The "Gualt." was a misprint for the written "Rumph."

H. LUTARIA. _H._ ovata-oblonga umbilicata, interne coloratiore.

"Habitat frequens in lutosis fluviis, lacubus." May not the _Valvata

piscinalis_ be the shell intended?

H. PERVERSA. _H._ ovato-oblonga subperforata glabra.

"Pet. Gaz. t. 44. f. 7", and "Grew. Mus. t. 10. f. 9" cited in

the 'Systema', were also referred to in the MS. "Alba", and "in

quibusdam", were interpolations in the Linnean handwriting: _H.

sulphurata_ was the intended designation.

H. IANTHINA. _H._ subrotunda obtusa patula diaphana.

The entire account of this beautiful shell was written by Linnæus

subsequently to the labours of his amanuensis: the twelve last

printed words were not present. The cited figure of Gualtieri was not

admitted, as a representation, but only alluded to in the final remark

of "Confer Gualt. t. 64. f. O." "List. Hist. t. 572. f. 23", and

"Sloan. Jam. 2. p. 239. t. 1. f. 4" were indicated as delineations.

Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society - Vol. 4 Zoology · 第 197 / 311 题