

a mechanical age and a utilitarian epoch. And if the New England idea of

social life continues to bear so cruelly on woman, we shall have a

reaction somewhat unexpected and shocking.'"

"Well now, say what you will," said Rudolph, "you have expressed my idea

of the conditions of the sex. Woman was not made to work; she was made

to be taken care of by man. All that is severe and trying, whether in

study or in practical life, is and ought to be in its very nature

essentially the work of the male sex. The value of woman is precisely

the value of those priceless works of art for which we build

museums,--which we shelter and guard as the world's choicest heritage;

and a lovely, cultivated, refined woman, thus sheltered, and guarded,

and developed, has a worth that cannot be estimated by any gross,

material standard. So I subscribe to the sentiments of Miss Jennie's

friend without scruple."

"The great trouble in settling all these society questions," said I,

"lies in the gold-washing,--the cradling I think the miners call it. If

all the quartz were in one stratum and all the gold in another, it would

save us a vast deal of trouble. In the ideas of Jennie's friend of the

Evening Post there is a line of truth and a line of falsehood so

interwoven and threaded together that it is impossible wholly to assent

or dissent. So with your ideas, Rudolph, there is a degree of truth in

them, but there is also a fallacy.

"It is a truth, that woman as a sex ought not to do the hard work of the

world, either social, intellectual, or moral. There are evidences in her

physiology that this was not intended for her, and our friend of the

Evening Post is right in saying that any country will advance more

rapidly in civilization and refinement where woman is thus sheltered

and protected. And I think, furthermore, that there is no country in the

world where women _are_ so much considered and cared for and sheltered,

in every walk of life, as in America. In England and France,--all over

the continent of Europe, in fact,--the other sex are deferential to

women only from some presumption of their social standing, or from the

fact of acquaintanceship; but among strangers, and under circumstances

where no particular rank or position can be inferred, a woman travelling

in England or France is jostled and pushed to the wall, and left to take

her own chance, precisely as if she were not a woman. Deference to

delicacy and weakness, the instinct of protection, does not appear to

characterize the masculine population of any other quarter of the world

so much as that of America. In France, _les Messieurs_ will form a

circle round the fire in the receiving-room of a railroad station, and

sit, tranquilly smoking their cigars, while ladies who do not happen to

be of their acquaintance are standing shivering at the other side of the

room. In England, if a lady is incautiously booked for an outside place

on a coach, in hope of seeing the scenery, and the day turns out

hopelessly rainy, no gentleman in the coach below ever thinks of

offering to change seats with her, though it pour torrents. In America,

the roughest backwoods steamboat or canal-boat captain always, as a

matter of course, considers himself charged with the protection of the

ladies. '_Place aux dames_' is written in the heart of many a shaggy

fellow who could not utter a French word any more than could a buffalo.

It is just as I have before said,--women are the recognized aristocracy,

the _only_ aristocracy, of America; and, so far from regarding this fact

as objectionable, it is an unceasing source of pride in my country.

The Chimney-Corner · 第 5 / 16 段