And is not silence golden in the home? If there is even one member who is

kindly and charitable, and who makes allowances for small failings,

looking for the good in everybody and taking a lenient view of other

people's shortcomings, the effect is surprising. The little leaven

leaveneth the whole lump in time, and the "soft answer" becomes the

fashion of the household. "How very rude Edith was this morning at the

breakfast table!" says some one, feeling aggrieved by the harshness of

some rebuke administered by one who had neither right nor reason to find

fault. If the interlocutor replies, "Yes, shameful; I wouldn't stand it; I

should tell her of it, if I were you," then the flame is fanned, and may

result in a general conflagration, in which friendliness, goodwill, and

serenity are consumed to ashes. But if a discreet silence on all

aggravating circumstances is observed the affair may blow over very

quietly. Suppose that some such reply as the following is made: "Oh, well,

you know what Edith is. She is easily put out, and she had just had a very

annoying letter. You may be sure she is very sorry by this time for the

way she spoke to you." At once the calming effect of gentleness and

reticence is felt, and when the belligerents next meet it is only to find

that peace is concluded, war at an end.

Blessed are the peacemakers!

[Sidenote: Family amenities.]

A perfectly frightful amount of talking goes on in some families. Each

member is picked to pieces, as it were, motives found for her conduct that

would astonish her indeed if she heard them attributed to her, and her

kindest and most disinterested actions are distorted to suit the narrow

minds and selfish ideas of those who are discussing her. Incapable of

magnanimity themselves, such people translate kindheartedness and

single-mindedness by the dim little light that is within their own petty

minds, and the result is just what might be expected from the process.

Light becomes darkness, purity foulness, goodness evil. There are

women--not at all the worst in the world, but a silly, selfish,

empty-headed class of unconscious mischief-makers--who, when they talk

together, produce a kind of brew like that of the Witches in "Macbeth."

"Fillet of a fenny snake

In the cauldron boil and bake;

Eye of newt, and toe of frog,

Wool of bat, and tongue of dog,

Lizard's leg, and owlet's wing,

Adder's fork, and blindworm's sting,

For a charm of powerful trouble

Let the hell-broth boil and bubble."

[Sidenote: The confidential whisperers.]

Many a little fault, deeply repented, would pass and be forgotten, except

in the sorrowing penitence of the faulty one, if only a stream of talk had

not flowed around and about it, bitter as the waters of Marah. Often and

often when friends look coldly on each other, each wondering why the other

should seem estranged, the cause may be found to lie in a "long talk," in

which some one has indulged, with the result that actions are

misrepresented, hasty words exaggerated, and charged with meaning they

were never meant to carry, and remarks repeated in a manner that gives

them an unkind bearing they were never intended to convey. "I wonder why

Mary did not stop for a word or two, as she always does when we meet? She

looked rather stiff, I thought." "Oh, I suppose ... has been talking to

her and making mischief. You know what she is!"

Yes; that's how it's done. It is only what might be expected from poor

Judy O'Grady; but the Colonel's lady is not always above the level of the

"whisperer" who "separates chief friends."

I say again--

"Blessed are the peacemakers."

_A SOCIAL CONSCIENCE._

[Sidenote: Conscience classes.]

[Sidenote: The hat-pin terror.]

Consciences can be cultivated, like voices, and it would do the world no

harm if there were professors who would give courses of lessons on their

cultivation. The young woman whose hat-pin pierced the eye of a young man

who was unfortunate enough to sit next to her on the top of a Liverpool

omnibus stood in need of a few lessons. If hat-pins are a necessity--and I

admit that they are--it should also be necessary to exercise care in their

disposition. It is quite possible to render them effectual and yet

harmless by pushing them slightly back after having thrust them through

the crown of the hat. And any one in whom a social conscience is properly

developed will see to it that her hat-pins are not unnecessarily long. For

instance, a six-inch hat crown cannot possibly require a ten-inch pin. It

is terrible to see the armoury of sharp-pointed pins that jut out at the

sides of some women's heads.

[Sidenote: Umbrellas as weapons of offence.]

Another point in which the members of our sex show a total absence of

social conscience is the manner in which they carry a sunshade or

umbrella. The latter is often, when open, held down over the head of a

rather short woman in a way that is certainly protective of herself and

her headgear, but which is extremely inconvenient, and sometimes even

dangerous, to those who share the footpath or pavement with her. The

points of her umbrella catch in the hair or dress, and sometimes threaten

the eyes of passers-by.

When closed, the sunshade or umbrella often becomes equally a weapon of

offence, being carried in the arms with the knob or crook of the handle

protruding. A smart blow is often administered to the unwary passer in

this way, and among the dangers of the streets, numerous enough without,

may now be catalogued the shouldered sunshade of our sex.

[Sidenote: Male injustices.]

It is not often that we imitate the equally dangerous method in which some

men carry sticks and umbrellas, viz., under the arm, with the ferule

protruding at the back, a danger to the eyes of those behind; nor do we,

as a rule, prod the pavement with our parasols, as so many men do with

their sticks or umbrellas, letting them drag after them, so that those who

come behind are apt to fall over them. But, on the other hand, our

husbands are free from the offence of opening sunshades in a crowd, with

an upward scrape of all the points.

[Sidenote: The matinee hat.]

And then there is the matinee hat! Oh, sisters, where is the social

conscience of those among us who of malice aforethought attend the theatre

with all-impeding and obstructive headgear? A knowledge of the sentiments

we excite in the bosoms of those behind us might help some of us to be a

little unselfish in the matter. Positive, if temporary, detestation is the

principal emotion entertained towards the wearer of a matinee hat, and the

hatred is not unmingled with contempt; for who can help despising a girl

or woman who is openly and avowedly careless of the inconvenience and

disappointment she is causing? Man's ideal of woman depicts her as so

exactly the opposite of this that he cannot fail to resent the

disillusion.

[Sidenote: Calls on wrong days.]

Of all the forms of social lack of conscience, one of the most irritating

is the way some women have of making calls on the off days, other than

those on which the callee announces herself to be "at home." Especially is

this annoying if the person called on happens to be a busy woman. She has

probably arranged her "day" in self-defence from intrusion on all others,

but to do so is no safeguard against the unconscionable acquaintance who

prefers to suit her own convenience rather than that of her friends. And

if sometimes she comes in in very wet garments and flounces down on one's

velvet-covered couch, why, she may be described as adding injury to

insult.

It is really almost insulting to call on an off day, for it means either

that one's caller hopes to find one absent or else that she intends to

monopolise one's attention after having flagrantly disregarded one's

wishes.

[Sidenote: Travelling sans conscience.]

There are fine opportunities for the display of "no conscience" in

travelling. It is so pleasant, for instance, to share a railway carriage

with a person who insists on keeping the windows closed. And, without

going into detail, I may refer to travellers by sea who make an inferno of

the ladies' cabin, when the weather is rough, simply for lack of

consideration for others.

[Sidenote: Some minor failings.]

There are minor ways in which this form of thoughtlessness may be

displayed. In doing up postal packets one may consider the postman, and

refrain from tying up half a dozen newspapers in one bundle just for the

sake of saving oneself the trouble of writing the address three or four

times. In an omnibus it is unnecessary to point the stick of one's

umbrella outwards, so that every one who enters is in danger of falling

over it. Yet many women do this. There are those, too, who lounge

sideways in a crowded omnibus, while their neighbours are screwed up

uncomfortably closely for lack of the inches that should be theirs, but

which the lounger has appropriated.

[Sidenote: Those poor servants!]

[Sidenote: And tradespeople!]

[Sidenote: The unpunctual woman.]

And who shall say that conscience is perfectly developed in the woman who

keeps her coachman and footman waiting for hours in the cold of a winter's

night while she is warmly housed and indifferent? Or in her whose maid has

to sit up for her till the small hours, and yet has to fetch her her cup

of tea bright and early the next morning? And what shall be said of her

who goes to her dressmaker and orders a gown at the very last moment?

Where is her social conscience? Does she not know that weary girls who

have worked hard all day must be kept late to complete her dress? Does she

know? Does she care? And what of her who omits to pay her milliner, her

dressmaker, her florist, and all others who supply her with the luxuries

of life? Her conscience must be of the most diminutive order. In things

great and small the lack of social conscience shows itself. As compared

with a few particulars I have mentioned, the want of punctuality is a

trifle, but it is sometimes productive of the most aggravating effects.

And there are women who almost appear to take pains to be unpunctual, so

invariably are they just too late for everything. What they cost their

housemates in time and temper can never be computed. They are themselves

serene. "I'm the most unpunctual of human beings," one such will be heard

to say. She keeps people fuming on a platform watching train after train

start for Henley, Ascot, Sandown, or Hurlingham, and comes up smiling and

saying, "I'm afraid all you dear people are very cross with me." At

mealtimes she is equally exasperating, but she never seems to be aware

that her consistent unpunctuality makes her a terrible trial to all her

acquaintances. She is destitute of social conscience. And I might cite a

hundred other instances of this destitution were it necessary!

_OUR DEBTS._

[Sidenote: "If there were no credit system!"]

It would be a lovely world if there were no credit system. Think of the

millstones some of us hang round our necks in the shape of debts, all on

account of this temptation. In one of Mr. Howell's books, he makes the

father of a family say to his children: "Don't spend money if you haven't

got any." The advice seems superfluous, and would be so if we had to pay

ready money for everything we buy. But it is, in existing circumstances,

only too easy to spend money that we have not got; from the dealings in

the Stock Exchange down to the fishmonger's round the corner.

[Sidenote: Two points of view.]

[Sidenote: "Facilis est descensus."]

There are two ways of looking at the matter--one from the purchaser's

point of view, the other from the seller's. I intend to take the

purchaser's first, having long thought the credit system highly

demoralising to many who might have thriven and prospered bravely had not

its insinuating temptations been thrown in their way. It is so fatally

easy to order a quantity of nice things, to be paid for in a nebulous

future, which always seem a long way off. And then, when the grip of it

all begins to be felt, we are afraid _not_ to go on ordering, lest our

creditor should be offended and dun us for his "little account." And so we

get deeper and deeper in debt, and soon begin to lose our footing in the

financial whirlpool. Oh, the misery of it! The long, sleepless nights of

worry and despair, the irritable frame of mind thereby engendered, the

loss of self-respect, the inability to make the most of our income while

in debt, and the consequent hopelessness of ever extricating

ourselves--all, all might be avoided if we were forced to pay on the spot

for every purchase.

[Sidenote: The young wife's initial error.]

[Sidenote: An odious characteristic.]

That the credit system has its advantages is more than possible; but I am

not looking for them just at this moment. I want to sketch a gloomy

picture, with the hope of inducing all who look upon it to abandon the

habit of running long accounts, with its often ruinous results. The

inexperienced young wife, unaccustomed to deal with large sums of money,

often cripples her hard-working husband by falling most unconsciously into

the snares of the system as it exists. In her desire to have everything

comfortable, inviting, and agreeable for him in the home in his hours of

leisure, she launches out in "ordering" all that she thinks would aid her

in this unquestionably excellent object. Money always promises to do a

great deal more than it ever actually accomplishes. It is one of its most

odious characteristics, and the novice never dreams but that the incoming

sums will cover all her outlay. Then comes the tug-of-war, and if she has

no moral courage she struggles on without laying the whole matter before

her husband, and is soon in a network of difficulties. He has to know,

soon or late, and the resultant rift within the lute is by no means

little. It is a very bad start! And when the wife would like to dress her

little ones daintily and prettily, she finds herself unable to spend upon

them anything beyond what may pay for absolute necessaries. If her

punishment had not begun before, it very certainly commences then.

[Sidenote: The poor husband.]

And is not the poor husband to be pitied? He had, no doubt, the idea that

all women, after their schooldays, are apt housewives, and entrusted to

his young wife the entire management of the household. It is hard on him

when he finds that all is chaos in the exchequer, and that he has to deny

himself for years in many ways in order to pay debts that should never

have been contracted.

[Sidenote: If "trust" were not.]

Think of the delightful difference there might have been in the little

family were there no such thing as "trust" in trade, the children

beautifully dressed and the pride of a happy mother; the father in good

humour and gaiety of heart, enjoying his home as a man ought, who works to

maintain it; and the sunshine of prosperity pervading every room of it!

Thousands and thousands of homes have been ruined by the credit system.

The only means of averting such disaster is the exercise of strength of

mind in resisting the temptation. This involves a splendid, but extremely

costly, education in moral fortitude, to those who possess but little of

such strength and have to acquire it by long and sad experience.

[Sidenote: The meanness of it.]

It might help some to resist running long accounts if they were to realise

that doing so is really borrowing money from their tradespeople. Yes,

madam! That L5 you owe your laundress is just so much borrowed of the poor

woman, and without interest, too. And can you bear to think of the anxiety

of mind it costs her, poor, hard-working creature; for how can she tell

that you will ever pay her? There is your dressmaker, too. How much have

you compulsorily borrowed of her? You owe her L100, perhaps. And for how

long has it been owing? You pay L10 or so off it, and order another gown;

and so it has been going on for years and years. You don't see why you

should have to pay your dressmaker money down when your husband never

thinks of paying his tailor under three or four years.

[Sidenote: "Two wrongs."]

Well, two wrongs never yet made a right, and the fact that men of fashion

never pay their tailors until they have been dunned over and over again

for the money is only another item in the indictment against the credit

system.

It is undignified to owe money to any one, and more particularly to one's

social inferiors, but this view of the subject is too seldom taken. Can

any one dispute it, however? We badly want it to be made plain to the eyes

of the whole community.

[Sidenote: Increased prices.]

One disagreeable result of the credit system is the raising of the market

price of commodities in order to cover the losses resultant to the trader.

Not only do bad debts occur, which have to be written off the books, but

being "out of one's money" for years means loss of interest. Those who pay

ready money are sometimes, and should always be, allowed discount off all

payments, but even when this is done it does not suffice to meet the

claims of absolute justice in the matter, the scales of prices having been

adjusted to cover losses owing to the credit system.

[Sidenote: The sufferers.]

Tradesmen have to charge high rates or they could not keep on their

business, and the hard part of it is that the very persons who enable them

to keep going by paying their accounts weekly are those who suffer most

from the system, paying a fifth or so more than they need were all

transactions "money down."

[Sidenote: The other side.]

And now for the other side of the question. It has often been said that

tradesmen like customers to run long accounts. Let any one who believes

this buy a few of the trade papers, and see what they have to say on the

subject. Let them visit a few of the West End Court milliners and ask them

what their opinion of the matter is. Let them interview the managers of

large drapery houses. They will soon find that the tradesman has a

distinct grievance in the credit system. Here is what one dressmaker says,

and she is only one of a very numerous class, every member of which is in

exactly similar circumstances.

[Sidenote: A dressmaker's opinion.]

[Sidenote: A case in point.]

She is a clever and enterprising woman who had opened an establishment for

the sale of all kinds of articles for ladies' wear, and complains bitterly

that, though she is doing a good trade, all her money has become "buried

in her books." She is making money with her extending business, "but," she

says, "I really have less command of cash than at any time in my life. The

fact is my savings are all lent to rich people." Asked for an example,

she said: "The last bill I receipted this morning will do. Ten months ago

a lady came into the shop, talked pleasantly on Church matters, in which I

am interested, bought nearly L30 worth of goods, after very sharp

bargaining, that reduced my profits to the narrowest margin, and went

away. To have suggested payment during these ten months would have been

regarded as an insult, and I should have lost her custom for ever. I have

often been in need of the money. She is the wife of a very high

ecclesiastical dignitary, is regarded as philanthropic, talks about

self-help among women, and very likely visited my shop in that spirit; yet

though she is undoubtedly rich she borrowed L30 of my capital for ten

months without paying any interest."

[Sidenote: A second opinion.]

"If I could only get a little money in from my customers," said a

hard-worked West End milliner to me one day during a very hot and

exhausting May, "I could run off to the seaside or to Scotland for a week,

and take my poor old mother, who needs a change even more than I do. But I

can't get any of my ladies to pay." "Write and tell them how it is," I

suggested. "Oh, no! That would never do," was the reply. "I should offend

them terribly, and they would not only never come back themselves, but

would pass the word round among their friends that I am given to

dunning."

[Sidenote: One result of the system.]

One of these ladies owed her L800, and probably still owes some of it,

though that was three or four seasons since; for her way of paying off is

to order a thirty-guinea gown or two, and pay in L50 or L100 to her

credit. The truth is that the system is chiefly responsible for the

enormous cost of fashionable dress nowadays, since the only means the

purveyors can adopt to secure themselves against loss is to charge

exorbitant prices. When their customers practically borrow all their money

of them, they are well justified in charging interest on it in some form

or other. This naturally results in raising the market value of well-cut

and skilfully-constructed dresses, &c., and bears very hardly on those who

pay their way with ready-money.

[Sidenote: A "ready-money" association.]

Would it not be an excellent idea to form a society of women in

aristocratic circles who would bind themselves to pay ready-money for all

articles purchased? They could demand, and would certainly obtain, a

substantial discount on all such payments, and with the thin edge of the

wedge thus inserted the reform would soon be well on its way to permanent

establishment.

_THE DOMESTIC GIRL._

[Sidenote: Not necessarily a dowdy.]

Do not for a moment imagine that the domestic girl cannot be smart. She

can turn herself out as bewitchingly as anybody, and the same cleverness

that goes into her delicious _entrees_, capital sauces, and truly lovely

afternoon tea-cakes concerns itself with the ripples of her coiffure, the

correct tilt of her hat, and the deft fall of her skirt. The domestic girl

need be neither plain nor dowdy. Plenty of exercise and the feeling that

she is of use in the world brighten her eyes, keep her complexion clear,

and give her that air of lightheartedness that should, but does not

always, characterise a girl. How middle-aged is the expression that some

of them wear! Both boys and girls in their early twenties have

occasionally this elderly look.

[Sidenote: Very much domesticated.]

Of course there is always the extreme domestic girl, who has not a soul

above puddings, whose fingers show generally a trace of flour, and whose

favourite light reading is recipes. She has been sketched for us

pleasantly:--

"She isn't versed in Latin, she doesn't paint on satin,

She doesn't understand the artful witchery of eyes;

But, oh! sure, 'tis true and certain she is very pat and pert in

Arranging the component parts of luscious pumpkin pies.

She cannot solve or twist 'em, viz., the planetary system;

She cannot tell a Venus from a Saturn in the skies;

But you ought to see her grapple with the fruit that's known as apple,

And arrive at quick conclusions when she tackles toothsome pies.

She could not write a sonnet, and she couldn't trim a bonnet,

She isn't very bookish in her letter of replies;

But she's much at home--oh, very--when she takes the juicy berry

And manipulates quite skilfully symposia in pies."

She is well appreciated at meal-times, that girl, but she is not the

liveliest of companions. Like the German girl, who is trained to

housewifery and little else from her earliest years, she has a dough-like

heaviness about her when other topics are started. But why should she ever

be domestic only?--and with all the world before her whence to choose

delightsome studies and pursuits.

[Sidenote: The Blue Stocking.]

Then there is the girl at the other end of the scale. Here is her

portrait:--

"She can talk on evolution;

She can proffer a solution

For each problem that besets the modern brain.

She can punish old Beethoven,

Or she dallies with De Koven,

Till the neighbours file petitions and complain.

She can paint a crimson cowboy,

Or a purple madder ploughboy

That you do not comprehend, but must admire.

And in exercise athletic

It is really quite pathetic

To behold the young men round her droop and tire.

She is up in mathematics,

Engineering, hydrostatics,

In debate with her for quarter you will beg.

She has every trait that's charming,

With an intellect alarming;

Yet she cannot, oh, she cannot, fry an egg!"

[Sidenote: Royal cooks and millinors.]

A Word to Women · 第 4 / 7 段