By CLARENCE COOK

(645-561 B.C.)

[Footnote 1: Copyright, 1894, by Selmar Hess.]

[Illustration: Nebuchadnezzar.]

With the death of Sardanapalus, the great monarch of Assyria, and the

taking of Nineveh, the capital city, by the Medes, the kingdom of

Assyria came to an end, and the vast domain was parcelled out among

the conquerors. At the time of the catastrophe, the district of

Babylonia, with its capital city Babylon, was ruled as a dependent

satrapy of Assyria by Nabopolassar. Aided by the Medes, he now took

possession of the province and established himself as an independent

monarch, strengthening the alliance by a marriage between the Princess

Amuhia, the daughter of the Median king, and his son Nebuchadnezzar.

In the partition of Assyria, the region stretching from Egypt to the

upper Euphrates, including Syria, Phoenicia, and Palestine, had fallen

to the share of Nabopolassar. But the tribes that peopled it were not

disposed to accept the rule of the new claimant, and looked about for

an ally to support them in their resistance. Such an ally they thought

they had found in Egypt.

Egypt was the great rival of Babylon, as she had been of Assyria. Both

desired to control the highways of traffic connecting the

Mediterranean with the farther East. Egypt had the advantage, both

from her actual position on the Mediterranean and her nearer

neighborhood to the coveted territory, and she used her advantage with

audacity and skill. No sooner, however, did Nabopolassar feel himself

firm on his throne than he resolved to check the ambition of Egypt and

secure for himself the sovereignty of the lands in dispute.

The task was not an easy one. Pharaoh Necho had been for three years

in possession of the whole strip along the Mediterranean--Palestine,

Phoenicia, and part of Syria--and was pushing victoriously on to

Assyria, when he was met at the plain of Megiddo, commanding the

principal pass in the range of Mount Carmel, by the forces of the

petty kingdom of Judah, disputing his advance. He defeated them in a

bloody engagement, in which Josiah, King of Judah, was slain, and then

continued his march to Carchemish, a stronghold built to defend one of

the few fordable passes of the upper Euphrates. This important place

having been taken after a bloody battle, Necho was master of all the

strategic points north and west of Babylonia.

Nebuchadnezzar was now put in command of an army, to force Pharaoh to

give up his prey. Marching directly upon Carchemish, he attacked the

Egyptian and defeated him with great slaughter. Following up his

victory, he wrested from Pharaoh, in engagement after engagement, all

that he had gained in Syria, Phoenicia, and Palestine, and was in the

midst of fighting in Egypt itself, when the news came of the death of

his father; and he hastened home at once by forced marches to secure

his possession of the throne. In his train were captives of all the

nations he had conquered: Syrians, Phoenicians, Jews, and Egyptians.

Among the Jewish prisoners was Daniel, the author of the book of the

Old Testament called by his name, and to whom we owe the little

personal knowledge we have of the great Babylonian monarch.

Of all the conquests of Nebuchadnezzar in this long struggle with

Egypt, that of the Jewish people is the most interesting to us. The

Jews had fought hard for independence, but if they must be conquered

and held in subjection, they preferred the rule of Egypt to that of

Babylon. Even the long slavery of their ancestors in that country and

the sufferings it had entailed, with the tragic memories of the exodus

and the wanderings in the desert, had not been potent to blot out the

traditions of the years passed in that pleasant land with its

delicious climate, its nourishing and abundant food. Alike in

prosperity and in evil days the hearts of the people of Israel yearned

after Egypt, and the denunciations of her prophets are never so bitter

as when uttered against those who turned from Jehovah to worship the

false gods of the Nile. Three times did the inhabitants of Jerusalem

rebel against the rule of Babylon, and three times did Nebuchadnezzar

come down upon them with a cruel and unrelenting vengeance, carrying

off their people into bondage, each time inflicting great damage upon

the city and leaving her less capable of resistance; yet each time her

rulers had turned to Egypt in the vain hope of finding in her a

defence against the oppressor, but in every instance Egypt had proved

a broken reed.

Of the three successive kings of Judah whom Nebuchadnezzar had left to

rule the city as his servants, and who had all in turn rebelled

against him, one had been condemned to perpetual imprisonment in

Babylon; a second had been carried there in chains and probably

killed, while the third, captured in a vain attempt to escape after

the taking of the city, had first been made to see his sons killed

before his eyes, had then been cruelly blinded, and afterward carried

in chains to Babylon, and cast into prison. The last siege of the

city lasted eighteen months, and when it was finally taken by assault,

its ruin was complete. By previous deportations Jerusalem had been

deprived of her princes, her warriors, her craftsmen, and her smiths,

with all the treasure laid up in the palace of her kings, and all the

vessels of gold and silver consecrated to the worship of Jehovah.

Little then was left for her to suffer, when the punishment of her

latest rebellion came. Her walls were thrown down, her temple, her

chief glory, was destroyed, the greater part of the inhabitants who

had survived the prolonged siege were carried off to swell the crowd

of exiles already in Babylon, and only a few of the humbler sort of

folk, the vine-dressers and the small farmers, were left behind.

When Nebuchadnezzar rested after his conquests, secure in the

subjugation of his rivals, and in the possession of his vast kingdom,

he gave himself up to the material improvement of Babylon and the

surrounding country. The city as he left it, at the end of his reign

of forty-three years, was built on both sides of the Euphrates, and

covered a space of four hundred square miles, equal to five times the

size of London. It was surrounded by a triple wall of brick; the

innermost, over three hundred feet high, and eighty-five feet broad at

the top, with room for four chariots to drive abreast. The walls were

pierced by one hundred gate-ways framed in brass and with brazen

gates, and at the points where the Euphrates entered and left the city

the walls also turned and followed the course of the river, thus

dividing the city into two fortified parts. These two districts were

connected by a bridge of stone piers, guarded by portcullises, and

ferries also plied between the quays that lined the river-banks, to

which access was given by gates in the walls.

Nebuchadnezzar's palace was a splendid structure covering a large

space at one end of the bridge. In the central court were the Hanging

Gardens, the chief glory of the city, and reckoned one of the wonders

of the world. No clear idea can be formed of these gardens from any

description that has come down to us, but it would appear that arches

eighty feet high supported terraces of earth planted with all the

skill for which the gardeners of the East were famous. We are told

that they were built for the pleasure of Queen Amuhia, who, as a

Median princess, missed her native mountains, but a more commonplace

explanation is that they were carried so high to escape the mosquitoes

that swarmed on the lower level.

Various splendid edifices, chiefly religious, adorned the great

squares of the city: the temple of the god Bel, enriched by the spoils

of Tyre and Jerusalem, was the especial pride of Nebuchadnezzar. It

rose in a succession of eight lofty stages, and supported on the top a

golden statue of the god, forty feet high. Still another temple of Bel

was built in seven stages, each faced with enamelled brick of one of

the planetary colors; the topmost one of blue, the color dedicated to

Mercury or Nebo, the patron god of Nabopolassar.

But the most important of the civic undertakings of Nebuchadnezzar was

the extension of the great system of canalization by which the barren

wastes of the Babylonian plain were made to rival the valley of the

Nile in fertility, and become the granary of the East. The whole

territory was covered with a network of canals fed by the Tigris and

Euphrates, and used for both irrigation and navigation. One branch had

already connected Nineveh with Babylon, and another constructed by

Nebuchadnezzar united Babylon to the Persian Gulf, running a distance

of four hundred miles. This is still to be traced in a portion of its

length.

The fate of Nebuchadnezzar is one of the most tragic in the long list

of calamities that have overtaken the great and powerful of the earth.

According to Daniel, it was just after the king had spoken those words

of exulting pride as he walked in the palace of the Kingdom of

Babylon: "Is not this great Babylon that I have built," when he was

attacked by that dreadful form of madness, called by the Greeks,

lycanthropy (wolf-man), in which the victim fancies himself a beast:

in its fiercer manifestations a beast of the forest, or in milder

visitations a beast of the field. Nebuchadnezzar's madness became so

violent that for four years he was exiled from his throne and from the

company of men, and wandered in the fields, eating grass like oxen,

"and his body was wet with the dews of heaven, and his hairs were

grown like eagles' feathers, and his nails like birds' claws."

Although no mention is made of this strange malady in any writing but

the book of Daniel, yet it has a pathetic confirmation in one of the

rock-cut inscriptions that record the acts of Nebuchadnezzar's reign.

"For four years the seat of my kingdom did not rejoice my heart. In

all my dominions I built no high place of power, nor did I lay up the

precious treasure of my kingdom. In Babylon I erected no buildings for

myself nor for the glory of my empire. In the worship of Bel-Merodach,

my Lord, the joy of my heart, in Babylon the city of his worship and

the seat of my empire, I did not sing his praise, nor did I furnish

his altar with victims"--and then, as if returning to the thing that

lay nearest him--"In four years I did not dig out the canals."

[Illustration: "And he was driven from men, and did eat grass as

oxen."]

In time, the black cloud of the king's madness passed away and health

and reason were restored to him. And if the words that Daniel puts

into the king's mouth on his recovery are really his, we must

recognize in this Eastern Despot a decided strain of religious

sensibility, a trait that appears beside in his almost passionate

expressions of affection for his god Merodach, and in his sympathy

with Daniel and the youths who were his companions, in their own

religious devotion. Although Daniel and the other youths whom the king

had caused to be called out from the mass of the Jewish captives for

his own particular service--boys distinguished from the rest by their

personal beauty, their intelligence and aptitude--were too earnest in

their religious convictions and too high-spirited to conform to the

Babylonian religion or to conceal their sentiments under the cloak of

policy, yet the king tolerated their adherence to their ritual and

yielded only in part to the persistence of the Jew-baiters, who saw

with angry eyes the promotion of the hated captives to places of power

and authority over the heads of their captors. In spite of his enemies

Daniel was allowed to exercise his own religion in peace; and the

persecutors of his companions, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, were

themselves destroyed in the furnace they had heated for their innocent

victims, which the youths themselves were rescued from by the personal

interposition of the king, who pretended to see--or in his religious

exaltation did really see--the god himself standing guard over the

victims in the midst of the flames.

Of Nebuchadnezzar after the recovery of his reason we learn but

little. The chronicle of Daniel passes abruptly from Nebuchadnezzar to

Belshazzar, and the great king is not mentioned again. History, too,

is silent. It tells us only that he left the throne to a son, whose

name, Evil-Merodach, records the devotion of his father to the god of

his people.

[Signature of the author.]

Great Men and Famous Women. Vol. 1 A series of pen and pencil sketches of the lives of more than 200 of the most prominent personages in History · 第 16 / 74 题