The Augusta _Transcript_, of Georgia, said:--

“To show the infamous slanders to which the fanatical

leaders are obliged to resort, in order to goad on their

followers to the new crusade against the South, we

republish an extract from Mr. Sumner’s last speech in

Massachusetts.”

In England, Colonel T. Perronet Thompson, the Freetrader, and

former Member of Parliament, in his series of articles in the

Bradford _Advertiser_, after enumerating the topics, said:--

“The man who has no curiosity to know what the first

statesman in America says on all these heads would go to

bed without asking whether the fire in the next street was

put out, or if the house next his own began to smoke. The

very jobbers in Rebel bonds, or builders of the Shenandoah,

might feel a desire to know which way the thing was going.”

The _Scotsman_, a foremost journal at Edinburgh, commenced a

leader on this speech as follows:--

“It would be at least difficult to name a man in the United

States, or rather the States now under process of being

reunited, who is better entitled to a respectful hearing,

all the world over, than Mr. Charles Sumner. He has had but

one object,--a noble object, worthy any calculable amount

of struggle and sacrifice; and he has pursued it ardently,

bravely, disregarding both party and personal consequences,

and letting no other object stand in the way or turn him

aside for a moment from the straight path. He has sought

only the Abolition of Slavery, and has deemed nothing else

worth fighting for.”

The response by correspondence was prompt and earnest from

various parts of the country. The letters from which extracts

are taken, with the exception of that from Great Salt Lake

City, were received immediately after the delivery of the

speech.

* * * * *

Charles Stearns, ardently against Slavery, and familiar with

the Rebel States, wrote from Springfield:--

“After an absence from good old Massachusetts of eleven

years, my heart was made glad, the other day, by seeing

a notice in the papers that you were to speak at the

Republican Convention at Worcester. I immediately hastened

thither, and felt happy beyond measure, as I listened to

the deafening applause with which your appearance upon the

platform was greeted.”

Rev. John T. Sargent, the Liberal clergyman, wrote from

Boston:--

“That noble speech of yours at the Worcester Convention,

so complete in its analysis of our national condition,

dangers, and duties, ought to be printed in letters of

gold, and emblazoned henceforth as the established moral

code of every one of our States.”

David A. Wasson, the honest thinker and student of philosophy,

wrote from Boston:--

“God bless you, and make you strong for the arduous and

immense work that is immediately before you! The coming

session of Congress will, I think, be preëminently the

critical and cardinal day in all American legislation. I

look forward to it with unspeakable anxiety. If only your

counsels had been accepted, how clear, how easy, all would

be! Now the situation is fearfully complicated.”

Rev. George C. Beckwith, Secretary of the American Peace

Society, wrote from Boston:--

“Let me express the earnest hope that you will economize

your strength for the great conflict soon to come during

the approaching Congress. I never doubted the final success

of our arms; but when the sword should be sheathed, I have

always expected to see our worst crisis in our last grapple

with slaveholders. We shall quite need all your prudence,

forecast, energy, courage, and decision, to meet the

dangers ahead from returning Rebels.”

Rev. Charles Brooks, eminent for his services to education,

wrote from Medford:--

“I thank you, I thank you a thousand times, for your

sound, comprehensive, and patriotic speech at Worcester.

Shakespeare says, ‘Things by season seasoned are.’ Never

was a word more fitly spoken. It is the best speech I have

read for years, and will become historic.”

William I. Bowditch, the able conveyancer and Abolitionist,

wrote from Boston:--

“I read your speech yesterday morning with great

satisfaction, and yet with considerable misgiving as to

whether its truths will be acted on. I doubt if the North

has been punished enough to induce it to forego the attempt

of trying again to circumvent God.”

P. R. Guiney, on the day the speech was delivered, wrote from

Boston:--

“I am under an overwhelming conviction, that, unless the

views which you express are substantially adhered to,

Despotism will have gained all that Liberty won in our

recent war. The Battle of Gettysburg was not more of a

crisis than this. May God prosper you!”

Professor George W. Greene, scholar and author, wrote from East

Greenwich, R. I.:--

“I received your Worcester speech this morning. I

must write a line to say I have read it carefully and

thoughtfully, and say ‘Amen’ to it all. God grant it may go

into every house and every heart! I look with deep anxiety

for the opening of Congress. You have yet your hardest

fight to win; but it is the fight of God and Humanity, and

you will win it.”

Professor Charles D. Cleveland, an ardent Abolitionist and

successful teacher, recently Consul at Cardiff in Wales, wrote

from Philadelphia:--

“Many, many thanks to you for your noble speech at the

Worcester Convention. Oh that your words might unite with

the heart of the President and bring forth appropriate

fruits! For the last two or three months I have been quite

desponding as to his course.”

John Penington, the scholarly bookseller, wrote from

Philadelphia:--

“With its matter I fully sympathize; but I was particularly

struck with the aptitude and felicity of your illustrations

of the various points of your argument.”

William Goodell, the early and constant Abolitionist, author

of “Slavery and Anti-Slavery,” a history also of the “American

Slave Code,” wrote from Bozrahville, Connecticut, where he was

then residing:--

“In my rural retreat, where I am for the present

recruiting my health, a copy of the _Commonwealth_

containing your great speech at Worcester, September 14th,

providentially falls into my hands, and I cannot forbear

trespassing upon your time one moment to congratulate and

to thank you, which I do most heartily, upon your great

achievement, and for your signal service to your country,

in the hour of its greatest peril,--_greatest_ I say,

because, as I fear, so little perceived and so little

understood.… If you had spent the whole summer in preparing

that speech, I see not how you could have improved it, nor

how your time and talents could have been more worthily

or more usefully employed.… You well say, ‘We must look

confidently to Congress’; to which permit me to add, that

for the leadership of Congress the country must look to

_you_, whose ‘course is fixed,’ who ‘will not hesitate,’

who ‘will not surrender.’”

Hon. Wayne MacVeagh, Chairman of the Republican State Committee

of Pennsylvania, afterwards Minister at Constantinople, wrote

from West Chester, Pennsylvania:--

“I have just finished reading your superb speech at

Worcester, in the complete form in which you sent it to

me, and cannot go to bed without thanking you for it. The

right word, in the right time, by the right man,--what more

should we ask?”

William Hickey, Chief Clerk of the Senate, where he had been

a life-long officer, and author of a well-known edition of

the Constitution with accompanying documents, wrote from

Washington:--

“Your speech ably maintains the consistency, ability, and

patriotism which have uniformly distinguished your course,

from your first essay in the sacred cause of Liberty, which

has elicited so much of disinterested zeal and indomitable

courage and perseverance on your part as to call forth,

in my hearing, from the most honorable and intelligent

of your political opponents from the South, declarations

attributing those qualities to you in an eminent degree,

giving you credit for consistency and unmistakable

integrity of purpose. Your exertions have in a very great

degree contributed towards the defeat of the Rebellion and

the victory of the Government over its enemies, and you

have now the satisfaction of enjoying the fruits of your

labors and the exercise of your literary superiority and

transcendent talents.”

Hon. John C. Underwood, who had written shortly before on

Reconstruction,[252] wrote from Alexandria, Virginia:--

“I thank you for your Convention speech. Its positions and

arguments are so overwhelming that I feel almost certain

that your efforts will succeed with our people, and that

you will be acknowledged the wise statesman and enlightened

Christian patriot that I know you are.”

General Saxton, an Antislavery army officer, commanding in

South Carolina, wrote from Charleston:--

“I most fully sympathize with and cordially indorse every

word and line. In the future, the wisdom of your position

will be fully established and vindicated.”

Hon. Charles D. Drake, an eminent lawyer and law-writer,

afterwards United States Senator from Missouri, and Chief

Justice of the Court of Claims, wrote:--

“Being detained at home by indisposition, I was glad of the

privilege of at once reading your latest views on the great

questions of the day in connection with Reconstruction.

For them, and for the heroic spirit with which you take

your stand, and determine ‘to fight it out on that line,’

I offer you my most sincere and fervent thanks. May God

preserve your life and health, and enable you to fight it

out to a complete victory!”

Hon. Charles Durkee, formerly Senator of the United States from

Wisconsin, and then Governor of Utah, wrote from Salt Lake City

to Governor Farwell, of Wisconsin:--

“I have just finished reading Mr. Sumner’s great speech

delivered at the Massachusetts State Convention. What a

masterly argument! It embodies the condensation of Calhoun,

the strength of Webster, and more than the eloquence of

Clay. In logic, in illustration, in simplicity of truth, I

have never read a state-paper that equals it. Its timely

utterance how fortunate for the country! He inspires

some of the most vital parts of the Constitution (which

heretofore have been a dead letter) with new life and

activity. Washington and Lincoln led in the first and

second revolutions, but it was left for Charles Sumner to

lead in the third,--a revolution in _Constitutional and

Republican ideas_. Be so kind as to thank him, in my name,

for this timely effort in behalf of his country and in the

cause of the oppressed.”

Such words from distant places were an encouragement to the

speaker. Evidently he was not alone, nor had he spoken in vain.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 12 (of 20) · 第 105 / 126 题