THE PERSONAL ESSAY

The Personal Essay is a peculiar form of literature, entirely

different from critical essays like those of Matthew Arnold and from

purely reflective essays, like those of Bacon. It is a species of

writing somewhat akin to autobiography or firelight conversation;

where the writer takes the reader entirely into his confidence, and

chats pleasantly with him on topics that may be as widely apart as the

immortality of the soul and the proper colour of a necktie. The first

and supreme master of this manner of writing was Montaigne, who

belongs in the front rank of the world's greatest writers of prose.

Montaigne talks endlessly on the most trivial subjects without ever

becoming trivial. To those who really love reading and have some

sympathy with humanity, Montaigne's _Essays_ are a "perpetual refuge

and delight," and it is interesting to reflect how far in literary

fame this man, who talked about his meals, his horse, and his cat,

outshines thousands of scholarly and talented writers, who discussed

only the most serious themes in politics and religion. The great

English prose writers in the field of the personal essay during the

seventeenth century were Sir Thomas Browne, Thomas Fuller, and Abraham

Cowley, though Walton's _Compleat Angler_ is a kindred work. Browne's

_Religio Medici_, and his delightful _Garden of Cyrus_, old Tom

Fuller's quaint _Good Thoughts in Bad Times_ and Cowley's charming

_Essays_ are admirable examples of this school of composition.

Burton's wonderful _Anatomy of Melancholy_ is a colossal personal

essay. Some of the papers of Steele and Addison in the _Tatler_,

_Guardian,_ and the _Spectator_ are of course notable; but it was not

until the appearance of Charles Lamb that the personal essay reached

its climax in English literature. Over the pages of the _Essays of

Elia_ hovers an immortal charm--the charm of a nature inexhaustible in

its humour and kindly sympathy for humanity. Thackeray was another

great master of the literary easy-chair, and is to some readers more

attractive in this attitude than as a novelist. In America we have had

a few writers who have reached eminence in this form, beginning with

Washington Irving, and including Donald G. Mitchell, whose _Reveries

of a Bachelor_ has been read by thousands of people for over fifty

years.

As a personal essayist Stevenson seems already to belong to the first

rank. He is both eclectic and individual. He brought to his pen the

reminiscences of varied reading, and a wholly original touch of

fantasy. He was literally steeped in the gorgeous Gothic diction of

the seventeenth century, but he realised that such a prose style as

illumines the pages of William Drummond's _Cypress Grove_ and Browne's

_Urn Burial_ was a lost art. He attempted to imitate such writing only

in his youthful exercises, for his own genius was forced to express

itself in an original way. All of his personal essays have that air of

distinction which attracts and holds one's attention as powerfully in

a book as it does in social intercourse. Everything that he has to say

seems immediately worth saying, and worth hearing, for he was one of

those rare men who had an interesting mind. There are some literary

artists who have style and nothing else, just as there are some great

singers who have nothing but a voice. The true test of a book, like

that of an individual, is whether or not it improves upon

acquaintance. Stevenson's essays reflect a personality that becomes

brighter as we draw nearer. This fact makes his essays not merely

entertaining reading, but worthy of serious and prolonged study.

[Note 1: His name was originally Robert Lewis Balfour Stevenson. He

later dropped the "Balfour" and changed the spelling of "Lewis" to

"Louis," but the name was always pronounced "Lewis."]

Essays of Robert Louis Stevenson Selected and Edited With an Introduction and Notes by William Lyon Phelps · 第 13 / 48 题