II

In the shouted extras that succeeded the initial news of the murder,

Margaret Austen was mentioned, not as the criminal, no one less criminal

than the girl could be imagined, but as being associated with the

parties involved.

That was her misfortune and a very grievous misfortune, though, however

grievous, it was as nothing to other circumstances for which she

subsequently blamed herself, after having previously attributed them to

fate, or rather, as fate is more modernly known, to karma.

Any belief may console. A belief in karma not only consoles, it

explains. As such it is not suited to those who accept things on faith,

which is a very good way to accept to them. It may be credulous to

believe that Jehovah dictated the ten commandments. But the commandments

are sound. Moreover it is perhaps better to be wrong in one's belief's

than not to have any.

Margaret Austen believed in karma and in many related and wonderful

things. Her face showed it. It showed other things; appreciation,

sympathy, unworldliness, good-breeding and that minor charm that beauty

is. It showed a girl good to look at, good through and through; a girl

tall, very fair, who smiled readily, rarely laughed and never

complained.

It is true that at the time this drama begins it would have been

captious of her to have complained of anything were it not that life is

so ordered that it has sorrow for shadow. The shadow on this human rose

was her mother.

Mrs. Austen had seen worse days and never proposed to see them again.

Among the chief assets of her dear departed was a block of New Haven.

The stock, before collapsing, shook. Then it tripped, fell and kept at

it. Through what financial clairvoyance the dear departed's trustee got

her out, just in time, and, quite illegally but profitably, landed her

in Standard Oil is not a part of this drama. But meanwhile she had

shuddered. Like many another widow, to whom New Haven was as good as

Governments, she might have been in the street. Pointing at her had been

that spectre--Want!

It was just that which she never proposed to see again. The spectre in

pointing had put a mark on this woman who was arrogant, ambitious and

horribly shrewd.

A tall woman with a quick tongue, a false front, an air of great

affability and, when on parade, admirably sent out, she ruled her

daughter, or thought she did, which is not quite the same thing.

Margaret Austen was ruled by her conscience and her beautiful beliefs.

These were her masters. This human rose was their lovely slave. But

latterly a god had enthralled her. It was with wonder and thanksgiving

that she recognised the overlordship of that brat of a divinity, whom

poets call Eros, and thinkers the Genius of the Species.

Mrs. Austen, who had danced many a time before his shrine, had no

objection whatever to the godlet, except only when he neglected to

appear Olympianly, as divinity should, with a nimbus of rentrolls and

gold.

In view of the fact that he had come to Margaret in deshabille, that is

to say without any discernible nimbus, he affronted Mrs. Austen's

ambitious eyes.

Of that she said nothing to Margaret. But at dinner one evening she

summarised it to Peter Verelst who sat at her right.

The room, which was furnished with tolerable taste, gave on Park Avenue

where she resided. At her left was Monty Paliser. Farther down were

Margaret, Lennox and Kate Schermerhorn. Coffee had been served. Paliser

was talking to Miss Schermerhorn; Lennox to Margaret.

"I don't like it," Mrs. Austen said evenly to Peter Verelst. "But what

can I do?"

Peter Verelst was an old New Yorker and an old beau. Mrs. Austen had

known him when she was in shorter frocks than those then in vogue. Even

as a child she had been ahead of the fashion.

"Do?" Verelst repeated. "Do nothing."

"I am a snob," she resumed, expecting him to contradict her. "I did hope

that Margaret, with her looks, would marry brilliantly."

The Paliser case · 第 4 / 200 题