CHAPTER XLIX.

Peace deliberations in Spain--Unpopularity of the project--

Disaffection of the courtiers--Complaints against Spinola--

Conference of the Catholic party--Position of Henry IV. towards the

republic--State of France Further peace negotiations--Desire of King

James of England for the restoration of the States to Spain--Arrival

of the French commissioners President Jeannin before the States-

General--Dangers of a truce with Spain--Dutch legation to England--

Arrival of Lewis Verreyken at the Hague with Philip's ratification--

Rejection of the Spanish treaty--Withdrawal of the Dutch fleet from

the Peninsula--The peace project denounced by the party of Prince

Maurice--Opposition of Maurice to the plans of Barneveld--Amended

ratification presented to the States-General--Discussion of the

conditions--Determination to conclude a peace--Indian trade--

Exploits of Admiral Matelieff in the Malay peninsula--He lays siege

to Malacca--Victory over the Spanish fleet--Endeavour to open a

trade with China--Return of Matelieff to Holland.

The Marquis Spinola had informed the Spanish Government that if 300,000

dollars a month could be furnished, the war might be continued, but that

otherwise it would be better to treat upon the basis of 'uti possidetis,'

and according to the terms proposed by the States-General. He had further

intimated his opinion that, instead of waiting for the king's consent, it

more comported with the king's dignity for the archdukes to enter into

negotiations, to make a preliminary and brief armistice with the enemy,

and then to solicit the royal approval of what had been done.

In reply, the king--that is to say the man who thought, wrote, and signed

in behalf of the king--had plaintively observed that among evils the

vulgar rule was to submit to the least. Although, therefore, to grant to

the Netherland rebels not only peace and liberty, but to concede to them

whatever they had obtained by violence and the most abominable outrages,

was the worst possible example to all princes; yet as the enormous sum

necessary for carrying on the war was not to be had, even by attempting

to scrape it together from every corner of the earth, he agreed with the

opinion of the archdukes that it was better to put an end to this eternal

and exhausting war by peace or truce, even under severe conditions. That

the business had thus far proceeded without consulting him, was publicly

known, and he expressed approval of the present movements towards a peace

or a long truce, assuring Spinola that such a result would be as grateful

to him as if the war had been brought to a successful issue.

When the Marquis sent formal notice of the armistice to Spain there were

many complaints at court. Men said that the measure was beneath the

king's dignity, and contrary to his interests. It was a cessation of arms

under iniquitous conditions, accorded to a people formerly subject and

now rebellious. Such a truce was more fatal than any conflict, than any

amount of slaughter. During this long and dreadful war, the king had

suffered no disaster so terrible as this, and the courtiers now declared

openly that the archduke was the cause of the royal and national

humiliation. Having no children, nor hope of any, he desired only to live

in tranquillity and selfish indulgence, like the indolent priest that he

was, not caring what detriment or dishonour might accrue to the crown

after his life was over.

Thus murmured the parasites and the plunderers within the dominions of

the do-nothing Philip, denouncing the first serious effort to put an end

to a war which the laws of nature had proved to be hopeless on the part

of Spain.

Spinola too, who had spent millions of his own money, who had plunged

himself into debt and discredit, while attempting to sustain the

financial reputation of the king, who had by his brilliant services in

the field revived the ancient glory of the Spanish arms, and who now saw

himself exposed with empty coffers to a vast mutiny, which was likely to

make his future movements as paralytic as those of his immediate

predecessors--Spinola, already hated because he was an Italian, because

he was of a mercantile family, and because he had been successful, was

now as much the object of contumely with the courtiers as with the

archduke himself.

The splendid victory of Heemskerk had struck the government with dismay

and diffused a panic along the coast. The mercantile fleets, destined for

either India, dared not venture forth so long as the terrible Dutch

cruisers, which had just annihilated a splendid Spanish fleet, commanded

by a veteran of Lepanto, and under the very guns of Gibraltar, were

supposed to be hovering off the Peninsula. Very naturally, therefore,

there was discontent in Spain that the cessation of hostilities had not

originally been arranged for sea as well as land, and men said openly at

court that Spinola ought to have his head cut off for agreeing to such an

armistice. Quite as reasonably, however, it was now felt to be necessary

to effect as soon as possible the recal of this very inconvenient Dutch

fleet from the coast of Spain.

The complaints were so incessant against Spinola that it was determined

to send Don Diego d'Ybarra to Brussels, charged with a general

superintendence of the royal interests in the present confused condition

of affairs. He was especially instructed to convey to Spinola the most

vehement reproaches in regard to the terms of the armistice, and to

insist upon the cessation of naval hostilities, and the withdrawal of the

cruisers.

Spinola, on his part, was exceedingly irritated that the arrangements

which he had so carefully made with the archduke at Brussels should be so

contumaciously assailed, and even disavowed, at Madrid. He was especially

irritated that Ybarra should now be sent as his censor and overseer, and

that Fuentes should have received orders to levy seven thousand troops in

the Milanese for Flanders, the arrival of which reinforcements would

excite suspicion, and probably break off negotiations.

He accordingly sent his private secretary Biraga, posthaste to Spain with

two letters. In number one he implored his Majesty that Ybarra might not

be sent to Brussels. If this request were granted, number two was to be

burned. Otherwise, number two was to be delivered, and it contained a

request to be relieved from all further employment in the king's service.

The marquis was already feeling the same effects of success as had been

experienced by Alexander Farnese, Don John of Austria, and other

strenuous maintainers of the royal authority in Flanders. He was railed

against, suspected, spied upon, put under guardianship, according to the

good old traditions of the Spanish court. Public disgrace or secret

poison might well be expected by him, as the natural guerdons of his

eminent deeds.

Biraga also took with him the draught of the form in which the king's

consent to the armistice and pending negotiations was desired, and he was

particularly directed to urge that not one letter or comma should be

altered, in order that no pretext might be afforded to the suspicious

Netherlanders for a rupture.

In private letters to his own superintendent Strata, to Don John of

Idiaquez, to the Duke of Lerma, and to Stephen Ybarra, Spinola enlarged

upon the indignity about to be offered him, remonstrated vehemently

against the wrong and stupidity of the proposed policy, and expressed his

reliance upon the efforts of these friends of his to prevent its

consummation. He intimated to Idiaquez that a new deliberation would be

necessary to effect the withdrawal of the Dutch fleet--a condition not

inserted in the original armistice--but that within the three months

allowed for the royal ratification there would be time enough to procure

the consent of the States to that measure. If the king really desired to

continue the war, he had but to alter a single comma in the draught, and,

out of that comma, the stadholder's party would be certain to manufacture

for him as long a war as he could possibly wish.

In a subsequent letter to the king, Spinola observed that he was well

aware of the indignation created in Spain by the cessation of land

hostilities without the recal of the fleet, but that nevertheless John

Neyen had confidentially represented to the archdukes the royal assent as

almost certain. As to the mission of Ybarra, the marquis reminded his

master that the responsibility and general superintendence of the

negotiations had been almost forced upon him. Certainly he had not

solicited them. If another agent were now interposed, it was an

advertisement to the world that the business had been badly managed. If

the king wished a rupture, he had but to lift his finger or his pen; but

to appoint another commissioner was an unfit reward for his faithful

service. He was in the king's hands. If his reputation were now to be

destroyed, it was all over with him and his affairs. The man, whom

mortals had once believed incapable, would be esteemed incapable until

the end of his days.

It was too late to prevent the mission of Ybarra, who, immediately after

his arrival in Brussels, began to urge in the king's name that the words

in which the provinces had been declared free by the archdukes might be

expunged. What could be more childish than such diplomacy? What greater

proof could be given of the incapacity of the Spanish court to learn the

lesson which forty years had been teaching? Spinola again wrote a most

earnest remonstrance to the king, assuring him that this was simply to

break off the negotiation. It was ridiculous to suppose, he said, that

concessions already made by the archdukes, ratification of which on the

part of the king had been guaranteed, could now be annulled. Those

acquainted with Netherland obstinacy knew better. The very possibility of

the king's refusal excited the scorn of the States-General.

Ybarra went about, too, prating to the archdukes and to others of

supplies to be sent from Spain sufficient to carry on the war for many

years, and of fresh troops to be forwarded immediately by Fuentes. As

four millions of crowns a year were known to be required for any

tolerable campaigning, such empty vaunts as these were preposterous. The

king knew full well, said Spinola, and had admitted the fact in his

letters, that this enormous sum could not be furnished. Moreover, the war

cost the Netherlanders far less in proportion. They had river

transportation, by which they effected as much in two days as the

Catholic army could do in a fortnight, so that every siege was managed

with far greater rapidity and less cost by the rebels than by their

opponents. As to sending troops from Milan, he had already stated that

their arrival would have a fatal effect. The minds of the people were

full of suspicion. Every passing rumour excited a prodigious sensation,

and the war party was already gaining the upper hand. Spinola warned the

king, in the most solemn manner, that if the golden opportunity were now

neglected the war would be eternal. This, he said, was more certain than

certain. For himself, he had strained every nerve, and would continue to

do his best in the interest of peace. If calamity must come, he at least

would be held blameless.

Such vehement remonstrances from so eminent a source produced the needful

effect. Royal letters were immediately sent, placing full powers of

treating in the hands of the marquis, and sending him a ratification of

the archduke's agreement. Government moreover expressed boundless

confidence in Spinola, and deprecated the idea that Ybarra's mission was

in derogation of his authority. He had been sent, it was stated, only to

procure that indispensable preliminary to negotiations, the withdrawal of

the Dutch fleet, but as this had now been granted, Ybarra was already

recalled.

Spinola now determined to send the swift and sure-footed friar, who had

made himself so useful in opening the path to discussion, on a secret

mission to Spain. Ybarra objected; especially because it would be

necessary for him to go through France, where he would be closely

questioned by the king. It would be equally dangerous, he said, for the

Franciscan in that case to tell the truth or to conceal it. But Spinola

replied that a poor monk like him could steal through France

undiscovered. Moreover, he should be disguised as a footman, travelling

in the service of Aurelio Spinola, a relative of the marquis, then

proceeding to Madrid. Even should Henry hear of his presence and send for

him, was it to be supposed that so practised a hand would not easily

parry the strokes of the French king--accomplished fencer as he

undoubtedly was? After stealing into and out of Holland as he had so

recently done, there was nothing that might not be expected of him. So

the wily friar put on the Spinola livery, and, without impediment,

accompanied Don Aurelio to Madrid.

Meantime, the French commissioners--Pierre Jeannin, Buzanval, regular

resident at the Hague, and De Russy, who was destined to succeed that

diplomatist--had arrived in Holland.

The great drama of negotiation, which was now to follow the forty years'

tragedy, involved the interests and absorbed the attention of the great

Christian powers. Although serious enough in its substance and its

probable consequences, its aspect was that of a solemn comedy. There was

a secret disposition on the part of each leading personage--with a few

exceptions--to make dupes of all the rest. Perhaps this was a necessary

result of statesmanship, as it had usually been taught at that epoch.

Paul V., who had succeeded Clement VIII. in 1605, with the brief

interlude of the twenty-six days of Leo XI.'s pontificate, was zealous,

as might be supposed, to check the dangerous growth of the pestilential

little republic of the north. His diplomatic agents, Millino at Madrid,

Barberini at Paris, and the accomplished Bentivoglio, who had just been

appointed to the nunciatura at Brussels, were indefatigable in their

efforts to suppress the heresy and the insolent liberty of which the

upstart commonwealth was the embodiment.

Especially Barberini exerted all the powers at his command to bring about

a good understanding between the kings of France and Spain. He pictured

to Henry, in darkest colours, the blight that would come over religion

and civilization if the progress of the rebellious Netherlands could not

be arrested. The United Provinces were becoming dangerous, if they

remained free, not only to the French kingdom, but to the very existence

of monarchy throughout the world.

No potentate was ever more interested, so it was urged, than Henry IV. to

bring down the pride of the Dutch rebels. There was always sympathy of

thought and action between the Huguenots of France and their

co-religionists in Holland. They were all believers alike in Calvinism--a

sect inimical not less to temporal monarchies than to the sovereign

primacy of the Church--and the tendency and purposes of the French rebels

were already sufficiently manifest in their efforts, by means of the

so-called cities of security, to erect a state within a state; to

introduce, in short, a Dutch republic into France.

A sovereign remedy for the disease of liberty, now threatening to become

epidemic in Europe, would be found in a marriage between the second son

of the King of Spain and a daughter of France. As the archdukes were

childless, it might be easily arranged that this youthful couple should

succeed them--the result of which would of course be the reduction of all

the Netherlands to their ancient obedience.

It has already been seen, and will become still farther apparent, that

nostrums like this were to be recommended in other directions. Meantime,

Jeannin and his colleagues made their appearance at the Hague.

If there were a living politician in Europe capable of dealing with

Barneveld on even terms, it was no doubt President Jeannin. An ancient

Leaguer, an especial adherent of the Duke of Mayenne, he had been deep in

all the various plots and counter-plots of the Guises, and often employed

by the extinct confederacy in various important intrigues. Being secretly

sent to Spain to solicit help for the League after the disasters of Ivry

and Arques, he found Philip II. so sincerely imbued with the notion that

France was a mere province of Spain, and so entirely bent upon securing

the heritage of the Infanta to that large property, as to convince him

that the maintenance of the Roman religion was with that monarch only a

secondary condition. Aid and assistance for the confederacy were

difficult of attainment, unless coupled with the guarantee of the

Infanta's rights to reign in France.

The Guise faction being inspired solely by religious motives of the

loftiest kind, were naturally dissatisfied with the lukewarmness of his

most Catholic Majesty. When therefore the discomfited Mayenne

subsequently concluded his bargain with the conqueror of Ivry, it was a

matter of course that Jeannin should also make his peace with the

successful Huguenot, now become eldest son of the Church. He was very

soon taken into especial favour by Henry, who recognised his sagacity,

and who knew his hands to be far cleaner than those of the more exalted

Leaguers with whom he had dealt. The "good old fellow," as Henry

familiarly called him, had not filled his pockets either in serving or

when deserting the League. Placed in control of the exchequer at a later

period, he was never accused of robbery or peculation. He was a

hard-working, not overpaid, very intelligent public functionary. He was

made president of the parliament, or supreme tribunal of Burgundy, and

minister of state, and was recognised as one of the ablest jurists and

most skilful politicians in the kingdom. An elderly man, with a tall,

serene forehead, a large dark eye and a long grey beard, he presented an

image of vast wisdom and reverend probity. He possessed--an especial

treasure for a statesman in that plotting age--a singularly honest

visage. Never was that face more guileless, never was his heart more

completely worn upon his sleeve, than when he was harbouring the deepest

or most dangerous designs. Such was the "good fellow," whom that skilful

reader of men, Henry of France, had sent to represent his interests and

his opinions at the approaching conferences. What were those opinions?

Paul V. and his legates Barberini, Millino, and the rest, were well

enough aware of the secret strings of the king's policy, and knew how to

touch them with skill. Of all things past, Henry perhaps most regretted

that not he, but the last and most wretched of the Valois line, was

sovereign of France when the States-General came to Paris with that offer

of sovereignty which had been so contumaciously refused.

If the object were attainable, the ex-chief of the Huguenots still meant

to be king of the Netherlands as sincerely as Philip II. had ever

intended to be monarch of France. But Henry was too accurate a calculator

of chances, and had bustled too much in the world of realities, to

exhaust his strength in striving, year after year, for a manifest

impossibility. The enthusiast, who had passed away at last from the

dreams of the Escorial into the land of shadows, had spent a lifetime,

and melted the wealth of an empire; but universal monarchy had never come

forth from his crucible. The French king, although possessed likewise of

an almost boundless faculty for ambitious visions, was capable of

distinguishing cloud-land from substantial empire. Jeannin, as his envoy,

would at any rate not reveal his master's secret aspirations to those

with whom he came to deal, as openly as Philip had once unveiled himself

to Jeannin.

There could be no doubt that peace at this epoch was the real interest of

France. That kingdom was beginning to flourish again, owing to the very

considerable administrative genius of Bethune, an accomplished financier

according to the lights of the age, and still more by reason of the

general impoverishment of the great feudal houses and of the clergy. The

result of the almost interminable series of civil and religious wars had

been to cause a general redistribution of property. Capital was mainly in

the hands of the middle and lower classes, and the consequence of this

general circulation of wealth through all the channels of society was

precisely what might have been expected, an increase of enterprise and of

productive industry in various branches. Although the financial wisdom of

the age was doing its best to impede commerce, to prevent the influx of

foreign wares, to prohibit the outflow of specie--in obedience to the

universal superstition, which was destined to survive so many centuries,

that gold and silver alone constituted wealth--while, at the same time,

in deference to the idiotic principle of sumptuary legislation, it was

vigorously opposing mulberry culture, silk manufactures, and other

creations of luxury, which, in spite of the hostility of government

sages, were destined from that time forward to become better mines of

wealth for the kingdom than the Indies had been for Spain, yet on the

whole the arts of peace were in the ascendant in France.

The king, although an unscrupulous, self-seeking despot and the coarsest

of voluptuaries, was at least a man of genius. He had also too much

shrewd mother-wit to pursue such schemes as experience had shown to

possess no reality. The talisman "Espoir," emblazoned on his shield, had

led him to so much that it was natural for him at times to think all

things possible.

But he knew how to renounce as well as how to dare. He had abandoned his

hope to be declared Prince of Wales and successor to the English crown,

which he had cherished for a brief period, at the epoch of the Essex

conspiracy; he had forgotten his magnificent dream of placing the crown

of the holy German empire upon his head, and if he still secretly

resolved to annex the Netherlands to his realms, and to destroy his

excellent ally, the usurping, rebellious, and heretic Dutch republic, he

had craft enough to work towards his aim in the dark, and the common

sense to know that by now throwing down the mask he would be for ever

baffled of his purpose.

The history of France, during the last three-quarters of a century, had

made almost every Frenchman, old enough to bear arms, an accomplished

soldier. Henry boasted that the kingdom could put three hundred thousand

veterans into the field--a high figure, when it is recollected that its

population certainly did not exceed fifteen millions. No man however was

better aware than he, that in spite, of the apparent pacification of

parties, the three hundred thousand would not be all on one side, even in

case of a foreign war. There were at least four thousand great feudal

lords as faithful to the Huguenot faith and cause as he had been false to

both; many of them still wealthy, notwithstanding the general ruin which

had swept over the high nobility, and all of them with vast influence and

a splendid following, both among the lesser gentry and the men of lower

rank.

Although he kept a Jesuit priest ever at his elbow, and did his best to

persuade the world and perhaps himself that he had become a devout

Catholic, in consequence of those memorable five hours' instruction from

the Bishop of Bourges, and that there was no hope for France save in its

return to the bosom of the Church, he was yet too politic and too

farseeing to doubt that for him to oppress the Protestants would be not

only suicidal, but, what was worse in his eyes, ridiculous.

He knew, too, that with thirty or forty thousand fighting-men in the

field, with seven hundred and forty churches in the various provinces for

their places of worship, with all the best fortresses in France in their

possession, with leaders like Rohan, Lesdiguieres, Bouillon, and many

others, and with the most virtuous, self-denying, Christian government,

established and maintained by themselves, it would be madness for him and

his dynasty to deny the Protestants their political and religious

liberty, or to attempt a crusade against their brethren in the

Netherlands.

France was far more powerful than Spain, although the world had not yet

recognised the fact. Yet it would have been difficult for both united to

crush the new commonwealth, however paradoxical such a proposition seemed

to contemporaries.

Sully was conscientiously in favour of peace, and Sully was the one great

minister of France. Not a Lerma, certainly; for France was not Spain, nor

was Henry IV. a Philip III. The Huguenot duke was an inferior financier

to his Spanish contemporary, if it were the height of financial skill for

a minister to exhaust the resources of a great kingdom in order to fill

his own pocket. Sully certainly did not neglect his own interests, for he

had accumulated a fortune of at least seventy thousand dollars a year,

besides a cash capital estimated at a million and a half. But while

enriching himself, he had wonderfully improved the condition of the royal

treasury. He had reformed many abuses and opened many new sources of

income. He had, of course, not accomplished the whole Augean task of

purification. He was a vigorous Huguenot, but no Hercules, and demigods

might have shrunk appalled at the filthy mass of corruption which great

European kingdoms everywhere presented to the reformer's eye. Compared to

the Spanish Government, that of France might almost have been considered

virtuous, yet even there everything was venal.

To negotiate was to bribe right and left, and at every step. All the

ministers and great functionaries received presents, as a matter of

course, and it was necessary to pave the pathway even of their

ante-chambers with gold.

The king was fully aware of the practice, but winked at it, because his

servants, thus paid enormous sums by the public and by foreign

Governments, were less importunate for rewards and salaries from himself.

One man in the kingdom was said to have clean hands, the venerable and

sagacious chancellor, Pomponne de Bellievre. His wife, however, was less

scrupulous, and readily disposed of influence and court-favour for a

price, without the knowledge, so it was thought, of the great judge.

Jeannin, too, was esteemed a man of personal integrity, ancient Leaguer

and tricky politician though he were.

Highest offices of magistracy and judicature, Church and State, were

objects of a traffic almost as shameless as in Spain. The ermine was sold

at auction, mitres were objects of public barter, Church preferments were

bestowed upon female children in their cradles. Yet there was hope in

France, notwithstanding that the Pragmatic Sanction of St. Louis, the

foundation of the liberties of the Gallican Church, had been annulled by

Francis, who had divided the seamless garment of Church patronage with

Leo.

Those four thousand great Huguenot lords, those thirty thousand

hard-fighting weavers, and blacksmiths, and other plebeians, those seven

hundred and forty churches, those very substantial fortresses in every

province of the kingdom, were better facts than the Holy Inquisition to

preserve a great nation from sinking into the slough of political

extinction.

Henry was most anxious that Sully should convert himself to the ancient

Church, and the gossips of the day told each other that the duke had

named his price for his conversion. To be made high constable of France,

it was said would melt the resolve of the stiff Huguenot. To any other

inducement or blandishment he was adamant. Whatever truth may have been

in such chatter, it is certain that the duke never gratified his master's

darling desire.

Yet it was for no lack of attempts and intrigues on the part of the king,

although it is not probable that he would have ever consented to bestow

that august and coveted dignity upon a Bethune.

The king did his best by intrigue, by calumny, by talebearing, by

inventions, to set the Huguenots against each other, and to excite the

mutual jealousy of all his most trusted adherents, whether Protestant or

Catholic. The most good-humoured, the least vindictive, the most

ungrateful, the falsest of mankind, he made it his policy, as well as his

pastime, to repeat, with any amount of embroidery that his most florid

fancy could devise, every idle story or calumny that could possibly

create bitter feeling and make mischief among those who surrounded him.

Being aware that this propensity was thoroughly understood, he only

multiplied fictions, so cunningly mingled with truths, as to leave his

hearers quite unable to know what to believe and what to doubt. By such

arts, force being impossible, he hoped one day to sever the band which

held the conventicles together, and to reduce Protestantism to

insignificance. He would have cut off the head of D'Aubigne or Duplessis

Mornay to gain an object, and have not only pardoned but caressed and

rewarded Biron when reeking from the conspiracy against his own life and

crown, had he been willing to confess and ask pardon for his stupendous

crime. He hated vindictive men almost as much as he despised those who

were grateful.

He was therefore far from preferring Sully to Villeroy or Jeannin, but he

was perfectly aware that, in financial matters at least, the duke was his

best friend and an important pillar of the state.

The minister had succeeded in raising the annual revenue of France to

nearly eleven millions of dollars, and in reducing the annual

expenditures to a little more than ten millions. To have a balance on the

right side of the public ledger was a feat less easily accomplished in

those days even than in our own. Could the duke have restrained his

sovereign's reckless extravagance in buildings, parks, hunting

establishments, and harems, he might have accomplished even greater

miracles. He lectured the king roundly, as a parent might remonstrate

with a prodigal son, but it was impossible even for a Sully to rescue

that hoary-headed and most indomitable youth from wantonness and riotous

living. The civil-list of the king amounted to more than one-tenth of the

whole revenue.

On the whole, however, it was clear, as France was then constituted and

administered, that a general peace would be, for the time at least, most

conducive to its interests, and Henry and his great minister were

sincerely desirous of bringing about that result.

Preliminaries for a negotiation which should terminate this mighty war

were now accordingly to be laid down at the Hague. Yet it would seem

rather difficult to effect a compromise. Besides the powers less

interested, but which nevertheless sent representatives to watch the

proceedings--such as Sweden, Denmark, Brandenburg, the Elector

Palatine--there were Spain, France, England, the republic, and the

archdukes.

Spain knew very well that she could not continue the war; but she hoped

by some quibbling recognition of an impossible independence to recover

that authority over her ancient vassals which the sword had for the time

struck down. Distraction in councils, personal rivalries, the well-known

incapacity of a people to govern itself, commercial greediness,

provincial hatreds, envies and jealousies, would soon reduce that jumble

of cities and villages, which aped the airs of sovereignty, into

insignificance and confusion. Adroit management would easily re-assert

afterwards the sovereignty of the Lord's anointed. That a republic of

freemen, a federation of independent states, could take its place among

the nations did not deserve a serious thought.

Spain in her heart preferred therefore to treat. It was however

indispensable that the Netherlands should reestablish the Catholic

religion throughout the land, should abstain then and for ever from all

insolent pretences to trade with India or America, and should punish such

of their citizens as attempted to make voyages to the one or the other.

With these trifling exceptions, the court of Madrid would look with

favour on propositions made in behalf of the rebels.

France, as we have seen, secretly aspired to the sovereignty of all the

Netherlands, if it could be had. She was also extremely in favour of

excluding the Hollanders from the Indies, East and West. The king, fired

with the achievements of the republic at sea, and admiring their great

schemes for founding empires at the antipodes by means of commercial

corporations, was very desirous of appropriating to his own benefit the

experience, the audacity, the perseverance, the skill and the capital of

their merchants and mariners. He secretly instructed his commissioners,

therefore, and repeatedly urged it upon them, to do their best to procure

the renunciation, on the part of the republic, of the Indian trade, and

to contrive the transplantation into France of the mighty trading

companies, so successfully established in Holland and Zeeland.

The plot thus to deprive the provinces of their India trade was supposed

by the statesmen of the republic to have been formed in connivance with

Spain. That power, finding itself half pushed from its seat of power in

the East by the "grand and infallible society created by the United

Provinces,"--[Memoir of Aerssens, ubi sup]--would be but too happy to

make use of this French intrigue in order to force the intruding Dutch

navy from its conquests.

Olden-Barneveld, too politic to offend the powerful and treacherous ally

by a flat refusal, said that the king's friendship was more precious than

the India trade. At the same time he warned the French Government that,

if they ruined the Dutch East India Company, "neither France nor any

other nation would ever put its nose into India again."

James of England, too, flattered himself that he could win for England

that sovereignty of the Netherlands which England as well as France had

so decidedly refused. The marriage of Prince Henry with the Spanish

Infanta was the bait, steadily dangled before him by the politicians of

the Spanish court, and he deluded himself with the thought that the

Catholic king, on the death of the childless archdukes, would make his

son and daughter-in-law a present of the obedient Netherlands. He already

had some of the most important places in the United Netherlands-the

famous cautionary towns in his grasp, and it should go hard but he would

twist that possession into a sovereignty over the whole land. As for

recognising the rebel provinces as an independent sovereignty, that was

most abhorrent to him. Such a tampering with the great principles of

Government was an offence against all crowned heads, a crime in which he

was unwilling to participate.

His instinct against rebellion seemed like second sight. The king might

almost be imagined to have foreseen in the dim future those memorable

months in which the proudest triumph of the Dutch commonwealth was to be

registered before the forum of Christendom at the congress of Westphalia,

and in which the solemn trial and execution of his own son and successor,

with the transformation of the monarchy of the Tudors and Stuarts into a

British republic, were simultaneously to startle the world. But it hardly

needed the gift of prophecy to inspire James with a fear of revolutions.

He was secretly desirous therefore, sustained by Salisbury and his other

advisers, of effecting the restoration of the provinces to the dominion

of his most Catholic Majesty. It was of course the interest of England

that the Netherland rebels should renounce the India trade. So would

James be spared the expense and trouble of war; so would the great

doctrines of divine right be upheld; so would the way be paved towards

the ultimate absorption of the Netherlands by England. Whether his

theological expositions would find as attentive pupils when the pope's

authority had been reestablished over all his neighbours; whether the

Catholic rebels in Ireland would become more tranquil by the subjugation

of the Protestant rebels in Holland; whether the principles of Guy Fawkes

might not find more effective application, with no bulwark beyond the

seas against the incursion of such practitioners--all this he did not

perhaps sufficiently ponder.

Thus far had the discursive mind of James wandered from the position

which it occupied at the epoch of Maximilian de Bethune's memorable

embassy to England.

The archdukes were disposed to quiet. On them fell the burthen of the

war. Their little sovereignty, where--if they could only be allowed to

expend the money squeezed from the obedient provinces in court

diversions, stately architecture, splendid encouragement of the fine

arts, and luxurious living, surrounded by a train of great nobles, fit to

command regiments in the field or assist in the counsels of state, but

chiefly occupied in putting dishes on the court table, handing ewers and

napkins to their Highnesses, or in still more menial offices--so much

enjoyment might be had, was reduced to a mere parade ground for Spanish

soldiery. It was ridiculous, said the politicians of Madrid, to suppose

that a great empire like Spain would not be continually at war in one

direction or another, and would not perpetually require the use of large

armies. Where then could there be a better mustering place for their

forces than those very provinces, so easy of access, so opulent, so

conveniently situate in the neighbourhood of Spain's most insolent

enemies? It was all very fine for the archduke, who knew nothing of war,

they declared, who had no hope of children, who longed only for a life of

inglorious ease, such as he could have had as archbishop, to prate of

peace and thus to compromise the dignity of the realm. On the contrary by

making proper use of the Netherlands, the repose and grandeur of the

monarchy would be secured, even should the war become eternal.

This prospect, not agreeable certainly for the archdukes or their

subjects, was but little admired outside the Spanish court.

Such then were the sentiments of the archdukes, and such the schemes and

visions of Spain, France, and England. On two or three points, those

great powers were mainly, if unconsciously, agreed. The Netherlands

should not be sovereign; they should renounce the India navigation; they

should consent to the re-establishment of the Catholic religion.

On the other hand, the States-General knew their own minds, and made not

the slightest secret of their intentions.

They would be sovereign, they would not renounce the India trade, they

would not agree to the re-establishment of the Catholic religion.

Could the issue of the proposed negotiations be thought hopeful, or was

another half century of warfare impending?

On the 28th May the French commissioners came before the States-General.

There had been many wild rumours flying through the provinces in regard

to the king's secret designs upon the republic, especially since the

visit made to the Hague a twelvemonth before by Francis Aerssens, States'

resident at the French court. That diplomatist, as we know, had been

secretly commissioned by Henry to feel the public pulse in regard to the

sovereignty, so far as that could be done by very private and delicate

fingering. Although only two or three personages had been dealt with--the

suggestions being made as the private views of the ambassadors

only--there had been much gossip on the subject, not only in the

Netherlands, but at the English and Spanish courts. Throughout the

commonwealth there was a belief that Henry wished to make himself king of

the country.

As this happened to be the fact, it was natural that the President,

according to the statecraft of his school, should deny it at once, and

with an air of gentle melancholy.

Wearing therefore his most ingenuous expression, Jeannin addressed the

assembly.

He assured the States that the king had never forgotten how much

assistance he had received from them when he was struggling to conquer

the kingdom legally belonging to him, and at a time when they too were

fighting in their own country for their very existence.

The king thought that he had given so many proofs of his sincere

friendship as to make doubt impossible; but he had found the contrary,

for the States had accorded an armistice, and listened to overtures of

peace, without deigning to consult him on the subject. They had proved,

by beginning and concluding so important a transaction without his

knowledge, that they regarded him with suspicion, and had no respect for

his name. Whence came the causes of that suspicion it was difficult to

imagine, unless from certain false rumours of propositions said to have

been put forward in his behalf, although he had never authorised anyone

to make them, by which men had been induced to believe that he aspired to

the sovereignty of the provinces.

"This falsehood," continued the candid President, "has cut our king to

the heart, wounding him more deeply than anything else could have done.

To make the armistice without his knowledge showed merely your contempt

for him, and your want of faith in him. But he blamed not the action in

itself, since you deemed it for your good, and God grant that you may not

have been deceived. But to pretend that his Majesty wished to grow great

at your expense, this was to do a wrong to his reputation, to his good

faith, and to the desire which he has always shown to secure the

prosperity of your state." Much more spoke Jeannin, in this vein,

assuring the assembly that those abominable falsehoods proceeded from the

enemies of the king, and were designed expressly to sow discord and

suspicion in the provinces. The reader, already aware of the minute and

detailed arrangements made by Henry and his ministers for obtaining the

sovereignty of the United Provinces and destroying their liberties, will

know how to appreciate the eloquence of the ingenuous President.

After the usual commonplaces concerning the royal desire to protect his

allies against wrong and oppression, and to advance their interests, the

President suggested that the States should forthwith communicate the

pending deliberations to all the kings and princes who had favoured their

cause, and especially to the King of England, who had so thoroughly

proved his desire to promote their welfare.

As Jeannin had been secretly directed to pave the way by all possible

means for the king's sovereignty over the provinces; as he was not long

afterwards to receive explicit instructions to expend as much money as

might be necessary in bribing Prince Maurice, Count Lewis William,

Barneveld and his son, together with such others as might seem worth

purchasing, in order to assist Henry in becoming monarch of their

country; and as the English king was at that moment represented in

Henry's private letters to the commissioners as actually loathing the

liberty, power, and prosperity of the provinces, it must be conceded that

the President had acquitted himself very handsomely in his first oration.

Such was the virtue of his honest face.

Barneveld answered with generalities and commonplaces. No man knew better

than the Advocate the exact position of affairs; no man had more

profoundly fathomed the present purposes of the French king; no man had

more acutely scanned his character. But he knew the critical position of

the commonwealth. He knew that, although the public revenue might be

raised by extraordinary and spasmodic exertion to nearly a million

sterling, a larger income than had ever been at the disposition of the

great Queen of England, the annual deficit might be six millions of

florins--more than half the revenue--if the war continued, and that there

was necessity of peace, could the substantial objects of the war be now

obtained. He was well aware too of the subtle and scheming brain which

lay hid beneath that reverend brow of the President, although he felt

capable of coping with him in debate or intrigue. Doubtless he was

inspired with as much ardour for the intellectual conflict as Henry might

have experienced on some great field-day with Alexander Farnese.

On this occasion, however, Barneveld preferred to glide gently over the

rumours concerning Henry's schemes. Those reports had doubtless emanated,

he said, from the enemies of Netherland prosperity. The private

conclusion of the armistice he defended on the ground of necessity, and

of temporary financial embarrassment, and he promised that deputies

should at once be appointed to confer with the royal commissioners in

regard to the whole subject.

In private, he assured Jeannin that the communications of Aerssens had

only been discussed in secret, and had not been confided to more than

three or four persons.

The Advocate, although the leader of the peace party, was by no means

over anxious for peace.

The object of much insane obloquy, because disposed to secure that

blessing for his country on the basis of freedom and independence, he was

not disposed to trust in the sincerity of the archdukes, or the Spanish

court, or the French king. "Timeo Danaos etiam dona ferentes," he had

lately said to Aerssens. Knowing that the resistance of the Netherlands

had been forty years long the bulwark of Europe against the designs of

the Spaniard for universal empire, he believed the republic justified in

expecting the support of the leading powers in the negotiations now

proposed. "Had it not been for the opposition of these provinces," he

said, "he might, in the opinion of the wisest, have long ago been monarch

of all Europe, with small expense of men, money, or credit." He was far

from believing therefore that Spain, which had sacrificed, according to

his estimate, three hundred thousand soldiers and two hundred million

ducats in vain endeavours to destroy the resistance of the United

Provinces, was now ready to lay aside her vengeance and submit to a

sincere peace. Rather he thought to see "the lambkins, now frisking so

innocently about the commonwealth, suddenly transform themselves into

lions and wolves." It would be a fatal error, he said, to precipitate the

dear fatherland into the net of a simulated negotiation, from unwise

impatience for peace. The Netherlanders were a simple, truthful people

and could hope for no advantage in dealing with Spanish friars, nor

discover all the danger and deceit lurking beneath their fair words. Thus

the man, whom his enemies perpetually accused of being bought by the

enemy, of wishing peace at any price, of wishing to bring back the

Catholic party and ecclesiastical influence to the Netherlands, was

vigorously denouncing a precipitate peace, and warning his countrymen of

the danger of premature negotiations.

"As one can hardly know the purity and value of gold," he said, "without

testing it, so it is much more difficult to distinguish a false peace

from a genuine one; for one can never touch it nor taste it; and one

learns the difference when one is cheated and lost. Ignorant people think

peace negotiations as simple as a private lawsuit. Many sensible persons

even think that; the enemy once recognising us for a free, sovereign

state, we shall be in the same position as England and France, which

powers have lately made peace with the archdukes and with Spain. But we

shall find a mighty difference. Moreover, in those kingdoms the Spanish

king has since the peace been ever busy corrupting their officers of

state and their subjects, and exciting rebellion and murder within their

realms, as all the world must confess. And the English merchants complain

that they have suffered more injustice, violence, and wrong from the

Spaniards since the peace than they did during the war."

The Advocate also reminded his countrymen that the archduke, being a

vassal of Spain, could not bind that power by his own signature, and that

there was no proof that the king would renounce his pretended rights to

the provinces. If he affected to do so, it would only be to put the

republic to sleep. He referred, with much significance, to the late

proceedings of the Admiral of Arragon at Emmerich, who refused to release

that city according to his plighted word, saying roundly that whatever he

might sign and seal one day he would not hesitate absolutely to violate

on the next if the king's service was thereby to be benefited.

With such people, who had always learned law-doctors and ghostly

confessors to strengthen and to absolve them, they could never expect

anything but broken faith and contempt for treaties however solemnly

ratified.

Should an armistice be agreed upon and negotiations begun, the Advocate

urged that the work of corruption and bribery would not be a moment

delayed, and although the Netherlanders were above all nations a true and

faithful race, it could hardly be hoped that no individuals would be

gained over by the enemy.

"For the whole country," said Barneveld, "would swarm with Jesuits,

priests, and monks, with calumnies and corruptions--the machinery by

which the enemy is wont to produce discord, relying for success upon the

well-known maxim of Philip of Macedon, who considered no city impregnable

into which he could send an ass laden with gold."

The Advocate was charged too with being unfriendly to the India trade,

especially to the West India Company.

He took the opportunity, however, to enlarge with emphasis and eloquence

upon that traffic as constituting the very lifeblood of the country.

"The commerce with the East Indies is going on so prosperously," he said,

"that not only our own inhabitants but all strangers are amazed. The West

India Company is sufficiently prepared, and will cost the commonwealth so

little, that the investment will be inconsiderable in comparison with the

profits. And all our dangers and difficulties have nearly vanished since

the magnificent victory of Gibraltar, by which the enemy's ships,

artillery, and sailors have been annihilated, and proof afforded that the

Spanish galleys are not so terrible as they pretend to be. By means of

this trade to both the Indies, matters will soon be brought into such

condition that the Spaniards will be driven out of all those regions and

deprived of their traffic. Thus will the great wolf's teeth be pulled

out, and we need have no farther fear of his biting again. Then we may

hope for a firm and assured peace, and may keep the Indies, with the

whole navigation thereon depending, for ourselves, sharing it freely and

in common with our allies."

Certainly no statesman could more strongly depict the dangers of a

pusillanimous treaty, and the splendid future of the republic, if she

held fast to her resolve for political independence, free religion, and

free trade, than did the great Advocate at this momentous epoch of

European history.

Had he really dreamed of surrendering the republic to Spain, that

republic whose resistance ever since the middle of the previous century

had been all that had saved Europe, in the opinion of learned and

experienced thinkers, from the universal empire of Spain--had the

calumnies, or even a thousandth part of the calumnies, against him been

true--how different might have been the history of human liberty!

Soon afterwards, in accordance with the suggestions of the French king

and with their own previous intentions, a special legation was despatched

by the States to England, in order to notify the approaching conferences

to the sovereign of that country, and to invite his participation in the

proceedings.

The States' envoys were graciously received by James, who soon appointed

Richard Spencer and Ralph Winwood as commissioners to the Hague, duly

instructed to assist at the deliberations, and especially to keep a sharp

watch upon French intrigues. There were also missions and invitations to

Denmark and to the Electors Palatine and of Brandenburg, the two latter

potentates having, during the past three years, assisted the States with

a hundred thousand florins annually.

The news of the great victory at Gibraltar had reached the Netherlands

almost simultaneously with the arrival of the French commissioners. It

was thought probable that John Neyen had received the weighty

intelligence some days earlier, and the intense eagerness of the

archdukes and of the Spanish Government to procure the recal of the Dutch

fleet was thus satisfactorily explained. Very naturally this magnificent

success, clouded though it was by the death of the hero to whom it was

due, increased the confidence of the States in the justice of their cause

and the strength of their position.

Once more, it is not entirely idle to consider the effect of scientific

progress on the march of human affairs, as so often exemplified in

history. Whether that half-century of continuous war would have been

possible with the artillery, means of locomotion, and other machinery of

destruction and communication now so terribly familiar to the world, can

hardly be a question. The preterhuman prolixity of negotiation which

appals us in the days when steam and electricity had not yet annihilated

time and space, ought also to be obsolete. At a period when the news of a

great victory was thirty days on its travels from Gibraltar to Flushing,

aged counsellors justified themselves in a solemn consumption of time

such as might have exasperated Jared or Methuselah in his boyhood. Men

fought as if war was the normal condition of humanity, and negotiated as

if they were all immortal. But has the art political kept pace with the

advancement of physical science? If history be valuable for the examples

it furnishes both for imitation and avoidance, then the process by which

these peace conferences were initiated and conducted may be wholesome

food for reflection.

John Neyen, who, since his secret transactions already described at the

Hague and Fort Lillo, had been speeding back and forth between Brussels,

London, and Madrid, had once more returned to the Netherlands, and had

been permitted to reside privately at Delft until the king's ratification

should arrive from Spain.

While thus established, the industrious friar had occupied his leisure in

studying the situation of affairs. Especially he had felt inclined to

renew some of those little commercial speculations which had recently

proved so comfortable in the case of Dirk van der Does. Recorder

Cornelius Aerssens came frequently to visit him, with the private consent

of the Government, and it at once struck the friar that Cornelius would

be a judicious investment. So he informed the recorder that the archdukes

had been much touched with his adroitness and zeal in facilitating the

entrance of their secret agent into the presence of the Prince and the

Advocate. Cruwel, in whose company the disguised Neyen had made his first

journey to the Hague, was a near relative of Aerssena, The honest monk

accordingly, in recognition of past and expected services, begged one day

the recorder's acceptance of a bill, drawn by Marquis Spinola on Henry

Beckman, merchant of Amsterdam, for eighty thousand ducats. He also

produced a diamond ring, valued at ten thousand florins, which he

ventured to think worthy the acceptance of Madame Aerssens. Furthermore,

he declared himself ready to pay fifteen thousand crowns in cash, on

account of the bill, whenever it might be, desired, and observed that the

archdukes had ordered the house which the recorder had formerly occupied

in Brussels to be reconveyed to him. Other good things were in store, it

was delicately hinted, as soon as they had been earned.

Aerssens expressed his thanks for the house, which, he said, legally

belonged to him according to the terms of the surrender of Brussels. He

hesitated in regard to the rest, but decided finally to accept the bill

of exchange and the diamond, apprising Prince Maurice and Olden-Barneveld

of the fact, however, on his return to the Hague. Being subsequently

summoned by Neyen to accept the fifteen thousand crowns, he felt

embarrassed at the compromising position in which he had placed himself.

He decided accordingly to make a public statement of the affair to the

States-General. This was done, and the States placed the ring and the

bill in the hands of their treasurer, Joris de Bie.

The recorder never got the eighty thousand ducats, nor his wife the

diamond; but although there had been no duplicity on his part, he got

plenty of slander. His evil genius had prompted him, not to listen

seriously to the temptings of the monk, but to deal with him on his own

terms. He was obliged to justify himself against public suspicion with

explanations and pamphlets, but some taint of the calumny stuck by him to

the last.

Meantime, the three months allotted for the reception of Philip's

ratification had nearly expired. In March, the royal Government had

expressly consented that the archdukes should treat with the rebels on

the ground of their independence. In June that royal permission had been

withdrawn, exactly because the independence could never be acknowledged.

Albert, naturally enough indignant at such double-dealing, wrote to the

king that his disapprobation was incomprehensible, as the concession of

independence had been made by direct command of Philip. "I am much

amazed," he said, "that, having treated with the islanders on condition

of leaving them free, by express order of your Majesty (which you must

doubtless very well remember), your Majesty now reproves my conduct, and

declares your dissatisfaction." At last, on the 23rd July, Spinola

requested a safe conduct for Louis Verreyken, auditor of the council at

Brussels, to come to the Hague.

On the 23rd of July that functionary accordingly arrived. He came before

Prince Maurice and fifty deputies of the States-General, and exhibited

the document. At the same time he urged them, now that the long-desired

ratification had been produced, to fulfil at once their promise, and to

recal their fleet from the coast of Spain.

Verreyken was requested to withdraw while the instrument was examined.

When recalled, he was informed that the States had the most

staight-forward intention to negotiate, but that the royal document did

not at all answer their expectation. As few of the delegates could read

Spanish, it would first of all be necessary to cause it to be translated.

When that was done they would be able to express their opinion concerning

it and come to a decision in regard to the recal of the fleet. This ended

the proceedings on that occasion.

Next day Prince Maurice invited Verreyken and others to dine. After

dinner the stadholder informed him that the answer of the States might

soon be expected; at the same time expressing his regret that the king

should have sent such an instrument. It was very necessary, said the

prince, to have plain speaking, and he, for one, had never believed that

the king would send a proper ratification. The one exhibited was not at

all to the purpose. The king was expected to express himself as clearly

as the archdukes had done in their instrument. He must agree to treat

with the States-General as with people entirely free, over whom he

claimed no authority. If the king should refuse to make this public

declaration, the States would at once break off all negotiations.

Three days afterwards, seven deputies conferred with Verreyken.

Barneveld, as spokesman, declared that, so far as the provinces were

concerned, the path was plain and open to an honest, ingenuous, lasting

peace, but that the manner of dealing on the other side was artificial

and provocative of suspicion. A most important line, which had been

placed by the States at the very beginning of the form suggested by them,

was wanting in the ratification now received. This hardly seemed an

accidental omission. The whole document was constrained and defective. It

was necessary to deal with Netherlanders in clear and simple language.

The basis of any possible negotiation was that the provinces were to be

treated with as and called entirely free. Unless this was done

negotiations were impossible. The States-General were not so unskilled in

affairs as to be ignorant that the king and the archdukes were quite

capable, at a future day, of declaring themselves untrammelled by any

conditions. They would boast that conventions with rebels and pledges to

heretics were alike invalid. If Verreyken had brought no better document

than the one presented, he had better go at once. His stay in the

provinces was superfluous.

At a subsequent interview Barneveld informed Verreyken that the king's

confirmation had been unanimously rejected by the States-General as

deficient both in form and substance. He added that the people of the

provinces were growing very lukewarm in regard to peace, that Prince

Maurice opposed it, that many persons regretted the length to which the

negotiations had already gone. Difficult as it seemed to be to recede,

the archdukes might be certain that a complete rupture was imminent.

All these private conversations of Barneveld, who was known to be the

chief of the peace party, were duly reported by Verreyken in secret notes

to the archduke and to Spinola. Of course they produced their effect. It

surely might have been seen that the tricks and shifts of an antiquated

diplomacy were entirely out of place if any wholesome result were

desired. But the habit of dissimulation was inveterate. That the man who

cannot dissemble is unfit to reign, was perhaps the only one of his

father's golden rules which Philip III. could thoroughly comprehend, even

if it be assumed that the monarch was at all consulted in regard to this

most important transaction of his life. Verreyken and the friar knew very

well when they brought the document that it would be spurned by the

States, and yet they were also thoroughly aware that it was the king's

interest to, begin the negotiations as soon as possible. When thus

privately and solemnly assured by the Advocate that they were really

wasting their time by being the bearers of these royal evasions, they

learned therefore nothing positively new, but were able to assure their

employers that to thoroughly disgust the peace party was not precisely

the mode of terminating the war.

History of the United Netherlands from the Death of William the Silent to the Twelve Year's Truce — Complete (1584-1609) · 第 54 / 59 章