CHAPTER XXII.

OLD ROME AND NEW ROME.--RUINS AND RESURRECTION.

ROME, October 8th.

At last we are in Rome! We reached here a week ago, on what was to me

a very sad anniversary, as on the first of October of last year I came

from the country, bringing one who was never to return. Now, as then,

the day was sadly beautiful--rich with the hues of autumn, when nature

is gently dying, a day suited to quiet thoughts and tender memories.

It was late in the afternoon when we found ourselves racing along the

banks of the Tiber--"the yellow Tiber" it was indeed, as its waters

were turbid enough--and just as the sun was setting we shot across the

Campagna, and when the lamps were lighted were rattling through the

streets of the Eternal City.

To a stranger coming here there is a double interest; for there are

two cities to be studied--old Rome and new Rome--the Rome of Julius

Caesar, and the Rome of Pius IX. and Victor Emmanuel. In point of

historical interest there is no comparison, as the glory of the

ancient far surpasses that of the modern city. And it is the former

which first engages our attention.

How strange it seemed to awake in the morning and feel that we were

really in the city that once ruled the world! Yes, we are on the very

spot. Around us are the Seven Hills. We go to the top of the Capitol

and count them all. We look down to the river bank where Romulus and

Remus were cast ashore, like Moses in the bulrushes, left to die, and

where, according to the old legend, they were suckled by a wolf; and

where Romulus, when grown to man's estate, began to build a city.

Antiquarians still trace the line of his ancient wall. On the Capitol

Hill is the Tarpeian Rock, from which traitors were hurled. And under

the hill, buried in the earth, one still sees the massive arch of the

Cloaca Maxima, the great sewer, built by the Tarquins, through which

all the waste of Rome has flowed into the Tiber for twenty-five

hundred years; and there are the pillars of the ancient bridge--so

they tell us--held by a hero who must have been a Hercules, of whom

and his deed Macaulay writes in his "Lays of Ancient Rome" how, long

after, in the traditions of the people,

"Still was the story told,

How well Horatius kept the bridge,

In the brave days of old."

Looking around the horizon every summit recalls historical memories.

There are the Sabine Hills, where lived the tribe from which the early

Romans (who were at first, like some of our border settlements, wholly

a community of men,) helped themselves to wives. Yonder, to the south,

are the Alban Hills; and there, in what seems the hollow of a

mountain, Hannibal encamped with his army, looking down upon Rome. In

the same direction lies the Appian Way, lined for miles with tombs of

the illustrious dead. Along that way often came the legions returning

from distant conquests, "bringing many captives home to Rome," with

camels and elephants bearing the spoils of Africa and the East.

These recollections increase in interest as we come down to the time

of the Caesars. This is the culminating point of Roman history, as then

the empire reached its highest point of power and glory. Julius Caesar

is the greatest character of ancient Rome, as soldier and ruler, the

leader of armies, and the man whose very presence awed the Roman

Senate. Such was the magic of his name that it was said peculiar

omens and portents accompanied his death. As Shakespeare has it:

"In the most high and palmy state of Rome,

A little ere the mighty Julius fell,

The graves stood tenantless, and the sheeted dead

Did squeak and gibber in the Roman streets."

It was therefore with an interest that no other name could inspire,

that we saw in the Capitol a statue, which is said to be the most

faithful existing representation of that imperial man; and in the

Strada Palace the statue of Pompey, which is believed to be the very

one at the base of which "great Caesar fell."[6]

With Caesar ended the ancient Republic, and began the Empire. It was

then that Rome attained her widest dominion, and the city its greatest

splendor. She was the mistress of the whole world, from Egypt to

Britain, ruling on all sides of the Mediterranean, along the shores of

Europe, Asia, and Africa. And then the whole earth contributed to the

magnificence of the Eternal City. It was the boast of Augustus, that

"he found Rome of brick, and left it of marble." Under him and his

successors were reared those palaces and temples, the very ruins of

which are still the wonder and admiration of the world.

The knowledge of these ruins has been greatly increased by recent

excavations. Till within a few years Rome was a buried city, almost as

much as Pompeii. The debris of centuries had filled up her streets and

squares, till the earth lay more than twenty feet deep in the Forum,

choking up temples and triumphal arches; and even the lower part of

the Coliseum had been submerged in the general wreck and ruin. In

every part of the city could be seen the upper portions of buildings,

the frieze on the capitals of columns, that were half under ground,

and that, like Milton's lion, seemed pawing to be free.

But the work of clearing away this rubbish was so vast that it had

been neglected from century to century. But during the occupation by

the French troops, that Government expended large sums in uncovering

these ruins, and the work has since been continued by Victor Emmanuel,

until now, as the result of twenty years continuous labor, a buried

city has been brought to light. The Forum has been cleared away, so

that we may walk on its pavement, amid its broken columns, and see the

very tribune from which Cicero addressed the Roman people. But beside

this Central Forum, there were half a dozen others--such as the Forum

of Julius Caesar, and of Augustus, and of Nerva, and of Trajan, where

still stands that marvellous Column in bronze (covered with figures in

bas-relief, to represent the conquest of the Dacians), which has been

copied in the Column of the Place Vendome in Paris. All of these

Forums were parts of one whole. What is now covered by streets and

houses, was an open space, extending from the Capitol as far as the

Coliseum in one direction, and the Column of Trajan in another,

surrounded by temples and basilicas, and columns and triumphal arches,

and overlooked by the palaces of the Caesars. This whole area was the

centre of Rome, where its heart beat, when it contained two millions

of people; where the people came together to discuss public affairs,

or to witness triumphal processions returning from the wars. Here the

Roman legions came with mighty tread along the Via Sacra, winding

their way up to the Capitoline Hill to lay their trophies at the feet

of the Senate.

Perhaps the best idea of the splendor and magnificence of ancient Rome

may be gained from exploring the ruins of the palaces of the Caesars.

They are of vast extent, covering all the slopes of the Palatine Hill.

Here great excavations have been made. The walk seems endless through

what has been laid open. The walls are built like a fortress, as if

to last forever, and decorated with every resource of art known to

that age, with sculptures and ceilings richly painted, like those

uncovered in the houses of Pompeii. These buildings have been stripped

of everything that was movable--the statues being transported to the

galleries of the Vatican. The same fate has overtaken all the great

structures of ancient Rome. They have been divested of their ornaments

and decoration, of gilding and bas-reliefs and statues, and in some

cases have been quite dismantled. The Coliseum, it is well known, was

used in the Middle Ages as a quarry for many proud noble families, and

out of it were built some of the greatest palaces in Rome. Nothing

saved the Pantheon but its conversion from a heathen temple into a

Christian church. Hundreds and thousands of columns of porphyry and

alabaster and costly marbles, which now adorn the churches of Rome,

were taken from the ruins of temples and palaces.

But though thus stripped of every ornament, ancient Rome is still

magnificent in her ruins. One may wander for days about the palaces of

the Caesars, walking through the libraries and theatres, under the

arches and over the very tessellated pavement where those proud

emperors walked nearly two thousand years ago. He should ascend to the

highest point of the ruins to take in their full extent, and there he

will see, looking out upon the Campagna, a long line of arches

reaching many miles, over which water was brought from the distant

hills for the Golden House of Nero.

Perhaps the most massive ruin which has been lately uncovered, is that

of the Baths of Caracalla, which give an idea of the luxury and

splendor of ancient Rome, as quite unequalled in modern times.

But, of course, the one structure which interests most of all, is the

Coliseum: and here recent excavations have made fresh discoveries. The

whole area has been dug down many feet, and shows a vast system of

passages _underground_; not only those through which wild beasts were

let into the arena, but conduits for water, by which the whole

amphitheatre could be flooded and turned into a lake large enough for

Roman galleys to sail in; and here naval battles were fought with all

the fury of a conflict between actual enemies, to the delight of Roman

emperor and people, who shouted applause, when blood flowed freely on

the decks, and dyed the waters below.

There is one reflection that often recurs to me, as I wander among

these ruins--what it is of all the works of man that really _lives_.

Not architecture (the palaces of the Caesars are but heaps of ruins);

but the Roman _laws_ remain, incorporated with the legislation of

every civilized country on the globe; while Virgil and Cicero, the

poet and the orator, are the delight of all who know the Latin tongue.

Thus men pass away, their very monuments may perish, but their

thoughts, their wisdom, their learning and their genius remain, a

perpetual inheritance to mankind.

After Imperial Rome comes Christian Rome. Many of the stories of the

first Christian centuries are fables and legends. Historical truth is

so overlaid with a mass of traditions, that one is ready to reject the

whole. When they show you here the stone on which they gravely tell

you that Abraham bound Isaac for the sacrifice; and another on which

Mary sat when she brought Christ into the temple; and the staircase

from Pilate's house, the Scala Santa, up which every day and hour

pilgrims may be seen going on their knees; and a stone showing the

very prints of the Saviour's feet when he appeared to Peter--one is

apt to turn away in disgust. But the general fact of the early

planting of Christianity here, we know from the new Testament itself.

Ecclesiastical historians are not agreed whether Peter was ever in

Rome (although he is claimed as the first Pope), but that Paul was

here we know from his epistles, and from the Book of Acts, in which

we have the particulars of his "appealing to Caesar," and his voyages

to Italy, and his shipwreck on the island of Malta, his landing at

Puteoli, and going "towards Rome," where he lived two years in "his

own hired house," "preaching and teaching, no man forbidding him."

Several of his epistles were written from Rome. It is therefore quite

probable that he was confined, according to the tradition, in the

Mamertine Prison under the Capitol, and one cannot descend without

deep emotion into that dark, rocky dungeon, far underground, where the

Great Apostle was once a prisoner, and from which he was led forth to

die. He is said to have been beheaded without the walls. On the road

they point out a spot (still marked by a rude figure by the roadside

of two men embracing), where it is said Paul and Peter met and fell on

each other's neck on the morning of the last day--Paul going to be

beheaded, and Peter into the city to be crucified, which at his own

request was with his head downwards, for he would not be crucified in

the same posture as his Lord, whom he had once denied. On the spot

where Paul is said to have suffered now rises one of the grandest

churches in the world, second in Rome only to St. Peter's.

So the persecutions of the early Christians by successive emperors are

matters of authentic history. Knowing this, we visit as a sacred place

the scene of their martyrdom, and shudder at seeing on the walls the

different modes of torture by which it was sought to break their

allegiance to the faith; we think of them in the Coliseum, where they

were thrown to the lions; and still more in the Catacombs, to which

they fled for refuge, where they worshipped, and (as Pliny wrote)

"sang hymns to Christ as to a God," and where still rest their bones,

with many a rude inscription, testifying of their faith and hope.

It is a sad reflection that the Christian Church, once established in

Rome, should afterwards itself turn persecutor. But unfortunately it

too became intoxicated with power, and could brook no resistance to

its will. The Inquisition was for centuries a recognized institution

of the Papacy--an appointed means for guarding the purity of the

faith. The building devoted to the service of that tribunal stands to

this day, close by the Church of St. Peter, and I believe there is

still a Papal officer who bears the dread title of "Grand Inquisitor."

But fortunately his office no longer inspires terror, for it is at

last reduced to the punishment of ecclesiastical offences by

ecclesiastical discipline, instead of the arm of flesh, on which it

once leaned. But the old building is at once "a prison and a palace";

the cells are still there, though happily unoccupied. But in the

castle of St. Angelo there is a Chamber of Torture, which has not

always been merely for exhibition, where a Pope Clement (what a

mockery in the name!) had Beatrice Cenci put to the torture, and

forced to confess a crime of which she was not guilty. But we are not

so unjust as to impute all these cruelties of a former and a darker

time to the Catholic Church of the present day. Those were ages of

intolerance and of persecution. But none can deny that the Church has

always been fiercely intolerant. There is no doubt that the massacre

of St. Bartholomew was the occasion of great rejoicings at Rome. The

bloody persecution of the Waldenses found no rebuke from him who

claimed to be the vicegerent of Christ; a persecution which called

forth from Milton that sublime prayer:

Avenge, O Lord, thy slaughtered saints,

Whose bones lie scattered upon the Alpine mountains cold!

Amid such bitter recollections it is good to remember also the message

of Cromwell to the Pope, that "if favor were not shown to the people

of God, the thunder of English cannon should be heard in the castle of

St. Angelo."

It seems as if it were a just retribution for those crimes of a former

age that the Pope in these last days has had to walk so long in the

Valley of Humiliation. Not for centuries has a Pontiff had to endure

such repeated blows. The reign of Pius IX. has been longer than that

of any of his predecessors; some may think it glorious, but it has

witnessed at once the most daring assumption and its signal

punishment--a claim of infallibility, which belongs to God

alone--followed by a bitter humiliation as if God would cast this idol

down to the ground. It is certainly a remarkable coincidence, that

just as the dogma of Infallibility was proclaimed, Louis Napoleon

rushed into war, as the result of which France, the chief supporter of

the Papacy (which for twenty years had kept an army in Rome to hold

the Pope on his throne), was stricken down, and the first place in

Europe taken by a Protestant power. Germany had already humbled the

other great Catholic power of Europe, to the confusion and dismay of

the Pope and his councillors. A gentleman who has resided for many

years in Rome, tells me that on the very day that the battle of Sadowa

was fought, Cardinal Antonelli told a friend of his to "come around to

his house that night to get the news; that he expected to hear of one

of the greatest victories ever won for the Church," so confidently did

he and his master the Pope anticipate the triumph of Austria. The

gentleman went. Hour after hour passed, and no tidings came. It was

midnight, and still no news of victory. Before morning the issue was

known, that the Austrian army was destroyed. Cardinal Antonelli did

not come forth to proclaim the tidings. He shut himself up, said my

informant, and was not seen for three weeks!

And so it has come to pass--whether by accident or design, whether by

the violence of man or by the will of God--that the Pope has been

gradually stripped of that power and prestige which once so acted upon

the imaginations of men, that, like Caesar, "his bend did awe the

world," and has come to be merely the bishop, or archbishop, of that

portion of Christendom which submits to the Catholic Church.

I find the Rome of to-day divided into two camps. The Vatican is set

over against the Quirinal. The Pope rules in one, and Victor Emmanuel

in the other; and neither of these two sovereigns has anything to do

with the other.

It would take long to discuss the present political state of Rome or

of Italy. Apart from the right or wrong of this question, it is

evident that the sympathies of the Italian people are on the side of

Victor Emmanuel. The Roman people have had a long experience of a

government of priests, and they do not like it. It seems as if the

world was entering on a new era, and the Papacy, infallible and

immutable as it is, must change too--it must "move on" or be

overwhelmed.

FOOTNOTE:

[6]

"E'en at the base of Pompey's statue,

Which all the while ran blood, great Caesar fell."

From the Lakes of Killarney to the Golden Horn · 第 22 / 31 章