STROMBUS.

This genus, rendered more natural by the omission of _S. lividus_ and

_ater_ (assigned to _Turricula_), appeared under the designation of

HARPAGO with the following definition:--

Testa depressa, nodosa. Apertura longitudinalis. Labium antice

dilatatum ultra basin.

The _Strombi_ of the manuscript were the young of this genus (erased by

Linnæus) and certain Lamarckian _Fusi_, _Pyrulæ_, and _Fasciolariæ_.

S. CHIRAGRA. _Har._ labii spinis lævibus 6, extimis recurvis, fauce

striata.

"Bar. Icon. 327. f. 1." was an additional synonym.

S. SCORPIUS. _Har._ labii spinis nodosis _7_, fauce striata.

The published account was enlarged by the following passages, which are

not to be found in the written copy: "crenulato cincta", "lato, brevi",

"s. incarnata", "s. testaceo-nebulosus". "Distinctum" was originally

"obscuro", and "repandus, inflexus" was "denticulatus."

S. LAMBIS. _Har._ labii spinis lævibus _7_, fauce lævi.

"Bar. Icon. t. 1326. f. _7_" was the synonym omitted in printing. The

name was borrowed from d'Argenville.

S. MILLEPEDA. _Har._ labii spinis lævibus 10.

"Anteriora" was "posteriora" in the manuscript.

S. LENTIGINOSUS. _Har._ labio inermi integro rotundato, angulis

pluribus nodosis.

The "aut marginatum" was "fragile, diaphanum", so that a young shell

appears to have furnished the materials for description.

S. GALLUS. _Har._ labio inermi mucronato, cingulo dorsali spinoso.

S. AURIS-DIANÆ. _Har._ labio inermi muricato, cauda recurva, lobo

incurvato.

The "32. f. II." was a misprint for the written "17. f. O." The

printed additions are "usque" and "Color testaceo et albido nebulosus."

S. PUGILIS. _Har._ labio inermi obtuso, spira spinosa distincta, basi

emarginata.

"Nitida", and "sed spira albida", were not found in the original.

S. LUHUANUS. _Har._ labio obtuso, antice posticeque emarginata.

Few of the details were present in the original copy, but appear

to have been added, to discriminate the species from the allied

_gibberulus_. "Spira obtusa brevis" was added by the hand of Linnæus;

"sæpe subplicati", "postice lobo obsoleto instructum", "intus",

"Columella nigricans", "Cauda nulla, sed postice emarginata", were all

absent from the MS.

S. GIBBERULUS. _Har._ labio inermi dorso lævi, spira repanda.

The printed additions are "subtus planiuscula", "læves", "fuscum", and

the final remark.

S. LATISSIMUS. _Har._ labio inermi rotundato, spira subnodosa

breviore, dorso lævi.

S. EPIDROMIS. _Har._ labio inermi dilatato, dorso lævi, spira

subnodosa.

The _S. epidromis_, as it originally stood in the manuscript, was a

recognizable species, and precisely identical with the shell so named

in the 'Systema'; for the erroneous reference to Gualtieri was not

present, neither was "carinato," nor any of the discordant details

from "interius" to the termination. As the printed description now

stands, it would suit _S. emarginatus_ or _succinctus_, at the least,

equally well. I doubt not our author, when correcting the press,

forgot his own species, and added the partial essentials of one

species to those of another.

S. CANARIUM. _Har._ labio inermi dilatato, dorso spiraque lævibus.

The erroneous reference to plate 37 of Rumphius was not present in the

written copy, which contains the additional synonyms of "Pet. Gaz.

t. 98. f. 11", and "Klein, t. 4. f. 73": the latter was not there

originally. The early description has been improved, in the press, by

the addition of "obovata", "Faux lævis, alba", and "longitudinaliter

subundulatus."

S. VITTATUS. _Har._ labiis inermibus, spiræ anfractibus vitta

interstinctis.

S. URCEUS. _Har._ labiis inermibus striatis, dorso nodoso.

The erroneous reference to Gualtieri was not present in the original,

but in place of it the 37. W. of Rumphius (_S. mutabilis_): "Spira

testa brevior, plicato-subnodosa" was, likewise, absent. "Klein,

49, urceus fimbriatus" (a name for Rumph. t. 37. f. F & W) was

interpolated by our author.

S. ATER. _Turricula_ labiata.

Neither the reference to Rumphius, nor the "et postice emarginatum"

were found in the original. This confirms my expressed belief that the

Museum species (to which no name was at first attached) was distinct

from that of the 'Systema.'

S. LIVIDUS. _Turric._ labiata, anfractibus serie subspinosa.

This was located in a section of _Turricula_ distinguished as having

the outer lip dilated and rounded.

* * * * *

Besides the above, the following unprinted details were found in the

manuscript:--

The _Strombus gigas_ was described at length under the appellation of

_Harpago gigas_.

_Har._ labio inermi rotundato, dorso spiraque subulato-spinosis.

Gualt. t. 34. f. A. Bar. Icon. 1727. f. 7.

Testa gibba, maxima, magnitudine capitis. Cauda obtusa. Spira spinis

patentibus, subulatis, validis. Anfractus desinens in dorso spina.

Series in dorso spinarum maximarum ferme conicarum. Labium dilatatum,

rotundatum, spira longius, vix adnatum spiræ. Faux glabra, nitida,

incarnata. Color pallidus.

The _Strombus dentatus?_ was also defined (without a specific

appellation) by the following characters:--

_Har._ labio dentato, testa lævis, plicato-nodosa.

Testa simillima reliquis, longitudine articuli digiti, lævis,

flavescens, subplicata, plicis antice acuminatis nodis. Spira

acutiuscula, similiter plicata, nodosa. Labium exterius minus

dilatatum, postice margine dentatum et interne fuscum, striatum.

Labium internum crassum, integrum, læve.

The _Strombus palustris_, although not published until the twelfth

edition of the 'Systema,' had been already defined in the 'Museum' as

_Turricula cornea_.

_Tur._ decussatim rugosa, labio dilatato.

Rumph. 101. t. 30. f. Q. Strombus palustris.

Testa crassa, rudis, pyramidalis, cornea aut plumbea, anfractibus

12 et ultra, secundum spiras transversim aliquot striis exarata,

longitudinaliter subplicata, adcoque sine spinis rugosissima. Labium

dilatatum, rotundatum, concavum, edentulum.

Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society - Vol. 4 Zoology · 第 162 / 311 题