42, 43. Cf. Parl. of Foules, ll. 439, 440.
44. Ed. 1561 also reads _In_. Perhaps the original reading was _Inwith_.
Moreover, the copies omit _eek_ in l. 45, which I supply.
47-49. This remarkable statement re-appears twice elsewhere; see Parl.
Foules, 90, 91, and note; and Compl. of Pite, ll. 99-104.