Julius III’s pontificate lasted only five years; but in the year

following his death the Virgo Aqueduct had already ceased to supply

the city, and his successors, Pius IV, Pius V, and Gregory XIII, were

obliged to begin and carry on a systematic and thorough restoration

and enlargement of the aqueduct. For Julius III the wonderful water

was only a perquisite belonging to the “good gift of the papacy,” and

he devoted his short pontificate to its exploitation and adornment,

possibly silencing his scruples by the thought that the construction

of a public fountain on this highway justified his manner of obtaining

the water. At the two opposite angles of the Via Flaminia and the

Arco Oscuro, where the ascent toward his villa began, he erected two

fountains, blunting the acute end of each angle by a mostra or high

façade from the base of which issued the water. The fountain on the

right-hand side was a drinking-trough for horses, while that on the

left was one of the most beautiful and interesting fountains in all

Rome. It was the work of Bartolomeo Amannati, possibly assisted

by Vignola; and very often must the youthful Domenico Fontana have

studied it, for the famous “Fontana Fountain” is only a modification of

this truly beautiful work of the dying Renaissance. It is noticeable

that Amannati’s fountain is not a screen nor a gateway; its mostra

stands against a solid background with severely plain wings of the

same height flanking it at an angle on either side. This mostra is of

peperino in the Corinthian order, the columns supporting a fine classic

entablature and pediment. The apex of the pediment was surmounted by

a colossal statue of Neptune, and the corners of it terminated in two

pedestals carrying, the one a Minerva, and the other a Rome. Between

these two figures and the Neptune were two minor pedestals marking

the architectural termination of the great central division of the

fountain, and on these stood two small obelisks, a feature borrowed by

Fontana for his fountain of the Moses. The arch of the central division

held between its Corinthian pillars the huge square slab with the

inscription:

JULIUS III PONT. MAX. PUBLICÆ

COMMODITATI ANNO III

The niches on either side of this slab once contained statues, one of

Happiness and the other of Abundance, a design embodied two hundred

years later in the background of the Fountain of Trevi. The basin

for receiving the water did not extend across the full width of the

mostra, but was, and is (for this still remains), a noble white

granite conca standing at the foot of the central division under the

inscription. It originally received the water from a beautiful antique

head of Apollo. All this is described in a letter written by the

architect himself, Amannati, from Rome in 1555, and there follows a

description of the arcade behind the fountain. This consists of three

loggias with Corinthian columns, making a semihexagonal design and

carrying a vaulted roof ornamented by pictures and exquisite stucco

work. This was where “his Holiness got repose without incommoding

the public,” which, on the other side of the wall, refreshed itself

and its beasts of burden from the public fountain. The columns were

joined together by a balustrade, and the three-sided colonnade held

in its embrace a large fish-pond with various _jets d’eau_. Beyond

this architectural loveliness stretched long walks bordered with

fruit-trees and espaliers, and up these paths the Pope walked when,

refreshed after his long journey from the Vatican, and eager to see

what his workmen had concluded over night, he finally decided to go on

to the villa on the hill. This beautiful fountain and its loggias have

suffered more than customary outrage from time, neglect, and stupidity.

There would seem to be no vile use to which the loggias have not been

put; and the superimposition of the Casino of Pope Pius IV, which is

now recognized to be the work of Piero Ligorio, has entirely altered

the proportions and beauty of the public fountain. The fate of Pope

Julius’s creation, from the time of his death until 1900, is poorly

outlined in the various half-obliterated escutcheons and inscriptions

which now ornament the fountain and its superstructural Casino. As the

villa and all the land about it had been immediately sequestered by

the Apostolic Chamber in spite of the protests of Julius III’s legal

heirs before a tardy compensation was awarded them, this portion of the

Monte property was divided by Pope Pius IV between a son of the Duke

of Tuscany “who was to have the usufruct for his lifetime” and his own

two nephews, Carlo and Federigo Borromeo. A sister of these Borromeo

brothers married a Colonna, and the property was bestowed upon her as

dowry. It remained in that family until 1900, when it was purchased by

the present owner, Cavaliere Giuseppe Balestra, who already owned the

adjoining villa on the high ground, which might have been a part of the

original Villa Giulia, since it corresponds to that land which Julius

III had acquired from Cardinal Poggio and Cardinal San Vitelleschi.

The Medici escutcheon may have been placed there either by the Duke

of Tuscany or by Pius IV. The Pope was of very humble Milanese origin

and had no connection whatever with the great family whose name he

happened to have; but after he became Pope, the Duke Cosimo I, who

found it to his interest to have the Pope on his side, permitted him

to use the escutcheon. Contrary to the decent Roman custom,[B] the

original inscription of Julius III was removed in the first quarter of

the seventeenth century, by that one of the Colonna who inherited the

property after the death of the last descendant of the earlier branch.

He placed his own, the present, inscription in place of it, sparing the

inscription to Carlo Borromeo, either because of Borroraeo’s connection

with the Colonna family or because of the great veneration felt by

everyone for the memory of the sainted young cardinal. It was also at

this time that the beautiful antique head of Apollo was replaced by the

Colonna escutcheon and the sculptured trophies. The inscription on the

small tablet under the spring of the arch relates that in 1750 Pope

Benedict XIV gave to the Colonna family the right to draw “two ounces”

of water daily from the receiving-tank of the Trevi Fountain for use in

their Roman palace as a recompense to them for their gift to the public

of the Trevi Water in this old fountain.[C]

Those who visit the Villa Giulia in the morning hours may see the

Campagna carts on their way back from Rome drawn up before the public

fountain of Pope Julius III, and the sleepy drivers, tired horses, and

responsible little dogs refreshing themselves with the water.

[Illustration: Fountain of the Virgins.]

So far the picture created more than three hundred and fifty years

ago remains the same; fundamental customs do not change in Rome. But

on the other side of the wall, where once sat and talked the joyous

Pope and his company, what ruin and desolation! Some day the Italian

Government will sweep the crumbling loggias free from dust and rubbish

and tear away the protecting foliage, not redeeming but unmasking the

desecration of the centuries. To-day the dark water in the rough garden

tanks, the unpruned trees and wild flowers, the old mule stabled under

the ruined loggias where hay is stored, the mysterious gloom of the

vaulted roof above the Corinthian capitals and everywhere black shadows

of impenetrable depth make up a scene whose like can in all probability

be found only among the engravings of Piranesi.

[Illustration]

II. THE NYMPHÆUM OR “SECRET FOUNTAIN”

The Villa Giulia proper is designated in the old Italian books as

l’Invenzione nella Vigna Giulia, and the literal English translation

of invention not inappropriately describes this truly marvellous

creation. Amannati, Vasari, Vignola,[D] and even the aged Michelangelo

spent themselves upon the architectural devices by which this

pleasure-house became a place of almost fabulous beauty. Consummate

knowledge of perspective was employed in making the building, which is

not at all large, seem so, and the only defect in the entire design

is, as might have been expected, the Pope’s fault, for Julius insisted

upon working into the loggias in the rear of the upper court of the

fountain a gift of columns, beautiful in themselves but too small for

the surrounding proportions, thus making that part of the construction

appear insignificant and inferior to the rest. The Pope’s changing

caprice wearied even the good-natured Vasari, who has left the record

that “there was no getting the villa done”; and it was not long before

Vignola, a man of genuine and independent genius, wearied utterly of

serving such a master and went off with the great Cardinal Farnese to

build the latter’s villa of Caprarola, where he could work at peace and

for an appreciative and sympathetic patron.

The last remains of Aurelian’s Temple of the Sun were presented by

Prince Colonna to the Pope and went into the fabric of the villa, and

a great collection of portrait busts of the Emperors, found in the

villa of Hadrian, helped to adorn the loggias and niches. The villa was

filled with rare marbles, tables, statues, and vases, and the marble

columns of the central loggia were so lustrous that Amannati says they

mirrored every one who entered there. As the villa is constructed on

the hillside, various levels are the natural result, and this feature

has been used with diverse and happy effects. The various courts are

all on different planes while, with the one exception of the grand

double stairway in the central court, all the stairs are cunningly

concealed so that there is no suggestion of physical effort as the

eye passes from one plane to another. The vaulted roofs of the long

semicircular galleries and various rooms were decorated with paintings

or with stucco work of the most exquisite perfection. Traces of this

last are still to be seen above the niches containing the colossal

river-gods, the Tiber and the Arno (Amannati was a Florentine). The

place was truly a Palace of Art. Nothing but beauty was permitted

to enter it. Stables, offices, and kitchens were placed outside the

villa, and the one house which stood within the villa grounds--that

of the keeper or custodian--was designed and decorated with great

care, so that, according to Amannati, the entire invention was of

such beauty that it was in itself “good enough for any great prince.”

Nothing remains of this splendor but the bare shell, and this has been

so tampered with that it is only from old plans or from outlines of

restoration by Letarouilly and Stern that a true conception can be

obtained of the villa of Pope Julius III. It is necessary to know,

for instance, that the front court, now a commonplace garden, was

originally a great paved cortile filled with statuary now in the

Vatican or scattered far and wide over Italy. The loggia leading up

and out of this court was originally closed and entered by doors. The

shallow, broad stairway leading down from the right-hand garden under

the terraces was put in for the benefit of the cavalry quartered there

during a petty war of the eighteenth century, when the horses were

taken down to drink at the Nymphæum! The present gardens in no wise

represent the beautiful formal gardens which stretched there on either

side of the various courts, and the present walls cannot possibly

enclose that space which was once filled with orange groves and every

sort of device for fastidious delight. Somewhere in those grounds,

probably on the right hand, there was a monticello or little hill

from which could be seen the Tiber, the Seven Hills, the “beautiful

Strada Flaminia,” the Vatican, and the vast erection of new St.

Peter’s overtopping and gradually engulfing the old basilica, the view

extending even to the sea. Under the high ground still held in place

by a great retaining wall were grottos beautifully decorated by stucco

and painting and icy cold even in summer. In the woods, where the

Italian pastime of snaring birds was carefully provided for, there were

accommodations for every kind of animal, and everywhere there were

fountains, marble seats, and antique garden statuary.

Louis XIV, for whom careful plans of the villa were drawn, wisely

made no attempt to copy the enchanted palace of Italy. Versailles

makes up in size for the beauty of color, architecture, vegetation,

and art treasures here formed into one beautiful whole by Pope Julius

III. The shape of the Villa Giulia is significant. It is a series of

gardens, loggias, and courts, one enclosing the other, each richer in

ornamentation, more ravishing in beauty than the last, until finally

the heart of the creation is reached, and the “secret fountain” of

the Acqua Vergine is discovered flowing out of the shadow and from

a hidden source into a sunlit Nymphæum of marvellous beauty and

again mysteriously disappearing into the shadow. The Fountain of the

Virgins, as it came to be called, was felt by its creator, Amannati,

to be beyond the power of description. Writing to a friend in Padua,

soon after Pope Julius’s death, he describes the entire villa in

extraordinary detail, noting the attitude even of many of the statues;

but when, after pages of description, he has brought his reader to the

lowest court of all, his pen fails him and he says that unless he can

paint a picture of this court and fountain he will never be able to

give his friend “any conception of this, the loveliest, richest, and

most marvellous place in the entire creation.” Amannati saw it in its

first splendor. The caryatides were perfect, white, and gleaming, and

perhaps beautiful. The niches round about were filled with marble boys

carrying urns upon their shoulders from which the water was poured

into the semicircular stream at their feet. It is impossible to tell

from the description of the old pictures what, if any, statue filled

the central niche behind the virgins. At present the niche holds a

great white marble swan, now almost hidden by fern, from whose bill

the water trickles into the black pool beneath. The pavement, made of

every conceivable kind of marble, glowed like a jewel. The balustrade

above held graceful statues and on either side of the court just above

stood a great plane-tree, giving delicious verdure and shade. Then,

as now, the water came from large reservoirs hidden beneath the upper

terrace to the east of the fountain; then, as now, it was carried off

over gentle, rough-paved inclines; then, as now, it fell steeply into

a subterranean cavern--the entire construction producing waves of cool

air and a ripple and murmur of water exquisitely refreshing to both eye

and ear. It is almost necessary to forgive Pope Julius his attack upon

the aqueduct. Never before or since has the Acqua Vergine received such

poetic treatment.

Nothing remains of this beauty but the water and the masonry. Pope

Julius was hardly buried before the spoliation of his villa began.

Like the Pope’s beautiful resting-place behind the public fountain,

the Nymphæum has endured three centuries of vile usage and neglect.

Nowhere in Rome is it more necessary to use imagination than in the

Villa Giulia. The visitor should descend into the lowest court on a

day of brilliant sunshine and, standing before the Fountain of the

Virgins, replace for himself the lost lustre of the columns, the

whiteness of the balustrades, the rich coloring of mural paintings and

stucco, and the gleam of antique statuary. He should see the flickering

shadows cast by the great plane-trees across the marble pavement, and

hear the birds twittering or calling from the aviaries which were in

the loggia wall above the river-gods. He must fancy the fitful music

of stringed instruments, the perfume from the orange groves drifting

over the garden walls where sat the monkeys and brilliant tropical

birds. He must feel the languid stir or deep repose of long, indolent,

luxurious summer days, and through it all, he must be conscious of the

water. Only so will he be able to form some adequate conception of what

the “secret fountain” must have been in the days of Pope Julius III.

The highest charm of the beautiful creation lay in its presentation

of contrast translated into a medium suitable to every sense. It was

an age of contrast, sharp and constant. No feature in the crowded

Italian life of those two centuries is so striking as this. Fame and

obloquy; triumphant health and the lazar-house; honor and exile; the

luxury of an Agostino Chigi and the squalor of the beggar at his doors;

compassion and fiendish cruelty, young Cardinal Borromeo’s sanctity on

the one hand, and on the other unblushing licentiousness; beauty to

which all but divine honors were paid, and hideous deformity; these

lay open to the eye on every side. There seemed to be no transition.

The “secret fountain,” with its light and shade, its rest and motion,

sound and silence, its art and nature, was the poetic expression of

life as it was known by the men for whom it was created.

The records of those days are never free from blood, and at least one

assassination is connected with the building of this house of mirth.

Baronino, an associate of Vignola and Amannati, leaving the villa

with a friend on a certain evening, was set upon as he turned into

the Via Flaminia and stabbed to death. The angle in the walls made

by the public fountain and the fact that it was a natural place for

loiterers probably suggested the choice of the spot. The assassin’s

identity was either never discovered or never revealed and the crime

went unpunished, for Cellini was not the only lucky rascal. Artists

especially carried their lives in their hands, and genius was as open

to violence as it was to fame.

Historians and moralists accord scant justice and no mercy to Julius

III. He is represented by them as spending his life in senseless and

indolent pleasures. Yet he had begun his pontificate with some show of

earnestness. He had reopened the Council of Trent, and had attempted to

play a part in the diplomacy of Europe. That after two years he wearied

of these arduous labors might have been because he had sufficient wit

to perceive that, for his time at least, the Papal See would have to

be a tool in the hands of Austria. His devotion to the creation of

his villa was perhaps the only outlet for the activities of a nature

too slight to cope with the stern and sinister century on which his

lot had fallen. Long days spent with Vignola, Amannati, and Vasari,

and above all, with the aged but undaunted Michelangelo himself, for

whom this Pope felt a loving veneration, must have had a zest and

stimulating quality sufficient to make the Pope’s life in this villa

something more than the sybaritic enjoyment of mere sensuous beauty.

Beyond a doubt, the construction of his villa became an obsession with

the Pope. He gradually abandoned all other avocations and duties. It

was at the villa that he held his audiences, received ambassadors, and

gave his suppers, at which last his wit was said to be of less fine

quality than were his vintages. He even had a medal struck, with his

own head on one side and on the other the front elevation of the Villa

Giulia, with the inscription, “Fons Virginibus.”

One fatal day a pet monkey savagely attacked the Pope. He was rescued

by a lad of sixteen whom he soon after made a cardinal. The scandal was

very great. Prelates and laymen alike felt this to be going too far.

The Pope might lay himself open to censure but not to ridicule. Here

in the midst of the beauty created by Pope Julius, men’s eyes began to

turn toward the slightly grim, ascetic figure of Cardinal della Croce,

great Roman patrician and true saint, who, as if to give the final note

to this life of vivid contrast, moved about in the gay papal court,

reserved, austere, devoted to a life of such sanctity that the Pope

himself felt uncomfortable in his presence.

The villa was still far from finished when Julius III’s short

pontificate came to an end. The Conclave almost unanimously chose as

his successor their saintly brother, Cardinal della Croce.[E] The world

had entered upon a new phase. Northern Europe had brought the spirit

of the Reformation to the gates of Rome, and men were ashamed of Pope

Julius III, whose misfortune it had been to live half a century too

late.

The Villa Giulia passed into the ownership of the popes and remained

there until it was taken over by the state in the present government.

It was eventually finished by Popes Pius IV and Pius V, but the art

treasures were scattered far and wide. During many pontificates it was

used for the stopping place of ambassadors and other great personages

who spent the night there before making their ceremonial entrance into

Rome. Perhaps the presence of so much water and luxurious vegetation

made the place peculiarly sensitive to mould and decay. Even as early

as 1585 it was not considered healthful. Sixtus V, with the restless

caprice of the poor sleeper, wished to spend a night there, but was

forbidden to do so by his physician. As it was papal property, no

private individual ever had the chance to take over the beautiful old

building and gardens and keep them in repair; and those popes whose

tastes might have led them to restore it built pleasure-houses or

palaces for themselves. Gregory XIII began the Quirinal Palace, and

not infrequently for his villegiatura visited the magnificent villa

of Mondragone at Frascati which Cardinal Altemps had already begun

to build. Sixtus V built his Villa Montalto, the new Lateran Palace,

and finished the Quirinal Palace. Clement VIII contented himself with

the Quirinal; but his great cardinal nephew, Peter Aldobrandini,

founded the magnificent Villa Aldobrandini at Frascati. The Medici

Leo XI devoted himself to the Villa Medici. Paul V did indeed make a

restoration, using much stucco, which can easily be distinguished from

the beautiful work of the original period, but that Pope’s interest was

really given to the great villa which his nephew, Cardinal Scipione

Borghese, was creating out of the old Villa Cenci.

Finally, late in the eighteenth century, the papal chair was occupied

by a man of culture who felt the charm of the old Cinque Cento villa in

the Valle Giulia, and tried to rescue it from total ruin. This was the

Ganganelli Pope, Clement XIV, the founder of the Clementine sculpture

gallery in the Vatican. Clement XIV’s investigation of Pope Julius

III’s villa showed that the aqueducts were ruined, the walls crumbled

by water, the pavements cracked by fire, while all the wood and iron

work was broken or rusted, and the exquisite paintings, stucco, and

gilding spoiled by smoke and damp.[F] The papal architect, Raphael

Stern, made careful and elaborate drawings from old plans, with a view

to a genuine restoration, as Pius VI (who, in 1774, succeeded Clement

XIV) carried on the work. This Pope also felt the fascination of the

marvellous, all but ruined pleasure-house, and decided to make it his

autumn residence, but it was too late! Pope Pius VI was carried off

by the French Revolutionary forces in 1798 and died a prisoner in the

French fortress of Valence. From that time forward, the villa fell

more and more into decay. Its pitiful condition might have furnished

material for endless sermons on the vanity of life, and the ruin of its

exquisite decorations fills all artists and lovers of the beautiful

with indignant regret. It has been a veterinary hospital, a cavalry

barracks, a storehouse for hay--no desecration has been spared it. At

last the present government rescued what was left of it and converted

it into a museum of antiquities, giving the last ironic touch to its

fate by filling the rooms built to minister to the joy and pride of

life, with ancient coffins and relics of the dead.

COLONNA

[Illustration]

COLONNA

Fountains of Papal Rome · 第 4 / 13 段