Sixteen persons had been murdered, and upwards of Six Hundred had been

badly wounded, on the Sixteenth of August. Coroners' Inquests had been

held, without effect, upon several of the bodies! "They all died a

Natural Death!" till, at last, an Inquest was held at Oldham, on the

body of John Lees. This Inquest was attended by Mr. Harmer, and, at the

end of the third or fourth day, the evidence was so conclusive, that the

Jury were prepared to have returned their verdict of Wilful Murder! but,

by some extraordinary fatality, by some unaccountable cause, Mr. Harmer

kept calling fresh witnesses, and the Inquest was adjourned from day

to day, and from place to place, for a month, and after the last

adjournment, they never met again. As the Petition of Robert Lees, the

father of the murdered man, speaks fully for itself, and will explain

this very curious circumstance better than any thing that I can say, I

shall conclude the subject by inserting it at full length, as follows:--

"TO TO THE HONOURABLE THE COMMONS OF THE UNITED

KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND, IN PARLIAMENT

ASSEMBLED.

The HUMBLE PETITION of ROBERT LEES,

Of OLDHAM, in the County Palatine of LANCASTER,

Cotton-spinner,

SHEWETH, That your Petitioner's son, John Lees, a

youth twenty-two years of age, having attended the

meeting held at Manchester on the 16th of August last,

was, as your Petitioner is led to believe, without any just

cause or provocation, most inhumanly attacked and cut by

Yeomanry Cavalry, and afterwards most unmercifully

beaten with the clubs or batons of Police and Special Constables,

and also trampled upon by the horses of the Cavalry,

whereby he was so much injured, that he was, from

that time, incapable of attending to his ordinary employment,

and lingered in pain and debility until the night of

the 6th of September following, when he died.

That the Surgeon who attended your Petitioner's

son having certified that his death was occasioned by violence,

several householders in Oldham and the neighbouring

townships were served, late in the evening of the

7th of September, with summonses from the Coroner of

the district, to attend the next morning at half-past ten

o'clock, to serve as Jurors on an inquest to be held on the

body of your said Petitioner's son. At the time appointed

the said Jurors assembled, and were met by a person

named BATTYE, who attended as Deputy for the said Coroner,

for the purpose of inquiring into the cause of the

death of your Petitioner's son; and, having sworn the

Jury, he went with them to take a view of the body. But,

finding that several witnesses had arrived from Manchester,

to give evidence upon the said inquiry, he refused to proceed

in the inquest; and having adjourned the same for

three hours, he, at the expiration of that time, further

adjourned until the 10th day of the same month, when the

said BATTYE promised, that either Mr. FERRAND, his employer,

or Mr. MILNE, a neighbouring Coroner, should

certainly attend and proceed in the investigation.

"That, on the next day, a Surgeon attended, by the direction

of the said Mr. BATTYE, to open and examine the

body of your Petitioner's son; and he was then allowed

to be interred.

"That, on the 10th day of September, the Jury again

assembled; but, although Mr. MILNE attended, he refused

to interfere in the business, as he said it did not belong to his

district; and the inquest was further adjourned until the 25th

day of the same month. And, during this interval, some of

the Manchester newspapers inserted the vilest falsehoods,

to depreciate the reputation of the deceased, with a view,

as your Petitioner believes, to extinguish every feeling of

sympathy for his fate.

"That, on the said 25th day of September, Mr. FERRAND

attended; and, after swearing the Jury, and ascertaining

from them that they had all seen the body, he proceeded to

examine witnesses; but, in the course of the investigation,

he adjourned several times for days together, without any

reasonable or probable cause, and merely, as your Petitioner

believes, to harass and tire out the witnesses, who

came day after day a considerable distance to give

testimony.

"That, in detailing his complaint to your Honourable

House, your Petitioner exceedingly regrets he should be

Please note

All known copies of volume 3 are "imperfect" and are "wanting

after page 640".

It is possible that these pages were suppressed as they were

"written by himself in H'.M's Jail at Ilchester".

End of Project Gutenberg's Memoirs of Henry Hunt, Esq. Volume 3,

by Henry Hunt

Memoirs of Henry Hunt, Esq. — Volume 3 · 第 37 / 37 段