GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS.

Details have been omitted from the foregoing description, as they can be

treated better and more fully by the constructing engineers in

succeeding papers. There are, however, some general considerations

involved in the designing of the work, which may, perhaps, be referred

to more conveniently in this introductory paper, and these will now

receive attention.

In all parts of the work problems were encountered requiring for their

solution large expenditures and much engineering skill; but many of

these difficulties had been frequently met in previous engineering

experience, and the methods of overcoming them were well understood.

Thus, in the Meadows Division, a long and heavy embankment, part of

which was on submerged meadow land, and many bridge foundations had to

be constructed; in the Bergen Hill tunnels, very tough trap rock was

encountered; in the tunnels under the city, the work was much

complicated and its cost increased greatly by the necessity of caring

for sewers, water and gas pipes, and the foundations of adjacent

buildings; and many troublesome problems were met in the construction of

the tunnels connecting the East River tunnels with the Sunnyside Yard.

The novel features of the project, however, were the great tunnels

extending the line under the North and East Rivers. Tunnels of the kind

contemplated, to be used for heavy and rapid railroad traffic, had never

been constructed through materials similar to those forming the beds of

the North and East Rivers. Questions arising in connection with the

design and method of construction of the tunnels will be considered

later. Here they are referred to only in their relation to the location

and grades of the line, in which connection the conditions controlling

their establishment were the most important elements.

_Location and Grades._--It was desirable to make the tunnels between

the bulkhead lines of the rivers as straight as possible, and it was

necessary to place them at sufficient depth below the dredging plane of

the War Department (which in the North and East Rivers is 40 and 26 ft.

below mean low water, respectively) to insure them against possible

injury from heavy anchors or sunken vessels. Furthermore, they had to

pass under the piers and bulkheads of Manhattan at a depth sufficient to

make it certain that they would not affect the stability of those

structures. Another consideration influencing the establishment of the

depth of the tunnels below the bottoms of the rivers became important as

soon as the method of construction by shields with compressed air was

adopted, namely, the necessity of providing sufficient cover to guard,

as far as possible, against blow-outs during construction.

The tunnels under the city, connecting the sub-river tunnels with the

Terminal Station, were located so as to give as favorable grades as

possible. The provision of the franchise requiring the tops of the

tunnels to be at least 19 ft. below the Street surface, which had been

suggested by the Company to permit of future subways, had no effect on

their location, as other conditions required them to be at a greater

depth.

The line extending westward from Bergen Hill had to be established so as

to give ample head-room at the numerous bridges over the railroads and

highways which it crosses.

Eastward from the East River tunnels, the grades were established so as

to rise as uniformly as possible to the level of the Sunnyside Yard.

The general features of the line, as finally adopted and constructed,

are as follows:

The maximum grade west of the Terminal Station occurs on the New York

side of the North River, and is 2% in the west-bound and 1.93% in the

east-bound tunnels. The ruling grades (for the ascending traffic) being

1.32% in the west-bound and 1.93% in the east-bound tunnels. In the

tunnels east of the Terminal Station the ruling grade is 1.5% for both

east-bound and west-bound traffic. There is, however, descending with

the traffic, a short section on a grade of 1.9 per cent. These grades

would be objectionable with steam locomotives under a heavy traffic, but

the development of the electric locomotive has rendered possible the

operation of grades which would have formerly been considered

prohibitive.

From the junction with the Pennsylvania Railroad, near Harrison, N. J.,

to Woodside, Long Island, a distance of 13.66 miles, there is an average

of 1.5 curves per mile; the line having a total curvature of 230

degrees. The maximum curvature is 2 degrees.

[Illustration: PLATE III.--P. T. & T. R. R. East River Division.

Sunnyside Yard]

_Method of Construction of Sub-River Tunnels._--The character of the

material through which the tunnels were to be constructed differed

greatly in the two rivers. The bed of the North River, at the level of

the tunnels, consists of silt composed principally of clay, sand, and

water, while that of the East River is formed of a great variety of

materials, such as quicksand, sand, boulders, gravel, clay, and

bed-rock. When the method of construction had to be decided there were

no thoroughly satisfactory precedents to follow in the case of either

river, although the Gas Tunnel under the East River, the partly

constructed Hudson Tunnels under the North River, the St. Clair Tunnel

under the St. Clair River, the Blackwall and several other tunnels under

the Thames River at London, supplied much useful information. The

smaller tunnels for a lighter traffic, since so successfully constructed

under the North and East Rivers, had not then been completed. Under

these circumstances, it was the desire of the Management that the Board

should receive and consider proposed methods of construction from all

available sources; and during the first year of its labors much of its

time was devoted to the examination and discussion of projects submitted

for its consideration by engineers and practical builders, some of these

projects having decided merit. Most of the methods proposed involved

temporary structures, or the use of floating plant, in the navigable

channels of the river. This was objectionable in view of the resulting

obstruction to the enormous river traffic. After full consideration of

the subject, it was decided to adopt the shield method with compressed

air for the construction of the tunnels under both rivers, this being

the only method recommended by the Chief Engineers, and having the great

advantage of conducting all operations below the bottom of the river,

thus avoiding obstruction of the channel.

Experience has shown, as was anticipated, that it is much more difficult

to construct tunnels in such material as occurs in the East River and on

the New Jersey side of the North River, than in more homogeneous

material such as is found in the greater part of the North River. During

the progress of construction under the East River, there were frequent

blow-outs through fissures opened in the river-bed, and the bottom of

the river over the tunnel had to be blanketed continuously with clay, to

check the flow of the escaping air.

In view of the serious difficulties which it was thought might be

encountered in the application of the shield method to the East River

work, other methods for the execution of this part of the project

received special consideration, one of the methods considered being the

freezing process. It was proposed to drive a small pilot tunnel and

freeze the ground for a sufficient distance around it by circulating

brine through a system of pipes established in the tunnel. The pilot

tunnel was then to be removed and the full-sized tunnel was to be

excavated in the frozen material and its lining placed in position. By

this means, it was intended to avoid the danger incident to the use of

compressed air in material of greatly varying character. This method

contained too many elements of uncertainty to justify its adoption; but

as the Management considered it desirable to have, if possible, an

alternative method, an extended experiment was made with the freezing

process. A pilot tunnel, 7 ft. 6 in. in diameter, was driven in the bed

of the East River for a distance of 160 ft., circulating pipes were

established in it, and brine at a very low temperature was passed

through the pipes until the ground was frozen for a distance of about

11.5 ft. around the tunnel. Observations to determine the rate of

cooling and other important points connected with the process were

carefully made. When it was found that the construction of the tunnels

was progressing satisfactorily by the shield method, and that so much

time was required to freeze the material that the freezing process could

not be used to advantage in this particular case, the experiment was

discontinued.

_Design of the Sub-River Tunnels._--The sub-river tunnels consist of a

circular cast-iron shell, of the segmental, bolted type, having an

outside diameter of 23 ft., lined with concrete having a normal

thickness of 2 ft. from the outside of the shell. Through each plate of

the shell there is a small hole, closed with a screw plug, through which

grout may be forced into the surrounding material. Each tunnel contains

a single track. A concrete bench, the upper surface of which is 1 ft.

below the axis of the tunnel, is placed on each side of the track, the

distance between benches being 11 ft. 8 in. These benches contain ducts

for carrying electric cables. The main reason for adopting single-track

tunnels instead of a larger tunnel containing two tracks was to avoid

the danger of accidents due to the obstruction of both tracks by

derailment or otherwise. The tunnels are made just large enough to allow

the passage of a train with perfect safety, as it was believed that with

such an arrangement thorough ventilation would be secured by the motion

of the trains. Experience seems to justify this assumption, but, in

order to assure thorough ventilation under unusual conditions, such as

the stoppage of trains in the tunnels, a complete ventilating plant will

be provided for each tunnel. The rapidity and safety of construction

were increased by making the tunnel as small as possible, one of the

difficulties in the shield method of construction being the difference

in hydrostatic pressure between the top and bottom of the shield, which

increases with the diameter of the tunnel.

The concrete lining was introduced to insure the permanency of the

structure, strengthen it from outward pressure and guard it against

injury from accidents which might occur in the tunnel. The side concrete

benches were suggested by Mr. Cassatt, President, to confine the trains

to the center of the tunnels in case of derailment, and to furnish

sidewalks on each side of the trains so as to obviate the necessity of

walking on the track.

Refuge niches are constructed in the side benches of the tunnels.

Manholes, splicing chambers, pump chambers, and other features for the

handling of the electric cables and drainage, are established at

intervals.

At points where unusual stresses were anticipated, as for instance where

the tunnels pass from rock to soft ground, the shell was composed of

steel instead of cast-iron plates. In the North River tunnels the

concrete lining in the invert and in the arch was reinforced by

longitudinal steel bars, but these were not introduced in the East River

tunnels.

Other details connected with the structures, including the drainage,

lighting, ventilation, signaling, and electrification systems, will be

given in succeeding papers.

_Stability of the Sub-River Tunnels._--One of the most important

questions connected with the design of these tunnels was their probable

stability under the long-continued action of a heavy and rapid railroad

traffic. The tunnels are lighter than the materials which they displace

even when the weight of the heavy live load is included. In the East

River the character of the material seemed to justify the conclusion

that the tunnels would not be displaced even under the action of the

live load. In the North River, however, the tunnels are enveloped by a

soft silt and it was at first apprehended that some system of supports

would be advisable to carry the heavy traffic and insure the tunnels

against displacement under its action. To meet this contingency, which

was then believed to be a very serious one, it was proposed to sink

cast-iron screw-piles through the bottom of each tunnel into and through

the underlying silt until satisfactory bearing material was reached. The

pile supports were worked out in sufficient detail to be embraced in the

contract for the construction of these tunnels, with provision, however,

for omitting them should it be determined subsequently that their use

was undesirable. The contract plans contained provisions for sliding

joints where the piles pass through the tunnel floor, so that the live

load might be carried directly to the pile heads by a system of girders,

and also for attaching the piles directly to the tunnel, the two plans

being alternatives.

Investigations, made during the progress of the work to determine the

physical character of the silt and its action on the tunnels, suggested

the possibility that the use of pile supports might be inadvisable. This

view was confirmed by actual experience in the operation of the tunnels

of the Hudson Companies between Hoboken, N. J., and Morton Street,

Manhattan, which were opened to traffic in February, 1908. The stability

of these tunnels under traffic gave further assurance that supports were

unnecessary under the North River tunnels of the Pennsylvania Railroad

Company, and they were therefore dispensed with.

_Cross-Passages Between the Tunnels._--The Bergen Hill tunnels, the land

portions of the North River tunnels and the tunnels under Manhattan are

connected by cross-passages at intervals varying from 50 to 300 ft. As

it was the desire of the Management to provide every arrangement

possible to insure the safety of its passengers and employees and also

to provide for the convenience of inspection, the question of

establishing cross-passages between the tunnels under the rivers was

given most careful consideration. The conclusion was finally reached

that such passages as it was possible to construct between these tunnels

might increase instead of diminish the danger in case of accident. No

more cross-passages have therefore been constructed in the sub-river

sections, except in the East River, where there is a cross-passage and

pump chamber combined between each pair of tunnels about 750 ft. from

the Manhattan bulkhead line.

Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910 The New York Tunnel Extension of the Pennsylvania Railroad. Paper No. 1150 · 第 12 / 15 题