CHAPTER VII

THE STORY OF MY STRUGGLES

_BY THE SAME AUTHOR._

ARMINIUS VAMBÉRY:

His Life and Adventures.

Imperial 16mo, cloth, 6s. Boys' Edition, crown 8vo, cloth gilt, gilt

edges, 5s.

THE STORY OF HUNGARY.

Fully Illustrated. Large crown 8vo, cloth, 5s. (THE STORY OF THE NATIONS

SERIES.)

LONDON: T. FISHER UNWIN.

[Illustration: VAMBÉRY AFTER HIS RETURN FROM CENTRAL ASIA.

_Photographed in Teheran, 1863._

_Frontispiece to Vol._ II.]

THE STORY OF MY STRUGGLES

THE MEMOIRS OF ARMINIUS VAMBÉRY

PROFESSOR OF ORIENTAL LANGUAGES

IN THE UNIVERSITY OF BUDAPEST

VOLUME II

[Illustration: Logo]

LONDON: T. FISHER UNWIN

PATERNOSTER SQUARE . 1904

(_All rights reserved._)

Contents

CHAPTER VII.

PAGE

FROM LONDON TO BUDAPEST 237

CHAPTER VIII.

MY POLITICAL CAREER AND POSITION IN ENGLAND 283

CHAPTER IX.

THE TRIUMPH OF MY LABOURS 317

CHAPTER X.

AT THE ENGLISH COURT 329

CHAPTER XI.

MY INTERCOURSE WITH SULTAN ABDUL HAMID 343

CHAPTER XII.

MY INTERCOURSE WITH NASREDDIN SHAH AND HIS

SUCCESSOR 391

CHAPTER XIII.

THE STRUGGLE'S END, AND YET NO END 411

APPENDICES 459

Illustrations

PROFESSOR VAMBÉRY AFTER HIS RETURN FROM

CENTRAL ASIA _Frontispiece_

PROFESSOR VAMBÉRY AND HIS TARTAR, 1864 _Facing page_ 393

From London to Budapest

CHAPTER VII

FROM LONDON TO BUDAPEST

I have often been asked how it was that, after the bitter disappointment

I had experienced in my native land on my return from Asia, and after

the brilliant reception accorded to me in England, I yet preferred to

settle down permanently in Hungary.

People have been surprised that I should choose a quiet literary career,

whereas my many years of intimate intercourse with various Eastern

nations might have been turned to so much better account, and a

practical, active career would have been so much more in keeping with my

character. All these questions were asked of me at the time in London,

but filled as I then became with a sense of oppression and a great

longing for home I could not give a satisfactory answer to these

queries. Now that the cloud has lifted, and my vision is clear, now that

sober reflection has taken the place of former rapture and exultation,

the causes which influenced my decision are perfectly clear. I see now

that I could not have acted differently; that the step I took was

partly the result of my personal inclination and views of life, and

partly influenced by the circumstances of my birth and bringing up, and

the notions then generally prevailing in Hungary; nor have I cause or

ground to regret my decision.

In the first place I have to confess that in England, notwithstanding

the noisy, brilliant receptions I had, and all the attention paid to me,

no one ever made me any actual proposal with a view to my future

benefit, and no one seemed at all disposed to turn to account my

practical experiences in the service of the State or of private

enterprise. The Memorandum about the condition of things in Central

Asia, written at the time in Teheran at the request of the British

Ambassador there, had duly found its way to Lord Palmerston, the Prime

Minister. The gray statesman received me most kindly; I was often a

guest at his private house, or dined with him at Mr. Tomlin's, of

Carlton House Terrace, or at Sir Roderick Murchison's, of 16, Belgrave

Square. At his initiative I was invited to other distinguished houses,

for the merry old gentleman was much entertained by my lively

conversation and my anecdotes from Asia, which I used to relate after

dinner when the ladies had retired. My stories about the white ass of

the English Embassy at Teheran, of diplomatic repute, and similar

amusing details of court life in Persia and the Khanates of Central

Asia, tickled the fancy of the most serious, sober-minded of these high

lords, and went the round in the fashionable West End circles. But for

all that they saw in me merely the "lively foreigner," the versatile

traveller, and if here and there some interest was shown in my future,

it amounted to asking what were my latest travelling plans, and when I

thought of setting out in search of fresh discoveries. As if I had not

been on the go for two-and-twenty years, ever since I was ten years old!

as if I had not battled and struggled and suffered enough! And now that

for the first time in my life I had lighted on a green bough and hoped

to have accomplished something, was I again straightway to plunge into

the vague ocean of destiny? "No, no," I reflected; "I am now thirty-two

years old, without for one moment having enjoyed the pleasures of a

quiet, peaceful life, and without possessing enough to permit myself the

luxury of resting on my own bed, or of working comfortably at my own

table." This uncertain, unsatisfactory state of things must come to an

end sometime; and so the desire for rest and peace necessarily overruled

any inclination for great and ambitious plans, and nipped in the bud all

projects which possibly might have made my career more brilliant, but

certainly not happier than it afterwards turned out.

The kind reader of these pages who is familiar with the struggles and

troubles of my childhood, who has followed me in thought on the thorny

path of early youth, and knows something of my experiences as

self-taught scholar and tutor, will perhaps accuse me of dejection, and

blame me for want of perseverance and steadiness of purpose. Possibly I

have disregarded the golden saying of my mother, "One must make one's

bed half the night, the better to rest the other half." I did give way

to dejection, but my resolve, however blameworthy it may be, should be

looked upon as the natural consequence of a struggle for existence which

began all too early and lasted sadly too long. Man is not made of iron,

too great a tension must be followed by a relaxation, and since the

first fair half of my life began to near its ending, my former iron will

also began to lose some of its force. The wings of my ambition were too

weak to soar after exalted ideals, and I contented myself with the

prospect of a modest professorship at the University of my native land

and the meagre livelihood this would give me.

In England, where a man in his early thirties is, so to speak, still in

the first stage of his life, and energy is only just beginning to swell

the sails of his bark, my longing for rest was often misunderstood and

disapproved of. In London I met a gentleman of sixty who wanted to learn

Persian and start a career in India; and I was going to stop my

practical career at the age of thirty-two! The difference seems

enormous, but in the foggy North man's constitution is much tougher and

harder than in the South. My physical condition, my previous sufferings

and privations, may to some extent account for my despondency; I had to

give in, although my object was only half gained.

Emotions of this kind overpowered me even in the whirl and rush of the

first months of my stay in London. Before long I had seen through the

deceptive glamour of all the brilliancy around me; and as I very soon

realised that my personal acquaintance with high society and the most

influential and powerful persons would hardly help me to a position in

England, I endeavoured at least to use the present situation as a step

towards a position at home, in the hope that the recognition I had

obtained in England would be of service to me in my native land, where

the appreciation of foreign lands is always a good recommendation. First

of all I set to work upon my book of travels, an occupation which took

me scarcely three months to accomplish, and which, written with the

experiences all yet fresh in my mind, resolved itself chiefly into a dry

and unadorned enumeration of adventures and facts. The introduction of

historical and philological notes would have been impossible in any

case, as my Oriental MSS. were detained in Pest as security on the money

loan, and also because in England everything that does not actually bear

upon political, economical, or commercial interests is looked upon as

superfluous ballast. When the first proof-sheets appeared of my

_Travels in Central Asia_ many of my friends regretted the brevity and

conciseness of the composition, but the style was generally approved of,

and after its publication the various criticisms and discussions of the

work eulogised me to such an extent, that my easily roused vanity would

soon have got the better of me, had I not been aware of the fact that

all this praise was to a great extent an expression of the hospitality

which England as a nation feels it its duty to pay to literary

foreigners. This, my literary firstfruits, necessarily contributed a

good deal to increase my popularity, and enlarged the circle of my

acquaintance in high society to which I had been semi-officially

introduced by my Asiatic friends. My fame now spread to all scientific,

industrial, and commercial circles all over England. I had no time to

breathe. The post brought me double as many invitations as before; I was

literally besieged by autograph hunters and photographers; and it is no

exaggeration to say that for months together I had invitations for every

meal of the day, and that my engagements were arranged for, days and

weeks beforehand.

Wearisome and expensive as this enjoyment of popularity was--for in my

outward appearance and bearing I could not neglect any of the prescribed

forms which mark the "distinguished foreigner"--my position afforded me

the opportunity of studying London society, and through it the aims and

objects of the highest representatives of Western culture, in a manner

which might otherwise not have come within my reach. When in my youth I

journeyed Westward I never went beyond the frontiers of Austria, and it

was always only in literary pursuits that I came in contact with Western

lands: hence I never saw any but the theoretical side of things. And now

I was transplanted from the depths of Asia, _i.e._, from the extreme end

of old-world culture and gross barbarism into the extreme of Western

civilisation and modern culture; and overpowering as was the impression

of all that I saw and experienced, equally interesting to me was the

comparison of the two stages of human progress.

What surprised me more than anything was the wealth, the comfort, and

the luxury of the English country houses, compared to which the rich

colouring of Oriental splendour--existing as a matter of fact mostly in

legends and fairy tales--cuts but a poor figure. As for me, who all my

life had only seen the smile of fortune from a distance, I was struck

with admiration. Most difficult of all I found it to get used to the

elaborate meals and the table pomp of the English aristocracy. I could

not help thinking of the time of my Dervishship, when my meals consisted

sometimes of begged morsels and sometimes of _pilaw_ which I cooked

myself. Now I had to eat through an endless series of courses, and drink

the queerest mixtures. During this period of my lionship it was

strangest of all to think of the miseries of my childish days and the

time when I was a mendicant student. It was the realisation of the fairy

tale of the beggar and the prince; and with reference to this I shall

never forget one night which I spent at the magnificent country house of

the Duke of A., not far from Richmond. I was guest there together with

Lord Clarendon, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, and other English

notabilities. After dinner the company adjourned to the luxuriously

furnished smoke-room, and from there shortly before midnight every guest

was conducted to his respective bedroom by a lacquey preceding him with

two huge silver chandeliers. When the powdered footman dressed in red

silk velvet had ushered me into the splendidly furnished bedroom,

provided with every possible comfort and luxury, and began to take steps

to assist me in undressing, I looked at the man quite dumbfounded and

said with a friendly smile, "Thank you, I can manage alone." The footman

departed. I feasted my eyes upon all the grandeur around me. It was like

a cabinet full of precious curiosities and overflowing with silver

articles and wonderful arrangements of all sorts. When I turned back the

brocaded coverlet and lay down on the undulating bed, my fancy carried

me back twenty years, and I thought of my night quarters in the Three

Drums Street at Pest with the widow Schönfeld, where I had hired a bed

in company with a tailor's apprentice, he taking the head and I the

foot of the bed. Musing upon the strange alternations of man's lot, and

the difference between my condition then and now, I could not go to

sleep, but tossed about half the night on my silken couch. It was after

all merely a childish reflection, for, though now in splendour, I was

but a guest. But it is difficult to divest oneself of the impression of

the moment, and as often as I found myself in a similar position the

comparison between the mendicant student suffering want and the petted

lion of English society has brought me to a contemplative mood.

More even than by the wealth and prosperity I was struck by the spirit

of freedom which, notwithstanding the strictly aristocratic etiquette of

society, must surprise the South-Eastern European, and more still any

one who from the inner Asiatic world finds himself suddenly transplanted

to the banks of the Thames. Formerly, in my native land it was always

with unconscious awe and admiration that I looked up to a prince, a

count, or a baron, and afterwards in Asia I had to approach a Pasha,

Khan, or Sirdar with submissive mien, sometimes even with homage. And

now I was surprised to notice how little attention was paid to dukes,

lords, and baronets in the clubs and other public places in England.

When for the first time I went into the reading-room of the Athenæum

Club, and with my hat on stood reading the _Times_ opposite to Lord

Palmerston and at the same desk with him, I could hardly contain myself

for surprise, and my eyes rested more often on the strong features of

"Mister Pam" than on the columns of the city paper. Later on I was

introduced in the Cosmopolitan Club to the Prince of Wales, then

twenty-three years old. This club did not open till after midnight. When

I saw the future ruler of Albion sitting there at his ease, without the

other members taking the slightest notice of him, I fairly gasped at the

apparent indifference shown to the Queen's son. I could but approach the

young Prince with the utmost reverence and awe; and it was entirely

owing to the great affability and kindness of heart of this son of the

Queen that I plucked up courage to sit down and hold half an hour's

conversation with him. Since that time this specially English

characteristic of individual freedom and independence has often struck

me forcibly, and could not fail to strike any one accustomed to the

cringing spirit of Asia and the servility of Eastern Europe. Truly a

curious mixture of the sublime and the ridiculous, of really noble and

frivolous impressions, marked these first months of my sojourn in

England. Feelings of admiration and contempt, of delight and scorn

alternated within me; and when I ask myself now what it was that I

disliked about England, and drove me to unfavourable criticism, I would

mention in the first place the rigid society manners, utterly foreign to

me, which I found it hard to conform to and consequently detested. The

straitjacket of etiquette and society manners oppresses the English

themselves more than they care to acknowledge; how, then, must it affect

the Continental and the wanderer fresh from the Steppes of Asia? The

second reason which made the idea of a longer stay in London quite

impossible for me was the dislike, nay, the absolute horror I had of the

incessant hurrying, rushing, bustling crowds in the thoroughfares; the

desperate efforts to gain honour and riches, and the niggardly grudging

of every minute of time. Standing at the corner of Lombard Street or

Cheapside, or mixing with the crowds madly hurrying along Ludgate Hill,

I felt like a man suddenly transported to pandemonium. To see how these

masses push and press past one another, how the omnibus drivers swing

round the corners, regardless of danger to human life, for the mere

chance of gaining a few coppers more, and to realise how this same

struggle for existence goes on in all stages of society, in all phases

of life, relentless, merciless, was enough to make me think with longing

of the indolent life of Eastern lands; and, without admitting the

Nirvana theory, all this fuss and flurry seemed out of place and far too

materialistic. My nature altogether revolted against it.

Of course this view was quite erroneous. For what has made England great

was, and is, this very same prominent individuality, this restless

striving and struggling, this utter absence of all fear, hesitation, and

sentimentality where the realisation of a preconceived idea is

concerned. But unfortunately at that time I was still under the ban of

Asiaticism; and although the slowness, indolence, and blind fanaticism

of the Asiatics had annoyed me, equally disagreeable to me was the

exactly opposite tendency here manifested. I wanted to find the "golden

middle way," and unconsciously I was drawn towards my own home, where on

the borderland between these two worlds I hoped to find what I sought.

And now, after the lapse of so many years, recalling to mind some

personal reminiscences of London society, I seem to recognise in the

political, scientific, and artistic world of those days so many traits

of a truly humane and noble nature, mixed with the most bizarre and

eccentric features which have been overlooked by observers.

The gigantic edifice of the British Empire was then still in progress of

building, the scaffolding was not yet removed, some portions still

awaited their completion; and as the beautiful structure could not yet

be viewed in its entirety, and an impression of the whole could,

therefore, not be realised, there was in the nation but little of that

superabundant self-consciousness for which modern times are noted. They

listened to me with pleasure when I spoke of England's mighty influence

over the Moslem East, they heard with undisguised gratification when I

commended England's civilising superiority over that of Russia, but yet

they did not seem to trust their own eyes, and to many my words were

mere polite speeches with which the petted foreigner reciprocated their

hospitality. The interest shown by a foreigner in a foreign land must

always seem somewhat strange, and my appreciative criticisms of England

may have appeared suspicious to many of my readers. Only later

statements by such men as Baron Hübner in his _Travels in India_, or

Garcin de Tassy's learned disquisitions on the influence of English

culture on Hindustan, have lent more weight to my writings.

Of all the leading statesmen of the time I felt most attracted towards

Lord Palmerston. I recognised in him a downright Britisher, with a

French polish and German thoroughness; a politician who, with his

gigantic memory, could command to its smallest details the enormous

Department of Foreign Affairs, and who knew all about the lands and the

people of Turkey, Persia, and India. He seemed to carry in his head the

greater portion of the diplomatic correspondence between the East and

the West; and what particularly took my fancy were the jocular remarks

which he used to weave into his conversation, together with _bon-mots_

and more serious matters. In the after-dinner chats at the house of Mr.

Tomlin, not far from the Athenæum Club, or at 16, Belgrave Square with

Sir Roderick Murchison, where I was an often invited guest, he used to

be particularly eloquent. When he began to arrange the little knot of

his wide, white cravat, and hemmed a little, one could always be sure

that some witty remark was on its way, and during the absence of the

ladies subjects were touched upon which otherwise were but seldom

discussed in the prudish English society of the day. I had to come

forward with harem stories and anecdotes of different lands, and the

racier they were the more heartily the noble lord laughed. The Prime

Minister was at that time already considerably advanced in years. The

most delicate questions of the day were freely discussed, and I must

confess that it pleased me very much when they did not look upon me as

an outsider, but fully took me into their confidence. Lord Granville,

afterwards Minister of Foreign Affairs, treated me also with great

kindness. He was a little more reserved, certainly, but an intrinsically

good man, and it always pleased him when I was at table with him to hear

me converse with the different foreign ambassadors in their native

tongue. His sister, Mrs. James, an influential lady in high life,

provided me with invitations from various quarters, and it was she who

urged me to settle in London. Similar encouragements I also received

from Sir Justin Sheil, at one time British Ambassador in Persia, and his

wife, most distinguished, excellent, people, who instructed me in the

ways of fashionable life, and taught me how to dress and how to comport

myself at table, in the drawing-room and in the street. Blunders against

the orthodoxy of English customs were resented by many; and once a lady

who had seen me on the top of an omnibus, from where the busy

street-life of London can best be observed, said to me in full earnest,

"Sir, take care not to be seen there again, otherwise you can no longer

appear as a gentleman in society." Admittance into society is everything

in England. One is severely judged by the cut and colour of one's

clothes. Society ladies demand that hat, umbrella, and walking-stick

come from the very best shop, and most important is the club to which

one belongs, and of course also the circle of one's acquaintances. When

I was able to give as my address, "Athenæum Club, Pall Mall," the

barometer of my importance rose considerably.

One can easily understand that all these trifles were little to my

taste. I had always been fond of simplicity and natural manners. All

these formalities and superficialities were hateful to me, but at that

time I had to yield to necessity and make the best of a bad job; nay,

even be grateful to my instructors for their well-meant advice in these

matters.

Honestly speaking, I have found among these people some very

noble-minded friends who, from purely humane motives, interested

themselves in me, and whose kind treatment I shall not forget as long as

I live. Amongst these I would especially mention Lord Strangford,

already referred to, a man of brilliant scientific talents, and

possessing a quite extraordinary knowledge of geography, history, and

the languages of the Moslem East. He had lived for many years on the

banks of the Bosphorus as Secretary to the Embassy, and was not only

thoroughly acquainted with Osmanli, Persian, and Hindustani, but also

with the Chagataic language, then absolutely unknown in Europe. He could

recite long passages from the poems of Newai. He was as much at home in

the works of Sadi, Firdusi, and Baki as in Milton and Shakespeare, and

well informed as regards the ethnography and politics of the Balkan

peoples, and the various tribes of Central Asia and India. Lord

Strangford, indeed, was to me a living wonder, and when he shook his

long-bearded, bony head in speaking of Asia and criticising the politics

of Lord Palmerston, I should have liked to note down every word he said,

for he was a veritable mine of Oriental knowledge. It is very strange

that this man was not used as English Ambassador at one of the Oriental

courts, and it has often been laid to Lord Palmerston's charge that he,

the illustrious Premier, was not well disposed towards his Irish

countryman, who sometimes expressed his resentment of the slight in the

columns of the _Pall Mall Gazette_, the _Saturday_, or the _Quarterly

Review_. As far as I am concerned Lord Strangford was always a most kind

and considerate patron, one of the best and most unselfish friends I

had in England, and his early death was a great grief to me. He died of

brain fever, and, as Lady Strangford afterwards wrote to me, holding in

his hand the volume of my Chagataic Grammar which I had dedicated to

him.

Next to the noble Lord Strangford I would mention the great

mathematician, Mr. Spottiswoode, who often asked me to his house; also

Sir Alexander Gordon, in Mayfair, whose sister, knowing something of

Egypt, took a special interest in my travels. I was also a welcome guest

at Lord Houghton's, both in town at Brook Street and in the country at

Ferrybridge, Yorkshire. The lunch parties at his town residence were

often of a peculiarly interesting nature. The master of the house, a

lover of sharp contrasts, used to gather round his table the fanatical

admirer of Mohammedanism, Lord Stanley of Alderley, and the equally

fanatical Protestant Bishop of Oxford, Dr. Wilberforce known as "Soapy

Sam." Most lively disputes took place at times in defence of the

teachings of Christ and Mohammed, in which the disputants did not deal

over-gently with one another, and their forcible attacks upon each

other's convictions sometimes caused the most ridiculous scenes. Still

finer were the meetings at Ferrybridge, Lord Houghton's country seat.

During one visit there I made the acquaintance of such celebrities as

Lord Lytton, afterwards Viceroy of India; the poet Algernon Swinburne,

who used to read to us passages of his yet unpublished poem, _Atalanta

in Calydon_, over which the slender youth went into ecstasies; and last,

but not least, of Burton, just returned from a mission in the North-West

of Africa. Burton--later Sir Richard Burton--was to spend his honeymoon

under the hospitable roof of the genial Lord Houghton. The company,

amongst which Madame Mohl, the wife of the celebrated Orientalist, Jules

Mohl, specially attracted my attention, had met here in honour of

Burton, the great traveller, and as he was the last to arrive, Lord

Houghton planned the following joke: I was to leave the drawing-room

before Burton appeared with his young wife, hide behind one of the

doors, and at a given sign recite the first _Sura_ of the Koran with

correct Moslem modulation. I did as arranged. Burton went through every

phase of surprise, and jumping up from his seat exclaimed, "That is

Vambéry!" although he had never seen or heard me before. In after years

I entertained the most friendly relations with this remarkable man, whom

I hold to be, incontestably, the greatest traveller of the nineteenth

century, for he had the most intimate knowledge of all Moslemic Asia; he

was a clever Arabic scholar, had explored portions of Africa together

with Speke, and gone through the most awful adventures at the court of

Dahomey; he had explored the unknown regions of North and South America,

and also made himself a literary name by his translations of the

_Lusiade_ and _The Thousand and One Nights_; in a word, this strangely

gifted man, who was never fully appreciated in his own country, and

through his peculiarities laid himself open to much misunderstanding,

was from the very first an object of the greatest admiration for me. His

contemporary and fellow-worker, Gifford Palgrave, I also reckoned among

my friends. He was a classical Englishman, first belonging to the

Anglican and afterwards to the Roman Catholic Church. For some time he

was in the service of the Society of Jesus, as teacher in the mission

school at Beyrût; and as he was quite at home in the Arabic language, he

under-took a journey into the then unknown country of Nedjd, the chief

resort of the Wahâbis, about whom his book of travels contains many

interesting new data. Being a classical orator, he used to fascinate his

audience with his choice language, and what Spurgeon has been in the

pulpit and Gladstone in Parliament, that was Palgrave in the hall of the

Geographical Society. I liked the man fairly well, only a peculiar

twinkle of the eye constantly reminded me of his former Jesuitism. In

David Livingstone, the great African explorer, I found a congenial

fellow-labourer, whose words of appreciation, "What a pity you did not

make Africa the scene of your activity!" sounded pleasant in my ears.

Other travellers, such as Speke, Grant, Kirk and others, I was also

proud to reckon among my friends; and in the field of literature I

would mention in the first place Charles Dickens, whose acquaintance I

made at the Athenæum Club, and who often asked me to have dinner at the

same table with him. Dickens was not particularly talkative, but he was

very much interested in my adventures, and when once I declined his

invitation for the following evening with the apology that I had to dine

at Wimbledon with my publisher, John Murray, he remarked, "So you are

going to venture into the 'Brain Castle,' for of course you know," he

continued, "that Murray's house is not built of brick but of human

brains." Among politicians, artists, actors, financiers, generals--in

fact in all classes and ranks of society--I had friends and

acquaintances. I had no cause to complain of loneliness or neglect; any

one else would no doubt have been supremely happy in my place, and would

have made better use also of the general complaisance. But I was as yet

absolutely new to this Western world; I was as it were still wrapped in

the folds of Asiatic thought, and, in spite of my enthusiasm for modern

culture, I had great difficulty in making myself familiar with the

principal conditions of this phase of life, with its everlasting rushing

and hurrying, the unremitting efforts to get higher up, and the cold

discretion of the combatants. In fact, my first visit to England made me

feel gloomy and discouraged.

This depression was yet enhanced by the disappointment in regard to the

material results of my book, and the rude awakening out of my dreams of

comparative prosperity. To judge from the enthusiastic reception of my

work both in Europe and America, and after all the laudatory criticisms

of the Press, I expected to get from the sale of the first edition a sum

at least sufficient to ensure my independence. The newspapers talked of

quite colossal sums which my publisher had paid or would pay me, and I

was consequently not a little crestfallen when at the end of the year I

received the first account, according to which I had made a net profit

of £500, a sum of which I had spent nearly a third in London. The modest

remainder, in the eyes of the former Dervish a small fortune, was as

nothing to the European accustomed to London high-life, and not by a

long way sufficient for the writer, anxious to make a home for himself.

The vision of all my fair anticipations and bold expectations vanished

as a mist before my eyes, and after having tasted of the golden fruit of

the Hesperides, was I to go back to my scantily furnished table, nay,

perhaps be reduced again to poverty and the struggle for daily bread?

After twenty years of hard fighting I was back again where I was at the

beginning of my career, with this difference, that I had gained a name

and reputation, a capital, however, which would not yield its interest

till much later.

I am therefore not at all surprised that in my desperate frame of mind

I clutched at a straw, and looked upon a professorship at Pest and the

doctor's chair of Oriental languages as the bark of salvation upon the

still turbulent ocean of my life. True, my cold reception at home had

somewhat sobered me, and made the realisation of even this modest

ambition not quite so easy of attainment, but my longing for my native

land and for a quiet corner admitted of no hesitation, no doubt. With

incredible light-heartedness I disengaged myself from the embrace of the

noisy, empty homage of the great city on the Thames and sped to Pest to

present myself to my compatriots after my triumphal campaign in England

and crowned with the laurels of appreciation of the cultured West. As

may be supposed, my reception was somewhat warmer but not much more

splendid than on my return from Asia. Small nations in the early stages

of their cultural development often follow the lead of greater,

mightier, and more advanced lands in their distribution of blame or

praise. The homely proverb, "Young folks do as old folks did," can also

be applied to whole communities, and, especially where it concerns the

appreciation and acknowledgment of matters rather beyond the

intellectual and national limits of the people, such copying or rather

echoing of the superior criticism is quite permissible and excusable. On

my return from England my compatriots received me with marked

attention, but Hungary was still an Austrian province, and in order to

attain the coveted professorship I had to go to Vienna and solicit the

favour of an audience with the Emperor. The Emperor Francis Joseph, a

noble-minded monarch and exceptionally kind-hearted--who was not

unjustly called the first gentleman of the realm--received me most

graciously, asked some particulars about my travels, and at once granted

me my request, adding, "You have suffered much and deserve this post."

He made only one objection, viz., that even in Vienna there are but few

who devote themselves to the study of Oriental languages, and that in

Hungary I should find scarcely any hearers. On my reply, "If I can get

no one to listen to me I can learn myself," the Emperor smiled and

graciously dismissed me.

I shall always feel indebted to this noble monarch, although, on the

other hand, from the very first I have had much to bear from the

Austrian Bureaucracy and the fustiness of the mediæval spirit which

ruled the higher circles of Austrian society; perhaps more correctly

from their innate ignorance and stupidity. The Lord-High-Steward, Prince

A., whom I had to see before the audience, regardless of the

recommendations I brought from the Austrian Ambassador in London,

received me with a coldness and pride as if I had come to apply for a

position as lackey, and while royal personages of the West, and later

on also Napoleon, had shaken hands with me and asked me to sit down,

this Austrian aristocrat kept me standing for ten minutes, spoke roughly

to me, and dismissed me with the impression that a man of letters is

treated with more consideration in Khiva and among the Turkomans than in

the Austrian capital.

And this, alas! hurt me all the more, as the social conditions at home

in my native land were no better. Here also the wall of partition, class

distinctions and religious differences rose like a black, impenetrable

screen adorned with loathsome figures before my eyes, and the monster of

blind prejudice blocked my way. The enormous distance between the

appreciation of literary endeavours in the West and in the East grew in

proportion as I left the banks of the Thames and neared my native land;

for although the public in Hungary warmly welcomed their countryman,

re-echoing the shouts of applause from England and France, nay, even

looked upon him with national pride, I could not fail to notice on the

part of the heads of society and the leading circles a cold and

intentional neglect, which hurt me.

The fact that this Hungarian, who had been so much fêted abroad, was of

obscure origin, without family relations, and, moreover, of Jewish

extraction, spoiled the interest for many, and they forcibly suppressed

any feelings of appreciation they may have had. The Catholic Church,

that hotbed of intolerance and blind prejudice, was the first in attack.

It upbraided me for figuring as a Protestant and not as a Catholic, as

if I, the freethinker, took any interest in sectarian matters!

I was the first non-Catholic professor appointed according to Imperial

Cabinet orders to occupy a chair of the philosophical faculty at the

Pest University. Thus not to give offence to this University--unjustly

called a Catholic institution--by appointing a so-called Protestant,

_i.e._, a heretic, the title of professor was withheld from me, and for

three years I had to content myself with the title of lector and the

modest honorarium of 1,000 florins a year--a remuneration equal to that

of any respectable nurse in England when besides her monthly wages we

take into account her full keep! Truly, from a material point of view,

my laborious and perilous travels had not profited me much!

To justify this humiliation certain circles at home took special care to

depreciate me at every possible opportunity. Wise and learned men, for

instance, professed to have come to the conclusion that my travels in

the Far East, and the dangers and fatigues I had professed to have gone

through, were a physical impossibility on account of my lame leg. "The

Jew lies; he is a swindler, a boaster, like all his fellow-believers."

Such were the comments, not merely in words, but actually printed in

black and white; and when I introduced myself officially to the Rector

of the University, afterwards Catholic bishop of a diocese, I was

greeted with the following gracious words, "Do you suppose we are not

fully informed as to the treacherousness of your character? We are well

aware that your knowledge of Oriental languages is but very faulty and

that your fitness to fill the chair is very doubtful. But we do not wish

to act against His Majesty's commands, and to this coercion only do you

owe your appointment." Such was the gracious reception I had, and such

were the encouraging words addressed to me after the learned

Orientalists of Paris and London had loaded me with praise and honour,

and after I had accomplished, in the service of my people, a journey

which, as regards its perilousness, privations, and sufferings, can

certainly not be called a pleasure trip.

As it is only natural that small communities on the lower steps of

civilisation are either too lazy or too incapable to think, and are

guided in their opinion by the views of the higher and leading ranks of

society, I am not surprised that in certain circles of Hungary for years

together I was looked upon with suspicion, and that my book of travels,

which in the meantime had been translated for several Eastern and

Western nations into their mother-tongue, was simply discredited at

home. Similar causes have elsewhere, under similar conditions, produced

similar effects. When the nickname of "Marco Millioni" could be given

to the celebrated Venetian who traded all over Asia, why should I mind

their treatment of me in Hungary, where, apart from national

archæological considerations, nobody evinced any great interest in the

distant East? Among the millions of my countrymen there was perhaps no

more than one who had ever heard the names of Bokhara and Khiva, and

under the extremely primitive cultural conditions of those days

geographical explorations were not likely to excite very great interest.

The nation, languishing in the bonds of absolutism, and longing for the

restoration of Constitutional rights, was only interested in politics;

and, since the few scientists, who in their inmost minds were convinced

of the importance of my undertaking, had become prejudiced by the

reception I had received abroad and were now filled with envy, my

position was truly desperate, and for years I had to bear the sad

consequences of ill-will. When the first Turkish Consul for Hungary

appeared in Budapest he was asked on all sides whether it was really

true that I knew Turkish, and when he replied that I spoke and wrote

Turkish like a born Osmanli, everybody was greatly surprised. One of my

kind friends and patrons said to me in reply to my remark that I should

talk Persian with Rawlinson, "You can make us believe this kind of

thing, but be careful not to take in other people." A few weeks later

Rawlinson took me for a born Persian, but at home they said it was

unheard of for a Hungarian scientist to be able to speak Persian. So

deplorably low was the standard of Hungarian learning in those days!

Under these conditions the reader may well be surprised, and I must

confess that I am surprised myself now, that my deeply-wounded ambition

did not revolt against these saddest of all experiences, but that I

meekly bore these constant insults and calumnies. This extraordinary

humility in the character of a man who in every fibre of his body was

animated by ambition and a desire for fame, as I was in those days, has

long been an enigma to me. I have accused myself of lack of courage and

determination, and I should blush for shame at the memory of this

weakness if it were not for the extenuating circumstance that I was

utterly exhausted and wearied with my twenty years' struggle for

existence, and that my strong craving for a quiet haven of rest was a

further extenuation. What did I care that my supposed merits were not

appreciated at home, since in the far advanced West the worth of my

labours had been so amply recognised? Why should I trouble myself about

the adverse criticism of my rivals and ill-wishers since I had at last

found a quiet corner, and in possession of my two modestly furnished

rooms could comfort myself with the thought that I had now at last found

a home, and with the scanty but certain income of some eighty florins

per month I could sit down in peace to enjoy the long wished-for

pursuit of quiet, undisturbed literary labour? When I had completed the

furnishing of my humble little home, and, sitting down on the

velvet-covered sofa, surveyed the little domain, which now for the first

time I could call my own, I experienced a childish delight in examining

all the little details which I had provided for my comfort. Thirty-three

years long I had spent in this earthly vale of misery, a thousand ills,

both physical and mental, to endure, before it was granted me to

experience the blissful consciousness, henceforth no longer to be tossed

about, the sport of fortune, no longer to be exposed to gnawing

uncertainty, but quietly and cheerfully to pursue the object of my life,

and by working out my experiences to benefit the world at large. To

other mortals, more highly favoured by birth, my genuine satisfaction

and delight may appear incomprehensible and ridiculous: one may object

that I longed for rest too soon, and that the small results were

scarcely worthy of all the hard labour. But he whom Fate has cast about

for years on the stormy ocean hails with delight even the smallest and

scantiest plot of solid land, and he who has never known riches or

abundance enjoys his piece of dry but certain bread as much as the

richest dish.

Such were the feelings which animated me when I settled down in

surroundings altogether apart from my studies, my desires and views of

life, and such also were the feelings which made me proof against all

the attacks and slights of a criticism animated more by ignorance than

intentional ill-will. I simply revelled in the enjoyment of these first

weeks and months of my new career. The healthy hunger for work acted

like a precious tonic, the old indestructible cheerfulness returned, and

when after my daily labour of eight or ten hours I went for a walk in

the country I fancied myself the happiest man on earth. On account of

the marked difference of treatment I had received in England and in

Hungary, and in order not to subject myself to unnecessary slights, I

had at home avoided all social intercourse as far as I possibly could.

Thus on the one hand I had all the more leisure for my work, and on the

other hand, through my large correspondence with foreign countries, I

was led to remove the centre of gravity of my literary operations and

the chief aim and object of my pursuits to foreign lands. At first this

necessity troubled me; but the remark of my noble patron, Baron Eötvös,

that Hungary never could be the field of my literary labours, and that I

should benefit my native land far more by putting the products of my pen

upon the world's market in foreign languages soon comforted me. I wrote

mostly in German and English, and enlarged my mind in various branches

of practical and theoretical knowledge of Asiatic peoples and countries.

Two years had scarcely passed before my pen was the most in request on

subjects of the geographical, ethnographical, philological, scientific,

and political literature of Central Asia--in fact, of the whole Moslemic

East. During this period I saw the realisation of the boldest ideas of

my early days, and only now began to reap the benefit of my studies. I

read the different European and Asiatic languages without the help of a

dictionary, and as in most of them I had had practical experience, I

could understand them the more easily, and also write in them. Gradually

I had got together a small library of special books, and on account of

the lively correspondence I kept up with my fellow-literati and friends

of Oriental study, I was enabled to work with energy far from the centre

of my studies as linguist, ethnographer, and editor. Now and then the

want of intellectual stimulus and personal intercourse with my

fellow-labourers made itself felt. I longed particularly for an

interchange of ideas with authorities on the East, as in Pest itself I

could only meet with a few orthodox scholars of Ural-Altaic comparative

philology; but in the zeal and enthusiasm for one's undertaking one

easily dispenses with encouragement, and with the device, "_Nulla dies

sine linea_," which I always conscientiously followed, I must ultimately

reach the goal and overcome all obstacles.

With industry and perseverance, energy and untiring zeal, I could

conquer anything except the stupidity of human nature galled by envy.

The more I worked to keep up my literary repute and the repute I had

gained as traveller, the more furiously raged my opponents, and the more

they endeavoured to discredit me, and to accuse me of all imaginable

mistakes and misrepresentations. Once when I complained about this to

Baron Eötvös, this noble and high-minded man rightly remarked, "The

regions of your travels and studies are unknown in this land, and you

cannot expect society to acknowledge its ignorance and incapacity to

understand. It is far easier and more comfortable to condemn one whom it

does not understand as a liar and a deceiver." Now this was exactly my

position; all the same it grieved me to meet with so much opposition on

every side. Not in any period of my life, when some public

acknowledgment on the part of the Academy or of the newly-established

Hungarian Government would have been such a help to one of my almost

childish sensitiveness, had I ever received the slightest token of

appreciation of my labours. Twelve years after my return from Central

Asia I was elected ordinary member of the Academy, and then only after

several quite insignificant men had preceded me, and I simply could not

be passed over any longer. Others of higher birth, but without any

literary pretensions, were made honorary members or even placed on the

directing staff. As regards the State's want of appreciation of my work,

although I may now look upon it as of no significance, it made me feel

very sore at the time, especially during the Coronation festivities

when Hungarian literati and artists were picked out and I was utterly

ignored. At other times they were glad enough to distinguish me as the

only Magyar who had brought Hungarian knowledge on to the world's stage,

and had been instrumental in making the name of the Hungarian Academy

known to the Western world. I could give many other proofs of this

intentional neglect and ignoring of my claims, but why should I weary

the reader any longer with revelations of wounded vanity? The conviction

that I had become a stranger in my own land impressed itself more and

more upon me; the false position in which I was placed must necessarily

become more and more conspicuous. No wonder, then, that I grew

indifferent towards the place which formerly had been the object of all

my desires, and I now began to long for England, the foreign land where

I was better understood and more appreciated, and where I had found more

interest in my studies and more encouragement of my efforts.

Nothing, therefore, was more natural than that in these circumstances I

should undertake a journey abroad, to cheer and comfort myself by

personal contact with congenial society. These motives drew me towards

Germany, France, and particularly England. In Germany I made the

acquaintance of distinguished Orientalists whose theoretical knowledge

excited my admiration as much as their practical incapacity and

awkwardness surprised me. They were kind, modest, worthy men, who, since

I was outside their particular set, met me very pleasantly, but they

looked very doubtful when I seemed not to be acquainted with their

theories or betrayed an insufficient knowledge of their treatises,

notes, and glossaries. They listened to me, but I saw at once that they

looked upon me as a dilettante, outside the pale of learning. This

opinion of my literary accomplishments was not altogether unjust, for I

was and remained always a practical Orientalist, and these theorists

might have remembered that a mere bookman could not possibly have

travelled through so many Islamic lands as Dervish and faced all dangers

and vicissitudes in close intercourse with the people.

In France I fared somewhat better. Here the political situation had

revealed the necessity of practical knowledge of Asiatic conditions, and

side by side with the theoretical guardians of Oriental science there

had at all times been a considerable number of practical authorities on

Asia, who now received me very warmly. Of the personages with whom I

became acquainted in Paris I will mention in the first place Napoleon

III., who admitted me to an audience more because it was the fashion

than to satisfy his scientific curiosity. When I entered the Tuileries

in company with Prince Metternich, then Austrian Ambassador at Paris,

and caught sight of the Emperor before the Pavillon de l'Horloge as he

was taking leave of Queen Christina of Spain, the vision of this

thick-set man, with his flabby features and pale, faded eyes, made a

miserable impression upon me. And still more lamentable was the result

of my half-hour's interview with him. He appeared to have been preparing

himself for my visit, for on his writing-table, covered with papers and

documents, I saw spread out the map which accompanied the English

edition of my _Travels_, and, after the usual ceremonies, he told me to

sit down by him and began to converse about Hungary. When I remarked

that I had undertaken these travels into the interior of Asia at the

request of the Academy, the Emperor replied he had heard a good deal in

praise of Hungary, and after receiving some information as to the

intellectual efforts of Hungary, he led the conversation on to Central

Asia. At first he attempted to give the conversation a more scientific

character, and, with reference to his _Jules César_, which had just

appeared, he began to talk about the ethnical origin of the Parthians.

Gradually he dropped into a consideration of the political condition of

Central Asia, and put to me the question whether in the Memorandum I had

presented to Lord Palmerston I had touched upon the politico-economic

relations between Central Asia and India, and wherein lay the danger for

England. My explanations did not seem to suit his preconceived notions,

for he tried to refute my views as regards the danger to English

interests by pointing out the strong position England held in India, so

gloriously maintained in the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, while Russia was only

just beginning to make conquests in Central Asia. When I replied that

Russia's object was not so much to conquer India, but rather to cripple

the English military forces, in order to tie the hands of one of the

chief opponents of Russia's designs upon Constantinople, the Emperor was

driven into a corner and said: "Such an eventuality is a long way off

yet, and as to this point in the Oriental question, there are yet other

factors to be considered." Leaving the discussion of politics, which did

not seem to please the Emperor, he suddenly turned the conversation

again upon my travels, and began to compliment me on my adventures and

the linguistic proficiency which had so helped me to success. He said,

"You have evidently a great talent for acting, and the fact that you,

with your physical weakness (hinting at my lameness), have been able to

go through so many fatigues, is altogether astonishing."

I had occasion later on to meet the Emperor in the salon of the Princess

Mathilde, but I must honestly say that I could not discern a trace of

that greatness of which for years I had heard so much. He could be

affable and pleasant; between taciturnity and gravity he simulated the

deep thinker, but his pale eyes and artificial speech soon betrayed the

adventurer who had been elevated to his exalted position by the

inheritance of a great name and the wantonness of the nation. His

minister, Count Drouyn de Lhuys, was somewhat more inquisitive and

better informed; but the most interesting personality of my Parisian

acquaintance was decidedly the great Guizot, to whom I was introduced in

the Rue de Bac at the salon of Madame Mohl. The old gentleman, then in

his 78th year, was full of sparkling humour, and his memory was quite

marvellous. He seemed to be most amused to hear me hold a lively

conversation in various European and Asiatic languages, and he made a

point of bringing me in contact with several more nationalities with the

object of confusing me. Monsieur Guizot took a warm interest in me; at

his suggestion I was invited to the various salons, but all these

civilities could not chain me to the Parisian world. In the leading

themes, belle lettres, music, and plastic art, I was an ignoramus and

had not a word to say; the superfine manners of society worried me, for

I missed here the lively interest in things Asiatic which in the London

circles, in spite of the no less strict etiquette, was constantly

evinced. Men such as Barthélemy de St. Hilaire, Garcin de Tassy, Pavet

de Courteille, and other experts, had a strong fascination for me, but

generally speaking France left me cold, for I missed even the great

cosmopolitan ideas, the lively interest in the movements of mankind in

the far-away corners of the globe, and I realised that national vanity

would not so easily admit a stranger to its platform.

On the other side of the Channel it was quite different, and in course

of time the oftener I came to England the more I felt at home there, and

the closer became the ties of friendship in various classes of society.

When in London I was often invited to the provincial towns to give

public lectures on some one or other subject of Inner-Asiatic

conditions, and thus became acquainted with the principal centres of

industry. My lectures were mostly limited to the description of those

Central Asiatic lands where I had resided for some considerable time,

and dealt with commerce, industry, natural products, and other such

practical points. In many places, as, for instance, in Birmingham, I was

asked to bring my costume bought in Central Asia, to give the

manufacturers an insight into the colour, material, and fashion of the

national costume, and, as I learned afterwards, similar goods of English

manufacture have since been imported into Bokhara by the way of

Afghanistan. In other places again, I had to speak of my travelling

adventures in connection with geographical and ethnographical interests,

and even in the smallest towns I always found an attentive and

interested audience. I also used to touch upon the political side of my

travelling experiences, and the more I railed against Russia the louder

was the applause. Sometimes there were comical episodes during my

lectures. After I had finished, the public always addressed various

questions to me, and once the learned entomologist, Mr. D., asked

whether I could not oblige him with some Central Asiatic lice, as he had

made a special study of these insects, and was on the point of

publishing a large book on the subject. On my reply that in Central Asia

I had been in quite too close contact with these creatures, but that

now, thank Heaven, there was a great distance between us, the scientist

asked whether, perhaps, my Tartar could oblige him with a few specimens.

He explained that he had various kinds, Chinese, Siamese, and other

lice, but he had not been able to procure any from Central Asia. Again,

I had to reply in the negative, but the enthusiastic entomologist would

not yet give in. "Could not," he suggested, "a European louse (a

Hungarian one in this case) be brought into contact with my Tartar? it

would be interesting to note what transformation would take place."

Needless to say, I did not perform this charitable duty to science, but

this little episode with Mr. D., who soon afterwards published a work in

two thick volumes upon _pedicula_, has often amused me. My lectures in

England have always had an exhilarating effect upon me. Commencing in

1868, I visited in this manner, with short intervals, many different

towns of the United Kingdom. Bath, Birmingham, Leeds, Sheffield,

Bradford, Leamington, Norwich, Kendal, York, Wakefield, Edinburgh,

Belfast, Halifax, Glasgow, Dundee, Aberdeen, Newcastle-on-Tyne,

Brighton, Cardiff, and other places, were visited once, twice, and even

oftener. Everywhere I enjoyed the hospitality of the most distinguished

and richest inhabitants of the place, and thus I got an insight into the

social, religious, ethical, and political standing as well as the

prevailing ideas and notions of the British people which increased my

admiration and enthusiasm for this remarkable nation. After two years of

uninterrupted sojourn in Hungary I always felt the need for what the

French call, "me retremper dans l'esprit européen," and to strengthen my

nerves and refresh my ideas by a trip to England. Just as on my journey

home from the East I felt that step by step I was advancing in Western

ways of living and thinking, in Western manners and customs, until they

reached their culminating point in England, so also when returning home

from thence I felt that each step was bringing me nearer to Eastern

notions of life, and to the errors, abuses, and superstitions of the Old

World. Year after year I made the same disappointing observation. It

always struck me in the same unpleasant manner; and if in spite of all

this I did not follow the promptings of my heart to make my permanent

home in the centre of Western thought and culture, so much more

congenial to my own conceptions of life, the fault lies not with me, but

with various external causes. In the first place the immediate contact

with these factors of Western culture, the incessant buzzing and

whirring of the machinery, had a stunning and exhausting effect upon me.

I realised that this restlessness, this everlasting mad rushing and

wrestling was unavoidable and indispensable to the attainment of the

object in view, but I preferred to watch the grotesque spectacle from a

distance, and to renew my strength by occasional visits to the field of

action. In the second place, notwithstanding all the many contradictions

and oppositions in which I constantly found myself with my countrymen on

account of my different views and notions of life, I clung far too

strongly to the soil of my native land to separate myself from it

altogether, and finally break with so many homely manners and customs

yet dear to me. And in the third place I was a Hungarian and had

presented myself to the world as the explorer of the early history and

language of my people. As such, an expatriation might reasonably have

shed a doubtful light upon my character as man and writer. My fate

compelled me to remain at home, to persevere, and to make myself as

comfortable as I could in the uncongenial surroundings. A hard struggle,

an everlasting self-denial, a constant incognito seemed to be my

appointed lot both in Europe and in Asia. Here, as there, my

surroundings were foreign and uncongenial to me, and while for many

years I accommodated myself to the necessity, and silently bore all

manner of mental injuries, I had always the consolation of work; for in

literary occupation I forgot everything else and was supremely happy.

I have often been asked why I did not from a patriotic point of view

join the national political endeavours, and take part in the movement of

1867? From a utilitarian point of view, and considering my eminently

practical views of life, my entering the Hungarian Parliament seemed to

commend itself; but serious considerations held me back. In the first

place I had no taste for this career. I had never studied Hungarian law,

and my knowledge of the political and economical conditions of the land

were far too slight for me to occupy a position as practical Hungarian

politician worthy of my ambition. And secondly, if these difficulties

could have been overcome, there were yet many other obstacles in the

way, which made a successful career such as I desired, practically

impossible. In Hungary, and elsewhere on the European Continent, birth

and origin play an important part in public life. The saying, "_Boni

viri vinique non quæritur origo_," is and always will be only a figure

of speech; and although, perhaps, the strong spirit of liberalism which

marked the commencement of Hungary's constitutional era might have

favoured my ambition--which I doubt, as so far not a single citizen of

Jewish extraction has succeeded in becoming a leading statesman--it was

not very likely that the highest circles of Vienna society would brook

a breach of their old conservative notions. I was bound to reckon with

this circumstance, and as my ambition could tolerate no half measures

and limitations, I preferred to keep altogether aloof from the political

arena of Hungary.

My Political Career and Position in England

The story of my struggles: the memoirs of Arminius Vambéry, Volume 2 · 第 1 / 8 章