CHAPTER XXX

SELF-HELP

I learned that no man in God's wide earth is either willing or able to

help any other man.--PESTALOZZI.

What I am I have made myself.--HUMPHRY DAVY.

Be sure, my son, and remember that the best men always make

themselves.--PATRICK HENRY.

Hereditary bondsmen, know ye not

Who would be free themselves must strike the blow?

BYRON.

Who waits to have his task marked out,

Shall die and leave his errand unfulfilled.

LOWELL.

"Colonel Crockett makes room for himself!" exclaimed a backwoods

congressman in answer to the exclamation of the White House usher to

"Make room for Colonel Crockett!" This remarkable man was not afraid

to oppose the head of a great nation. He preferred being right to

being president. Though rough, uncultured, and uncouth, Crockett was a

man of great courage and determination.

"Poverty is uncomfortable, as I can testify," said James A. Garfield;

"but nine times out of ten the best thing that can happen to a young

man is to be tossed overboard and compelled to sink or swim for

himself. In all my acquaintance I have never known a man to be drowned

who was worth the saving."

Garfield was the youngest member of the House of Representatives when

he entered, but he had not been in his seat sixty days before his

ability was recognized and his place conceded. He stepped to the front

with the confidence of one who belonged there. He succeeded because

all the world in concert could not have kept him in the background, and

because when once in the front he played his part with an intrepidity

and a commanding ease that were but the outward evidences of the

immense reserves of energy on which it was in his power to draw.

"Take the place and attitude which belong to you," says Emerson, "and

all men acquiesce. The world must be just. It leaves every man with

profound unconcern to set his own rate."

"A person under the firm persuasion that he can command resources

virtually has them," says Livy.

Richard Arkwright, the thirteenth child, in a hovel, with no education,

no chance, gave his spinning model to the world, and put a scepter in

England's right hand such as the queen never wielded.

Solario, a wandering gypsy tinker, fell deeply in love with the

daughter of the painter Coll' Antonio del Fiore, but was told that no

one but a painter as good as the father should wed the maiden. "Will

you give me ten years to learn to paint, and so entitle myself to the

hand of your daughter?" Consent was given, Coll' Antonio thinking that

he would never be troubled further by the gypsy.

About the time that the ten years were to end the king's sister showed

Coll' Antonio a Madonna and Child, which the painter extolled in terms

of the highest praise. Judge of his surprise on learning that Solario

was the artist. His great determination gained him his bride.

Louis Philippe said he was the only sovereign in Europe fit to govern,

for he could black his own boots.

When asked to name his family coat-of-arms, a self-made President of

the United States replied, "A pair of shirtsleeves."

It is not the men who have inherited most, except it be in nobility of

soul and purpose, who have risen highest; but rather the men with no

"start" who have won fortunes, and have made adverse circumstances a

spur to goad them up the steep mount, where

"Fame's proud temple shines afar."

To such men, every possible goal is accessible, and honest ambition has

no height that genius or talent may tread, which has not felt the

impress of their feet.

You may leave your millions to your son, but have you really given him

anything? You can not transfer the discipline, the experience, the

power, which the acquisition has given you; you can not transfer the

delight of achieving, the joy felt only in growth, the pride of

acquisition, the character which trained habits of accuracy, method,

promptness, patience, dispatch, honesty of dealing, politeness of

manner have developed. You cannot transfer the skill, sagacity,

prudence, foresight, which lie concealed in your wealth. It meant a

great deal for you, but means nothing to your heir. In climbing to

your fortune, you developed the muscle, stamina, and strength which

enabled you to maintain your lofty position, to keep your millions

intact. You had the power which comes only from experience, and which

alone enables you to stand firm on your dizzy height. Your fortune was

experience to you, joy, growth, discipline, and character; to him it

will be a temptation, an anxiety, which will probably dwarf him. It

was wings to you, it will be a dead weight to him; to you it was

education and expansion of your highest powers; to him it may mean

inaction, lethargy, indolence, weakness, ignorance. You have taken the

priceless spur--necessity--away from him, the spur which has goaded man

to nearly all the great achievements in the history of the world.

You thought it a kindness to deprive yourself in order that your son

might begin where you left off. You thought to spare him the drudgery,

the hardships, the deprivations, the lack of opportunities, the meager

education, which you had on the old farm. But you have put a crutch

into his hand instead of a staff; you have taken away from him the

incentive to self-development, to self-elevation, to self-discipline

and self-help, without which no real success, no real happiness, no

great character is ever possible. His enthusiasm will evaporate, his

energy will be dissipated, his ambition, not being stimulated by the

struggle for self-elevation, will gradually die away. If you do

everything for your son and fight his battles for him, you will have a

weakling on your hands at twenty-one.

"My life is a wreck," said the dying Cyrus W. Field, "my fortune gone,

my home dishonored. Oh, I was so unkind to Edward when I thought I was

being kind. If I had only had firmness enough to compel my boys to

earn their living, then they would have known the meaning of money."

His table was covered with medals and certificates of honor from many

nations, in recognition of his great work for civilization in mooring

two continents side by side in thought, of the fame he had won and

could never lose. But grief shook the sands of life as he thought only

of the son who had brought disgrace upon a name before unsullied; the

wounds were sharper than those of a serpent's tooth.

During the great financial crisis of 1857 Maria Mitchell, who was

visiting England, asked an English lady what became of daughters when

no property was left them. "They live on their brothers," was the

reply. "But what becomes of the American daughters," asked the English

lady, "when there is no money left?" "They earn it," was Miss

Mitchell's reply.

Men who have been bolstered up all their lives are seldom good for

anything in a crisis. When misfortune comes, they look around for

somebody to lean upon. It the prop is not there, down they go. Once

down, they are as helpless as capsized turtles, or unhorsed men in

armor. Many a frontier boy has succeeded beyond all his expectations

simply because all props were early knocked out from under him and he

was obliged to stand upon his own feet.

"A man's best friends are his ten fingers," said Robert Collyer, who

brought his wife to America in the steerage.

There is no manhood mill which takes in boys and turns out men. What

you call "no chance" may be your only chance. Don't wait for your

place to be made for you; make it yourself. Don't wait for somebody to

give you a lift; lift yourself. Henry Ward Beecher did not wait for a

call to a big church with a large salary. He accepted the first

pastorate offered him, in a little town near Cincinnati. He became

literally the light of the church, for he trimmed the lamps, kindled

the fires, swept the rooms, and rang the bell. His salary was only

about $200 a year,--but he knew that a fine church and great salary can

not make a great man. It was work and opportunity that he wanted. He

felt that if there were anything in him work would bring it out.

When Beethoven was examining the work of Moscheles, he found written at

the end, "Finis, with God's help." He wrote under it, "Man, help

yourself."

A young man stood listlessly watching some anglers on a bridge. He was

poor and dejected. At length, approaching a basket filled with fish,

he sighed, "If now I had these I would be happy. I could sell them and

buy food and lodgings." "I will give you just as many and just as

good," said the owner, who chanced to overhear his words, "if you will

do me a trifling favor." "And what is that?" asked the other. "Only

to tend this line till I come back; I wish to go on a short errand."

The proposal was gladly accepted. The old man was gone so long that

the young man began to get impatient. Meanwhile the fish snapped

greedily at the hook, and he lost all his depression in the excitement

of pulling them in. When the owner returned he had caught a large

number. Counting out from them as many as were in the basket, and

presenting them to the youth, the old fisherman said, "I fulfil my

promise from the fish you have caught, to teach you whenever you see

others earning what you need to waste no time in foolish wishing, but

cast a line for yourself."

A white squall caught a party of tourists on a lake in Scotland, and

threatened to capsize the boat. When it seemed that the crisis had

really come, the largest and strongest man in the party, in a state of

intense fear, said, "Let us pray." "No, no, my man," shouted the bluff

old boatman; "_let the little man pray. You take an oar._"

The grandest fortunes ever accumulated or possessed on earth were and

are the fruit of endeavor that had no capital to begin with save

energy, intellect, and the will. From Croesus down to Rockefeller the

story is the same, not only in the getting of wealth, but also in the

acquirement of eminence; those men have won most who relied most upon

themselves.

"The male inhabitants in the Township of Loaferdom, in the County of

Hatework," says a printer's squib, "found themselves laboring under

great inconvenience for want of an easily traveled road between Poverty

and Independence. They therefore petitioned the Powers that be to levy

a tax upon the property of the entire county for the purpose of laying

out a macadamized highway, broad and smooth, and all the way down hill

to the latter place."

"Every one is the artificer of his own fortune," says Sallust.

Man is not merely the architect of his own fate, but he must lay the

bricks himself. Bayard Taylor, at twenty-three, wrote: "I will become

the sculptor of my own mind's statue." His biography shows how often

the chisel and hammer were in his hands to shape himself into his ideal.

Labor is the only legal tender in the world to true success. The gods

sell everything for that, nothing without it. You will never find

success "marked down." The door to the temple of success is never left

open. Every one who enters makes his own door, which closes behind him

to all others.

Circumstances have rarely favored great men. They have fought their

way to triumph over the road of difficulty and through all sorts of

opposition. A lowly beginning and a humble origin are no bar to a

great career. The farmer's boys fill many of the greatest places in

legislatures, in business, at the bar, in pulpits, in Congress, to-day.

Boys of lowly origin have made many of the greatest discoveries, are

presidents of our banks, of our colleges, of our universities. Our

poor boys and girls have written many of our greatest books, and have

filled the highest places as teachers and journalists. Ask almost any

great man in our large cities where he was born, and he will tell you

it was on a farm or in a small country village. Nearly all of the

great capitalists of the city came from the country.

Isaac Rich, the founder of Boston University, left Cape Cod for Boston

to make his way with a capital of only four dollars. Like Horace

Greeley, he could find no opening for a boy; but what of that? He made

an opening. He found a board, and made it into an oyster stand on the

street corner. He borrowed a wheelbarrow, and went three miles to an

oyster smack, bought three bushels of oysters, and wheeled them to his

stand. Soon his little savings amounted to $130, and then he bought a

horse and cart.

Self-help has accomplished about all the great things of the world.

How many young men falter, faint, and dally with their purpose because

they have no capital to start with, and wait and wait for some good

luck to give them a lift! But success is the child of drudgery and

perseverance. It cannot be coaxed or bribed; pay the price and it is

yours. Where is the boy to-day who has less chance to rise in the

world than Elihu Burritt, apprenticed to a blacksmith, in whose shop he

had to work at the forge all the daylight, and often by candle-light?

Yet, he managed, by studying with a book before him at his meals,

carrying it in his pocket that he might utilize every spare moment, and

studying at night and holidays, to pick up an excellent education in

the odds and ends of time which most boys throw away. While the rich

boy and the idler were yawning and stretching and getting their eyes

open, young Burritt had seized the opportunity and improved it. At

thirty years of age he was master of every important language in Europe

and was studying those of Asia. What chance had such a boy for

distinction?

Probably not a single youth will read this book who has not a better

opportunity for success. Yet he had a thirst for knowledge and a

desire for self-improvement, which overcame every obstacle in his

pathway.

If the youth of America who are struggling against cruel circumstances

to do something and be somebody in the world could only understand that

ninety per cent. of what is called genius is merely the result of

persistent, determined industry, in most cases of down-right hard work,

that it is the slavery to a single idea which has given to many a

mediocre talent the reputation of being a genius, they would be

inspired with new hope. It is interesting to note that the men who

talk most about genius are the men who like to work the least. The

lazier the man, the more he will have to say about great things being

done by genius.

The greatest geniuses have been the greatest workers. Sheridan was

considered a genius, but it was found that the "brilliants" and

"off-hand sayings" with which he used to dazzle the House of Commons

were elaborated, polished and repolished, and put down in his

memorandum book ready for any emergency.

Genius has been well defined as the infinite capacity for taking pains.

If men who have done great things could only reveal to the struggling

youth of to-day how much of their reputations was due to downright hard

digging and plodding, what an uplift of inspiration and encouragement

they would give! How often I have wished that the discouraged,

struggling youth could know of the heartaches, the headaches, the

nerve-aches, the disheartening trials, the discouraged hours, the fears

and despair involved in works which have gained the admiration of the

world, but which have taxed the utmost powers of their authors. You

can read in a few minutes or a few hours a poem or a book with only

pleasure and delight, but the days and months of weary plodding over

details and dreary drudgery often required to produce it would stagger

belief.

The greatest works in literature have been elaborated and elaborated,

line by line, paragraph by paragraph, often rewritten a dozen times.

The drudgery which literary men have put into the productions which

have stood the test of time is almost incredible. Lucretius worked

nearly a lifetime on one poem. It completely absorbed his life. It is

said that Bryant rewrote "Thanatopsis" a hundred times, and even then

was not satisfied with it. John Foster would sometimes linger a week

over a single sentence. He would hack, split, prune, pull up by the

roots, or practise any other severity on whatever he wrote, till it

gained his consent to exist. Chalmers was once asked what Foster was

about in London. "Hard at it," he replied, "at the rate of a line a

week."

Even Lord Bacon, one of the greatest geniuses that ever lived, at his

death left large numbers of manuscripts filled with "sudden thoughts

set down for use." Hume toiled thirteen hours a day on his "History of

England." Lord Eldon astonished the world with his great legal

learning, but when he was a student too poor to buy books, he had

actually borrowed and copied many hundreds of pages of large law books.

Matthew Hale for years studied law sixteen hours a day. Speaking of

Fox, some one declared that he wrote "drop by drop." Rousseau says of

the labor involved in his smooth and lively style: "My manuscripts,

blotted, scratched, interlined, and scarcely legible, attest the

trouble they cost me. There is not one of them which I have not been

obliged to transcribe four or five times before it went to press. . . .

Some of my periods I have turned or returned in my head for five or six

nights before they were fit to be put to paper."

Beethoven probably surpassed all other musicians in his painstaking

fidelity and persistent application. There is scarcely a bar in his

music that was not written and rewritten at least a dozen times. His

favorite maxim was, "The barriers are not yet erected which can say to

aspiring talent and industry 'thus far and no further.'" Gibbon wrote

his autobiography nine times, and was in his study every morning,

summer and winter, at six o'clock; and yet youth who waste their

evenings wonder at the genius which can produce "The Decline and Fall

of the Roman Empire," upon which Gibbon worked twenty years. Even

Plato, one of the greatest writers that ever lived, wrote the first

sentence in his "Republic" nine different ways before he was satisfied

with it. Burke wrote the conclusion of his speech at the trial of

Hastings sixteen times, and Butler his famous "Analogy" twenty times.

It took Vergil seven years to write his Georgics, and twelve years to

write the Aeneid. He was so displeased with the latter that he

attempted to rise from his deathbed to commit it to the flames.

Haydn was very poor; his father was a coachman and he, friendless and

lonely, married a servant girl. He was sent away from home to act as

errand boy for a music teacher. He absorbed a great deal of

information, but he had a hard life of persecution until he became a

barber in Vienna. Here he blacked boots for an influential man, who

became a friend to him. In 1798 this poor boy's oratorio, "The

Creation," came upon the musical world like the rising of a new sun

which never set. He was courted by princes and dined with kings and

queens; his reputation was made; there was no more barbering, no more

poverty. But of his eight hundred compositions, "The Creation"

eclipsed them all. He died while Napoleon's guns were bombarding

Vienna, some of the shot falling in his garden.

When a man like Lord Cavanagh, without arms or legs, manages to put

himself into Parliament, when a man like Francis Joseph Campbell, a

blind man, becomes a distinguished mathematician, a musician, and a

great philanthropist, we get a hint as to what it means to make the

most possible out of ourselves and our opportunities. Perhaps

ninety-nine of a hundred under such unfortunate circumstances would be

content to remain helpless objects of charity for life. If it is your

call to acquire money power instead of brain power, to acquire business

power instead of professional power, double your talent just the same,

no matter what it may be.

A glover's apprentice of Glasgow, Scotland, who was too poor to afford

even a candle or a fire, and who studied by the light of the shop

windows in the streets, and when the shops were closed climbed the

lamp-post, holding his book in one hand, and clinging to the lamp-post

with the other,--this poor boy, with less chance than almost any boy in

America, became the most eminent scholar of Scotland.

Francis Parkman, half blind, became one of America's greatest

historians in spite of everything, because he made himself such.

Personal value is a coin of one's own minting; one is taken at the

worth he has put into himself. Franklin was but a poor printer's boy,

whose highest luxury at one time was only a penny roll, eaten in the

streets of Philadelphia.

Michael Faraday was a poor boy, son of a blacksmith, who apprenticed

him at the age of thirteen to a bookbinder in London. Michael laid the

foundations of his future greatness by making himself familiar with the

contents of the books he bound. He remained at night, after others had

gone, to read and study the precious volumes. Lord Tenterden was proud

to point out to his son the shop where he had shaved for a penny. A

French doctor once taunted Fléchier, Bishop of Nismes, who had been a

tallow-chandler in his youth, with the meanness of his origin, to which

he replied, "If you had been born in the same condition that I was, you

would still have been but a maker of candles."

Edwin Chadwick, in his report to the British Parliament, stated that

children, working on half time (that is, studying three hours a day and

working the rest of their time out of doors), really made the greatest

intellectual progress during the year. Business men have often

accomplished wonders during the busiest lives by simply devoting one,

two, three, or four hours daily to study or other literary work.

James Watt received only the rudiments of an education at school, for

his attendance was irregular on account of delicate health. He more

than made up for all deficiencies, however, by the diligence with which

he pursued his studies at home. Alexander V was a beggar; he was "born

mud, and died marble." William Herschel, placed at the age of fourteen

as a musician in the band of the Hanoverian Guards, devoted all his

leisure to philosophical studies. He acquired a large fund of general

knowledge, and in astronomy, a science in which he was wholly

self-instructed, his discoveries entitle him to rank with the greatest

astronomers of all time.

George Washington was the son of a widow, born under the roof of a

Westmoreland farmer; almost from infancy his lot had been that of an

orphan. No academy had welcomed him to its shade, no college crowned

him with its honors; to read, to write, to cipher--these had been his

degrees in knowledge. Shakespeare learned little more than reading and

writing at school, but by self-culture he made himself the great master

among literary men. Burns, too, enjoyed few advantages of education,

and his youth was passed in almost abject poverty.

James Ferguson, the son of a half-starved peasant, learned to read by

listening to the recitations of one of his elder brothers. While a

mere boy he discovered several mechanical principles, made models of

mills and spinning-wheels, and by means of beads on strings worked out

an excellent map of the heavens. Ferguson made remarkable things with

a common penknife. How many great men have mounted the hill of

knowledge by out-of-the-way paths! Gifford worked his intricate

problems with a shoemaker's awl on a bit of leather. Rittenhouse first

calculated eclipses on his plow-handle.

Columbus, while leading the life of a sailor, managed to become the

most accomplished geographer and astronomer of his time.

When Peter the Great, a boy of seventeen, became the absolute ruler of

Russia his subjects were little better than savages, and in himself

even the passions and propensities of barbarism were so strong that

they were frequently exhibited during his whole career. But he

determined to transform himself and the Russians into civilized people.

He instituted reforms with great energy, and at the age of twenty-six

started on a visit to the other countries of Europe for the purpose of

learning about their arts and institutions. At Saardam, Holland, he

was so impressed with the sights of the great East India dockyard that

he apprenticed himself to a shipbuilder, and helped to build the _St.

Peter_, which he promptly purchased. Continuing his travels, after he

had learned his trade, he worked in England in paper-mills, saw-mills,

rope-yards, watchmakers' shops, and other manufactories, doing the work

and receiving the treatment of a common laborer.

While traveling, his constant habit was to obtain as much information

as he could beforehand with regard to every place he was to visit, and

he would demand, "Let me see all." When setting out on his

investigations, on such occasions, he carried his tablets in his hand

and whatever he deemed worthy of remembrance was carefully noted down.

He would often leave his carriage if he saw the country people at work

by the wayside as he passed along, and not only enter into conversation

with them on agricultural affairs, but also accompany them to their

homes, examine their furniture, and take drawings of their implements

of husbandry. Thus he obtained much minute and correct knowledge,

which he would scarcely have acquired by other means, and which he

afterward turned to admirable account in the improvement of his own

country.

The ancients said, "Know thyself"; the twentieth century says, "Help

thyself." Self-culture gives a second birth to the soul. A liberal

education is a true regeneration. When a man is once liberally

educated, he will generally remain a man, not shrink to a manikin, nor

dwindle to a brute. But if he is not properly educated, if he has

merely been crammed and stuffed through college, if he has merely a

broken-down memory from trying to hold crammed facts enough to pass the

examination, he will continue to shrink, shrivel, and dwindle, often

below his original proportions, for he will lose both his confidence

and self-respect, as his crammed facts, which never became a part of

himself, evaporate from his distended memory.

Every bit of education or culture is of great advantage in the struggle

for existence. The microscope does not create anything new, but it

reveals marvels. To educate the eye adds to its magnifying power until

it sees beauty where before it saw only ugliness. It reveals a world

we never suspected, and finds the greatest beauty even in the commonest

things. The eye of an Agassiz could see worlds of which the uneducated

eye never dreamed. The cultured hand can do a thousand things the

uneducated hand can not do. It becomes graceful, steady of nerve,

strong, skilful, indeed it almost seems to think, so animated is it

with intelligence. The cultured will can seize, grasp, and hold the

possessor, with irresistible power and nerve, to almost superhuman

effort. The educated touch can almost perform miracles. The educated

taste can achieve wonders almost past belief. What a contrast between

the cultured, logical, profound, masterly reason of a Gladstone and

that of the hod-carrier who has never developed or educated his reason

beyond what is necessary to enable him to mix mortar and carry brick!

Be careful to avoid that over-intellectual culture which is purchased

at the expense of moral vigor. An observant professor of one of our

colleges has remarked that "the mind may be so rounded and polished by

education, and so well balanced, as not to be energetic in any one

faculty. In other men not thus trained, the sense of deficiency and of

the sharp, jagged corners of their knowledge leads to efforts to fill

up the chasms, rendering them at last far better educated men than the

polished, easy-going graduate who has just knowledge enough to prevent

consciousness of his ignorance. While all the faculties of the mind

should be cultivated, it is yet desirable that it should have two or

three rough-hewn features of massive strength. Young men are too apt

to forget the great end of life, which is to be and do, not to read and

brood over what other men have been and done."

"I repeat that my object is not to give him knowledge, but to teach him

how to acquire it at need," said Rousseau.

All learning is self-teaching. It is upon the working of the pupil's

own mind that his progress in knowledge depends. The great business of

the master is to teach the pupil to teach himself.

"Thinking, not growth, makes manhood," says Isaac Taylor. "Accustom

yourself, therefore, to thinking. Set yourself to understand whatever

you see or read. To join thinking with reading is one of the first

maxims, and one of the easiest operations."

"How few think justly of the thinking few:

How many never think who think they do."

Pushing to the Front · 第 30 / 66 章