ARTICLE IN THE BOSTON DAILY ADVERTISER, OCTOBER 2, 1865.

The two colored regiments enlisted, equipped, and sent forth by

Massachusetts have returned home and been mustered out. Officers and

privates are now dispersed. The last music has died away. Of these

two famous regiments, which made such a mark on the times, nothing

now remains but the memory. This cannot die; for it belongs to the

history of a race. But all who went have not returned. The youthful

hero, so gentle and true, who was selected by the Governor to command

the Fifty-Fourth Regiment, fell at the head of his men on the very

parapets of the Rebel enemy, and was buried in the sand with his humble

companions in arms,--thus in death, as in life, sharing their fortunes.

Family, parents, wife, were left to mourn. As was said of “Bonnie

George Campbell,” in the beautiful Scotch ballad,--

“Hame cam’ his gude horse,

But never cam’ he.”

Few who were in Boston at the time can forget that pleasant day in

May, when this colored regiment, with Colonel Shaw riding proudly at

its head, passed by the State-House, where it had been equipped and

inspired. Cheers and the waving of handkerchiefs greeted it. There

were tears also. It was a joyous and a sad sight to see this new

legion, acquired to the national service, promptly marching to its

distant and perilous duty, under a commander who, turning away from

the blandishments of life, consecrates himself to his country. Nor was

another consecration forgotten. It was to the redemption of a race.

Massachusetts had sent forth many brave regiments; but here was the

first regiment of colored soldiers marshalled at the North. It was an

experiment, destined to be an epoch. By the success of this regiment a

whole race was elevated. As he went forth, it became less an incident

of war than an act of magnanimity and moral grandeur. Sidney, who

refused the cup of cold water, was one of our young hero’s predecessors.

Not long after came tidings of the bloody assault on Fort Wagner,

when, by an advance without parallel over an open beach, exposed to a

storm of shot and shell, these new-made soldiers of a despised color,

sleepless, dinnerless, supperless, vindicated their title as bravest of

the brave. They had done what no other troops had done during the war.

This was their Bunker Hill, and Shaw was their martyred Warren. Though

defeated, they were yet victorious. The regiment was driven back; but

the cause was advanced. The country learned to know colored troops,

and they learned to know themselves. From that day of conflict nobody

doubted their capacity or courage as soldiers. There was sorrow in

Massachusetts as we were told how many had fallen, and that the beloved

officer so recently admired in our streets was sleeping in an unknown

grave; but even this sorrow did not blind an intelligent people to the

magnitude of the event. Grief was chastened by honest pride. Swelling

hearts were soothed by the thought that much had been done for humanity.

A desire arose at once for a monument to commemorate alike the hero

and the event. But the Rebellion was then raging. It was no time for

monuments. At last, with the overthrow of the Rebel arms, the time

seems to have arrived. The youthful commander still sleeps with his

comrades in death. There let him sleep. Westminster Abbey has no

resting-place more honorable. But his patriotic sacrifice and the great

event deserve commemoration, as well for gratitude as for example. Some

propose a monument on the spot where he fell. This may be made; but

it can be only a mound or pile of stones, to be seen by ships as they

enter the harbor of Charleston. This is not enough. It will not tell

the whole story.

The monument should be in Massachusetts, where the hero was born, and

where the regiment was also born. Each belonged to Massachusetts,--the

martyr by double title: first, as he drew his breath here, and,

secondly, as he commanded this regiment of Massachusetts. Let the

monument be here. Of course, no common stone or shaft will be

sufficient. It must be of bronze. It must be an equestrian statue. And

there is a place for it. Let it stand on one of the stone terraces

of the steps ascending from Beacon Street to the State-House. It was

in the State-House that the regiment was equipped and inspired. It

was from the State-House that the devoted commander rode to death.

Let future generations, as long as bronze shall endure, look upon

him there riding always, and be taught by his example to succor the

oppressed and to surrender life for duty. Especially let legislators of

Massachusetts, by daily sight of the symbolic statue, be gratefully led

to constant support of the cause for which he died. Here is a theme for

Art, and its elements are youth, beauty, self-sacrifice, death, and a

great cause.

On the Continent of Europe, by general usage, only members of a

royal family are allowed the honor of an equestrian statue. In the

unequalled monument by Rauch, at Berlin, the royal Fritz is mounted,

but his generals are about him standing. Near by is Blücher, who was

prince and marshal, also standing. In England there are equestrian

statues of kings, and of the Duke of Wellington. But this is no reason

why a grateful people should not decree an equestrian statue to a

youthful hero, whose duty was on horseback, and who was last seen in

our streets on horseback. As an American citizen he belonged to our

sovereignty, and we fitly celebrate him with the highest honors. Few

belonging to any royal family have so good a title. In the Republics

of Italy, during the early ages, when royalty did not exist, there

were equestrian statues. The first of these in merit, and one of the

first in time, was the renowned statue in bronze of the _condottiere_

Bartolommeo Coleoni, who, after a lapse of centuries, is still admired

as he rides bravely in a public square of Venice, while the artist has

secured the immortality of his own name by engraving it upon the girth

of the saddle. It is sometimes said, on doubtful authority, that this

early chieftain was the first to mount cannon on wheels, so that they

could be used in the field. But our chieftain did more than mount

cannon, and the triumphant experiment with which his name is linked

surpasses far anything in the life of an Italian trooper. His act was

above any triumph of battle. It was a victory of ideas, and belongs to

the sacred history of Humanity.

Let the monument be made. Boston has a sculptor without a superior

among living artists, whose soul and genius would be in the work.

Already a colored person, well known among us, with a heart full of

gratitude, has subscribed five hundred dollars. Other colored persons

are contributing in smaller sums, according to their means. They

properly lead now in tribute to him who died in leading them. But

others of ampler means must see that this generous effort does not

fail. I should not suggest this, if I thought that I should take away

from other things deserving aid. The present charity is so peculiar,

that it appeals equally to all who are moved by patriotism, by

gratitude, by sympathy, or by Art.

This article was followed by a public meeting in the Council

Chamber of the State-House, at the invitation of Governor

Andrew, to consider the proposition of an equestrian statue in

honor of Colonel Shaw. The following committee was appointed

to collect subscriptions and superintend the erection of the

statue: John A. Andrew, Charles Sumner, Joshua B. Smith,

Charles R. Codman, Samuel G. Howe, Robert B. Storer, Frederick

W. Lincoln, Jr., James L. Little, William W. Clapp, Jr.,

Charles Beck, Rev. Leonard A. Grimes, Peleg W. Chandler,

William G. Weld, Edward Atkinson, Charles W. Slack, Robert E.

Apthorp, Henry Lee, Jr., Edward W. Kinsley, George B. Loring,

LeBaron Russell, Henry I. Bowditch.

At a meeting of this committee, Charles Sumner, Samuel G. Howe,

Charles Beck, George B. Loring, LeBaron Russell, Henry I.

Bowditch, and Charles R. Codman were appointed a sub-committee

to select an artist, to contract with him, to secure a proper

place for the statue, and to superintend its erection.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 12 (of 20) · 第 111 / 126 题