A circumstance that occurred at this time made such a lasting impression

upon my memory, that I shall record it for the benefit of future

generations. Although it is of a private and pecuniary nature, yet I

suspect that it will not be altogether devoid of interest, as it makes

part of my history. When I left Rowfant, in Sussex, my stock, crops,

underwood, and furniture, produced a very considerable sum, amounting to

eight thousand pounds; and, after paying off all pecuniary demands upon

me, I purchased five thousand pounds in Exchequer Bills, which I took

with me to Middleton Cottage, and opened an account with Messrs. Heaths,

the bankers, of Andover. In their hands I deposited several hundred

pounds, and the Exchequer Bills, taking all their notes, and drawing

upon them for what sums I required to furnish my house, stock my farm,

&c. &c., they turning the Exchequer Bills into cash as often as I wanted

money. I took care never, for any length of time, to have less than five

hundred pounds in cash in their hands, generally several hundreds more,

and sometimes as much as fifteen hundred pounds balance of cash in my

favour, which they had the use of, as well as the advantage of my taking

their notes, and circulating them round the country, besides what I kept

in my house. I stocked my farms, both in Hampshire and Wiltshire, at

a most expensive time, giving as high as fifty guineas each for my

cart-horses; and as I had made great alterations and improvements, at

a heavy expense, the money flew pretty fast. When I was taken so

dangerously ill, the news spread over the country with considerable

rapidity, and, amongst others, it seems it reached the ears of my

bankers, who, for the _first time_, the next morning sent in my account

by the post, saying, that as I had _overdrawn_ it a few pounds, they

would thank me to remit the balance. This was the latter end of July,

and immediately at the point of harvest. Thus situated, I wrote an

answer, or rather dictated an answer, stating my situation; and, as I

expected I should be prevented from getting out to collect any money to

meet the expenses of the harvest, I requested that they would allow me

to draw for one hundred pounds for a few weeks, when the balance should

be repaid, and my account should be replenished with a fresh advance. To

my great surprise, however, I received a reply, saying, that they were

much in want of cash, and not only declining to comply with my request,

but re-urging the payment of the small balance due to them. I certainly

felt extremely mortified at such illiberal, ungenerous, ungrateful, and,

I might add, brutal conduct; because it was generally believed at

the time that I was in a most perilous situation, and my surgeon had

pronounced it as his opinion, that it was absolutely necessary to keep

me quiet, and my mind perfectly easy, or the most fatal result might be

expected from a relapse; and I have good reason to know that my worthy

friend, Mr. WILLIAM HEATH, the Quaker Banker, had been informed of this

fact, previous to his sending in my accounts. This treatment, however,

operated very differently upon me from what might have been expected,

and probably exactly the reverse of what might have been anticipated

by _Friend William_. I had experienced a sudden and violent attack

of illness, which had deprived me of the use of my limbs, and almost

deprived me of my sight and my speech; I was unable to leave my bed, and

it was not expected that I should be able to leave my room for several

weeks; and in the weak and very languid state in which I felt myself, I

have often thought, and I believe now, that if I had not been roused by

the base and unfeeling conduct of _Friend William_, I should have given

way to extreme lassitude; I should have had a relapse, and probably

should never have left my room alive, although I was attended by Mr.

Davis, who is at the same time one of the most skilful, experienced, and

attentive surgeons in the kingdom, and in whose ability and judgment

I placed the greatest reliance; but the moment I received this second

letter from the Quaker (which was in the evening of the third day of my

illness), I got out of bed, and with the assistance of my family I put

my clothes on, and with great difficulty I was taken down stairs. I

ordered my servant to get my horses ready, as I was determined to go to

Bath the next day, to have the advice of Dr. Parry; but the real fact

was, that I was much more anxious to see my tenants there, to receive

some rent that was due to me, that I might be prepared to pay my harvest

people, and get out of the hands of _neighbour Heath_, the Quaker

Banker. On the next day I accordingly drove to Bath, as I have before

described, and succeeded in both the objects of my journey, by obtaining

the advice of Dr. Parry, and receiving my rent.

On my return home I wrote an answer to _Friend William_, to say, that I

was sorry to hear that he was so pressed for money, the truth of which,

I told him, I did not doubt, and, as that was the case, I would pay him

the small balance which was due; but that, at the same time, I should

certainly decline placing any more money in his hands, and I should also

take good care not to keep any of his _notes_ by me any longer than I

could help; and from that time to this I have kept my word, as the day

may not be far distant when a sovereign may be worth a hundred pounds'

worth of them.

I am bound in justice to say, that I do not believe that Messrs. Charles

and Thomas Heath were in any way privy to this transaction. On the

contrary, I am convinced, that they are totally incapable of such dirty

conduct; there is no improbability in their being ignorant of the

matter; _Squire Quaker Williams_ having the sole management of the

Banking concern, while the two elder brothers, Charles and Thomas,

managed the Brewing and Wine Trade. The secret of this dirty conduct of

_Mister William Heath_ soon afterwards came out. It seems that he was at

the time bargaining to _quit the Beaver_, and to give up THEE and THOU

for a seat in the Corporation of the rotten-borough of Andover; and I

have no doubt but that he acted in this unworthy manner in hopes of

currying favour with the rotten managers of that rotten, corrupt,

and contemptible Corporation; as he very soon afterwards doffed the

straight-cut coat without a collar, sunk the broad-brimmed hat, mounted

a dandy-cut coat and puppy hat, went to church, married the Parson's

sister, and became a right worthy member of that truly worthy body, the

Corporators of Andover. Of course he had gone through the ceremony of

being _read out of the meeting_, which is similar to that of being

_drummed out of a regiment_. Alas! alas! what would his poor old father

say, if he could peep out of his grave and take a squint at his lisping,

darling, baby boy Billy! The old man was a very worthy, respectable,

staunch Quaker, and I believe the two elder brothers are very worthy

honest men; but _Master Billy_ has just that sort of cast with his eye,

that my father always used to caution me against. He always used to say,

beware how you trust any fellow that has such a twist in his eye; and I

have generally found this observation correct.

Master Billy Heath is also the nominal possessor of a toft of land,

or a pig-sty, at Ludgershal, and being a toft man of that wretched

Borough, of course he is one of the electors, and he has been

instrumental in sending to Parliament some of the most corrupt members

that ever entered that Honourable House. This amiable worthy has had a

finger in the national pie; he has been one of those who has voted for

those that created the national debt; he is, therefore, one of those

whom I hold responsible for the payment of it, as long as he has a

shilling left to pay with. We hear of a great deal of horror expressed

about the breach of national faith, when persons have talked about a

reduction of the national debt; and it would indeed be a breach of

national faith to reduce the interest of the widow and the orphan, who

have their money in the funds, while one of the ramifications of the

boroughmongers has got any thing left to pay it with; let all those who

supported the system of extravagance, which created the debt, by all

means pay the interest of it, as far as they are able; but the great

breach of national faith has been, to compel others who have had no

finger in the pie, to pay towards making it. Only think of those

impudent imposters who supported the infamous breach of national faith

in the year 1797, by passing a law to protect the Bank of England from

paying their notes; only think of those barefaced swindlers now whining

and canting about national faith; only think of the impudence of those

who, at the very moment that they are blustering about national faith,

and pretending to be shocked at the bare mention of reducing what they

call the national debt; only think of their passing an Act of Parliament

to reduce the interest of a particular portion of that debt, by lowering

the 5 per cent. stocks to 4 per cent.; thus, in the most partial manner,

reducing the income of those persons who had their money in the 5 per

cents. from one hundred pounds a-year to eighty, while all the holders

of other stock continue to receive their full interest!! And yet these

are the men that pretend they are so much shocked at the idea of being

guilty of any breach of national faith!

But to return to my narrative.--On the sixteenth of _August_, 1815, a

most sanguinary murder was committed by the French Government, in direct

violation of the treaty of Paris, which guaranteed the safety of all who

had taken part against the Bourbons. _Marshal Ney was executed_; and

this was done under the sanction of the high Allied Powers. Amiable

alliance! what a disgrace to the character of Wellington! Ney was a

brave soldier, and to execute such a man, under such circumstances, was

the height of treachery and baseness. Talk of keeping faith, indeed!

This is another proof that tyrants never keep their faith with God or

man, any longer than they think it their interest to do so. My opinion

is, that Ney deserted and betrayed Napoleon, after the battle of

Waterloo, by not doing his duty when he returned to the French capital;

but that was no excuse for the gross and cowardly violation of the terms

of the capitulation of Paris. There could, in fact, be no justification

for such an unfeeling breach of faith, and there certainly was no other

excuse for such an act, but that of a base desire to be revenged in cold

blood, upon a brave general, whom they could never subdue in honourable

warfare.

On the third of October following, the brave patriot Spanish General,

Porlier, met a similar fate, and was executed at Corunna, by the order

of the execrable and treacherous tyrant Ferdinand. To shew their

detestation of such a murder, a considerable number of the British

inhabitants of Corunna appeared in mourning for the death of the brave,

though unfortunate patriot; upon which, Ferdinand immediately laid an

extraordinary contribution upon them. Let the present patriots of Spain

never forget this fact, and let them remember that the cause of rational

Liberty in that country will never be safe while such a treacherous

tyrant has any power left. It is cruelty of the very worst description

to suffer such a monster to endanger the freedom and happiness of a

whole people. In Italy the despots also enjoyed a triumph. Murat, having

been defeated by the Austrian troops, fled, and was assassinated in the

kingdom of Naples on the thirteenth of October.

About this time there were serious riots in the North, and particularly

amongst the seamen at Sunderland, Newcastle, and Shields, which were

ultimately settled by giving them the increase of wages which they

demanded. On the fifth of November a treaty was entered into between

Russia and Great Britain; by which treaty the Greek Islands, called the

Ionian Islands, were placed under the protection of the latter power;

and on the twentieth, treaties of general peace were signed at Paris.

On the twenty-first of December, Lavalette, condemned at Paris for high

treason, escaped from prison in the clothes of Madame Lavalette.

Sir Robert Wilson, and Messrs. Bruce and Hutchinson, were mainly

instrumental in procuring the escape of this destined martyr to the

Bourbon tyrants, by assisting Madame Lavalette in this holy enterprise,

for which they were afterwards tried, found guilty, and sentenced to

three months' imprisonment in Paris. Sir Robert, as well as Messrs.

Bruce and Hutchinson, one of whom was an Irishman, the other a

Scotchman, secured to themselves immortal honour, in addition to the

sweet satisfaction of having rescued a victim from the remorseless hands

of a cruel tyrant.

On the same day, Lord Cochrane was sentenced to a hundred pounds fine

for escaping from the King's Bench Prison; but such was the enthusiasm

in favour of his Lordship, that the money was raised in a few days by a

penny subscription. The House of Commons having honoured his Lordship

by expelling him, when he was found guilty of being privy to the Stock

Exchange Hoax, a dead set was made by the Westminster Rump to get Mr.

Brougham elected in his place; and many private meetings were held at

the Crown and Anchor for that purpose. These intrigues having been

communicated to me by Mr. Samuel Miller, I wrote to him a letter, which

I begged him to shew to the Members of the Rump, and say, that it was

my opinion the Electors of Westminster would disgrace themselves if

they did not unanimously give the Honourable House a kick, by returning

Lord Cochrane again, and that if they did not choose to elect Lord

Cochrane again, if they proposed to bring in any other person, except

Major Cartwright, I would come to town and oppose him for at least the

space of fifteen days. This letter was shewn by Mr. Miller to some of

the leaders of the junto, and Mr. Miller informed me that it had the

effect of making them at once come to the resolution of returning Lord

Cochrane again, or at least of not making any opposition to him, by

bringing forward any other person. I believe that on this occasion Sir

Francis Burdett stood neuter, but it nevertheless was thought that he

was favourable to the return of Mr. Brougham. Whether this was so or

not, I cannot say, but it was very natural to conclude so, because those

very persons who were his most devoted supporters, appeared to wish

it. There had, in fact, been an attempt made, a short time before, to

prepare the way for Mr. Brougham and the Whigs to have a share in the

rotten Borough of Westminster. It was made at a public meeting, held

on some occasion, I forget what, in Palace-yard. At that meeting I

attended, having heard that a resolution was to be moved, which had been

agreed to at a previous private meeting, held the night before at the

Crown and Anchor, and at which meeting some of the said Whig members

attended. This said resolution was drawn up by Lawyer Brougham himself,

and it was in effect a vote of thanks to the Whigs, for their patriotic

exertions in Parliament. Well, after a considerable portion of the

business of the day had passed off, as a matter of course, it was

announced to the gaping, astonished crowd, by old Wishart, that some

patriotic Members of Parliament were in attendance, and that they wished

to address the people, they having just arrived upon the hustings for

that purpose. The old Tobacconist, Wishart, acting as a sort of master

of the ceremonies, introduced them in form as they came to the front of

the hustings: as, "This is Mr. Brougham, Gentlemen: this is Mr. Lambton

this is Mr. Madocks, (upon which a few voices in the crowd cheered):

this is Mr. Grey Bennet: this is Mr. ----, Member for Hertfordshire,"

I forget his name, which is not of much consequence, as he has since

_changed_ it, by taking a _Peerage_. There might have been several

others, but I forget; they were, however, all exhibited to the wondering

multitude by Mr. Wishart, and very much in the tone, voice, and manner

that a showman exhibits the wild beasts at a country fair--" This is the

royal tiger from Bengal," &c.

While all this was going on, I stood snug at one corner in the front of

the hustings, and I must own, that I was considering in my mind which

would be the best way to expose this intended hoax upon the people

of Westminster. I saw there was no feeling of enthusiasm amongst the

people; they looked first at the exhibited M. P. and then cast an

inquiring suspicious look at the dealer in pigtail and rappee, who

introduced them. I contrived to keep my muscles so unconcerned that no

one could imagine what was passing in my mind, yet I saw and felt that I

had a difficult card to play, and that it would seem very invidious to

oppose a mere vote of thanks to any one of the individuals, or, in fact,

to oppose a general vote of thanks to those Members of Parliament, for

their opposition to the measures of a corrupt administration. On the

other hand, it forcibly struck me that it would look very much like an

act of cowardice, to stand silent and hear a vote of thanks passed to

the Whigs, whose measures and whose conduct I had so often beheld behind

their backs, and, in conjunction with Sir Francis Burdett, reprobated

and exposed in the strongest language. I therefore determined at all

risks to stand forward, and give my reasons for my opposition. At

any rate I was determined to support my _consistency_; although I felt

some doubt about the success of my apparently difficult undertaking.

Thanks, however, to Mr. Wishart, who, at the best of times, was but a

blundering politician, and who had no other influence over the minds

of the people than that which he had acquired from being a wealthy

shopkeeper, and by putting himself forward at the Westminster elections

and dinners, as the advocate of Sir Francis Burdett, I was soon relieved

from the unpleasant situation in which I was placed. By the speech

which he made, preparatory to the moving this resolution, he likewise

completely removed all doubts which I had previously entertained

upon the question; for he began with a pompous eulogium upon the

political conduct of the Whigs generally, and on that of Mr. Fox in

particular. I took care to observe the manner in which the multitude

received this eulogium; and I plainly saw, that it only required the

boldness to refute his arguments, to be able to carry the proposition

in the negative. I saw, too, that there was every now and then a hint

given, by one of the Rump understrappers upon the hustings, to get the

people to cheer the sentiments which were delivered by Mr. Wishart,

but it would not do; a few of the powdered-headed gentry in the crowd

certainly responded these hints, by a solitary cheer or two, while the

great mass of the people listened more with astonishment than with

indifference, and continually cast their eyes towards me with an

inquiring look, as much as to say, "Hunt, will you tolerate all this

humbug? Surely you will come forward and blow it into the air; we

will support you." Mr. Wishart concluded his speech by reading the

resolution, and saying, that he confidently expected that it would be

carried unanimously. "Stop a bit," said a man in the crowd, "Softly,

Sir! let us first hear what Mr. Hunt has to say to it."

Mr. Brougham had been standing, smirking, and bowing, and smiling, all

the time that Mr. Wishart had been larding them over with praises, and

he was only waiting to have the resolution put and carried, as a matter

of course, and was absolutely making ready, and seemed even to be

clearing his throat, to thank the enlightened and patriotic Electors of

Westminster, for the great honour which they had conferred upon him, and

his honourable friends. Some person, I forget who, but it was one of

the junto, seconded the motion. I shall never forget the old Major's

supplicating look at me; as plain as looks could speak, he seemed to

say, "Pray do, Mr. Hunt, let the vote pass; if you do not oppose it no

one else will, and I shall have these gentry at any rate entangled in

the meshes of my political net." But when the paper was put into the

hands of Mr. Arthur Morris, the High Bailiff, I coolly pulled off my

hat, and before I could say a word, I was greeted with a shout that

might have been heard at the Palace, and at Brooks's. This reception was

a deathblow to the Whigs, who began to stare at each other in the most

pitiable manner. They knew me well, and they knew that I would not fail

to denounce and expose to their faces, the hypocrisy of the Whigs, as I

had so often done behind their backs. I began, and the first sentence

was received with a loud cheer, and "Bravo, Hunt! give it them; they

richly deserve it," resounded from the crowd. "I shall," said I,

"without being personal, endeavour to shew you the fallacy, the

absurdity, and the inconsistency, of all that Mr. Wishart has

said."--(_Cheers_.) I then went through the history of the Whig measures

during the administration of Mr. Fox, and this I did in the way of

questions to Mr. Wishart, asking him if he meant _that_ Mr. Fox

who brought a Bill into the House of Commons, and got it passed by

Ministerial majorities, to enable Lord Grenville to hold, at the same

time, the two incompatible offices of First Lord of the Treasury, and

Auditor of the Exchequer?--"Bravo! answer that, Wishart." Whether, when

he was speaking of the purity of mind, and disinterestedness of soul of

Mr. Fox, whether he meant _that_ Mr. Fox who brought in the said Bill,

to enable Lord Grenville to receive _six thousand_ a-year, as First Lord

of the Treasury, and at the same time _four thousand_ a-year more, to

audit his own accounts ?--_(tremendous cheers.)_--I then went on in the

same strain, to ask him, if he meant _that_ Mr. Fox, and those Whigs,

who, in defiance of all former precedents, when they were in power,

in the year 1807, introduced into the Cabinet, Lord Ellenborough, a

corrupt, political Judge, so that he might sit one day as a member of

the Cabinet, and advise the prosecution of a man for sedition, or high

treason, and the next day might sit in judgment upon him? Whether he

meant _that_ Mr. Fox, and those Whigs, who raised the allowances of

all the younger branches of the Royal Family, from twelve thousand to

eighteen thousand a-year? Whether he meant _that_ Mr. Fox, and those

Whigs, who had so violently opposed the passing of the income tax by

Mr. Pitt, declaring, in the House of Commons, that it was so unjust, so

unconstitutional, and so inquisitorial a measure, that the people of

England would be justified in taking up arms to resist the collection of

it; yet, when they came into place and authority themselves, immediately

raised the same income-tax, from six and a quarter to ten per cent.;

while, to curry favour with the Crown, they exempted the King's private

property in the funds, amounting to several millions, from the operation

of the act, though, with an infamous want of humanity, they left the

widow and the orphan of fifty pounds a-year, subject to all its demands?

Whether he meant _that_ Mr. Fox, and those Whigs, who brought a Bill

into the House to subject to the operation of the Excise Laws, all

private families who brewed their own beer; a Bill, which, if passed,

would have increased the number of Excise officers from ten to twenty

thousand, giving them power at all hours to enter the house of every

private family in the kingdom who brewed their own beer? I went on in

this way, through the whole history of the Whigs, during the time that

they were in power, one year, one month, one week, and one day, in

1806 and 1807; and, before I could get to the end of any one of the

questions, the people, who anticipated what was coming, for the subject

had been rendered familiar to the mind of every one, gave several almost

unanimous and tremendous cheers.

It will be seen that I never spoke one disrespectful word of Mr. Fox, or

ever mentioned the names of one of the Whig Members of Parliament who

were upon the hustings, or even alluded to them; but just as I was about

to wind up my string of questions, by noticing their dismissal from

office, I observed a great bustle amongst the populace, who soon burst

forth into exclamations of "Look there! they are running away! Why do

you not stay and answer the questions?" I did not at first understand

what this meant, till a gentleman exclaimed with a loud voice, "Look

round, Mr. Hunt; all the Whig gentry are run away!" I turned round, and

sure enough they were all flown, having escaped from the back part of

the hustings through the King's Arms Inn. As soon as they were gone, the

people gave three cheers, and roared out lustily, "Hunt for ever!" I

proceeded with my harangue, and lamented that the gentlemen had not

remained to assist Mr. Wishart in answering my questions; and I put it

to the good sense of Mr. Wishart, whether, unless he could answer them

satisfactorily, it would not be more prudent to withdraw the resolution

of a vote of thanks to the Whigs, especially as none of them remained to

return thanks, even supposing it possible that the resolution should

be carried. (This was received with a loud laugh, and a cry to put the

question.) Mr. Wishart, however, as if for the purpose of exposing his

friends, and totally defeating his own object, persisted in having the

resolution submitted to the meeting. The result was, that perhaps forty

or fifty hands were held up for it, and a forest of ten thousand hands

were raised against it. The High Bailiff, of course, declared that the

resolution was lost by a very large majority. This was received with

loud peals of applause, and the usual votes of thanks having been

passed to the members and the High Bailiff, the meeting was dissolved,

reiterating the warm expressions of their approbation of my blowing

up such a bubble as was intended to have been palmed upon them by the

gentlemen of the Rump Committee.

Memoirs of Henry Hunt, Esq. — Volume 3 · 第 16 / 37 段