The battle began. The large numbers of the Franks who covered the ground

for some distance dismayed the Britons, and many of them fled, seeking

where they might hide themselves. Morvan, beside himself with rage and

at the head of his most devoted followers, rushed down upon the Franks

as if to demolish them at a single stroke; and many fell beneath his

blows. He singled out a warrior of inferior grade, toward whom he made

at a gallop, and, insulting him by word of mouth, after the ancient

fashion of the Celtic warriors, cried: "Frank, I am going to give thee

my first present, a present which I have been keeping for thee a long

while, and which I hope thou wilt bear in mind;" and launched at him a

javelin which the other received on his shield. "Proud Briton," replied

the Frank, "I have received thy present, and I am going to give thee

mine." He dug both spurs into his horse's sides and galloped down upon

Morvan, who, clad though he was in a coat of mail, fell pierced by the

thrust of a lance. The Frank had but time to dismount and cut off his

head when he fell himself, mortally wounded by one of Morvan's young

warriors, but not without having, in his turn, dealt the other his

deathblow. It spreads on all sides that Morvan is dead; and the Franks

come thronging to the scene of the encounter. There is picked up and

passed from hand to hand a head all bloody and fearfully disfigured.

Ditcar the monk is called to see it, and to say whether it is that of

Morvan; but he has to wash the mass of disfigurement, and to partially

adjust the hair, before he can pronounce that it is really Morvan's.

There is then no more doubt; resistance is now impossible; the widow,

the family and the servants of Morvan arrive, are brought before Louis

the Debonair, accept all the conditions imposed upon them, and the

Franks withdraw with the boast that Brittany is henceforth their

tributary.

On arriving at Angers, Louis found the empress Hermengarde dying; and

two days afterward she was dead. He had a tender heart which was not

proof against sorrow; and he testified a desire to abdicate and turn

monk. But he was dissuaded from his purpose; for it was easy to

influence his resolutions. A little later, he was advised to marry

again, and he yielded. Several princesses were introduced; and he chose

Judith of Bavaria, daughter of Count Welf (Guelf), a family already

powerful and in later times celebrated. Judith was young, beautiful,

witty, ambitious, and skilled in the art of making the gift of pleasing

subserve the passion for ruling. Louis, during his expedition into

Brittany, had just witnessed the fatal result of a woman's empire over

her husband; he was destined himself to offer a more striking and more

long-lived example of it. In 823, he had, by his new empress Judith, a

son, whom he called Charles, and who was hereafter to be known as

Charles the Bald. This son became his mother's ruling, if not exclusive,

passion, and the source of his father's woes. His birth could not fail

to cause ill-temper and mistrust in Louis' three sons by Hermengarde,

who were already kings. They had but a short time previously received

the first proof of their father's weakness. In 822, Louis, repenting of

his severity toward his nephew, Bernard of Italy, whose eyes he had

caused to be put out as a punishment for rebellion, and who had died in

consequence, considered himself bound to perform at Attigny, in the

church and before the people, a solemn act of penance; which was

creditable to his honesty and piety, but the details left upon the minds

of the beholders an impression unfavorable to the Emperor's dignity and

authority. In 829, during an assembly held at Worms, he, yielding to his

wife's entreaties, and doubtless also to his own yearnings toward his

youngest son, set at naught the solemn act whereby, in 817, he had

shared his dominions among his three elder sons; and took away from two

of them, in Burgundy and Alemannia, some of the territories he had

assigned to them, and gave them to the boy Charles for his share.

Lothair, Pépin, and Louis thereupon revolted. Court rivalries were added

to family differences. The Emperor had summoned to his side a young

southron, Bernard by name, duke of Septimania and son of Count William

of Toulouse, who had gallantly fought the Saracens. He made him his

chief chamberlain and his favorite counsellor. Bernard was bold,

ambitious, vain, imperious, and restless. He removed his rivals from

court, and put in their places his own creatures. He was accused not

only of abusing the Emperor's favor, but even of carrying on a guilty

intrigue with the empress Judith. There grew up against him, and, by

consequence, against the Emperor, the Empress, and their youngest son, a

powerful opposition, in which certain ecclesiastics, and, among them,

Wala, abbot of Corbie, cousin-german and but lately one of the privy

counsellors of Charlemagne, joined eagerly. Some had at heart the unity

of the empire, which Louis was breaking up more and more; others were

concerned for the spiritual interests of the Church, which Louis, in

spite of his piety and by reason of his weakness, often permitted to be

attacked. Thus strengthened, the conspirators considered themselves

certain of success. They had the empress Judith carried off and shut up

in the convent of St. Radegonde at Poitiers; and Louis in person came to

deliver himself up to them at Compiègne, where they were assembled.

There they passed a decree to the effect that the power and title of

emperor were transferred from Louis to Lothair, his eldest son; that the

act whereby a share of the empire had but lately been assigned to

Charles was annulled; and that the act of 817, which had regulated the

partition of Louis' dominions after his death, was once more in force.

But soon there was a burst of reaction in favor of the Emperor;

Lothair's two brothers, jealous of his late elevation, made overtures to

their father; the ecclesiastics were a little ashamed at being mixed up

in a revolt; the people felt pity for the poor, honest Emperor; and a

general assembly, meeting at Nimeguen, abolished the acts of Compiègne,

and restored to Louis his title and his power. But it was not long

before there was revolt again, originating this time with Pépin, King of

Aquitaine. Louis fought him, and gave Aquitaine to Charles the Bald. The

alliance between the three sons of Hermengarde was at once renewed; they

raised an army; the Emperor marched against them with his; and the two

hosts met between Colmar and Bâle, in a place called _le Champ rouge_

("the Field of Red"). Negotiations were set on foot; and Louis was

called upon to leave his wife Judith and his son Charles, and put

himself under the guardianship of his elder sons. He refused; but, just

when the conflict was about to commence, desertion took place in Louis'

army; most of the prelates, laics, and men-at-arms who had accompanied

him passed over to the camp of Lothair; and the "Field of Red" became

the "Field of Falsehood" (_le Champ du Mensonge_). Louis, left almost

alone, ordered his attendants to withdraw, "being unwilling," he said,

"that any one of them should lose life or limb on his account," and

surrendered to his sons. They received him with great demonstrations of

respect, but without relinquishing the prosecution of their enterprise.

Lothair hastily collected an assembly, which proclaimed him Emperor,

with the addition of divers territories to the kingdoms of Aquitaine and

Bavaria: and, three months afterward, another assembly, meeting at

Compiègne, declared the emperor Louis to have forfeited the crown, "for

having, by his faults and incapacity, suffered to sink so sadly low the

empire which had been raised to grandeur and brought into unity by

Charlemagne and his predecessors." Louis submitted to this decision;

himself read out aloud, in the Church of St. Médard at Soissons, but not

quite unresistingly, a confession, in eight articles, of his faults,

and, laying his baldric upon the altar, stripped off his royal robe, and

received from the hands of Ebbo, archbishop of Rheims, the gray vestment

of a penitent.

Lothair considered his father dethroned for good, and himself henceforth

sole Emperor; but he was mistaken. For years longer the scenes which

have just been described kept repeating themselves again and again;

rivalries and secret plots began once more between the three victorious

brothers and their partisans; popular feeling revived in favor of Louis;

a large portion of the clergy shared it; several counts of Neustria and

Burgundy appeared in arms, in the name of the deposed Emperor; and the

seductive and able Judith came afresh upon the scene, and gained over to

the cause of her husband and her son a multitude of friends. In 834, two

assemblies, one meeting at St. Denis and the other at Thionville,

annulled all the acts of the assembly of Compiègne, and for the third

time put Louis in possession of the imperial title and power. He

displayed no violence in his use of it; but he was growing more and more

irresolute and weak, when, in 838, the second of his rebellious sons,

Pépin, king of Aquitaine, died suddenly. Louis, ever under the sway of

Judith, speedily convoked at Worms, in 839, once more and for the last

time, a general assembly, whereat, leaving his son Louis of Bavaria

reduced to his kingdom in Eastern Europe, he divided the rest of his

dominions into two nearly equal parts, separated by the course of the

Meuse and the Rhone. Between these two parts he left the choice to

Lothair, who took the eastern portion, promising at the same time to

guarantee the western portion to his younger brother Charles. Louis the

Germanic protested against this partition, and took up arms to resist

it. His father, the Emperor, set himself in motion toward the Rhine, to

reduce him to submission; but, on arriving close to Mayence, he caught a

violent fever, and died on the 20th of June, 840, at the castle

Ingelheim, on a little island in the river. His last acts were a fresh

proof of his goodness toward even his rebellious sons and of his

solicitude for his last-born. He sent to Louis the Germanic his pardon,

and to Lothair the golden crown and sword, at the same time bidding him

fulfil his father's wishes on behalf of Charles and Judith.

There is no telling whether, in the credulousness of his good nature,

Louis had, at his dying hour, any great confidence in the appeal he made

to his son Lothair, and in the impression which would be produced on his

other son, Louis of Bavaria, by the pardon bestowed. The prayers of the

dying are of little avail against violent passions and barbaric manners.

Scarcely was Louis the Debonair dead, when Lothair was already

conspiring against young Charles, and was in secret alliance, for his

despoilment, with Pépin II, the late King of Aquitaine's son, who had

taken up arms for the purpose of seizing his father's kingdom, in the

possession of which his grandfather Louis had not been pleased to

confirm him. Charles suddenly learned that his mother Judith was on the

point of being besieged in Poitiers by the Aquitanians; and, in spite of

the friendly protestations sent to him by Lothair, it was not long

before he discovered the plot formed against him. He was not wanting in

shrewdness or energy; and, having first provided for his mother's

safety, he set about forming an alliance, in the cause of their common

interests, with his other brother, Louis the Germanic, who was equally

in danger from the ambition of Lothair. The historians of the period do

not say what negotiator was employed by Charles on this distant and

delicate mission; but several circumstances indicate that the empress

Judith herself undertook it; that she went in quest of the King of

Bavaria; and that it was she who, with her accustomed grace and address,

determined him to make common cause with his youngest against their

eldest brother. Divers incidents retarded for a whole year the outburst

of this family plot, and of the war of which it was the precursor. The

position of the young king Charles appeared for some time a very bad

one; but "certain chieftains," says the historian Nithard, "faithful to

his mother and to him, and having nothing more to lose than life or

limb, chose rather to die gloriously than to betray their King." The

arrival of Louis the Germanic with his troops helped to swell the forces

and increase the confidence of Charles; and it was on the 21st of June,

841, exactly a year after the death of Louis the Debonair, that the two

armies, that of Lothair and Pépin on the one side, and that of Charles

the Bald and Louis the Germanic on the other, stood face to face in the

neighborhood of the village of Fontenailles, six leagues from Auxerre,

on the rivulet of Audries. Never, according to such evidence as is

forthcoming, since the battle on the plains of Châlons against the Huns,

and that of Poitiers against the Saracens, had so great masses of men

been engaged. "There would be nothing untruthlike," says that scrupulous

authority, M. Fauriel, "in putting the whole number of combatants at

three hundred thousand; and there is nothing to show that either of the

two armies was much less numerous than the other." However that may be,

the leaders hesitated for four days to come to blows; and while they

were hesitating, the old favorite, not only of Louis the Debonair, but

also, according to several chroniclers, of the empress Judith, held

himself aloof with his troops in the vicinity, having made equal promise

of assistance to both sides, and waiting, to govern his decision, for

the prospect afforded by the first conflict. The battle began on the

25th of June, at daybreak, and was at first in favor of Lothair; but the

troops of Charles the Bald recovered the advantage which had been lost

by those of Louis the Germanic, and the action was soon nothing but a

terribly simple scene of carnage between enormous masses of men,

charging hand to hand, again and again, with a front extending over a

couple of leagues. Before midday the slaughter, the plunder, the

spoliation of the dead--all was over; the victory of Charles and Louis

was complete; the victors had retired to their camp, and there remained

nothing on the field of battle but corpses in thick heaps or a long

line, according as they had fallen in the disorder of flight or steadily

fighting in their ranks.... "Accursed be this day!" cries Angilbert, one

of Lothair's officers, in rough Latin verse; "be it unnumbered in the

return of the year, but wiped out of all remembrance! Be it unlit by the

light of the sun! Be it without either dawn or twilight! Accursed, also,

be this night, this awful night in which fell the brave, the most expert

in battle! Eye ne'er hath seen more fearful slaughter: in streams of

blood fell Christian men; the linen vestments of the dead did whiten the

champaign even as it is whitened by the birds of autumn!"

In spite of this battle, which appeared a decisive one, Lothair made

zealous efforts to continue the struggle; he scoured the countries

wherein he hoped to find partisans; to the Saxons he promised the

unrestricted reëstablishment of their pagan worship, and several of the

Saxon tribes responded to his appeal. Louis the Germanic and Charles the

Bald, having information of these preliminaries, resolved to solemnly

renew their alliance and, seven months after their victory at

Fontenailles, in February, 842, they repaired both of them, each with

his army, to Argentaria, on the right bank of the Rhine, between Bâle

and Strasburg, and there, at an open-air meeting, Louis first,

addressing the chieftains about him in the German tongue, said: "Ye all

know how often, since our father's death, Lothair hath attacked us, in

order to destroy us, this my brother and me. Having never been able, as

brothers and Christians, or in any just way, to obtain peace from him,

we were constrained to appeal to the judgment of God. Lothair was beaten

and retired, whither he could, with his following; for we, restrained by

paternal affection and moved with compassion for Christian people, were

unwilling to pursue them to extermination. Neither then nor aforetime

did we demand aught else save that each of us should be maintained in

his rights. But he, rebelling against the judgment of God, ceaseth not

to attack us as enemies, this my brother and me; and he destroyeth our

peoples with fire and pillage and the sword. That is the cause which

hath united us afresh; and, as we trow that ye doubt the soundness of

our alliance and our fraternal union, we have resolved to bind ourselves

afresh by this oath in your presence, being led thereto by no prompting

of wicked covetousness, but only that we may secure our common advantage

in case that, by your aid, God should cause us to obtain peace. If,

then, I violate--which God forbid--this oath that I am about to take to

my brother, I hold you all quit of submission to me and of the faith ye

have sworn to me."

Charles repeated this speech, word for word, to his own troops, in the

Romance language, in that idiom derived from a mixture of Latin and of

the tongues of ancient Gaul, and spoken, thenceforth, with varieties of

dialect and pronunciation, in nearly all parts of Frankish Gaul. After

this address, Louis pronounced and Charles repeated after him, each in

his own tongue, the oath couched in these terms: "For the love of God,

for the Christian people and for our common weal, from this day forth

and so long as God shall grant me power and knowledge, I will defend

this my brother and will be an aid to him in everything, as one ought to

defend his brother, provided that he do likewise unto me; and I will

never make with Lothair any covenant which may be, to my knowledge, to

the damage of this my brother."

When the two brothers had thus sworn, the two armies, officers and men,

took, in their turn, a similar oath, going bail, in a mass, for the

engagements of their kings. Then they took up their quarters, all of

them, for some time, between Worms and Mayence, and followed up their

political proceeding with military fêtes, precursors of the knightly

tournaments of the Middle Ages. "A place of meeting was fixed," says the

contemporary historian Nithard, "at a spot suitable for this kind of

exercises. Here were drawn up, on one side, a certain number of

combatants, Saxons, Vasconians, Austrasians, or Britons; there were

ranged, on the opposite side, an equal number of warriors, and the two

divisions advanced, each against the other, as if to attack. One of

them, with their bucklers at their backs, took to flight as if to seek,

in the main body, shelter against those who were pursuing them; then

suddenly, facing about, they dashed out in pursuit of those before whom

they had just been flying. This sport lasted until the two kings,

appearing with all the youth of their suites, rode up at a gallop,

brandishing their spears and chasing first one lot and then the other.

It was a fine sight to see so much temper among so many valiant folk,

for, great as was the number and the mixture of different nationalities,

no one was insulted or maltreated, though the contrary is often the case

among men in small numbers and known one to another."

After four or five months of tentative measures or of incidents which

taught both parties that they could not, either of them, hope to

completely destroy their opponents, the two allied brothers received at

Verdun, whither they had repaired to concert their next movement, a

messenger from Lothair, with peaceful proposals which they were

unwilling to reject. The principal was that, with the exception of

Italy, Aquitaine, and Bavaria, to be secured without dispute to their

then possessors, the Frankish empire should be divided into three

portions, that the arbiters elected to preside over the partition should

swear to make it as equal as possible, and that Lothair should have his

choice, with the title of emperor. About mid-June, 842, the three

brothers met on an island of the Saône, near Châlons, where they began

to discuss the questions which divided them; but it was not till more

than a year after, in August, 843, that assembling, all three of them,

with their umpires, at Verdun, they at last came to an agreement about

the partition of the Frankish empire, save the three countries which it

had been beforehand agreed to accept. Louis kept all the provinces of

Germany of which he was already in possession, and received besides, on

the left bank of the Rhine, the towns of Mayence, Worms, and Spire, with

the territory appertaining to them. Lothair, for his part, had the

eastern belt of Gaul, bounded on one side by the Rhine and the Alps, on

the other by the courses of the Meuse, the Saône, and the Rhone,

starting from the confluence of the two latter rivers, and, further, the

country comprised between the Meuse and the Scheldt, together with

certain countships lying to the west of that river. To Charles fell all

the rest of Gaul: Vasconia or Biscaye, Septimania, the marshes of Spain,

beyond the Pyrenees; and the other countries of Southern Gaul which had

enjoyed hitherto, under the title of the kingdom of Aquitaine, a special

government subordinated to the general government of the empire, but

distinct from it, lost this last remnant of their Gallo-Roman

nationality, and became integral portions of Frankish Gaul, which fell

by partition to Charles the Bald, and formed one and the same kingdom

under one and the same king.

Thus fell through and disappeared, in 843, by virtue of the treaty of

Verdun, the second of Charlemagne's grand designs, the resuscitation of

the Roman Empire by means of the Frankish and Christian masters of Gaul.

The name of _emperor_ still retained a certain value in the minds of the

people, and still remained an object of ambition to princes; but the

empire was completely abolished, and, in its stead, sprang up three

kingdoms, independent one of another, without any necessary connection

or relation. One of the three was thenceforth France.

In this great event are comprehended two facts: the disappearance of the

empire and the formation of the three kingdoms which took its place. The

first is easily explained. The resuscitation of the Roman Empire had

been a dream of ambition and ignorance on the part of a great man, but a

barbarian. Political unity and central, absolute power had been the

essential characteristics of that empire. They became introduced and

established, through a long succession of ages, on the ruins of the

splendid Roman Republic destroyed by its own dissensions, under favor of

the still great influence of the old Roman senate though fallen from its

high estate, and beneath the guardianship of the Roman legions and

Imperial praetorians. Not one of these conditions, not one of these

forces, was to be met with in the Roman world reigned over by

Charlemagne. The nation of the Franks and Charlemagne himself were but

of yesterday; the new Emperor had neither ancient senate to hedge at the

same time that it obeyed him, nor old bodies of troops to support him.

Political unity and absolute power were repugnant alike to the

intellectual and the social condition, to the national manners and

personal sentiments of the victorious barbarians. The necessity of

placing their conquests beyond the reach of a new swarm of barbarians

and the personal ascendency of Charlemagne were the only things which

gave his government a momentary gleam of success in the way of unity and

of factitious despotism under the name of empire. In 814 Charlemagne had

made territorial security an accomplished fact; but the personal power

he had exercised disappeared with him. The new Gallo-Frankish community

recovered, under the mighty but gradual influence of Christianity, its

proper and natural course, producing disruption into different local

communities and bold struggles for individual liberties, either one with

another, or against whosoever tried to become their master.

The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 05 (From Charlemagne to Frederick Barbarossa) · 第 4 / 36 段