CHAPTER VI

OTIUM CUM DIGNITATE. THE NEW EARL. A ROYAL WATER JOURNEY TO HAMPTON

COURT. “MERRIE ENGLAND.” CAVALIERS AND ROUNDHEADS. “HOUSEHOLD WORDS.”

THE NEW LETTER-POST. HACKNEY COACHES. LINEN. FAITHFUL FRIENDS. A

LORDLY HOME

A few years before his death, the Earl of Derby retired to a country

house which he had bought, on the banks of the Dee, near Chester. Weary

of the cares of life, and of the ordering of his large estate, he made

all his possessions over to his son, Lord Strange, reserving to himself

a thousand pounds a year for his own maintenance. In 1640 Lord Strange

was appointed to share with his father in the office of Lord Chamberlain

of Chester. Two years later the old Earl died; and his son succeeding

him, “Madame Strange,” as her French and Dutch relatives called her,

became Countess of Derby.

In the course of time, since the murder of the Duke of Buckingham, the

affairs of the country had gone from bad to worse, and year by year the

breach between Royalists and Parliamentarians widened. Outwardly the

kingdom not only seemed to prosper, but was in a manner flourishing. Her

possessions abroad were increased by new colonies, and her harbours were

filled with merchant ships sailing from all parts of the world. Art and

learning prospered exceedingly. In the midst of the turmoil of ribaldry

and fanaticism of the extreme parties, and the smoke and luridness of

battle-fields, learning and civilisation were steadily advancing. Like

Archimedes, men of science, painters and scholars, worked on, some of

them amid the din of battle; and, with a happier fate than his, lived

on, for the most part into calmer days. Others, sheltered in the

retirement of country homes, and recking little of papist or puritan

shibboleths, wrote and thought, and to this day their work remembers

them. Trade flourished, and diversions and junketings were in nowise

neglected. Amid all the royal troubles, courtly state was not only well,

but splendidly maintained.

A refinement and dignity prevailed in Charles’s Court which fascinated

his loyal subjects; and the beauty of the Queen, and the gracious if

always melancholy aspect of the King, won hearts, and intellects to

boot, which had originally inclined to the side of his disaffected

subjects. The French nature of Henrietta Maria delighted in masques and

gaieties and music; and though etiquette and sobriety ruled the King’s

household, dulness found no part there. Often the people had the chance

of looking on their sovereigns as their gilded barge rowed down the

river from London to Hampton Court, to the music of lutes and viols, and

sweet choiring voices mingling with the song of the birds, not yet

driven hence by the smoke and screech of an overcrowded city. From

Westminster Stairs on one side, and Lambeth Palace on the other, the

banks were still open, clothed with grass and foliage, and dotted here

and there with gabled and timbered dwellings, whose gardens glowed with

fragrant flowers and ripening fruit. Tothill Fields were rookeries then,

as now; but the birds were of another feather. Battersea Fields on the

south side still grew simples and herbs for the medicaments of London

apothecaries—the “Physic Garden” of Sir Hans Sloane opposite being but a

concentrated, double-distilled essence of these older sources. Beyond

and behind lay the Five Fields, soon to become notorious for infesting

footpads and highwaymen; for the numbers of the gentlemen of the road

increased with alarming speed, as the means of travelling improved and

increasing opportunities made more and more thieves. Leaving the

immediate environing of London, the village of Chelsea reflected its

stately mansions and terraces in the clear Thames reaches. And so,

onward by the winding stream, till under the shadows of fair Richmond

woods the royal beeches and elms of Hampton Court bent their boughs in

the summer breeze to their majesties and the courtly train in greeting

and in welcome to the palace associated with memories and traditions,

not all of them too fair and consolatory, of “my good Lord Cardinal” and

his tyrannical lord.

In reasonable pastime and amusements the average subject of King

Charles’s day followed the suit of the Court. A sour forbiddance and

abhorrence of amusements had not yet come to be the order of the day.

If fasts were duly kept, festivals were in nowise forgotten. The “all

work and no play making Jack a dull boy” observance was not yet rendered

paramount by the prick-eared, aggressive spirit of Puritanism; for the

master enjoyed a sober junketing and relaxation every whit as much as

the ’prentice loved his turn at the quintain, or a merry round with the

maid of his choice, or a stage play in an inn yard. As to the shameful

“sport” of bear-baiting, to give the Puritan his due, he did excellent

work indeed when he succeeded in stamping it out; though his

consideration for the bear appears to have been somewhat circumscribed,

if, as more than one account tells, generally the first proceeding was

to kill the bear. Anything less than sweeping reform and a _tabula rasa_

savoured ill to Puritan nostrils; and while Praise-God-Barebones took

away the bears, he forgot the abhorrence of nature,—human nature

notably—for a vacuum, and that in a few years the lack of all rational

diversions, the pulling down of maypoles, the silencing of all music but

psalm-singing, would drive man and woman to try and drown care in the

pottle-pot. It was small wonder that the English people so soon came to

regard the Commonwealth as a not utterly unmitigated blessing. The

promised millennium grew to be unsatisfactory to all but the very elect;

and outside that pale, the desire for the King to have his own again was

to spread fast and wide. The intrinsic worth of that King they were less

concerned about; and if, after a few years’ experience of the Merry

Monarch’s rule, they found it full of flaws, they endured as they might:

not perhaps altogether forgetful that if the young Prince had not been

hounded from his country to herd with all sorts and conditions of

swashbucklers and adventurers, finding no rest for the sole of his foot,

no true and sober counsel in the very years that temptations are

strongest upon all men—especially men of his temperament—their restored

King’s virtues might have outshone his shortcomings.

To the moderate-minded the typical Royalist and Puritanic extremes of

the civil war days could only have been vexatious to a degree. It is

curious to observe how many scholars and writers of the middle of the

seventeenth century make no allusion to what was passing around them.

Take only the one instance of Isaac Walton, who at least lived in the

very thick of the fray, in that pargeted and latticed-casemented old

house of his at the corner of Chancery Lane. Truly, in his lives of the

worthies and divines of the time, he alludes frequently to the religious

and political divisions of the country, as indeed his themes entailed;

but in his immortal volume, whose secondary title is the significant one

of “The Contemplative Man’s Recreation,” scarce a shadow of the gloom of

the times darkens its equable, sunshiny humour. Soberly, but with

intense enjoyment, Master Isaac Walton takes his way from Fleet Street,

and, stretching his legs over Tottenham Hill—no short stretch neither—he

falls in with his hunter and falconer, gossips along the road to Ware,

whither he is bound that “fine, fresh May morning”; and so the three

trudge on together in genial discourse to the text that “good company

makes the way to seem shorter.” How thoroughly the wayfarers enjoy the

freshness of the country and the green beauty of the “new livery’d

year”! How they delight in the milkmaid’s song, and luxuriate in the

“honest alehouse with its cleanly room, lavender in the windows, and

twenty ballads stuck about the wall”!

Last, not least, in the general intellectual and mental life of England

in Charles’s reign, comes the band of poets, a goodly train, Cavalier or

Puritan, or not greatly concerned for either, but writing in

“numbers,

Since the numbers came.”

Milton, Cowley, Herrick, Lovelace, Herbert, Wither, Dekker, Webster, and

many more, breathing forth sweet words and quaint aphorisms which mingle

in our every-day talk, and are too familiar for us to pause to think

whence or how they rise to the lips. Those dead poets of Charles’s reign

resting beneath the hoary old stones of Westminster, or the sod of

peaceful village graveyards, or whose dust the venom of bigots and

fanatics has scattered, left their country a heritage which cannot

perish while the English tongue endures.

Only a comparison between the closing years of James I.’s reign, and the

opening ones of Charles II., a period of thirty-five years at the

utmost, can afford a true estimate of the improvements in the public and

social conditions of the country. Among these was the establishment of

regular inland postal communication in 1635. The proclamation “for

settling of the letter-office of England and Scotland” sets forth that

“there hath been no certain or constant intercourse between the kingdoms

of England and Scotland,” and commands “Thomas Witherings, Esq., his

Majesty’s postmaster of England for foreign parts, to settle a

running-post or two to run night and day between England and Scotland

and the city of London, to go thither and come back in six days.”

Ireland was included in these arrangements. The horses for conveyance of

the letters were furnished by the postmasters at the rate of

twopence-halfpenny a mile. In 1649 letters were forwarded once a week to

all parts of the kingdom.

Another public benefit was the setting-up of hackney coaches. These

predecessors of our four-wheelers and hansoms were first started from

Hackney—then a fair-sized village—to London, for those who had business

or pleasure in the metropolis. Very soon the coaches began to ply in

London streets, making their stands at the inns. There were twenty of

them in 1625 under the superintendence of one Captain Bailey, an old

sea-officer.

For its linen industries Ireland owes a deep debt of gratitude to the

memory of the Earl of Strafford. While Governor of Ireland, he observed

that the soil of the Green Isle was suited to the production of flax. He

sent to Holland for the seed, and to France and the Netherlands for

skilful workmen. To promote still further the undertaking, he advanced a

considerable sum from his own private fortune, thus establishing

Ireland’s most important manufacture.

England was later in the field: for linen was not produced in this

country to any degree of perfection until twoscore years later, when the

French Protestant refugees sought shelter here at the revocation of the

Edict of Nantes. Under their skilful instructions, the English

manufacturers wrought immense improvement in the material. It is small

wonder that housewives and betrothed maidens of the olden days set such

store by the contents of their linen-presses and dowry-chests. The Queen

of Henry VI. could boast only two linen shifts. The scarcity of this

commodity when Lady Strange first arrived in England, doubtless accounts

for her writing for so many articles of clothing for her young family to

be sent from France.

From such a quickening of industrial activity through the length and

breadth of the nation, quite independently of the improvements in

printing, or rather of the dissemination of books, in engraving and in

etching, it is obvious that time no longer necessarily hung heavy on the

hands of country gentlemen. The wits of the domestic “ffoole” were no

longer so indispensable now that the lord of the manor had material upon

which to exercise his own. If, _faute de mieux_, he had hitherto

bestowed all his time on his hawk and his hound, the pleasures of the

table, and a vast amount of sleep, he was no longer forced to confine

himself to these pastimes. “To divert at any time a troublesome fancy,”

says worthy Master Fuller, “run to thy books. They presently fix thee to

them, and drive the other out of thy thoughts. They always receive thee

with the same kindness.”

With many other noblemen and gentlemen of that time, the Earl of Derby

fell in with this sound advice. “His life,” says Walpole,[9] “was one of

virtue, accomplishments, and humanity.” Neither firebrand, busybody, nor

time-server—too high of rank to desire to be higher—James, seventh Earl

of Derby, nearing on to middle life at the time of his father’s death,

lived chiefly on his own estates, and these preferably at Lathom House.

He appeared rarely at Court, finding full occupation in the affairs of

his own estate, of which the kingdom of Man formed an important and

seemingly difficult part to manage. “But,” says one of his biographers,

“peaceful years and charitable acts fill few pages in history; and Lord

Derby owes his place there, not to virtues arising from his own choice

and goodwill, but to those which were struck from him by the blows of

fortune, as fire is struck from flint stones.”

Footnote 9:

_Noble Authors._

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The life-story of Charlotte de la Trémoille, Countess of Derby · 第 6 / 15 章